On my way to work this morning, I heard this story on NPR. Starting in January, the Obama Administration is cutting food stamp benefits for millions of Americans by $50 per month because they are lowering the credit they give recipients for paying utility bills because those rates have gone down due to lower natural gas prices. Then came the kicker, the Ohio Department of Job and Family Services(JFS), which administers the program in my state, had appealed the decision to the US Department of Agriculture and been turned down flat.
Just to make sure I could believe my ears, I used the Google a little bit on my lunch hour. Lo and behold, from the Toledo Blade and the Associated Press:
Some Ohio families will lose $50 per month in food stamp benefits in 2013, leaving food banks bracing for higher demand.
The cut won’t apply to all 869,000 households(in Ohio alone) receiving food stamps, only to some homeowners and renters who have a “standard utility allowance” deducted when determining whether they are eligible for food stamps, The Blade reported.
Those families will see a cut in benefits because of how the government calculates utility expenses. A mild winter in 2011 and lower natural gas prices led to a decrease in aid.
The thinking is that lower utility expenses meant families had more money for food.
Ohio’s Department of Job and Family Services tried to stop the change but the appeal was denied by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees the food stamp program.
“This is a federal issue,” said Joel Potts, executive director of the job and family services directors’ association. “We just think it is going to be really hard on families and individuals. They will see significantly less money starting in January.”
The state appealed the change because many families that will see a reduction don’t even use natural gas to heat their homes and instead use fuel oil or propane and didn’t see a cost savings, said Ben Johnson, a spokesman for the job and family services department.
Plus, many people still rely on food assistance at a time when the nation is coming out of the recession, he said.
Ben Johnson is the head of the Ohio JFS, appointed by Republican Governor John Kasich. So, the Obama Administration cuts food stamp benefits for millions of Americans and a whole boatload of Ohioans, the Kasich Administration objects on their behalf, and is rebuffed by the Democratic administration.
Less than a week after Obama’s re-election, which was made possible by many of the working poor who turned out to vote for him by the millions. The same working poor who he is now screwing at the first opportunity.
Governor Kasich himself, to my knowledge, has not spoken about this, and he may have had some good conservative business reasons for opposing the cut. For example, grocery stores, farmers’ markets and others who accept food stamps will be hurt and less money will be flowing into the economy. But that doesn’t matter. What matters is that the the administration of a Republican governor tried to do what was right for hundreds of thousands of its citizens and was shot down by the Democratic federal administration who, as we’ve been told for a couple of years now by a legion of Democratic Party apologists, we simply had to vote for in order to keep the Big Bad Scary Crazy Republican out of the White House and thereby save civilization as we know it.
Natural gas prices drop, so the Obama Administration leaps at the chance to slash food stamps by 36%. I say that because the average food stamp grant is a measly $138 per month. As Obama himself said in the debates, “Do the math.” 50 bucks can buy a few family meals by a smart shopper, and most food stamp recipients are by necessity. It’s definitely a hit in the pocketbook.
Worse than that, it’s just downright mean.
No doubt Obama supporters will claim it’s a necessary part of some Grand Bargain or that their demigod is playing umpti-dimensional chess again. Balderdash! Obama could stop this move with the stroke of a pen.
But he won’t. Because he’s not some progressive whose going to show his true colors now that he can’t run for re-election again. He’s just a fascist bastard who really doesn’t care about the working class. He’s also going to hurt and piss off a whole lot of people.
Even John Kasich won’t go that far. I think that says something important. Do you?



37 Comments

Excellent diary entry, my Barbarian!
Highly rec’d!
Push-back from Obama voters will occur any minute now, just you wait and see.
OK, maybe not. But it’s not so bad because Romney would have cut food stamps with a sneer on his face. A despicable sneer, mind you.
Come to think of it, if Romney tried the same thing, there would no doubt be push-back. Go figure.
One day the ax just fell- Bob Dylan
It did, by several meals a month.
Kasich has more on the ball than Washington ?? WTF ??
This will save a few million dollars, chump change to the federal budget. Obama is just plain cruel.
Apparently so. Whatever he is, he’s not stupid. After his attempt to destroy public sector unions was shot down in flames by the Ohio voters and the Republican Legislature announced plans to destroy them one at a time, starting with the teachers, Kasich was asked at a press conference whether he backed the new strategy and would sign such a law.
