A year ago I wrote a piece on 420, contrasting legalized booze and illicit pot. It generated a good deal of reader feedback. A common thread:
"The war against drugs is a money making business. Prisons are a money making business. How are you going to replace all those jobs for the DEA…prisons, prison officers, other suppliers?"
"This is America, people. Europeans are socially enlightened, we are not. Europeans are progressive, we are not…frustrating, sure, but it’s not going to change in my lifetime…"
"We Americans love to talk the talk, but never seem to have the time or energy to walk the walk."
"…it won’t change any time soon. As long as the majority of people are ignorant and vote accordingly, our politics and laws will reflect that ignorance."
"I would not expect a sitting President or Senator to take up your cause until there is a MASSIVE public cry for it."
In other words, say these readers, no matter what common sense and science have to offer on the subject it’s not going to happen. The willful inflexibility of special interests (namely those profiting from the drug war: drug cartels, drug warriors, Big Pharma, prison industrial complex, et al) is simply too powerful to overcome.
Given slavish governmental allegiance to the drug war (over the course of eight presidencies), skepticism is understandable. But unwarranted.
Look at what’s happening across the country. Formerly timid state legislatures, admittedly driven in some instances by economic hard times, are actually considering the legalization of marijuana. Cannabis is, after all, the biggest (untaxed, unregulated) cash crop in the country.
Assemblyman Tom Ammiano of San Francisco — before the recession hit with full force, and with only three months on the job — introduced a bill in the California State Assembly that would have allowed adults to grow, buy, sell, and possess cannabis. While it passed the assembly’s public safety committee, by a 4-3 vote, AB 390 died when the health committee failed to act on it by January of this year. Reintroduced as AB 2254, the identical bill, in its current or a future incarnation, promises to get continuing play at the state capitol and in the national media.
We’ve witnessed a veritable explosion of cannabis law reform in other states and local communities: medical marijuana; decriminalization; pot as a city’s lowest law enforcement priority.
But the eyes and the imagination of the nation remain fixed on California. As lawmakers wrestle with conscience and courage, the voters of that state are taking matters into their own hands. "Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis 2010," the brainchild of Oaksterdam University founder Rich Lee, has qualified for the November ballot. Support is polling at 56 percent.
Enthusiastic editorial backing from across the country, along with the endorsement of a vast array of trade unions, professional associations, and drug policy reform organizations bodes well for the connected causes of liberty, justice and economic recovery: According to the State Board of Equalization, California’s tax collector, the initiative will net the state a cool $1.4 billion a year.
The campaign is meeting pitched resistance from opponents, which will only intensify as election day nears. Conventional wisdom suggests a softening of support as undiscerning voters succumb to the scare tactics of forces determined to keep pot illegal.
We all know that the federal government trumps the states when it comes to drug laws, and that against all concepts of sanity, marijuana remains a Schedule 1 drug (in the company of PCP and China White) — and therefore a top enforcement priority. But Attorney General Eric Holder, with the blessings of President Obama, has promised to honor the will of lawmakers in the individual states, whether those lawmakers be legislators or citizen activists.
You don’t have to be a Californian to strike a blow for freedom and justice. As a voter and/or a toker, perhaps at 4:20 on 4/20/10 you’ll pick up a pen and compose a letter to the editor and/or write a check to the campaign. What happens in the nation’s largest state will certainly reverberate throughout the other forty-nine.
Norm Stamper, a member of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (www.CopsSayLegalizeDrugs.com), served as Seattle’s chief of police from 1994-2000. He is the author of Breaking Rank: A Top Cop’s Exposé of the Dark Side of American Policing.



65 Comments







Thanks for stopping by, Mr. Stamper! Great to have you writing here at FDL about ending prohibition.
A lot of teachers fired just so we can keep cannabis illegal.
Mr. Stamper, Thanks for the great post.
Nice to see you here at the Lake.
x2
Thanks, rec’d heartily!
Always willing to help fight the good fight.
Marijuana should be the first chinc in the armor getting some sanity back into the world.
Recommended… but of course!!!
cough
cough
cough
good shit man…
Pass some this way!!!!
Here ya go OFG… glad to share..
Thank you for the post. Excellent. It’s about time we brought some sanity to this issue. I’m voting for legalizing pot.
