History seldom exactly repeats itself, but it sure does repeat similar patterns and allow parallels to be drawn. The growing inequality of wealth we Americans have lived in for the last 30 years leads me to see an eerie parallel to this old story:
By the year 375 CE, the Roman Empire was financially and governmentally bankrupt. The preceeding two centuries had seen a growing inequality of wealth and oppurtunity to such an extent that Roman society had become a caste system, whereby sons were required to do whatever their fathers had done. There was no possibility of upward mobility except for generals who could use their legions to seize the Imperial throne. The small independent farmers who had once been the backbone of Roman citizenry were gone, replaced by a small class of landowners who controlled nearly all of the land and all of the wealth.
The Empire was ruled by a tiny elite, maybe five per cent of the entire population, who controlled at least 95 per cent of the wealth. They liked it that way, and hired “barbarian” mercenaries into the legions to maintain the status quo and advance their own personal ambitions. These barbarians came from the mainly Germanic tribes who had migrated down from Scandinavia over the course of several hundred years and settled in the lands east of the Rhine and north of the Danube, the two main frontiers of half of the Empire. . . .
The once vibrant Roman middle class had been taxed and squeezed almost out of existence. The subject peoples, most of whom had been made Roman citizens over a century before(in order to tax them more) subsisted mainly as indentured servants or serfs. Yet the rapacity of the ruling class knew no bounds, and in spite of declining revenues, they always demanded more. The Empire was so broke that it was divided into Western and Eastern Empires in an attempt to make administration more efficient, but all that did was to create two different geographical ruling classes without addressing the underlying problems, which ultimately stemmed from the rulers’ own ambition and greed.
The Visigoths were a Germanic tribe of maybe 100,000 people who had settled for awhile in what is now Poland and Ukraine, but had been forced south and west by the expansion of the Huns from the Russian steppes. Upon reaching the Danube in 375, they petitioned the Roman authorities for permission to settle in the Roman Balkans, now Bulgaria and Serbia, so the still formidable Roman legions could protect them from the Huns. The Visigoths needed land for their flocks and crops, and offered to serve in the legions as allied auxillaries in return.
The Romans agreed and let them in in 376, and then immediately began treating the Visigoths as a conquered people with no human rights whatsoever. They confiscated their weapons and jewelry, and denied them food to such an extent that parents were forced to sell their children into slavery in order to survive.
In short, the Roman PTB treated the Visigoths in much the same way as they treated their own lower classes. The problem was that the Visigoths were a proud nation of warriors, men and women alike, and they didn’t take very kindly to being treated as chattel.
The inevitable happened. The Visigoths revolted. The Eastern Emperor Valens led his legions out to crush them, and died with nearly all of his men in 378 at the Battle of Hadrianopolis, aka Adrianople. You see, the Visigoths had invented heavy cavalry. They may have even invented the stirrup, allowing a rider to stand on his horse and swing his sword down, but evidence there is scanty. What is clear was they did something to improve the efficacy of cavalry.
The Visigoths then embarked on a leisurely migration throughout Greece and the Balkans, eventually arriving in Italy. The Western Romans, under the leadership of a wily Vandal general named Stilicho, managed to stop them for awhile, mainly by bribing other barbarian tribes, including the Huns, to harry them. But the arrogance and greed of the Roman ruling class reared its ugly head yet again.
The Western Emperor, Honorius, fearing Stilicho, had him executed in 408. He not only killed his most valuable commander, but ordered the slaughter of his Germanic allies and their families as well, keeping much of the loot for himself, of course. The surviving barbarian soldiers who had served in the Roman legion did the only practical thing–they joined the Visigoths.
The Visigothic king, Alaric, once again offered to serve Rome as an ally in exchange for a safe homeland for his people. Honorius refused, and the Visigoths sacked Rome in 410. The Visigoths, who really only wanted safety and land, once again tried to ingratiate themselves to the Roman ruling class by having Alaric’s son Ataulf marry Honorius’ sister Placidia, but it didn’t work out. Alaric died, Ataulf was murdered, and the Visigoths continued their leisurely and plundering migration into Gaul and Spain. Emperor Honorius, unable to stop them, finally granted them huge land grants in those countries.
One would think that the existing Roman population would have resented Visigothic rule, but that didn’t happen. It is true that the Visigoths took the best land for themselves, but since that was owned by only a tiny fraction of the population that the majority resented anyway, the land grab didn’t really affect the bottom 95% of the Roman population. In fact, their taxes went down, trade increased, and their standard of living improved. Many probably viewed the Visigoths as liberators from their own aristocracy, and the Visigoths had no problem with small farmers or tradesmen. They also had this curious idea about locals handling their own affairs by voting.
So the Visigoths settled to stay in southern Gaul and most of Spain. They were critical in saving what was left of the Western Empire, and subsequent Western Civilization, when they joined with the last great Roman general, Aetius, at Chalons-sur-Marne in 451 and stopped Attila the Hun in his tracks. They preserved and reinvigorated the greatest Roman contribution to us, government by law. Their descendants in Spain, with one brief exception in the 8th Century, successfully blocked the Islamic Moorish conquest of Western Europe. Their language, mixed with Latin, became Spanish.
