First published on WhyIHateCCA
In an interesting bit of grassroots advocacy, a few shareholders of the country’s two largest private prison companies have worked to bring more accountability to the industry, which is exempt from public records laws in nearly every jurisdiction despite the fact that it performs inherently governmental functions.
The GEO Group, based in Boca Raton, FL, had its annual shareholders’ meeting in Palm Beach a few weeks back. Some demonstrators protested outside, but the true challenge for the company would come from inside that very meeting. The Dominican Sisters of Hope and Mercy Investment Services, both of which own a small amount of stock in the company, introduced a resolution that would have required the company to improve its policies to address human rights abuses within its facilities and submit to third-party audits. A resolution by the Capuchin Order of Priests would have required the company to publicly disclose all the money it spends lobbying and which issues that money is meant to influence.
Meanwhile, CCA has been fighting off a resolution by an activist and shareholder that would require it to report on efforts to reduce sexual abuse within its facilities. The resolution would bring some much-needed accountability to an industry that has proven quite effective at skirting it. CCA has been aggressively fighting the resolution with the SEC from its inception, I assume because they’d rather spend their money lobbying Congress and state legislatures than trying to protect the prisoners under their watch.
Unfortunately, all three of these proposals were defeated in the respective meetings. But there is reason for optimism – they all managed a sizable margin of support. The resolution before the GEO Group concerning human rights abuses garnered nearly 30% of the vote. The resolution introduced by the CCA shareholder was likewise rejected, but did garner more than 14 million votes out of a possible 86 million, nearly 20% of the vote. With such support, I am optimistic these resolutions will be introduced again in the future, which would continue to pressure the industry into more accountability for its actions and transgressions.




9 Comments

Mercy! I am seeing ‘comments off’, but I suppose this just means ‘comments, none yet’?
One the one hand, I am delighted to see that the Dominican Sisters are kicking up a stink on this (full disclosure, my great aunt was Mother Superior of the Dominion sisters based in Adrian Michigan, back in the 60′s/70′s). OP’s were always my favourites, they actually used their brains.
OTOH, I wonder why they own stock in a company that makes money
incarcerating fellow humans? This may be a ‘corporal work of mercy’, or just an investment. Anyone know?
Now isn’t this interesting! I went a-googling, ‘corporal work of mercy’. Although I am fairly sure that we (Catholics)were taught that ‘visiting the imprisoned‘ was number, um 5 or something, now I go look at the (Some?) Catholic website and find that it is ‘Ransoming the captive‘ uh, guys, not the same Totally.
So, what to do? Divest, or raise hell? What do you think?
Sorry, Rec’d!
Thank you for pursuing this and bringing us this information.
Yeh, I sure would like to know why these nuns are investing in a prison system?
A better dollar return than investing in rulers?
What the hell those that mean?
I meant to say what the hell that does mean?
My guess, a cheap shot at all the old jokes about nun’s proclivity to corporal punishment. Was there. Went through that. Had my own Sr. Marie de Sade. Have wild stories. BUT!!!! They taught!
The real question is, why does ANYONE profit upon the statutory penalty that society has leveled against an individual, for a crime against that society? Simply put, if a man steals from a store, and is convicted, he is sent to jail. This costs the man his freedom. The store has lost the value of what he stole. Society has spent a lot of money to convict the man of the crime. IF he had resources, he spent a lot in his defense. IF he DID NOT, We, the People, justly funded his defense.
Now that ALL those expenditures have been made, we are faced with the question, “qui bene?” or “Who benefits?”
Are the victims of crime being repaid for their losses? Are the investigative and prosecutoral functions being compensated?
The answer, of course, is NO.
Government has, in its infinite wisdom, decided that XXXXCorp should profit because a person is incarcerated.
You forgot that these are called “correctional facilities”. Not freedom-robbing retaliation facilities. Allegedly. So the BIG question is supposed to be (sick joke)did the bad guy get converted to good guy so we can all live happily ever after?