“Well, look, first of all, I know both (Lloyd Blankfein and Jamie Dimon). They’re very savvy businessmen. And I, like most of the American people, don’t begrudge people success or wealth.”
–President Barack Obama
“It is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle that it is for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven.”
–Jesus of Nazareth, New Testament, Matthew 19:24
“Americans celebrate wealth. And they should.”
–President Barack Obama
“Let those who hoard the wealth that God has given them never think that they will benefit from it. It will bring them nothing but evil. The riches that they have hoarded will be their chains on Judgement Day.”
The Koran, 3:180
Quite the contrast there. Barack Obama, a self-proclaimed defender of capitalism, succinctly summed up what he truly believes in those two quotes. He also directly contradicted a fundamental moral tradition that is common to all of the major world religions and moral philosophical traditions. I could have just as easily cited the Torah, a Buddhist work, a Hindu Yogi book, the Egyptian Book of the Dead, the threefold law of Wicca, of any number of secular humanists.
For capitalism, the ultimate good is the accumulation of capital, or profit, for its own sake. Profit is defined as how much money one has accumulated by the sale of a product or service after the cost of making the product or performing the service is subtracted from the total sale price. This isn’t exactly rocket science here.
Since the making of more and more profits is considered a good thing by capitalists, it follows that anything that stands in the way of increasing their profits is necessarily a bad thing. This is where capitalism gets into trouble with the moral traditions common to most of humanity, moral traditions that evolved over the millennia as survival traits of the tribe or nation or species as a whole.
The teachings of Confucius, Socrates, Buddha, Jesus, the Druids, the Stoics, Muhammad, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King all caught on with large numbers of people because they fundamentally make sense. People instinctively know that cooperation and sharing are necessary to their survival and the survival of their children. They know that treating other people or their environment badly always results in suffering, and that even an animal backed into a corner and tormented will strike back.
Most people know that they need the help of other people to build communities and to raise children. In order to get that help, people have to cooperate and to share. If they don’t, the community falls apart and the children don’t grow up to have grandchildren. This is a fundamental truth that goes back to the days when the first homo erectus figured out how to rub two sticks together to make a fire and shared it with his or her clan so they could all keep warm.
But capitalism isn’t about cooperation and sharing, except to temporarily collaborate to increase profits. I say “temporarily” for as soon as one capitalist sees a chance to increase his profits at the expense of a partner, much less an employee, he won’t hesitate to screw over his partner. In fact, if he does not do so, he is considered a fool by his own capitalist belief system and by his peers.
You see, capitalism isn’t about building communities, forging a better society, justice, or even the survival of the human species and Old Mother Earth herself. It is ONLY about building more and more profits, and will crush anything and anyone that stands in the way of that goal if it can.
On an individual level, one cannot be a good capitalist without being selfish. Therefore, selfishness is a moral good as far as capitalism is concerned, and any doctrine that teaches anything else is at best naive and at worst an evil that must be destroyed.
But those old moral traditions common to all of humanity just keep getting in the way. So capitalists write books and TV shows and invent entire news networks with the goal of preaching that selfishness is a good thing, that if everyone just acts in their own self-interests and gets out there and competes that they, too, have the chance of rising to wealth and power, that those who have attained wealth and power have a right to keep it, and that those who oppose that way of thinking are just a bunch of losers who should either shut up or be locked up, and that concerns about the survival of the human species or the Only Planet We’ve Got are just unrealistic drivel unworthy of discussion, much less policy changes.
They forget the lessons of our common history. They forget the lessons of human survival itself. They ignore the warning of Jesus of Nazareth:
“But everyone who hears these words of mine and does not put them into practice is like a foolish man who built his house on sand.”
–Matthew 7:26
Our modern capitalists, our self-proclaimed Masters of the Universe, have built their palatial homes on the sands of selfishness.
And a storm is coming. It started in Tunisia.



71 Comments

Only after human brains had evolved enough intellect and cleverness, along with requisite cooperation to ensure survival, some must have evolved further to achieve wisdom, which implies being able to learn from experience, look beyond immediate gratification, plan for the future, and take into account the effects of one’s own actions upon the environment, whether advantageous or destructive, and adopt self-restraint in the case of the latter.
Once agriculture was devised, leading to surplus, those possessed of great cleverness, along with intellect, were enabled to use guile, devoid of wisdom or concern for future destructive effect, to gain unfair advantage without contributing equitably to the group effort. Thus capitalism was born. As George Mobus puts it: “We now know that we screwed up when we put wisdom on the back burner in favor of material wealth.”
Another gem from George Mobus, which shows how we’ve erred due to the refusal to value wisdom: “Much of intelligence is mobilized to rationalize our decisions after our feelings have forced us toward our choices!” I believe most of the RW think tanks are engaged in the wholesale rationalization of gratification devoid of wisdom.
Great post & recommended!
Strongly agree. And this is one of the main failings of the Democratic party, they are fanatical free-market capitalists.
Thus constantly preach the virtues of a system that is, at best, amoral, and often immoral and unethical. They never point out the fact that it is unsustainable, or it’s shortcomings, or the fact that most of the problems facing the word require more cooperation and sharing (not competition and selfishness) to solve.
Not to mention that the whole raison d’etre for capitalism, is in fact, socialistic: lower prices and better products is the predicted outcome and more desirable FOR THE CONSUMER. What is best for the most = socialism.
Anyway, nice diary. Nice to see a fellow Ohioan who gets it.
