I turned on ABC’s This Week this morning to see the latest propaganda about the Occupy Wall Street protests the corporate media is spewing. There was a clip of Eric Cantor expressing his concern about the “mobs” gathering in American cities that were promoting “class warfare, ” another of Mitt Romney saying he wasn’t paying much attention because his goal was to occupy the White House. Ha ha. Another of Nancy Pelosi saying she understood the protesters and basically agreed with them. Another of Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke saying he didn’t blame them. Huh? All righty, then.
The pleasant surprise was that Christine Amanpour actually interviewed one of the OWS protesters(sorry, I forget his name and the Google didn’t help me, maybe one of my fellow Firedogs can supply it), a thirty-something white guy who didn’t look at all bedraggled.
He was sharp and articulate and refused to take any bullshit from either Amanpour or the only one on the panel who accepted her invitation to ask him questions, George Will(were the others afraid to? Probably). He said it was telling that he was the only member of the working class to appear on the mainstream media this morning(Amanpour smiled nervously), that the media had completely ignored the working class until now, and that while “politicians pander to us, in the end they always fold to the interests of the top 1%.”
He said Wall Street financiers had wrecked our economy, that the politicians had allowed them to get away with it, and were now telling the working class they had to endure austerity measures in order to recover. He said, “I cannot name one country that has used austerity measures that has succeeded in recovering. ” No one contradicted him. They couldn’t. There isn’t one.
Amanpour tried to pin him down on the OWS goals. He said the goal was economic and social justice, and suggested that anyone who objected to placing the word “social” in front of “justice” should re-read the Constitution. When George Will tried to say that the OWS movement was avoiding the political process, the guy replied that OWS was engaged in direct democracy, which is the very foundation of the political process. He said that while he personally recommended that everyone vote, that OWS was not part of any political party and that they weren’t going anywhere until their demands for social and economic justice were met. George Will’s mouth closed with an audible snap.
The guy was tough, smart, unapologetic, and stood his ground. Our ground. I am very proud of him and am kicking myself for not remembering his name. I’m terrible with names, which is why I’d make a lousy politician.
After the interview, George Will said this movement showed that the “strong intellectual tradition of the American Left” was still around, and that just like the Sixties, years of protests would simply result in another Republican victory.
Surprise #2. He got shot down by everybody else. No, this movement is different. It’s its own thing. It is something new. One talking head even intoned that the base of the Republican Party, the bourgoisie(yes he actually used that word) and rural American voters, were being squeezed by the same forces that OWS is protesting, and that if those people see that they have more in common with OWS, with the Left, that the consequences for the Republicans would be “disastrous.” He didn’t mention that the same applies to the Democrats, but that really would have been too good to be true.
Anyway, well done, sir! And, to give credit where credit is due, well-done to Christine Amanpour and ABC for giving OWS a voice this Sunday morning.
Now, I’m off to Occupy Cleveland. I know where it is thanks to the local Fox affiliate, where they interviewed one guy who said he was opposed to everything the protesters stood for, while refusing to interview any of the dozen or so protesters who surrounded him and were asking pointed questions. Meanwhile, in the background, a Cleveland cop sat in his patrol car contentedly munching on something, looking totally unconcerned.
It’s going to be a warm day. I think I’ll distribute some Gatorade.



23 Comments

I don’t watch network TV but I found something on the web that might indicate who the guy is.
I googled “amanpour occupywallst” and found this.
Is the guy’s name Jesse LaGreca?
Either way, check out the video at the link. It was great watching the Fox reporter trying to “handle” him. Interviewee: 1; interviewer: 0.
Yep- His name is Jesse LaGreca and he blogs at DailyKos under the handle of “Ministry of Truth” and people refer to him shorthand as MoT.
You can find him here: http://dailykos.com/user/MinistryOfTruth
That be him! Sorry, Jesse, and thanks, Welsh.
Excellent…thanks! I missed that..I flipped through the Sunday morning news shows and didn’t listen to any. When I crossed ABC’s Christianne Amanpour, George Will was on screen, so I kept going.