Federal marijuana prohibition is a fully unconstitutional religious prohibition based on Exodus 22:18 Thou shall not suffer a witch to live. Here is a nice book on the history, I highly recommend it,
Marijuana – The First Twelve Thousand Years
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/abel.htm
Marijuana is completely harmless and a very useful medicine. From FOXN,
Are You Cannabis Deficient?
http://health.blogs.foxnews.com/2010/03/10/are-you-cannabis-deficient/
It is a states rights issue. From our constitution,
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
OR PROHIBITING THE FREE EXERCISE THEREOF;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
From my church,
Cultivation and enjoyment of Cannabis sacrament is a fundamental human right provided by God and protected by the first Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. It is our opinion that Cannabis is the original sacrament of Hebrew, Muslim, Christian, Hindu, Shinto, Buddhist, Rasta and more, and fulfills the prophesies to ‘raise up for them a plant of renown…’
http://www.thc-ministry.org/
Last month our main church was raided by the IRS. When we pass that test, and I know we will, then there will be no more reason to prohibit marijuana. Potheads will be granted their freedom of religion!
VIDEO: Hilo marijuana ministry open after federal raid
http://www.bigislandvideonews.com/2010/03/14/video-hilo-marijuana-ministry-open-after-federal-raid/
Reverend Lauren Unruh
THC Ministry
Pleasant Hill, Ca
Amen. Thanks for the courage to stand up.
Maybe 420 has become like so many other organizations before it. Less interested in their stated goals as in their continued survival as an organization and the attending fund raising…
That’s a tea bag I can believe in.
I’m perfectly capable of holding a pen and writing with a joint at the same time, thank you very much.
Hey, since the invention of the keyboard, it’s way easier to write with a joint than it used to be. Now ashes don’t get all over the page.
Bahahaha!
True confessions of an aging hippie: I can’t roll. Never learned. Besides, it’s the heat and soot charring your throat, not the THC, that will give you cancer. (Cue Cypress Hill: Hits from the bong!)
I use it for anxiety (per doctor’s recommendation, along with a pharmaceutical). Obviously, the fear, that some gung-ho local cop can turn my life upside down and inside out, isn’t helping. Whether he has the right to or not, I’ll still have to defend that in court. In the meantime, there goes my sanity, health, house, job, etc.
Hey, I’m one of the only 3 women I know that can roll. While my contemporaries were batting their eyelashes and demurely pretending to be helpless, I was practicing the skills it takes to be independent of anybody’s help. I used to get so furious with them for enforcing their own dependence on men.
All this talk of rolling joints and the dexterity required therein — geesh! I switched to using a small pipe many years ago as a matter of conservation. Much less of the product goes — literally — up in smoke.
It’s easy to roll – a dollar bill works as a rolling machine if you can’t roll using just fingers.
Pffft! I can roll with my fingers during a hurricane. I know because I have. ;-) Never learned to roll with a dollar though. By the time I saw that done, I could already do so free hand.
I learned to roll in a dark movie theater using just my fingers. Machines do have some utility though, and using a dollar works for those that need a machine.
First learned to roll using a “rizla roller” then moved to EZ-widers or Broads (yes, that was the brand name) but gradually worked to the point (helped along by some time in the land of Aloha) of being able to roll single paper wheat or rice zigzags.
Never did master the dollar bill trick, tho
I remember during WW2 when you couldn’t get cigs my dad had a machine that would roll them for you. Can’t remember how it worked but it did work. Hadn’t thought of that in many, many years.
Are you making an argument against gender equality lol?
RetirinInFive’s got it right (except for the evidence factor).
Heat and soot isn’t the issue. And CA NORML did studies of delivery systems back in the 90s, a joint is better than a bong as far as carcinogenic chemicals delivered to the lungs.
Cancer and cannabis smoking has been looked for since at least the 1970s – a researcher at UCLA Medical School named Donald Tashkin has been principal investigator on a lot of papers that fail to find any cancers. Billy Martin found some links to less cancer at University of Virginia in the early 1970s, somehow those studies didn’t get followed up on until recently.
Right, so sucking unfiltered fire and ash is supposed to be less carcinogenic? Then why are vaporizers the preferred method? Sucking the products of anything burning is inherently carcinogenic.