A concern I have is that the promise of the people’s revolutions in Tunisia in Egypt will be subverted by the IMF structural adjustment policies and other neo-liberal economic policies of global capitalism. To my mind neo-liberal corporate economics is the embodiment on a global scale of the selfishness of which you so eloquently write and is also antithetical to democracy.
BTW, while on the topic of the immorality of capitalism, I would like to offer up an observation of mine:
While grocery shopping a the local supermarket, I came across a woman with a young child in tow. The woman was obviously distraught and overwhelmed. She approached me to inquire about some of the items in her cart but ended up bursting into tears.
I immediately sensed what the problem really was, as I had been in those shoes myself only two years before; that woman did not have enough money to buy the small amount of food in her cart. I will admit at this point that I am a recipient of food stamps myself, and while I don’t have much, I did have a little extra this month so I insisted that the woman put her groceries in my cart and we proceeded to the checkout lane.
We got out to the parking lot and while sorting through the bags, this woman started to explain her situation to me. Most of the details are not important to this post, however, she disclosed to me that she worked for Family Dollar store and earned minimum wage. She did not always get 40 hours per week as her hours were basically on the whim of her employer (is the store expected to be busy that day? etc…). When I got home, I ‘Googled’ Family Dollar and was appalled and disgusted to see that the CEO of Family Dollar, Howard Levine, had a pay raise to a whopping $6.8 million in 2010! http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2010/12/09/1897252/family-dollar-ceo-pay-rises-in.html On the other side of the coin,the gross monthly salary (can we actually call it that?) for a 40 hour week, minimum wage employee is $1282, or $15,392 per year!
No doubt Levine feels perfectly justified in having this outrageous salary and would certainly never encounter the observations that I do on a daily basis. I wonder if Jesus also feels that Levine’s salary is justified?
Very nice addendum. Thank you.
You’re right. That is exactly what the IMF, etc will try to do. Great observation of the rule of selfishness on a global scale.
Or, as Chris Rock’s character said in “Head of State”: That ain’t right!
Capitalism and Christianity are incompatible. I am amazed at how many professed Christians simply don’t recognize this contradiction. Or if they do, they will choose the teachings of Capitalism and then twist themselves in knots to rationalize and reconcile the contradictions. “Prosperity Gospel” – give me a break. Jesus was a socialist. Otherwise he would have sold the fishes and loaves of bread. I mean, his cost of production was pretty close to zero. How could he pass up that opportunity? I’m sure the MOU think he was a putz.
All true, but I think most of the world outside the USA is well aware of the machinations of the IMF, which is largely and directly responsible for creating the conditions that motivated the Jasmine Revolutions and made them possible. The USA is subjected to more intensive propaganda and deceit than anywhere else in the world; ours is the Flimflam Nation, and our politics and media are a mirror maze of traps and deceits. The best thing we as Americans can do to liberate the rest of the world is to liberate our own minds, and those of our fellow citizens. We should worry primarily about enlightening ourselves, not the rest of the world.
There are three sources of information for this purpose I would like to draw everyone’s attention to.
First of all, as it happens, there is an imminent FDL Book Salon on Wendell Potter’s Deadly Spin (2010):
http://fdlbooksalon.com/2011/02/13/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-wendell-potter-deadly-spin-an-insurance-company-insider-speaks-out-on-how-corporate-pr-is-killing-health-care-and-deceiving-americans/
This book is the best single source I’m aware of on corporate PR, which is the principal source of those traps and deceits that I just referred to. Everyone please attend the Book Salon!
Another serious problem for political discourse in the USA is the lack of a general source for world political news that is not under corporate or U.S. government influence. Al Jazeera is subjected to de facto corporate censorship in the USA, in that they are not carried by most U.S. cable and satellite TV providers. But of course they want to be. They have a petition page for viewers to use in requesting access on American TV:
http://english.aljazeera.net/demandaljazeera/
Everyone please sign the petition if you haven’t already!
Last, I have now updated my annotated bibliography on the Tunisian Revolution to a second version covering the Egyptian Revolution as well (and I’m planning a third version now that Mubarak is out):
Note that an earlier post by OhioGringo, which drew my attention to the significance of the Tunisian Revolution, is included in the bibliography. Thanks again, OG!
Oh, and a fourth source I would recommend is Athena1′s current diary on what news sources we rely on:
http://my.firedoglake.com/athena1/2011/02/13/who-do-you-listen-to-economics-news-etc-name-your-top-3/
Highly recommended!
More of this is likely coming:
Wait till the blowback from this starts tying into to the forces already driving the Jasmine Revolutions.
Oops, it already has tied in – this is what I get for breaking my usual rule about reading articles before I post links to them. This article will be included in the next version of my annotated bibliography.
Karl Marx (Capital, Volume 1, last paragraph of Chapter 18, “Various formulae for the rate of surplus-value”), on what capitalism is really about:
In other words, workers have to be paid in order to survive, while capitalists can sit on their capital if need be. Thus, the workers are in an unfavorable bargaining position, and the capitalists can get the workers’ labor for an amount of money less than what the products of their labor will bring in the marketplace. But the nature of the system obscures this fact. Capitalism is a scam, and it is also slavery “lite”. Slaves get nothing but food for their work; workers get some pay, but less than what their labor is really worth. The difference is capitalist profit.
Isn’t that just a wonderful basis for a civilization?