He replied, “No. The people of Ohio have spoken and I heard them.” The new union-busting legislation died then and there. Then he proposed taxing natural gas extraction at 10%, to the howls of dismay from the Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute. He signed a law that limited private water usage of the Lake Erie Basin; even if it was inadequate, it was still a limit. Property rights fanatics screamed.
He pushed to get farmers’ markets to accept food stamps. He pushed the Collateral Sanctions law through the state legislature, whereby employers no longer have the right to see whether or not a person has a non-violent felony conviction for something that has nothing to do with the job in an attempt to get ex-cons back into the workforce. It even lets some of them get their drivers licenses back. The law and order types went into apoplexy.
During the last election campaign, Romney and Ryan made oodles of trips to Ohio. Kasich appeared with them maybe three times.
I admit I don’t always understand just where Kasich is coming from. But he’s not stupid and he’s not crazy, which is more than I can say for a lot of politicians and most Republicans.
{{{{ssshhhh…he’s an Eisenhower republican…}}}}
It’s possible. He sure acts like one sometimes.
Look on the bright side, it cldve been worse bcz it cldve been Romney taking the foodstamps from them. They voted for Obama now they need to suck it up and take it from Obama. The time for whining about the president being a republican is over, if you voted for him you voted for things like this. And from I hear he is just getting started. lol
Exactly. It’s like a penny on the sidewalk to the federal budget, so inconsequential that nobody stops to pick it up
Financial considerations are obviously not the motivation here.
Heartless.
Recommended.
Has the ‘real work” begun yet?
Has there been a Food Stamp appropriation from Congress for FY2013? Last I remembered hearing was that the Farm Bill, which includes Food Stamps, failed to pass because the GOP caucus in the House wanted to cut Food Stamps.
X 2
…”just you wait and see” …indeed…go figure
Obama was just re-elected last week but we will now see this is all “Back To The Future” now again as we jump back to 2009 with Obama again in the WH.
Those who wanted Obama back in the WH despite all the very good political reasons for not doing that were rubbing in Obama’s “win” last week.
Yet already this week some ( many? ) of these very same people are now bemoaning Obama’s WH 2.0 signaled intents or desires.
It is like these people buy The Stupid from Sams Club in bulk at discount…sheesh…too late now…suck it up suckers.
Obama got what Obama wanted…being in the WH until 2017 — you got/now will get what you have coming with Obama in the WH until 2017.
Expect Obama to go Full Bill Clinton after Jan.2017 which means 2013-2016 will be lined up to serve Obama’s post WH retirement ease and comfort with Those Who Count And Matter. Or you think not? That is noble of you…
So 2009-2012 was just not enough of a Obama cautionary tale?
OB…thank you … recommended
Thanks for this Ohio Barbarian.
It makes my blood boil, but it is an important example of how much of a fasacist Obama is; and an important lesson in the Grand Canyon sized gulf between his rhetoric and what he actually works to accomplish.
I honestly have ZERO sympathy for the marks who thought that Obama would really get all progressivy in his 2nd term. They got rolled, and they deserved to get rolled…….unfortunately we all get rolled as a consequence.
“Let them eat cake.” Yeah, how did that work out?
Obama campaigned on “asking the very wealthy to pay a little more” but emphasized that no one else would see a tax increase.
Isn’t cutting food stamp benefits a tax increase on the very poorest Americans? “Sorry you and your family are starving, old chum, but I had to show good faith in my “fiscal cliff” negotiations.” Unconscionable.
They’ve already cut them horribly for homeless people. Even though the actual existing law qualifies most homeless (here in Massachusetts) for about $200 per month in Food Stamps, the homeless have been cut back to $60 or $70 per month (it varies month to month). The Food Stamp workers tell them that the reason that they are being starved out is that they do not pay rent. They are losing lots of weight, and dropping dead like flies around here.
The fallacy of this Obama program is this: Homeless people need just as much food to live as regular people. And $200 dollars sure doesn’t do it, but it comes closer than $60 or $70.
I consider the actions of the Food Stamp workers in these cases to be Hate Crimes. I think when the client dies after being cut back or cut off, that the Food Stamp worker should be charged in the death.
That’s stupid. It’s not the food stamp worker’s fault. They don’t have the latitude to determine the rules and you are completely wrong in what you say. Blame Obama. Don’t blame the innocent workers.
On the contrary: The Food Stamp worker is being paid to protect and serve the Food Stamp recipient: When the Food Stamp worker instead decides to take part in what is arguably the Premeditated Murder of the Food Stamp recipient, that person is committing a crime.
