User Picture

The Impeachment of President Obama — Act I

By: Ohio Barbarian Sunday May 19, 2013 8:53 am

Yesterday, I had a feeling. Today, after watching a couple of the morning talk shows, that feeling has hardened into a suspicion with the strength of prediction: the Republicans are going to impeach Obama, probably no later than next spring.

Fox News has been bandying the word “scandal” about for awhile, but it really escalated over the last few days with the revelations about some IRS employees targeting Tea Party groups for extra screening when applying for tax-exempt status.  Then, today on ABC’s This Week,  George Will compared the ongoing Benghazi kerfuffle, the IRS “scandal,” and the broad sweep of Justice Department subpoenas of Associated Press reporters’ phone calls in order to find the source of a leak to Watergate,  George Stephanopoulos’ panel piled on, and Republican congresscritters talked Very Seriously about abuses of Executive Branch power and how they will investigate to uncover The Truth about who knew what when.

First, I’d like to give my own thoughts on each of the three “scandals,” and I use the word very loosely, and then outline what I think is likely to happen inside the Beltway, and to point out a few Very Important Things the corporate media is ignoring and will continue to ignore.

The Benghazi affair that resulted in the death of the American ambassador to Libya and subsequent mischaracterizations  by Obama Administration officials appears to be much ado about very little.  There was clearly a communications breakdown within the Department of State and between that department, intelligence agencies, and the military. The attack on the Benghazi Consulate happened with only a few days lead up, if that, and, in spite of Congresscritter Issa’s pontifications, there appears to be no deliberate conspiracy on the part of the White House itself to lie to Congress or the press about what happened. In the long run, though Benghazi may well be introduced as an Article of Impeachment by Republicans determined to throw as much shit against the wall as possible to see what sticks, I doubt it will go anywhere. There’s probably no there there.

I find the targeting of Tea Party groups applying for tax exempt status by IRS bureaucrats entirely understandable. No rational IRS employee is NOT going to be suspicious of groups that one, don’t believe in paying taxes in the first place, and two, want to eliminate their jobs. Of COURSE they are going to scrutinize such people more than they would others. They needed absolutely no direction from the White House to do so, quite the opposite. All they needed was a LACK of direction from their superiors NOT to do so. Odds are the highest this will go is to senior officials in the IRS who knew about it but did nothing to stop it, and I personally don’t blame them. They’ll take the fall, and Obama and the Democrats will do their best to look all righteous about it. That won’t stop today’s Republicans, not exactly well-known for their own rationality, from trying to impeach Obama over it. I don’t think they will succeed in convicting him, but I think they’ll try.

The blanket subpoenas issued by the Justice Department to obtain communications records of the Associated Press are a different matter. As Engineer Scott on Star Trek said,  ”That’s the ticket, laddie.”

The Attorney General himself authorized this end run around the courts to sweep up all of these records without judicial oversight. It was done, the Justice Department says, in the interests of “national security.” I find it highly unlikely that Obama himself did not know of and approve beforehand this action that can easily be characterized as an unconstitutional infringement of the freedom of the press. And the whole thing, the digging for leaks in secrecy in the name of national security, the deliberate avoidance of both congressional and judicial oversight, the arrogant executive privilege style stance of the Obama Administration, do indeed remind me of Watergate in a general way.

And, most importantly, the inside the Beltway corporate media itself is outraged by this kind of treatment from the Executive Branch. This story has legs, and will grow, and probably will implicate President Obama himself.

This is what I think will happen. The House of Representatives will hold a series of highly publicized hearings on all three of the above issues. “Progressive” and “conservative” talking heads will bloviate ad nauseum, and eventually, by next spring at the latest, the House Judiciary Committee will meet to discuss Articles of Impeachment. Why next spring? Because it’s an election year, of course, and the Republicans will see this as an advantage. They may even by right.

I will continue to follow up on this when my digestion is strong enough to allow me to do so,  and, if I’m wrong, I’ll freely admit it.

Now, what WON’T be mentioned. The ongoing decline in the standard of living for most Americans, the Iraq and Afghan Wars and the plight of their veterans or civilian populations; the student loan bubble until it bursts and the banks demand, and probably get, another bailout; the exponentially growing inequality of wealth and the power of the financial sector; the living wage movements in both America and developing countries; the rising economic populism in Europe; peak oil; and last but not least, climate change. There are undoubtedly more that I haven’t mentioned, but those are some biggies.