The Wendell Potter Deadly Spin book salon is now live!:
http://fdlbooksalon.com/2011/02/13/fdl-book-salon-welcomes-wendell-potter-deadly-spin-an-insurance-company-insider-speaks-out-on-how-corporate-pr-is-killing-health-care-and-deceiving-americans/
Agreed. War and Christianity are also incompatible. So much for the Christian Nation.
We live in a world where success is marked by ostentatious wealth and bling rather than intellect, charity and compassion. Our world is being rapidly consumed and spoiled by an insatiable gluttony. The planet warms, polar ice melts, the tides advance, plant and animal species are disappearing at an alarming rate and our leaders still yield to the same old corporate interests.
Leaders no longer lead. They follow the dollar and genuflect to corporate lobbyist. There is something dangerously wrong with the values of such a system.
Thanks for posting Ohio Gringo. Excellent.
Very well written!
(It is amazing how many, other people, who write here at FDL just blurt out large amounts of disconnected words, with no structure or overall theme, and believe they have somehow actually communicated ideas …)
I can’t help but be reminded of Al Franken’s “Gospel of Supply-Side Jesus” cartoon in his book “Lying Liars and the Liars Who Tell Them.”
When Peter suggests Supply-Side Jesus speak of the rich man, the camel, and the eye of the needle, Supply-Side Jesus tells him that’s “class warfare”
Poor Jesus has been co-opted for just about every cause.
I think the unspoken passage in this discussion is: “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money.” Matthew 6:24 (NIV)
What’s really surprising is that the father of capitalism, Adam Smith, who wrote in 1776 in the “Wealth of Nations” that he was “distrustful of concentrations of capital.” In other words, he feared the publicly-traded corporation.
He also seemed to advocate regulation of big business: “capitalists left to their own devices would rather collude than compete.”
Even though “Wealth” was written in 1776, at the beginning of the American Revolution, the influence of corporate power is unchecked in either the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.
Corporate power really began to exert undue influence over our government during the Civil War and in the years right after it. That influence was exerted unchecked all the way up until the 1890′s with the passage of the Sherman-Clayton Anti-Trust Act of 1890. But the act did not get its teeth until Teddy Roosevelt started “trust-busting” during his 1901-1908 presidency.
It was further bolstered in 1914. The Progressives also pushed back beginning in the 1890s. This battle has raged back and forth since that time. It looked like it was being won by regular folks during the FDR’s Administration and LBJ’s Administration, but working people have lost ground almost non-stop since the Reagan Administration.
Like Slavery and Civil Rights for all, this is a struggle we have to win as a Nation or lose our liberty to Corporate Tyranny.
There’s nothing wrong with farmers making money from selling their crops and livestock to feed their families as long as they’re not gouging people to do it. There’s nothing wrong with mechanics and service people providing their services under the same circumstances. Inventors–not corporations–should be adequately compensated.
But these corporations are parasites. The first step to revitalizing the economy and checking corporate power is another round of “trust busting.” These corporations are too big and they need to be chopped down to size. This will curtail their power, increase competition to the benefit of consumers and provide thousands of jobs.
Marx’s analysis of capitalism is flawlessly logical. No one understood the capitalism of the time better than Marx, including the capitalists.
Marx, though an atheist, nevertheless was influenced by the old moral traditions of Judaism and Christianity, even if he never did admit it. He appears to have been genuinely upset and appalled by the injustices of the economic system that he analyzed.
Like any other normal human being.
It doesn’t matter what Jeebus would say; Jeebus now LOVES the rich, you know. The West, and everywhere else has used religion for it’s own Amoral purposes since the Church was founded in 300 – 400 AD. The church is as corporate as any corporation.
Oh, and after all these “men of God get their bonuses which we paid for next comes this:
Obama set to unveil austerity plan
US president to release a tough and tight fiscal budget, but House Republicans want deeper cuts.
http://english.aljazeera.net/news/americas/2011/02/201121315938469409.html
We’re being spun like tops. Meanwhile we fight with each other. This is going to be a tough year.
Mexico freeze kills 80-100 pct of crops; US food prices to soar
http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/02/12/mexico-freeze-kills-80-100-pct-of-crops-us-food-prices-to-soar/
Planting a garden this year may well be all you can afford to eat.
As Mayer Rothschild said “Give me control of a nation’s finances and I care not what laws they pass”.
Now their arms include the IMF,The World Bank, the WTO, Bilderberg ( which chooses our presidents) the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission.
And people think their votes count and that’s all we do ,if that
Something to watch if you have time ( it’ll curl your hair)
The Obama Deception HQ Full length version
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eAaQNACwaLw
Even Lenin came around to recognizing that there is nothing wrong with farmers making money to feed their families as long as they’re not gouging people to do it, because they provide a valuable service.
My little polemic here was not against the idea of making a fair profit from trade, I remember my childhood Episcopalian priest proclaiming that a 10% profit was reasonable(remember usury laws, anyone, anyone?), and Islam teaches that wealthy merchants must give a share of their wealth to the mosque in order to help the poor if they are to be admitted to paradise.
Trade is one thing. Capitalism is another. Trade mutually enriches both buyer and seller; well, at least it CAN. Capitalism seeks only to increase the profits of the capitalist, and totally disregards the costs to everyone else in doing so. Capitalism teaches it is good for the capitalist to be selfish.
Taken to its logical conclusion, it is self-destructive. Every major religion and philosophy agrees with me on that point.