The Food Stamp workers know how many of their clients are dropping dead from the starvation regime, yet they continue to impose it.
I feel better and more justified in NOT voting for this corporate-fascist shitbag with every passing day.
Lesser evil? Give me a fucking break. I have zero respect or even sympathy left for Democrats who continue to misplace their trust in this glad handing, grinning reptile.
I understand exactly how you feel. That is why I voted for the Socialist on the ballot in Ohio. With not quite 3000 other Ohioans who did the same thing, and another 17,000 or so who voted for the Green. At least our consciences are clear.
I think they had an extension bill or whatever you call it, to keep things like that at the status quo, for a year.
No, no, NO! Wait. I phrased that badly. Sorry, I want you to see the thought process, or lack thereof :), but that’s a good question.
I don’t know.
All I know is what I heard on the radio and read in a few newspaper websites. If I should have engaged in more research, well, I didn’t, that’s all. Maybe I should have.
Maybe not, too. I must presume that the savings to the US Department of Agriculture resulting from this cut in food stamp payouts will come from an already funded budget or from a projected one. Bureaucracies, public AND private, do this all of the time.
Politically and morally though, none of that matters. The FACT is that millions of Americans will have less disposable income, for FOOD, in January 2013 than they do now.
That is inexcusable. That’s wrong. That’s EVIL. As in lesser of two of.
That’s my point.
Ah. An existing budget, then. Thanks.
Interesting post. I wonder if the cut will really be $50 off of $136 benefit, that’s an awful lot. I hope not. Some families receive several hundred dollars in benefits.
Last winter, for sure it was warm, and people did save money on heat, ie., if they had natural gas. If they had fuel oil or propane they might have had a contract, though. I used to live in the northeast for several years, and there are a lot of older homes there with fuel oil systems, and people got locked into contracts. When the commodities price spikes hit in 2008, I remember reading about people in the northeast, sounding almost desperate, and wood stoves becoming popular.
I do think Obama is doing this for the sake of triangulation, probably. The senate farm bill has cuts in food stamps, too, but not nearly as big as House versions. I don’t know how this particular development fits in with that. I figure he wants to make sure he has “cred” on deficit reduction to fend off much bigger cuts. I guess. I wonder if it will be the same in all states.
Thanks, man, or woman for I don’t know. Anyway, I appreciate your comment. The years, though…can this screwed up system of ours survive until 2017?
Probably. Our PTB are miracle-workers at short-term delay. But their system is fundamentally flawed. It simply can’t survive for another few decades. It might last one, though. I think that’s about it.
Hey. I got the Electoral College right months ago. Whatever. This situation in America just can’t last long in historical terms. Because it doesn’t frickin’ WORK!
Let them eat Lilly Ledbetter.
Now now, that’s just not fair. Those food stamp workers are just trying to survive by doing their jobs. Don’t blame them.
They are working class, too, and worthy of respect as a group of people. They usually have families to support. None of them should ever have to choose between keeping their families provided for with food, clothing and shelter, and their consciences.
Only people who have the luxury of living more or less independently wealthy would mount a moral high horse by even implying that food stamp workers are somehow responsible for a decision whose ultimate responsibility is that of the President of the United States.
Are you my class enemy, or are you just on crack, normanb?
LOL! DiE loved that one.
Heh. A dry “heh” at that. You are right, of course, but I still fear the future. Things will get worse for awhile, and then probably really bad before they get better.
I have faith things WILL eventually get better. If I’m really, really lucky I just might live to see it.
The D-Bots are really irrelevant in the long term.
STEEE-Rike! GOAL! Touchdown!
Little Doggie, that comment won the World Series, Stanley Cup, and Super Bowl of Completely Precisely Accurate Comment Awards in the blogosphere for 2012.
Congratulations.
Umptidimensional political chess in the top tier of the political pyramid of power can never justify taking away the money to buy FOOD from American citizens.
Period.
I don’t know how to talk to anyone who finds cutting a food budget negotiable when there is absolutely no need to do so. Political games in the richest country the world has ever seen do not count.
In my judgment.
I’m not implying that the Food Stamp workers are responsible for the nationwide decision to eliminate the lives of lots of homeless people across the country.
But like deported Concentration Camp guard Demjanjuk, they had to make the final decision to either issue the orders that would ultimately kill their clients, or to refuse to follow the orders that would kill their clients.
After the deaths stop, I will not be so adamant that they be charged. While the Murder spree continues, all of the co-conspirators should be charged, in my opinion.