There are several lessons we can learn from the Visigothic experience, but the one I will focus on is the following. Extreme inequality of wealth and oppurtunity always results in injustice, but that injustice can be successfully resisted and overthrown. Since we Americans now live in a society where the inequality of wealth is just as bad as it was in the days of the late Roman Empire, and the warnings of the collapse of America mount, many look around for the modern day Visigoths.
Look in a mirror. We are the Visigoths now.



29 Comments

Thanks OG, I like the analogy and very much enjoyed the post.
I’m a Vandal, so nyah! :-p
Great history lesson in an area with which I was never as well-acquainted as I should have been.
But the ending was something of a let-down, because what we actually seem to be is equivalent to the oppressed Roman citizenry who waited for an external people (the Visigoths) to take the lead in liberating them.
After we invaded Iraq so gratuitously and so long overstayed our welcome in Afghanistan, I had kind of hoped that the Muslim world would have brought those wars home to us in sufficiently dramatic fashion that it would have paved the way for real change (making them the analogues of the Visigoths). But such hope has faded as time passed – it seems that the Muslims are more political than aggressive, and more interested in how to take advantage of our depredations to change their own world than in actually confronting them directly in ours (can’t blame them for that: they have no moral obligation to help US out).
So I see no Visigoths anywhere, and thus no hope that they’ll magically jump in and rescue us. I think we’re on our own, and don’t think we have any justification for bemoaning that rather than buckling down and tackling the job ourselves.
Heh, yes. It’s true. And the Empire has more and more Visigoths to deal with every day because it’s policies make a lot of enemies.
But one point which should be stressed. The Empire isn’t America’s Empire. The Empire is globalized and has absolutely no national allegiance. Sure, it controls policy in the US, the EU and many other nations but the Empire itself has no national identity.
There are some pretty big bands of Visigoths out there… Iranians that won’t hand over thier nation to the international bankers. Chavez who constantly kicks sand into the eyes of the corrupt elite of Venezuela. And the man who said NO to the IMF: Nestor Kirchner, former President of Argentina.
The Modern-Visigoth Revolution will begin…IN THE VILLAGE OF MINERVA!!!!!
That we are!
The rightwingnuts, teabaggers, etc., having no comprehension of the benefits of progressive taxation have been calling for a flat tax for years.
As you know, a flat tax unfairly levies the highest taxation on the poor while the rich get away almost scott free. I’d heard that the Roman Empire went bankrupt because of the flat tax. What do you know about the Roman Empire and the flat tax?
Very interesting diary. thanks
They want america to go bankrupt so everything becomes privatized and we become serfs.
I heard something about some important pennsylvania road or bridge getting sold off to dubai the saudis or some other mid east country.
The Romans themselves didn’t call it a flat tax, but in effect the late Empire did have one. Every Roman citizen, which from the time of Caracalla, in the late 200′s(I think), comprised everyone who was not a slave, had to pay an annual tax. In theory, everybody had to pay the same amount.
In practice, the Romans sent out tax collectors, or tax farmers, to collect a certain amount of taxes from each district the tax collectors were responsible for. If the tax collector didn’t collect the requisite taxes based on the last census, he had to pay the difference out of his own pocket. If he couldn’t do that, Bad Things happened to him. If he collected more than was required, he pocketed the difference.
You can easily see this system was wide open to fraud and abuse. A wealthy landowner, for example, could bribe a collector to ignore his tenants and double the burden on a competitor’s. To make matters worse, at some point the position of tax collector was made hereditary, so the tax collector’s sons and grandsons had to engage in the same trade.
So, yes, the Romans used a primitive flat tax system, and yes, it failed. Declining populations in the Western Empire didn’t help, nor did people fleeing into the woods because they could not afford to pay their taxes. When the barbarian tribes took over parts of the Empire, they didn’t levy such high taxes, which is one reason the Romanized natives accepted their overlordship so readily.
A couple notes here:
- by 167 BC, taxes on Roman citizens in Italy were gone; only the provinces paid taxes
-the tax farmers (Publicani – ring a bell?) were essentially finished in the 1st century BC. That’s when the census and direct taxation took effect; about 1% wealth tax and a flat tax per head.
- in the late 3rd century CE, Diocletion declared universal price freezes, which capped maximum prices, and reinstituted land tax on Italian land owners.
So it changed over time and is a bit complicated.
Reinforces the old adage that those who don’t remember history (or learn it to begin with) are doomed to repeat it. Good diary, thank you.
Yeah, Matt Taibbi’s ‘Griftopia’ Rolling Stone article talked a lot about that. Some investment bankers were trying to sell the PA Turnpike to an investor group in the UAE. Fortunetly that deal fell thru but others are in the pipeline and some have already been completed.
I’m an Invisigoth. Just ask Obama.