“Even though “Wealth” was written in 1776, at the beginning of the American Revolution, the influence of corporate power is unchecked in either the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution.”
Very good point. I don’t think corporate power was the problem then as it has grown to be today. Maybe the Constitution needs to be amended to check corporate power. The Constitution contains checks on executive, legislative and judicial branches – why not checks on corporate power? Possible amendments would include abolishing corporate personhood, the chartering of corporations to serve the public welfare, the periodic review and renewal or ending of corporate charters based on if they are serving the public welfare, eliminating the primacy of maximizing profits and shareholder value as the corporate purpose, the banning of corporate contributions to candidates for public office and the public financing of all elections.
I agree completely. Seriously, though, how can dismantling corporate dominance of America be achieved? The corporatists are taking this country and much of the world on a course headed straight to disaster at warp speed. Is there TIME to build a political movement that can achieve success before the whole corrupt, bloated structure the corporations have built comes crashing down?
Or do the American people have to emulate their Tunisian and Egyptian counterparts to bring it to a screeching halt before it is too late?
These are genuine questions on my part, and I welcome feedback. But if there is to be a Second American Revolution, of any sort, what you just said has to be a non-negotiable demand. Corporate power must be checked. If it is not, it will destroy our civilization in its endless lust for increasing profits.
That is QUITE the bibliography you have compiled there. It obviously took a lot of time and effort on your part to compile it. Thank you!
And thank you for graciously including my own modest contribution.
Yeah, Jones was spot on with that one.
The main problem I see is that they’re wrecking the planet as well in their greed. Even if we can stop them somehow, what will we do with what’s left?
Thinks are getting VERY serious on that front…fast.
I don’t know how we could mobilize enough people to beat them back with all the propaganda.
They’ve been planning this for centuries, while we’ve been blaming the victims.
This winter, the mayor asked people to check on their neighbors when it got so cold and many people were without gas. Not a soul called me. Our communities are wrecked
Open to everything, differences likely smaller
than people realize.
However surely we should always grow and especially
encourage our children to grow (as much and in as
many ways as possible.)
So just give me a fair playing field and
a government ombudsmen to evenly enforce
the rules of the game, including rules aimed at
assuring the game’s continuity, as much as the laws
dead-issue known to protect public health, and then let
ambition and healthy incentives
(and we should always try incentivizing
being compassionate even for those
who can’t look past themselves)reign.
http://sites.google.com/site/evernewecon
I’m sorry no one called you. I know our communities are severely damaged if not wrecked. You are right that things are getting serious fast.
I think you are wrong in thinking that “they” have been planning this for centuries. There was no plan, no conspiracy, just lust for profit and immediate gratification. To say otherwise gives them too much credit and they don’t deserve it.
As for mobilization, neither the Tunisian, Egyptian, nor American governments saw what happened in North Africa coming. It just happened. The same can happen anywhere if conditions are right.
This is true, IF we can wake people up to their responsibilities. Maybe a couple of seasons of high priced food and energy outages will do it.
Glen Greenwald nailed it in this piece on Salon:
The Tea Party and civil liberties
http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2011/02/09/tea_party
We’ve got to identify the problem if we are to correct it.
And I DO think the banks have been going for this since the Napoleonic Wars. I’ve got some links, but I have to go do some other stuff now.
Before even choosing an economic system, or assigning it labels like capitalism, socialism, etc, we need to define what our values are and what we hope an economic system will help us achieve.
Fundamental goals such economic prosperity for all where few or none live below “the poverty line” and a respect for “the commons”, however we define it, seem like minimum requirements. But, perhaps, even more fundamental than that is that we are communal by nature. We are pack animals. We moved in our earliest days on the planet in clans. To isolate ourselves into tiny, competing economic units is not natural. It leaves us disoriented and alienated from our very essence. We need institutions that support rather than tear down our innate sense of community.
Capitalism is by definition a selfish system. It rewards the successful but demands nothing back in return. It asks what a corporation can do for its investors rather than asking what a corporation can do for its host country and its citizens. It socializes risk and privatizes profit.
Capitalism’s marketplace is haphazard. If more cars can be sold, then they are sold. Whether there are 30,000 highway deaths per year is not the concern of automakers. Whether many Americans spend hours a day stuck in commuter traffic because no mass transit is available is not their concern. Automakers rail against mass transit (sorry!). Air pollution controls, safety features… only if mandated by government.
Socialism attempts to “tame” consumer markets by giving voice and presence to the commons. Too often “central planning” is thought of in a negative way. It may be negative for industries that want no government “interference”; it is certainly not negative when it represents the citizens by considering non-market issues like air pollution, highway safety, urban planning, energy policy and mass transit. When capitalism rules, the commons is silenced.
To argue that the “free market” represents the will of the people is nonsense. If someone buys a car, did they do it to sit in traffic two or three hours a day, poison the air we breath and deplete precious, imported energy reserves or did they do it because there is no mass transit available? Their “choice” may not have been a choice at all if there was no viable alternative. Did the market place reflect the will of consumers or were the other choices neutered by corporate corruption of government?
Capitalism’s great lie, i.e. its great myth, is that by competing for profits, investors will incur risks to produce things that make our lives better. Inefficiencies will be weeded out. Workers and investors alike will strive to do their best because everything is driven in pursuit of the almighty dollar.