I’ll have to see that study to believe it. The info I’m going on is much more recent.
Vaporization is safer. At the time of the study vaporizers weren’t available, in fact part of the impetus for their invention came from the study.
It’s possible to vaporize using a glass pipe – heat the glass, preferably with an electric lighter (cigarette lighter from car). A chillum style pipe is very good for this.
From memory the gases from combustion in various smoking media analyzed using machines used for analyzing tobacco smoking – collected gas was subjected to MS/GC analysis and ranked according to toxics/carcinogens. Joints came out safest, water pipes did not reduce toxics and to some extent reduced THC content of smoke.
A later study exploded the custom of holding smoke in after taking a hit. The amount of THC absorbed didn’t change – inhaling and exhaling normally resulted in the same level of THC in blood as those that held smoke in. The subjective difference is explained by light oxygen deprivation from holding one’s breath.
Very interesting. Thanks for the detailed reply. My subjective experience is that getting the fire further from my face is better for my throat. Certain pipe designs promote symptoms of smoke inhalation injuries; others, I can hardly tell I’m smoking.
Back in the day, a lawyer friend wrote his JD thesis on the cost of the war on pot. In the late 80s, that was already over a billion dollars, just for the freakin’ paperwork.
The whole point being, smoking pot does not an “evil-doer” make. Decriminilization only makes sense.
If something works better for you go for it. And presence of toxic and carcinogenic substances doesn’t necessarily result in bad effects, it’s just something to know.
Re-legalization makes sense. Decriminalization still has punitive sanctions on sumptuary actions. Sin taxes are the biggest nudge I’m comfortable with for cannabis.
no shit, I wouldn’t have guessed
Not actually; here is the study referenced ; ” Nonetheless, it is still premature to judge that waterpipes are actually unhealthful, since they may filter out other, non-solid smoke toxins occurring in the gas phase of the smoke, which was not analyzed in the study. Noxious gases known to occur in marijuana smoke include hydrogen cyanide, which incapacitates the lung’s defensive cilia; volatile phenols, which contribute to the harshness of the taste; aldehydes, which promote cancer; and carbon monoxide, a known risk factor in heart disease. Previous studies indicate that water filtration may be quite effective in absorbing some of these [Nicholas Cozzi, "Effects of Water Filtration on Marijuana Smoke: A Literature Review," MAPS Newsletter, Vol. IV #2, 1993]. If so, waterpipes might still turn out to have net health benefits. ”
A GOOD vaporizer is the best way to smoke if getting cancer is your concern but I’ll bet money the environment,genes, and one’s head has more to do with getting cancer than whether one rolls of pipes.
VIP’s(very important potheads)
For me ,the advantage of a waterpipe is less smoke just going up into the air.
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve some Jack Herer beckoning me after my dentist visit today. Unfortunately, this medium doesn’t allow for sharing.
Thanks for digging up the link.
RIP Jack Herer 6/18/1939-4/15/2010.
In the entire history of the human race, when has prohibition ever worked? People are either really stupid or are heavily invested in keeping it illegal. Either way, as long as the neocons worship Reagan’s memory, (distorted as it is), don’t look for them to give up their drug war easily.
Mr. Stamper -
Wish we had you back in Seattle.
On the topic of getting beyond the “war on drugs” so that sane policies can be instituted, how do you see getting past our own political establishment? The national political class has entrenched itself firmly on the side of prohibition policies. What’s going to make the national officeholders change course, given the famous inertia and refusal to change in DC? Take this question in the context of a Washington, DC that still hasn’t quit fighting the Cold War despite the fact that the Soviet Union ceased to exist in 1991.
An early entry in the campaign-naming contest:
“America’s Going To Pot”
Mr Stamper,
Gil Kerlikowske was Chief of Police in Seattle after you, and is currently head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy (Drug Czar). Measure 75 (marijuana is lowest law enforcement priority) passed during his tenure in Seattle, and by many accounts has resulted in good results – less property and violent crime thanks to resources being redirected. There is good data because the initiative required reports on effects of the initiative and Gil must know about it. Dominick Holden presented this data at DPA and NORML conferences in 2006.