When the Roman Empire could no longer defend or provide for the common welfare of vast areas and numbers, the Visigoths, Lombards and Franks picked up the slack. The plebian(including some church leaders) people Of Rome opened the gates of the city for Alaric in 410, because they were starving. Most of The ruling class fled the city. The emperors sister Galla Placidia Married a Visioth commander.
Biggest problem is, our modern day Roman Elite have much more advanced technology.
They’ve been preparing for this big showdown for decades, and test their technology in China and Saudi Arabia, etc.
Ask Google and Cisco Systems, or the Israeli company Pennsylvania recently hired to spy on anybody with an opinion.
And beware the Haliburton constructed FEMA camps that can hold several million “barbarians”.
I’ve heard that Marine Corp drill sgts refer to American civilians as “the nasties” in certain exercises.
And Obama has declared all future presidents have a license to kill Americans on any whim.
Marxist Labor Analysis really emphaisizes the need for GENUINE immigration reform. As long as Mexican “Visigoths” are semi outlwas they cant organize or demand higher wages. In fact, one of the main features of all the immigrtation “reform” ideas being thrown around y dems and repubs would make joining a union a deportable offense for thoseoffered “amnesty”.
Great diary by the way.
And the Romans in this case are indeed international and stateless. It’s IMF and World Bank occupy many lands.
I get the feeling the rest of the world is just sitting around waiting for Americans to wake the fuck up. The Greeks and French, to cite 2 specific examples.
I’m a retardigoth
Although many of the situations back then are similar to our present plight this isn’t 400 AD. The ruling classes now have much more power and they’re power is Int’l in scope. Plus, they have many more ways to exert they’re control of society. What’s changing now is that the pretense that were a middle class society is collapsing and as we go forward the elites are going to be on the look out for trouble. Trouble from the right they’ll always allow to some extent ( witness the so called Tea party) but from the left not at all.
By the way one way they keep control are these sites. We tell them exactly what were up to they don’t even have to lurk. You can bet every word and every person that visits this site are being recorded in Alexandria and @ NSA hgts in MD.
And far beyond our shores…
m.youtube.com/watchgl=US&client=mv-google&hl=en&v=JWpWc_suPWo
Many likely fear the USA. President Jimmy Carter, who never engaged in any war, said that the USA now has a higher military budget than all the rest of the countries of the world combined.
And no D Pol will dare say to cut it by one penny for fear of being labelled “weak on terror” by Rethuglicans.
And they all love to feed the MIC as they cut our social security benefits which they call entitlements. Even the D’s.
Hoooommmeeee offfff theeee freeee fries with every 2 hamburgers and lannddd offff theeeee slaaaaaaavvvvveeeesssss.
Heh! I know the FBI and CIA have files on me from my college days. And I still got a Secret security clearance later when I was in the Navy. Let ‘em. I’m not very concerned.
“As you know, a flat tax unfairly levies the highest taxation on the poor while the rich get away almost scott free.”
Actually, I don’t know that. You can make a case for uneven distribution of the burden based on marginal value, but how exactly do the rich get away almost scott free?
Never could figure out why the Vandals got so much opprobrium while the Goths would always skate.
inflation is the biggest driver of wealth disparities, according to both Austrians and Keynesians, and is often considered a “regressive tax”….. printing press inflation in particular since it’s often the wealthy who are in control of the printing presses….. a good way to fight inflation is the abolishion of legal tender laws, however you can’t effectively abolish legal tender when you have a progressive tax because to do so would require a government determined exchange rate which could be (and likely would be) skewed to make one currency a defacto standard (even if not dejure)…. a flat tax, say 5% of sales/income (really, just two sides of the same equation), can be applied equitably to all transactions regardless of what currency/commodity is used as a medium of trade. If I pay you 100 kg of Au, than the tax is 5 kg of Au, if I pay you 100 plastic spoons than the tax is 5 plastic spoons………. obviously this would require shrinking the government to the point where a flat tax wouldn’t bankrupt people, though if you also abolished property tax and slightly modified property laws it should at least reduce the hurt associated with a high % flat tax.
Though, if you look at history as a whole and not just a little snippet from the mid first millennium, I think you’ll be hard pressed to find an instance where government (for laymen…. more accurately, a state… a state is a political body that exercises a territorial monopoly on violence, government is that which governs or makes decisions) has existed for any purpose other than for a small group of elites to exert control over others….
just so I have something to point at for all the people who I am sure are going to call me a Republicans/Conservative/Right Winger, I am going to respond to this…..
cut the military budget by 80%, if the Admirals and Generals can’t figure out how to work with a budget that is still bigger than the next two biggest spenders combined they are blatantly incompetent and need to be replaced.
the weapons of peasants 1500 years ago where improvised farm implements, the weapons of peasants today are AK-47s, RPG-7s, and hackers that can fuck up all your 0s and 1s. Technology favors the poor far more than it does the rich, hell the very fact that any pretext of justice is even attempted is proof of that.