Our corporate media just won’t have the TIME. After all, what’s more dramatic than speculating over whether the President will or should be impeached, and the non-stop coverage the whole thing will require, whether most of the American people are really interested in it or not?  Besides, our power elite was running out of distractions. Political drama is always a great one.

As I said earlier, thank the Odd Gods of the Galaxy that I don’t have cable TV.

America’s Fast Food Workers Might Just Be Real Hope and Change

By: Ohio Barbarian Saturday May 11, 2013 12:45 pm

It started in New York. It spread to St. Louis.  Now it’s in Detroit, with no less a personage than Al Sharpton in its midst. American fast food workers are getting fed up with low wages, long and unpredictable hours, lousy working conditions, and employers who make a mint off of their labor but pay them only the state minimum and fire them if they try to do anything about it.

Have you ever worked in fast food? In the last 20 years? If you have, you know it SUCKS. My stepson works in a fast food place while also attending high school. He busts his butt, and gets minimum wage and “flexible hours” in return. They work him up to ten hours a day on weekends and up to 11 o’clock at night on school nights(he has to be at school at 7:20 am), and they don’t give a good goddamn. His mother has to drive him to his suburban fast food joint in an outer ring suburb of Cleveland, and that costs about $15 a week, which he pays. A bus pass would cost $85 a month, and he has no car, so what the hell else can he do?

Our family needs the money, as little as it is.

The bottom line is this: a fast food worker’s labor, and hard labor at that, on an eight hour shift probably brings in several thousand dollars for the corporate owners, and in return for all of that labor he or she gets paid a few dozen bucks. An insignificant fraction of the fruit of said labor. The worker is also frequently subjected to verbal abuse by both management and customers, and both can be real assholes, lording it over the lowly serf toiling over the grill or the cash register in order to make themselves feel better about their own pathetic lives.

I’ve seen it firsthand. You probably have, too. Sometimes I’ll speak up on behalf of such a worker–what is corporate gonna do, I’m a customer, after all–and be  rewarded with a grateful smile or even a thank you from the truly oppressed worker. That warms the cockles of my old barbarian heart.

Now, it seems, more and more fast food workers in America have had enough of this maltreatment.  If you live in a city where one of these fast food strikes is happening, please PLEASE show your support for these workers. Who knows? They might just be the trigger that can start turning this country around to a more just and fair society. After all, there are a LOT of them, since fast food jobs are often the only jobs working class people can get. If they really mobilize, they can make a big difference quickly.

The Assault on Food Stamps Takes Legislative Form, and Jamie Dimon Profits!

By: Ohio Barbarian Saturday May 11, 2013 9:40 am

Last March,  I wrote a post about the two-pronged assault on Food Stamps, now known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program(SNAP).  Now the legislation doing  just that is being shaped in Congress. The bad news is, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, Debbie Stabenow, only wants to cut SNAP benefits by 0.5%. The worse news is that  Republicans want to cut it a LOT more. That great Libertarian hero, Rand Paul, wants to cut the program by $45 Billion a year until $322 billion in “savings” is achieved.

“Americans would be flabbergasted” if they knew how much money is spent on Food Stamps, Paul intoned. Fortunately, his amendment was shot down in flames, with 13 Republicans joining all of the Senate Democrats in killing it; whether they were motivated by lost revenue to corporations like Wal-Mart and JP Morgan Chase or fear of rioting is unclear.

JP Morgan Chase, you ask? Oh, yes, Jamie Dimon profits handsomely off the SNAP program and has for some time. JP Morgan, you see, makes many of the EBT cards that SNAP recipients use, and charges them a quarter every time they  check their balance. With millions of EBT cards in circulation that benefit one in seven Americans, that’s got to be millions of dollars every month that Jamie Dimon rakes in, for doing exactly nothing productive.