Yet Gil is unwilling to speak about this. Changing this is critical. We’ve got to get the word out that there is data showing that not enforcing the laws leads to good outcomes, so removing the possibility of sanctions is a natural next step.
Since Seattle’s Measure 75, Oakland passed Measure Z (Richard Lee had an adult use club in Oakland that thrived under Measure Z until it looked like it would get negative publicity), and several other cities in California.
Kerlikowkse opposed measure 75, and is very much a status quo politician. The fact that he was made ‘drug czar’ as opposed to Stamper shows exactly how much difficulty proponents of ending marijuana prohibition face even from the supposedly ‘progressive’ or ‘reform-oriented’ Democrats.
How can he deny the data? Clearing rate for violent and property crime is up since measure 75 passed. An experiment was conducted and results are positive, this should result in more data collection under varying hypotheses – did Measure Z result in the same changes in violent and property crime (different demographics could be confounding).
When Kerlikowkse was nominated it looked like he had some harm reduction views (being close to Vancouver BC would be an explanation) and was amenable to evidence based social policies. Since confirmation he’s been pretty disappointing. The same dynamic that keeps us in Iraq/Afghanistan may be at work (Democrats can’t look weak on Wars, including war on crime/drugs).
Thanks Norm.
“How are you going to replace all those jobs for the DEA…prisons, prison officers, other suppliers?”
Guess who’s going to be writing the “against legalization” checks to fund the bullshit ad campaign?
I too am a priest of a religion. We pray to the wind goddess. We are sailors and must pray to the wind goddess when the wind turns light. We do this by praying with our religion’s sacramental gift to the Old Girl by wafting our smoke into the air. Unlike all the other fake gods, ours responds to our wishes most of the time. However when she does not, we don’t get mad, we just keep trying. ;-)
It is not for everyone, particularly for the still forming minds of the young. You can only find out if it is for you by trying it. It will take a little getting use to it as it does for every new experience.
We believe in peace and brotherhood and allowing everyone to do their thing as long as it does not hurt anyone else.
Then there is the issue of Hemp. Here in Oregon, we have passed a law allowing the growing of hemp but are waiting for the feds to come to their senses. It would mean $300,000,000 per year to our economy.
Now if you all would join me in a prayer…click…sssusuussp…whoooosh…ahhhh.
I wish that somehow this country would pull their thumb out of the place where the sun don’t shine and move out of the 18th century.
Give honor to Jack Herer today. He passed on April 15, 2010. I imagine there will be some solemnity in Eugene’s 4/20 celebration today.
Thank you Mr Stamper for your reasoned analysis.
Would that all LEOs had such a grasp of what is seemingly the obvious point that prohibition does not work
The moment I read the title to this thread, it applied to me in the most direct way. How embarrassing.
Wall Street funds the drug business, launders the money, and aids in most of it’s distribution.
They have all the money to buy the drugs, and are the biggest users.
Yet we like to concider them above the frey on drugs.
I was told Years ago that the drug business in Soth America was started and funded by five big Wall Street Tycoons. Why not believe it because everything from bananas to rubber down there never would have been anything unless our Corporations built the plantations and empoyed the people to grow all that. Drugs are just another product, but much more lucritive than most. To believe a way to make money was there without some American help, is the biggest proof of ignorance there is.
Back in the day I used to roll perfect joints while driving my ’66 VW. Now I iz growed up and more responsible :)
With respect to the joints or the ’66 VW?
Thanks, mod.
let’s just say i’ve upgraded my rolling venues since then ..
Anyway, I would so love to win this battle in CA .. definitely will lend my voice and money.
@17
The way is simple. All 420 people should go out into the streets in gangs and smoke their brains out. If the people want it to be legal they have to give the politicians something to worry about. They don’t like it when the people are happy. Their modus operandi is to keep the people poor and stupid while blaming them for the countries problems. We have only one problem and that is the fact that 1% of the people own more the the bottom 95%. They don’t think they have enough yet, that is why we are getting poorer. The problem is that the world is thinking the same thing. A rerun of the Roman Empire. So far it is working because the media is telling the same lies. The one thing that scares them is people in the streets with pitchforks. Remember, they cannot arrest us all.
Not that Crist is a saint or anything special, but people voting for Rubio are just as dumb as the people in MASS. who voted for Brown.
