At this bleak political moment, gaining congressional power for progressives might seem like pie in the sky. More and more desperate efforts are underway to stave off a Republican takeover of Congress. But the necessity of trying to prevent right-wing rule on Capitol Hill should not obscure the need to win more seats for genuine progressives.
Ever since early last year, the Obama administration has chipped away at the Democratic Party’s base — undermining its capacity to mobilize for the midterm election — while sometimes courting Republican leaders to the point of absurdity. Consider this news account from the New York Times a few days ago: “Though liberal and labor groups have been agitating for public works spending, Mr. Obama and his advisers are emphasizing business tax cuts in hopes of drawing Republican support — or, failing that, to show that Republicans are so determined to thwart Mr. Obama that they will oppose even ideas that they and most business groups, like the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, advocate.”
Huh?
Or consider the Washington Post report Thursday on “Obama’s proposal for $180 billion in fresh infrastructure spending and business tax breaks.” The newspaper explained that “his plan would make permanent a corporate tax credit for research and allow companies to deduct from their taxes this year and next the entire cost of whatever they spend in new investments — ideas pulled directly from GOP playbooks.”
Progressives need to fight back — today, tomorrow and every day. The electoral struggle is just one part of what’s needed to build effective social movements, but it’s an important part. And that effort should include primary battles to elect real progressives to Congress.
One such election is coming up Tuesday in Rhode Island, where progressive populist David Segal is running against corporate Democratic insiders to fill the seat of retiring Congressman Patrick Kennedy. For many years, Segal has been organizing to challenge banks and other corporate behemoths on behalf of working people and the poor. Although he’s been in the state legislature for four years and on the Providence City Council before that, Segal isn’t a politician nearly so much as a committed activist whose work has won him wide support from labor unions and many other progressive organizations in the current campaign.
“It’s a slap in the face to American workers that our current trade agreements give corporations incentives to lay off U.S. workers and move jobs abroad where they can pay their workers sub-poverty wages and wreak havoc on the environment,” David Segal said on Labor Day. “These job losses aren’t an accident or the result of a force of nature: they are the direct result of the obscene power that corporations wield over our government. Corporations and the extremely wealthy spend tens of millions of dollars each year to ensure that our trade agreements guarantee their profits, even if it’s at the expense of millions of our working families.”
Of course Segal is being heavily outspent by the corporate opposition. He’s a distinct underdog, but — whatever the Sept. 14 election results — the work behind his campaign is an inspiring model for grassroots, volunteer-driven approaches to fighting for electoral power.
More broadly, progressive populism is essential in the quest for economic and social justice — a vast worldview away from the “populism” flaunted by Tea Bag boosters and the like.
“It’s necessary to restate the solid principles of populism and reassert its true spirit, because both are now being severely perverted by corporate manipulators and a careless media establishment,” Jim Hightower wrote early this summer. “To these debasers of the language, any politicos or pundits who tap into any level of popular anger (toward Barack Obama, liberals, the IRS, poor people, unions, gays, immigrants, Hollywood, community organizers, environmentalists et al.) get a peel-off ‘populist’ label slapped onto their lapels — even when their populist pose is funded by and operates as a front for one or another corporate interest. That’s not populism, it’s rank hucksterism — disguising plutocrats as champions of the people.”
Hightower’s assessment is true today, and it will be true the morning after Election Day: “Now is the time for progressives to reassert their populist beliefs and bona fides, for we’re living in a teachable moment in which it’s possible to reach most Americans with an aggressive and positive approach to achieving a higher level of economic and political democracy.”
There’s a viable — and essential — alternative to right-wing Republicans and corporate Democrats. Real progressive populism is grounded in humane values, solidarity, caring and organizing. We can put up a fight. And we can win.



11 Comments

We’re just gonna have to bite the bullet and finally get a Progressive/Labor Party going in the US.
I love you Normon. I love your book “Make Love, Got War.” But I am disappointed that the left, professional or otherwise, has not formed a Progressive/Labor Party as Adam503 suggests. We work for a lefty (My preferred term) and see them turn into corporatists or bullied into submission before our eyes. Why are we still flogging this dead Donkey?
Progressives need to tear a chapter out of the Tea Party (Taxed Enough Already, smaller government, return to strict constitution) playbook and actually articulate position(s) that American’s understand and care about — and articulate them in a way that will motivate people to join the cause.
David Segal has a good start with his speech about moving jobs abroad, and corporate incentives. But exactly what is he fighting against?
It’s called Globalism and it is the biggest transfer of wealth in the history of the world. The result is what we see today in America with no jobs and little prospect for job growth.
It’s sister is called Corporatism — and it results in a political system that is controlled by large global financial interests. Sound familiar?
If Progressives would start really standing against Globalism and Corporatism — and really develop platforms, positions and solutions that the American People can understand will be to their personal and patriotic benefit — then we would have a have a shot at a political movement that can move the populace the way the Tea Party has.
As for “Labor”, “Liberal”, and “Left” — these are dangerous terms to associate with, as the “Middle” does not want to associate with nouns that have been so thoroughly trampled and discredited. I would avoid their use entirely.
The teachable moment was Fall of ’08. Progressives had the opportunity of a generation to point out the failures of free market extremism and to replace the status quo with a just and compassionate economic model.
Democrats failed utterly. More Democrats is not the answer, and IMO any candidate working inside the D party should be examined skeptically at this point. Any candidate.
BTW, I’m a fan of yours also.
Fixed it for you.
You write, “the necessity of trying to prevent right-wing rule on Capitol Hill should not obscure the need to win more seats for genuine progressives.”
When exactly did right-wing rule end on Capitol Hill, that it is possible to prevent its return? Because as far as I can tell, the rightward slide that began in earnest under reagan and devolved into apocalyptic proportions under the shrub never stopped, and shows no signs of slowing its growth.
Are you still afraid to support progressive populists who aren’t Democrats, Mr. Solomon?
You’ve hit on the key problem: ‘leftists’ and ‘progressives’ are actually quite confused or reactionary on globalization. Try some time, at a ‘liberal/progressive’ gathering, saying you’re in favor of ‘protectionism’. See what I mean?
This guy was one of corporate globalization, bail out the banks, neoliberal, American imperialist Obama’s biggest backers in 2008. Solomon needs to fess up that that was an enormous error, as does the rest of the ‘connected left’, before any actual leftists should take him seriously.
Actually, it already has — two of them, in fact.
http://www.progressiveparty.org
http://gp.org
Vermont has the most successful outside political party in the nation, with statewide offices that include five house seats and one senate seat. They also have a lot of local offices. There is no reason why we cannot grow this homegrown political party in each and every state.
Good post. Thank you.