All of this is nonsense. Is there efficiency in building housing far from where people work? Is there efficiency in cutting safeguards in pursuit of profit such that the Gulf of Mexico is now toxic? Is there efficiency in importing oil instead of developing alternative technologies? Is there efficiency in increasing investor profits by exporting jobs and devastating the lives of millions of our citizens? Capitalists are whores; they do it for money.
That’s what capitalism is all about. It doesn’t give a damn about anyone or anything but its own profits. Under capitalism, the commons is raped while the rapists profit. You cannot sustain a society when you pit its dominant economic system against the interests and values of the nation and its people. Ultimately, those who are successful in such a system will be at odds with the sustainability and well-being of the nation itself.
We are dangerously close to that precipice today.
Whatever our values may be, the blind, singular pursuit of wealth surely is not consistent with them. Capitalism embraces competition over cooperation and profits before people. At its core, capitalism condones greed and selfishness. It sets neighbor against neighbor, town against town, state against state and country against country. Socialism, however we might define it, is a system that strives to more equitably distribute opportunity, wealth and political power and, as such, is far more likely to adhere to the values most of us share. Socialism sees each citizen as an integral part of the greater community. No one gets caviar until all have been fed.
It is often said that “a rising tide lifts all boats.” Under capitalism, a rising tide just drowns the poor; the poor have no boats. What we need is an economic system that lifts up the poor and the middle class.
I like to call that economic system “socialism”.
Great post, Welsh. But it deserves its own diary entry instead of just a comment to this one. I can’t recommend a reply on this site :)
Look above.
I’m definitely a capitalist. actually happy investor,
though one who’s right decisions in recent times is
paying the bonuses of the wrong / fools who’ve played
loose.
Simply (again:)
we should always grow and especially
encourage our children to grow (as much and in as
many ways as possible.)
So just give me a fair playing field and
a government ombudsmen to evenly enforce
the rules of the game, including rules aimed at
assuring the game’s continuity, as much as the laws
dead-issue known to protect public health, and then let
ambition and healthy incentives
(and we should always try incentivizing
being compassionate even for those
who can’t look past themselves) reign.
Differently:
If 6 kids are playing Monopoly(R,) and 2 kids
have all the properties, game’s over.
Before getting to that point, if the game’s rigged
in favor of the kids already owning the
best properties, then they’ll always be on the take,
the other kids always on the give.
To complete the analogy, the kids with the properties
would also include health insurers statutorily immune
from the anti-trust laws, monopolizers of water
distribution, a monetary regime kinda’ lookin’ held
hostage, and a preposterously unbalanced transportation
system given to a million injuries annually and the
$US always handicapped by net imports.
http://sites.google.com/site/evernewecon
(2d “whoxx’ing” for the day because I’m referring to
my own, 2 comments “up.” (“down” if finding this
on my FDL – assembled comments.)
Yes, but what happens in Monopoly when only one player is left?
The game ends. It’s all over. There is no one left to exploit, no more property to buy up, no more money to be made. And all of the little pieces and cards and dice and the board go back in the box.
In real life, the game of humanity could end. The game the capitalists are playing with our species and our planet must be stopped. Or, at the very least, the rules must be changed so that the Game of Life can continue.
They don’t call us “wage slaves” for nothing dude!
Wasn’t Marx who said I believe in Capital, that the ultimate goal of every Capitalist is to have a monopoly? As we journey closer and closer to the event horizon of this ultimate capitalist black hole we’ve now reach the place called Plutocracy. Plutocracy leads to Feudalism and new forms of slavery.
Feudalism, in theory, worked both ways. The serfs owed allegiance to their various lords, who owed allegiance to the king, who in turn owed allegiance to God as manifested by the Church.
In return for fealty, the king had a duty to maintain the lords, who in turn had a duty to make sure the serfs could at least make a living and reproduce to make more serfs.
Capitalism imposes no such duties on the capitalists, even in theory. I’m not defending feudalism here; in practice, it was a truly abominable and unjust system, which is one reason why it ultimately collapsed. Just saying it at least had some theoretical restrictions on its rulers that capitalism does not. In that ivory tower context, one can make a logical argument that capitalism is worse than feudalism in a moral sense.
Capitalism cannot survive. Like it or not, old Marx was right: its internal contradictions will bring it down, one way or the other. It is up to We the People to determine what takes its place.
Indeed. The term “wage slave” is closer to the literal truth than I would have thought possible before I started reading Marx.
South American countries and some Asian countries see the flaw in neoliberalism and they have rejected the IMF and WB. Those organizations face inevitable decline and rejection because their policies always lead to extreme wealth disparity, massive poverty and suffering, and revolutions.
No country should ever borrow money from the IMF.
I think it takes people finally connecting the dots and coming to a new viewpoint. What Tunisia and Egypt illustrate is people can connect the dots and that at some point stand up, come together and take ownership of their country. This was unpredictable. I don’t think even the organizers thought they could mobilize the population the way they did. I don’t know what will cause this to happen in the U.S. In Tunisia what triggered the protests initially was the suicide of the college graduate who was denied a permit to sell goods to earn a living. While I don’t know what would cause public action I think it is important to be prepared and have goals in mind when the time comes. I really admire the way the Egyptian and Tunisian people conducted their revolution – largely non-violent, they persevered, and they stood together.
Within the U.S. I think the election of 2008 showed a hunger and enthusiasm for a new direction among the population that was real even if the politicians proved not up to the task.
Most exellent, Ohio Gringo.
Thought provoking.
Recommended.