With Politicians You can’t get a bite of the candy, before You buy the whole Box.
Youth and looks, and even what one says are poor choices to use to pick a Politcian from. Your vote is like throwing a coin down a hole, and hoping Your wish come true. If it doesn’t You can’t take Your vote back just like that coin.
stoners sure talk about weed a lot
i’m almost 27 and I’ve never been high, but I do agree that the war on drugs should be ended
Not to mention the savings from LEOs’ time thru prison expenses. Releasing pot offenders would go far to alleviate overcrowding and all that entails, too (although we’d have a pile of new unemployed, mostly without prospects…)
$1.4 billion is off by a factor of 3 or more.
It would be a lot better to promise $300M in tax revenue (6 million ounces sold) and have tax revenue surprise to the upside. Telling people $1.4 billion in taxes (28 million ounces sold!) and disappointing isn’t good politics.
BTW, Chief Stamper, I had the pleasure of being a citizen of the Emerald City during your tenure. Remember the Hidden Hate Crimes hearings in the 90s? I helped organize and run them (esp. the U District hearing, and I was on the Queen Anne panel; I saw you at the Capitol Hill event.) Always wanted to thank you for that. So thanks, I bow in your virtual direction.
Sittin here listening to Sean Reefer and The Resin Valley Boys cd called Texas Hill Country, or THC for short. 4:20 comes twice a day not just once a year. Until the political will for change arises I and others like me will continue to be criminals. Far too many people make a living by keeping me a criminal. From main street to Congress. Who do you think owns these prisons. They recieve a per-diem payment for each incarcerated person.
If I hadn’t just lost my job, I’d be sending you some $$.
VKOYTS. You’ve obviously done way more reading on this than I have.
After Prohibition, we decriminalized alcohol, to make a long story short, and that’s an arrangement I’d like to see for pot.
Dependency is a very real problem, especially when users are introduced without traditions of self-regulation and knowledge of hazards. I know people who use it like just psychic firecrackers. It’s always been about the empathic compassion, for me, the ethos that goes along with the rituals.
Yes, I agree, re-legalization would be ideal, but I’d settle for being able to get a month’s supply at the local pharmacy for the same $15 that I’m charged for the same amount of a pharmaceutical, instead of the black market cost of $300 or more.
Who knows, as a fully human citizen, not a consumer to be milked like a cash cow, I might learn to grow my own and save even that cost. Take that, Big PhRMA!
I don’t use but I support the right of others to do so. Abolishing prohibition is not enough. All those who are serving time for simple possesion (not dealers) should be released from prison and their arrest and convition expunged from the police records. This should be made a part of your campaign.
One other sign of changing times that was missed by almost everyone:
Democrats Abroad, one of 56 ‘states’ recognized by the DNC, passed a resolution calling for the regulation & taxation of marijuana in all US states last year. The leadership of the state party effectively buried the resolution once it was passed, but it can be found buried in an anonymous file of resolutions they passed in 2009 on their website – it’s the last resolution.
You can read more about it here: http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/05/26/under-the-radar/
Best Anti-drug War Primer Ever
In the year 2000 Dan Gardiner, an investigative reporter for the Ottawa Citizen, wrote a 16 part series “Losing the War on Drugs”. It covered the issue from law enforcement, social, legal, economic and international political perspectives. This award winning series is a devastating critique on how this policy fails EVERYONE. So, of course, we double-down and do it more and better. It’s ten years old, and could have been written yesterday – except the consequences have had 10 more years to pile up. It is available at the Media Awareness Project, and I have never read such a thorough, yet succinct catalog of this madness.
http://www.mapinc.org/gardner.htm
4:20 on 4/20
I don’t know what’s going to happen, but if marijuana is gifted to Big Pharma, Im leaving this backwards slave nation.
Marijuana Helps Grow Brain Cells
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHtdaSp4FkU
I honestly think the confusion or distraction so common with cannabis use is a result of more blood to the brain, more connections being made, it kind of overwhelms things. Basically more to think about. Teens also act goofy for the same reason. Growing brains have silly ideas.
It is calcified or shrinking brains that are resistant to new ideas.
Long time heavy users do not seem to exhibit those effects nearly as often.