I find it interesting, disgusting, and completely unsurprising that the opening Democratic position is to cut SNAP benefits by a few dollars a month for everyone receiving them, and that no one in either party is saying anything about the beau coup bucks Wall Street is making off of the program. The same people who wrecked the economy are now sucking money off the most vulnerable working poor like so many gleeful vampires, and our government does absolutely nothing about it. I speculate that Obama, the fascist poltroon, is doing everything he can to make sure his buddy Jamie sucks as much as he can get away with.

So. Food Stamp benefits WILL be cut; the only question is by how much. Probably not by all that much, but I speak from experience when I say that even the slightest cuts will hurt the working poor a lot. Money that used to go to rent or clothes or utilities or gasoline will soon have to go to food; either that or somebody in the family will have to miss a meal or two. Democratic cheerleaders will scream that the Republicans would do worse, Republican cheerleaders will say that they are only trying to “enable” people to get off of Big Government assistance, and capitalist cheerleaders will say that now maybe those lazy bums will be forced to get a minimum wage job, never mind the fact that most adult SNAP recipients DO already have low-paying jobs at places like Wal-Mart.

The great irony on this topic is that Wal-Mart and the grocery store chains, which stand to lose money for every dollar cut from the SNAP budget, are the working poor’s strongest allies on this particular issue. Chances are even they can’t kill all of the cuts, but they will limit them.

In the larger scheme of things, this move fits neatly into how capitalism operates. Cut social programs that help people in order to force them to grovel for whatever crumbs the capitalists are willing to throw them, at the greatest possible profit, of course. And they will NEVER stop trying to do so. That is why I think it is foolish to try to reform and regulate capitalism, that is why it should be destroyed before it succeeds in destroying not only the lives of ordinary people, but the planet itself. It’s an insane system. It should be shot down like the rabid dog it is.

The Long Shadow of Issue 2: Ohio Republicans Kill “Right to Work” Legislation

By: Ohio Barbarian Thursday May 2, 2013 3:01 pm

Ohio Gov. John Kasich's survival instinct kicked in.

Up until just a couple of days ago, it was widely assumed in the local media that Republicans, who control the Ohio General Assembly by large margins, would introduce legislation to make Ohio a “right to work” state, like most Southern states and Texas.

As the Cleveland Plain Dealer reports, it ain’t happenin’.   Senate President Keith Faber said, “After discussions with other leaders and my caucus, I don’t believe there is current support for this issue in the General Assembly. The only purpose this discussion serves right now is to generate a bunch of breathless fundraising appeals from the Ohio Democratic Party.”

Well, that’s a partial truth, I’ll give him that. The real reason is that some Republicans, probably including Governor John Kasich, have a political survival instinct. Just two years ago, Kasich signed Senate Bill 5 into law, which effectively banned all public sector workers from unionizing. The cops, firefighters, teachers, and a whole host of other public employees went to war, and got Senate Bill 5 on the ballot as Issue 2. It went down in flames with almost two-thirds of Ohio voters giving a thumbs down.

Subsequent attempts to resurrect it piecemeal were shot down by Kasich but, not to be deterred, the Really Crazy wing of the Ohio GOP, mostly based in southern Ohio, decided to go whole hog and effectively emasculate ALL unions with “Right to Work” legislation, which makes it optional for union members to pay union dues.

I’m sure most people here on FDL are very well aware of the effects of such laws: weaker unions, lower wages, even fewer benefits, and a lower standard of living for the working class. If such legislation was actually passed and signed into law, there would have been another Issue 2 or the equivalent on the ballot in nothing flat. The Ohio Republican leadership, who above all want to be re-elected, wouldn’t touch that live wire with Nancy Pelosi’s botox.

There’s an important lesson here for the left. When the majority of people effectively mobilize around an issue AND win decisively at the polls, even corporatist politicians will hesitate to put their own precious political lives on the line by trying to screw the people again, at least for a few years. The key is to keep the pressure up.

“Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty.” Old Thomas Jefferson’s words still ring true.

The Boston Lockdown–Is This REALLY Necessary?

By: Ohio Barbarian Friday April 19, 2013 2:38 pm

If you’ve listened to or watched the news at all in the last couple of days, then you know that most of the entire Boston metropolitan area is in “lockdown.” All public transportation is shut down, hockey and baseball games canceled, most businesses closed, and most residents staying inside their homes while police in full riot gear, armed with assault rifles, comb the place house to house, building to building, car to car(I saw one shot of cops opening the trunk of a parked car on a quiet suburban street.) Residents also reported the Army moving around, though I don’t know if that’s really true.