The dollar stores don’t allow their workers to work 40hrs a week so they don’t have to pay for benefits.
BTW that EBT food stamp card you use is a great profit generator for JPMorgan who run the system.
If anyone is interested in learning how 21st Century Socialism works Venezuelanalysis.com covers the Good the Bad and the Ugly.
Well said. I was one those who hungered for change and was denied in 2008.
Interestingly, Marx thought the brutal ruthlessness of capitalism was one of its good points when compared to earlier socioeconomic systems. He praised it for forcing the human race to face reality, and for at least creating something worthwhile with the labor it extorted from the proletariat, while earlier social systems had veiled their exploitation in hypocrisy, and wasted what they stole. From the Communist Manifesto, Section 1, “Bourgeois and Proletarians”:
Much of this sounds like it might have been written by Ayn Rand. Not even Adam Smith praised capitalism as Marx did. And this is the system that he wants to abolish!
Jack Shenker wrote this last year about a report issued by the Egyptian Govt.’s investment authority. It blew the lid off the effects the IMF promised when they granted loans back in 1991 and tied them to acceptance of neoliberal practices and policies. Of course the rich got wealthy, and 90% of the population got the shaft.
I’d think at least some in Egypt would know to be carefulof the World Bank and the IMF by now.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/nov/08/egypt-imf
So true.
Another great post OG. Thanks.
Another great post OhioGringo, thanks.
Think about this: Marx praises capitalism, in all its ruthlessness, with an enthusiasm that exceeds Adam Smith and rivals Ayn Rand. Yet he does not bow down to worship it. Quite the contrary. He beholds all its wonders, and says: We can do better than this. The human race deserves better.
What must he then expect from the economic system he favors?
Just imagine.
Nice diary, Gringo.
You’ve provided a longer arc of history for our society’s embrace of capitalism, but a lot of our current adherence to it can be laid at Ronnie Reagan’s feet, IMO. His snide and glib announcements that ‘government is the problem’ had a subtext of ‘superior people can get what they want, screw the rest’ to it, and ‘government does well not to listen to those losers who would engage in the collective bargaining that would slow down the engines of capitalism’.
His attitudes have permeated the public discourse so much that millions of people have voted against their own interests economically, always believing in the back of their minds that they were just around the corner of some deal that would make them millionaires, and by God, they weren’t gonna vote for anyone who wanted to use their profits to prop up some inferior peoples’ lives or enact laws that would interfere in their quests for profit! Remember the pollution laws in California that ‘drove industry out of the state’? It became a legend writ in stone that helping the planet’s air and water was antithetical to the profits that drove creation, and we’re still stuck in that dreck. The same with higher wages now, or taxation. I heard Liz Cheney mouthing off on a Sunday show about ‘Obama’s failed neo-Keyensian policies’ (guffaw, choke) proving that the only way to job creation is lower taxes, la la la… , no matter that all the reports and charts lately show that the opposite is true: the economy did better when the marginal tax rates were higher. But I digress.
So selfishness is permeating our society. As is addiction to material goods, at least convincing others we are wealthy; people seem to grasp that wealth begets wealth even at the lower levels. Visit the Florida Gold Coast, and witness the hordes who invest in fancy cars and bling so that they can convince others that they are worthy of a better job, a position, a deal, etc., that can catapult them toward uber-wealth. It’s disgusting, and most go broke when they can’t pay their bills, or start skirting the law in their panic to hold on, knowing the right deal is just coming to bail them out.
The politics of it won’t change until people’s psycho-spiritual attitudes change. I think. And what might drive that change wholesale would be an interesting discussion. Some academics have been doing studies on wealth and power, and finding that beyond a certain point, there really isn’t much satisfaction in wealth accumulation, but I don’t think the studies have dealt with The Power part of the equation. Or what people want to do with that Power. But controlling their destinies, controlling others, are arguably part of it; and there must be differences in motivation between the simply uber-wealthy and the level at which one is sincerely a MOTU, and I’m not even sure we know some of their names and identities, as they operate in the dark behind the scenes.
According to Chrysta Freeland’s new book, it’s become almost hip for the uber-wealthy to try to outdo each other with their charitable foundations and whatnot, and to give away wealth like Buffet and Gates. I tend to be pretty cynical about their motivations, but it’s partly because they don’t seem to want the system that allowed them to become multi-billionaires to change.
We’re watching Egypt and Tunisia in the first steps of over-throwing dictatorial regimes that kept them poor and hungry and in bondage, and often tortured for speaking out. And we’re wondering if those next layers of Elites will have their come-to-Jesus moments and realize that there is reason to give in to the Common Good or not, or if the struggle will turn bloody, as even within the military there are business Elites. We don’t know yet.
On these boards we often speak of the millions of unemployed, the millions losing their homes, their dignity, becoming hungry…as those who might spontaneously rebel against the selfish ruling class who could care less if they live or die, go hungry or not, suffer or not. But I think a movement won’t happen until mass amounts of people really begin to realize (maybe driven by their own suffering) that Community Connectedness is crucial to our/their survival and the planet’s survival, that the American Material Dream is dead, that our Empire must be unwound, and that the only sane and satisfying way forward is making sure none of us suffer, and all are guaranteed the Four Freedoms FDR spoke about. A major transformation, really, in our souls, without which political solutions won’t happen.
(Too much coffe at 3:30, I think.) ;o)
‘Coffee’.