This is one of the best things about the Occupy movement: For as much as the main stream media criticizes it for not having clearly defined goals, etc., the participants know beyond a shadow of a doubt what we are doing. And we are totally committed to it.
It’s amazing that a member of OCCUPY was on a Sunday show and Jesse is really good at stating what’s what. Hat tip to Christine for having him.
And Glenn Smith had some comments up this morning on George Will and his contempt for America and Americans:
http://firedoglake.com/2011/10/09/freedom-ride/
“When George Will tried to say that the OWS movement was avoiding the political process, the guy replied that OWS was engaged in direct democracy”
I guess old George didn’t read that pesky amendment that says something about the FREEDOM to assemble.
Sorry I missed this – very important post and recommended, Ohio Gringo – we are so tired of MSM corporate goarounds that this morning when they started out with election stuff and Rom Immanuel’s smiling face that was it for me. (I did catch Left, Right and Center on the radio yesterday and was disappointed in that. Very shallow assessment, and Tony Blankley asserted the occupiers must be being paid – wierd.)
I too have been pleasantly surprised by our local CBS affiliate in Albuquerque with their coverage of Occupy Albuquerque. Even though some of it has been disappointing I cannot fault the newscast for that – they did simply report what was happening, and perhaps that will help Occupy Albuquerque get a grip. My son was down there, and indeed they do have a GA, ( if last night’s posters such as Tarheel Dem on Kevin’s last thread are reading. ) There will be a march today at 4:30 there. I think the major Occupy centers are to be praised for setting an excellent example.
Thanks!
Thanks, Kelly. I’ll have to venture over there and check him out. He was great.
Speaking of pleasant surprises:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/10/09/nancy-pelosi-wall-street-protests_n_1002289.html
Try here:
http://videocafe.crooksandliars.com/heather/jesse-lagreca-calls-out-corporate-media-ig
Yeah, saw that. I think Pelosi, a multimillionaire herself, will do everything she can to co-opt the OWS movement for the Democratic Party. If she and others like her succeed, violent revolution is guaranteed, for they will stab us in the back.
I think that she and others like her will fail. We have had enough.
You are most welcome.
Kudos for Albuquerque. Been there. Great food. Nice, down to earth people. Great balloon festival, too. And we REALLY miss the Hatch green chile.
“We do what we must do.”
–Robert E. Lee
No, I don’t agree with old REL on most things, but it’s a good quote.
Does anyone think any of the MSM will see the writing on the wall and choose to support the 99%-ers. I recognize media executives all live within ivory towers . . . . but I would think the first one to become a voice for the people might benefit more than imaginable. I understand that ‘new’ media–internet, tweet, FB, etc.–are successfully getting the message out, but again, when we are dealing with a culture that only understands greed, or at least profit, like many police dramas on the teevee machine, the DA is always offering a deal to the first one to squeal. If a major media outlet found that pension fund managers, etc. might consider ‘moving investments’ based on social demands, would that outlet not stand to hit the competitors in the pocketbook? Just asking?
As someone who is done with the OS, but still lurks and reads a lot of rec-listed diaries, I have to say that MoT is one of the good guys there. He is really smart and I hope his “15 minutes” lasts considerably longer. I’m guessing that it probably will.
George Will doesn’t give a crap that the political process is broken; after all, it’s broken in his favor.
As Zonker would say “Far Freaking Out.” He was good, for sure.
And recd’
Is that cracks appearing in the Overton Window panes…? ;-)
he was great there and also great when fox news interviewed him on the street. VERY articulate and thinks well on his feet.
I don’t think so. She’s too ticked at Obama for undercutting the Party at every fricking turn by pretty much forcing the Dems to choose between supporting him and supporting the basic underpinnings of the party. There are signs that this is actually forcing Obama to at least fake a populist pose as he’s come to the realization that he has to do something to get his numbers back up or the party will of necessity be running against him next year (assuming he doesn’t do an LBJ).
That’s the sound of the windowframes being shifted away from the far right for a change. :-)