So how many Bostonians are going for days without pay because they can’t go to work? How many small businesses that operate on a very thin margin are getting hit hard in the old bank account? How many street vendors are losing hundreds of dollars a day? None of these questions are being asked by the corporate media as they gush about the thorough response of the authorities.

And it’s all for exactly what? A 19 year old kid, that’s what. One post-adolescent who is probably armed with at least a handgun, and maybe with a few explosives, is the reason that one of America’s, and I’m sure Bostonians would say the world’s, greatest cities has been paralyzed.  Just how much more damage could this kid cause? Sure, he might kill a couple more people, might, but does that possibility really justify shutting down Boston for who knows how long?

Did they shut down Chicago when searching for Hannibal Lecter, who killed more people than these two Chechen brothers? Did they shut down Atlanta after the bombing in the Olympic Games? Did the Germans shut down Munich in 1972? Did they shut down Los Angeles a few months back when a fired cop with military training was gunning down other cops? Did they shut down Aurora,  much less the entire Denver metro area after the shooting in the theater? For that matter, did they completely shut down all of New York City and Washington DC after 9/11?

The answer to all of those questions is NO, they did not. So what’s different now? It’s almost like they, whoever “they” are, are seeing just how far and how fast they can impose a police state on a great and diverse city. How long will Bostonians put up with this?

How long will Americans in general put up with this type of reaction from the authorities? Or do you think they should? Do you think this is justified? Sorry, but I don’t. Feedback is welcome.

John Kerry, Is There Something Wrong with Your Brain?

By: Ohio Barbarian Friday April 12, 2013 3:01 pm

Just a few minutes ago, on the CBS Evening News, I heard Secretary of State John Kerry say the following:

North Korea will not be accepted as a nuclear power.

I immediately thought of what my father used to say to me when I was a teenager and said or did something particularly boneheaded:

Is there something wrong with your brain?

Well, there was at the time; I was a teenager, after all, and teenage brains, especially male ones, are not fully developed. Kerry, however, isn’t a teenager. He should know better.

The Kingdom of North Korea, Kim III, monarch, IS  a nuclear power. It has nuclear weapons, therefore it’s a nuclear power. This isn’t exactly rocket science. Saying it will never be accepted as a nuclear power is like saying that Venezuela will never be accepted as an oil-exporting country, or saying that global warming will not be accepted as scientific fact, or that Magellan’s voyage that circumnavigated the planet will not be accepted as proof positive that the Earth is ball-shaped.

Besides, Kim III has absolutely no incentive to give up his nuclear weapons. The last dictator despised by the American Empire who gave up his nuclear weapons program in exchange for trade with the West and other goodies and a solemn American promise to leave him alone was Muammar Gaddafi of Libya. And look what happened to him. Kim III surely knows this. Ain’t no way, no how he’s gonna give up his nukes.

They are his only guarantee that the American Empire won’t try the regime change trick on him. He doesn’t even have to be all that smart to figure that one out.

So. Why would Kerry, usually known as an intelligent man, say such a boneheaded thing? Either it’s diplomatic bluster, or a domestic political distraction, or both. Probably both.

After all, his buddy Obama is well on his way to achieving the decades-old Republican dream of starting to dismantle Social Security, Medicare, and O knows what other surviving  programs of the New Deal and the Great Society in the name of Corporatism, er, I mean, fiscal responsibility. He’s involved in delicate negotiations right now with the Republican “opposition”  to do just that, and if too many people are aware of it they might get angry, at Obama. 

Can’t have that. Wouldn’t be prudent. Better press the “Be Afraid” button. Who better to do that than the oh-so-respectable-looking John Kerry?

The problem is, well, have you ever looked at Kim III? He really looks like a fat, pompous spoiled brat. He’s even more ridiculous-looking than Saddam Hussein. And we’re supposed to be afraid of North Korea?  With their women soldiers in high heels? Due to copyright rules I do not understand, I simply post the following link:

https://www.google.com/search?q=north+korean+women+in+the+military&hl=en&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=fJFoUcuPHI200QGjrYDgBA&ved=0CD4QsAQ&biw=1280&bih=899

I trust Google won’t mind. Probably won’t notice, either.