Your use of the term ‘moral traditions’ implies adhering to acts and deeds that align with the best religious and spiritual teachings, and to a degree I think religious dogma could act as a roadmap to moral behavior. But in the end, the sense I have is that far too many people live without strong moral compasses, or consciences that would act in their lives to limit greed or callous disregard for their fellow humans, and be at the core of living helpful and useful lives for their fellow citizens.
Watching the many on Wall Street and at the heads of corporations, you wonder if they ever had consciences, which leads to the question of how consciences form, for which there are boatloads of theories. We’ve all watched the films of the two-year-olds who were eager to help solve small problems they witnessed others having, which the researches said proved we’re hard-wired to be empathetic, though I think it’s all more complex than that, but even if it were so, it’s clear that killer competition is more of a rule than cooperation by now in America, and that it’s taught in high schools and colleges, especially in the field of economics.
Sadly, in the general population, ‘morals’ (‘ethics’ is out of vogue as a term) means who you love and have sex with and when, and your stand on abortion now, instead of critical self-examination about the principles on which you base your life.
And this is the most religious nation on the planet; they told us so. ;o)
-”the goal of preaching that selfishness is a good thing, that if everyone just acts in their own self-interests and gets out there and competes that they, too, have the chance of rising to wealth and power”
That’s obviously not the case in the parasitic economy of the western world with their fiat money systems.
You’re obviously describing the economic system as you see it. It has features of mercantilism and fascism. One thing it’s not is a free market and a free society.
We need Ubuntu.
Ubuntu is a Zulu word that describes the foundation of African societies. In essence, it means that a person is a person through other persons. Desmond Tutu said ubuntu is about community; “when we see another, we should recognize ourselves and the God in whom all people are made.”
“My humanity is caught up in your humanity. I am a human being only because you are a human being. There is no such thing as a solitary human being . . . And for that reason, the highest value is accorded to harmony, communal harmony, and anger and revenge and bitterness are corrosive of this harmony. And in a sense, it is the best form of self-interest to forgive you, because if I do not, my anger against you, which goes toward dehumanizing you, dehumanizes me in the process. The minute you are diminished, whether I like it or not, I am diminished. And so if I can enhance your humanity, ipso facto, my humanity is enhanced.
When another person is diminished, I am diminished.”
The comments regarding the founding of this nation and how corporate tyranny was not a problem then are spot on. As are the realizations that Adam Smith was himself no corporatist, but instead advocated a form of regulated capitalism. The whole laissez-faire myth is a mischaracterization of Adam Smith. It is the taking of one sentence that he wrote out of context and then summarily ignoring the entire body of work from which it was ripped.
The Founding Fathers emerged from an era of Monarchs and landed aristocracy, where class was based on birth, and meritocracy did not exist. They championed “business” interests because they were primarily mom and pop type shops, entrepreneurs who worked hard with their own labor and made 10% profit at best. The founding fathers never envisioned that “business” interests would be wealthier than nation states (Adam Smith did not write “Wealth of Mutlinational Conglomerates”) and they did not perceive of the destructive effect of Central Banking, globalization, and the hijacking of democracy to Fascist interests. The founding fathers did not know of fascism. The great evils of their day were religious intoleration, aristrocratic strangleholds on wealth, and the monarch’s ability to bestow title and power upon those who merely brown-nosed and sold out.
The revolving door of politician/lobbyist and the regulatory capture of today are just as nefarious to our constitution as monarchial bestowment of title and power to aristocratic brown-nosers.
Fascism is the capture of the state to serve the corporate interests. Today’s corporate interests are yesterdays’ aristocracy. America has thus failed to sustain its founding principles. Adam Smith would have chastised the current system as much as Karl Marx has done. But alas, Economics is not even taught to American school children until their High School Senior Year, and then, its a mish-mash of bad theory, and poor history.
Exactly as intended, of course. The Financial Vampires of our society would never want young American minds being taught how to peer behind the curtain or pierce the fog of misinformation or learn how to read a financial statement or SEC filing or bank note sufficiently to perceive the deceptions. Slavery is easy to achieve when the slaves don’t know they are slaves, and Americans have proven that axiom to be true.
Lovely, Mason; thanks for that.
In Navajo land, a person who behaves immorally is said to ‘act like he/she has no relations’ (meaning ‘relatives’).
That makes sense.
The neoliberals do not realize that an individual’s life has no significance or meaning by itself and profits are meaningless drivel.
We become something only in relation to something else. We derive all of the significance and meaning in our lives from the groups to which we belong and the people with whom we associate. The whole of which we are a part spiritually and infinitely is the infinite great spirit of which everything is composed but who has no name. Our focus should be on our relationship with spirit and commuity, not on profiting at the expense of others.
Great shorter version of my comments above; I went around Dobbins barn a few more times than you did, though. ;o)
I do spend some time wondering how those with imperfect conscience/empathy/sense of the organic and spiritual nature of The Whole might have some spiritual Gestalt that brings them to understand the necessity, and also that our relationship to the planet is crucial. When the planet is seen as ‘Other’ is another place we always get into trouble.
Others have envisioned that as more of us suffer great needs, we’ll seek more community with our brothers and sisters, and from that can spring both personal and societal change, and maybe spur common themes for kicking back for justice and freedom.
Or maybe it will take visitors from other parts of the Universe or the coming of the next Planetary Prophet; she will have a hard row to hoe. ;o)
I do not look at myself or others who think like me and earn my own way as selfish, but rather, I look at people who think like you who would take from me as theives.