Be afraid of North Korea. Don’t pay attention to Obama screwing you over yet again. Did you really think this would fool all of us, Mr. Secretary?

And your ketchup sucks, too.

A Grand Conspiracy in Plain Sight

By: Ohio Barbarian Thursday April 11, 2013 3:59 pm

This week, Barack Obama unveiled his budget proposal. Among the lowlights is a proposal to  cut Social Security and Medicare in exchange for a few very modest tax increases on the wealthy. And that’s just his opening bargaining position.

I decided to conduct a little experiment. I’d watch or listen to some mainstream news, such as CBS or NPR during prime news time(early morning and late afternoon), and see how many times the media mentioned this very important news. For the most part…(crickets).

Oh, I heard about all sorts of other stuff–heavy on gun control legislation and the Imminent Threat posed by North Korea, a fair amount on immigration reform, spring storms, a florist in Washington state being sued because she refused to sell floral arrangements to a gay couple getting married, and, of course, Wall Street hitting new highs.

I don’t have cable or satellite, can’t afford it and I like my free over the air TV just fine thank you, but I don’t imagine there’s all much there there, either. Corrections welcomed.

Anyway, why is this? My father once told me: “If you want to know why something is being done in politics, follow the money and it will lead you to the truth.”

Well, Dad, this wasn’t very hard. Our ruling plutocratic oligarchy absolutely hates the fact that there’s all this money out there in the Social Security and Medicare systems that they can’t get their hands on. So they’re doing something about it. They’re going to legally redefine these programs, originally intended to put a human face on capitalism to help save it from itself by guaranteeing senior citizens a retirement free of grinding poverty after they are too old to work, as just two more welfare programs that can be cut in the name of fiscal responsibility(Europeans are more honest; they call it “austerity.”)  But they have to do it as quietly as possible.

Why? Well, if We The People really had all the details broadcast into our eyes and ears, we might get angry at them. Why, we might even start electing independents and third party candidates to office because we can still vote and there are LOTS of us. We might even get so pissed off we physically threaten them and their property. So, since they own  the major media, they distract us with these other stories that really aren’t all that important to them. They tell us what’s important, what we should get all excited about.

And while we’re focused on those relatively inconsequential things, they’ll legally(of course, since they write the laws) steal what’s left of our retirement security from us while we squabble over background checks for guns, sizes of magazines, gay rights, and which Mexicans should be allowed to come out of the shadows in America.

And, of course, cheer for the Prez while he shows his resolve to Kim III of North Korea. And if Kim III stops throwing a temper tantrum, some other foreign threat will suddenly emerge. Oh, yeah, there’s always those crazy Iranians or maybe Venezuelans.

You see, they learned some lessons in the First Great Depression. They had to give some back to us then or face a real revolution. So they cut a deal with the left and the labor movement: Social Security, minimum wage, higher wages, jobs programs, and other cool stuff in exchange for shutting up about throwing out the capitalist system itself. Then there really was an existential threat during World War II, so they needed us then, too, and didn’t want to piss off millions of men coming home from war who knew how to use modern weapons, and made them happy with the GI Bill.

Our ruling classes put up with these concessions until the 1970′s, but have been systematically dismantling them ever since. They destroyed the left and then the unions. And now, they have their most effective champion since Ronald Reagan, Barack Obama, a self-professed admirer of Reagan. Who better than a black Democrat to finish the job that really got started under Reagan?

They are succeeding brilliantly. Most Americans haven’t even noticed.They won’t, until they get clobbered by the new aristocratic order. This is a grand conspiracy to increase wealth and power for the already wealthy and powerful at the expense of the rest of us, and it’s happening in plain sight if we only bother to look. And think, just a little.

So, what can be done? Quite a bit, actually, even if it starts small. But this post is already way too long. I’ll ask you what you think should be done, and come back another day with some of my own thoughts.

The Ohio Tea Party is Outraged–by Republican Governor John Kasich’s Budget

By: Ohio Barbarian Thursday April 4, 2013 4:48 pm
John Kasich - Caricature

John Kasich - Caricature

Enigmatic Republican Governor John Kasich of Ohio continues to baffle both the left and the right. His biennial budget proposal is definitely a mixed bag in this Socialist Barbarian’s opinion, but Teabaggers, lawyers, and accountants positively hate it; therefore, it’s not all bad. The News Record  has a nice, short summary.

First, what I don’t like. Kasich wants to cut the state income tax rate by 20% and the “small business” tax rate by 50%, which helps “job creators,” of course. It’s hard to define what politicians mean by “small business.”  A mom and pop pizza place, sure. A McDonald’s franchise, not so. Besides, truly small businesses don’t create that many jobs, much less good paying ones,  and, if you’ve ever worked for one and not been a part of the family, you know they’re usually horrible employers. “Small business” has become part of the American mythos as automatically good things, but I don’t believe that small business is necessarily “good.” There’s probably a whole ‘nother post there.

Cutting the state income tax rate will necessarily benefit the top 1% in Ohio more than anyone else. There’s just no doubt about that. They’ll get to keep a LOT more than the bottom 80% will, and that’s for sure.

Kasich starts wandering from my black into my gray, however, in how he proposes to pay for the above. For one thing, he wants to impose an excise tax on oil and gas extraction. It’s not much in the budget–it starts at something like 2.4%, increasing to about 5% over a couple of years. Kasich originally wanted to imitate Texas and just slap a 10% royalty on the oil and gas companies, but that had zero chance of making it through the corporatist-controlled Republican legislature and he scaled it back. Even his more modest proposal faces stiff opposition and may not happen.

For another, he wants to cut the state sales tax from 5.5% to 5%, but expand it to include lawyers, accountants, concert and theater tickets, haircuts, and lobbyists. About the only thing I’d pay more far would be haircuts and the very occasional ticket, so it just doesn’t bother me that much. Democrats, and of course the Ohio Bar Association, are saying that the proposal would make legal services even more expensive for the poor, but that is a bogus argument, in my view.

If poor people can’t afford to pay $250/hour for an attorney now, they can’t afford to pay $265/hour, either. As for lobbyists, to hell with them.

There’s a big school budget change, but I don’t totally understand it. There are no cuts to school funding, and the overall budget is increased by $1.2 billion, but only half the districts  get more. Some of them are wealthier and have more students, some of them are poor and have fewer students; but I just don’t know enough to intelligently comment on it. Feedback is welcome.

Now, for what I do like.

Medicaid expansion. To the apoplectic outrage of the Tea Party, Kasich proposed accepting the Obamacare Medicaid expansion to include all Ohioans who make up to 138% of the abysmally low federal poverty line. From a  fiscally conservative, pragmatic point of view, it makes sense. Why should Ohio turn down oodles of free federal money?

But that’s only part of Kasich’s pitch. He’s main thrust is that it’s the morally right thing to do,  as displayed in his recent performance at the City Club of Cleveland.

Responding to Tea Party threats to primary any Republican legislator who votes for Medicaid expansion, Kasich said “This nasty, mean politics must come to an end. When it comes particularly to poor people, there is no partisanship. I don’t care if they’re addicted. I don’t care if they’re disabled. I’m not leaving them behind.”

(Howls of outrage from the Tea Party, Grover Norquist, and Fox News.)

As far as Republican legislators who are adamantly opposed to Medicaid expansion, Kasich told the Cleveland audience, “Kick them in the shins if they’re not going to vote for this.”

Ever heard Obama talk like that about Republicans? (Waiting). Didn’t think so.

I don’t know for sure why Kasich is pushing for Medicaid expansion, but at least he’s pushing for it all over the state, unlike Obama when it came to the public option, or a veritable plethora of other progressive things, such as closing Guantanamo or ending overseas imperial adventures or, well, you already know the drill.

On the one hand, he advances the agenda of the oligarchy. On the other, he opposes it. It depends, on what I’m not sure. But I kinda sorta like him. At the very least, he seems open to reason, and he sometimes actually applies Christian ethics to the poor. And that in itself makes Kasich an endangered species within the Republican Party.

If he’s re-elected 2014, I also wonder if he’ll stay a Republican. This could get very interesting.

 crossposted at Voices on the Square