So that the record of history is absolutely crystal clear. That there is no alternative way, so far discovered, of improving the lot of the ordinary people that can hold a candle to the productive activities that are unleashed by a free enterprise system.
Milton Friedman
What would we take from you in thievery? And I know I’ve heard, but can’t remember, what percentage of our GDP comes from rent-seeking financial activities and produce absolutely nothing of true value.
And I can’t think of what you see in the current system that is ‘free enterprise’ when all risk is to the taxpayer, and the profit for those engaged in the transactions, and their friends manipulate the system for their benefit? (As in, the Fed and Treasury and policies that encorage/allow the same?
I think Democratic Socialism could be just the remedy for fair and just policies for all. Your belief must be that people who arren’t in competition will be ‘unproductive’. In this country, we pay surgeons up the wazoo to keep us alive; in other nations surgeons become surgeons for the love of their chosen field, not big bucks. I like that a lot better.
Well, hello there, class enemy! And how are you this nice Valentine’s Day?
Of course, I completely disagree with Milton Friedman, whose advocacy of unabashed selfishness, greed, and combining the power of the state with that of corporations(ie fascism) is responsible for the Second Great Depression.
At least Friedman had the decency to admit that he was wrong about the markets regulating themselves.
As for you considering me and those like me thieves, I really don’t care. You have no right to accumulate unlimited wealth and treat the rest of us like dirt. Sooner or later, the vast majority of people will say, “You have it, we need it, and we’re taking it.”
So, in one sense you’re right. It comes down to who has the power. Right now, those such as yourself do. I think that is wrong and must change.
So did the Egyptians and Tunisians. So, one day, will the Americans.
You have a fine understanding of Adam Smith. He feared monopoly, and wrote in The Wealth of Nations that the king, or government, had the duty to protect the people from just that.
Believe it or not, I agree with you. We have neither a free market nor a free society, and our society definitely does have features of both mercantilism and fascism, with more of the latter than of the former.
But can there EVER really be a free market, with human nature being as it is? I have my doubts. For that matter, no society can ever be free in the anarchistic sense of the word or society ceases to exist. There must be rules and laws.
The question is who should make them and how?
excellent post, OG. I would only suggest adding quotes from other US “leaders” as well, esp. congressmen of both parties. While I agree with your assessment of BHO, our country’s ills were long in the making. By only quoting BHO, I feel your worthy post turns into a simple slam. just my two cents.
Thanks though for the overall theme. Really great, as are the additional comments and contributions from firedogs.
Astrology provides an answer to your question. Jupiter (death-defying expansive optimism) is conjunct Uranus (urge to liberate via revolution) and both are square to Pluto (urge to destroy structure manifesting unconsciously through the inexorable power of will). These forces are not outside us. They reside in and are triggered in our consciousness affecting how we perceive the world and interact with it. Our feelings and ways of thinking are literally changing and those who cling to the old ways and resist the change will experience heightened levels of stress, fear, and disasters in their lives that will eventually consume and destroy them unless they go with the flow.
Think surfing. By sensing the changes in the pattern and height of the waves, we can enhance our surfing experience into a fun and thrilling action ride. Our spirits are immortal, after all. Since we understand, we have no fear and we can help the others who are lost and afraid.
The change will happen regardless of what we do, but we can help the others through the transition by explaining what’s happening. Seeking community with our brothers and sisters is a classic sign of Aquarian thinking. We are moving into a time of leaderful community where everyone is a co-leader of the community that they join.
We are on the cusp of a new age going from Pisces (mutable water) to Aquarius (fixed air) and all living things are affected by it. The transition will take several hundred years to complete.
You have nothing I want and your spirit is bankrupt. I pity you.
My response above is to provencial.
Re world hunger, I keep putting out the information hoping it will reverberate somewhere, that hemp seed is an amazing source of perfect nutrition, and one can grow one’s own patch, quite independent of corporations.
Hemp is Superfood
Hemp protein is one of the very few plant based complete protein sources. This means that it contains sufficient quantities of all 9 essential amino acids. Hemp is a great source of sulfur containing amino acids methionine and cysteine, which are necessary for cellular detoxification and the production of vital enzymes. Additionally, it is rich in branched chain amino acids that are needed for muscle growth and repair.
Almost 60% of the protein in hemp is made up of a globulin source called edestin. Most of the rest is in the form of albumin. Albumin and Edestin have a very similar molecular makeup as the protein found in the human body. Because of this common link, hemp protein is very easily absorbed into human blood and used for roles as critical as DNA repair.
Most of our world is suffering from abnormal fatty-acid ratios. Two critical forms of essential fats are the omega 6 and omega 3 varieties. Due to the heavy consumption of processed vegetable oils and grain-fed meat & dairy products most people have very high levels of omega 6. The World Health Organization recommends a 4:1 omega 6:omega 3 ratio. The typical western diet produces a ratio from 20:1 – 50:1. Abnormal ratios cause heavy increases in inflammation that lead to accelerated aging and advanced disease states.
Hemp contains the optimal ratio of 3.75:1 (omega 6:3) making it a powerful source for an anti-inflammatory diet. Hemp is also a great source of the omega-6 essential fat gamma linoleic acid (GLA).
man, that is sad, and a real sign of life in North America.
Acknowledged. I could have quoted any number of American Presidents or politicians; I just remembered Obama’s.
But I do feel betrayed by BHO, and he deserves to be slammed.