In just a few hours from now, a travesty will happen. President Barack Obama will publicly begin his second term by taking the oath of office while placing his hand on the Reverend Martin Luther King’s Bible, and on the holiday that was set aside to honor the latter to boot. If such a thing as sympathetic magic or a wrathful God really existed, either the Bible or the President would burst into flame.

President Obama was inaugurated today on Martin Luther King, Jr Day
Dr King, you see, wasn’t just about achieving legal equality for his people, the black Americans, or Negros as they were called when he was alive. He was also all about eradicating poverty for all Americans, and, by extension, all human beings everywhere. Barack Obama does not share that vision, not at all, and chances are he won’t even mention it as he symbolically cloaks himself as the realization of Dr King’s dream.
Anyone who paid attention to the 2012 presidential election campaign, and anyone who turned on a TV in the “battleground” states knows that Obama and his campaign propagandists could hardly utter a sentence without mentioning the “middle class,” but “the poor” and “poverty” were seldom if ever mentioned. Dr King would have been horrified(all quotes from hereon are in the words of Dr King):
Middle-class values stress the importance of career and money. These were not the values which led to the civil rights movement; these are not the values which lead to positive social transformation.
What were these values? Every American schoolchild should know that legal equality was one of them, but economic equality was an equally important goal for Martin Luther King. For that reason, he was no fan of capitalism:
The profit motive, when it is the sole basis of an economic system, encourages a cutthroat competition and selfish ambition that inspires men to be more concerned about making a living than making a life.
The profit motive is the sole basis of our dominant economic system, and Barack Obama has proven himself to be one of its biggest supporters. He’s said that Americans should celebrate wealth, and compared the financial success of his investment banker friends on Wall Street to that of baseball players in an effort to make their obscene riches appear to be legitimate. Dr King would never have said any such thing.
Dr King knew that the society in which he lived was unjust, and he also knew that only a revolution could make it just:
The dispossessed of this nation — the poor, both white and Negro — live in a cruelly unjust society. They must organize a revolution against that injustice, not against the lives of the persons who are their fellow citizens, but against the structures through which the society is refusing to take means which have been called for, and which are at hand, to lift the load of poverty.
What did Dr King mean by “revolution?”
A social movement that only moves people is merely a revolt. A movement that changes both people and institutions is a revolution.
A movement that changes both people and institutions. It’s pretty clear to me that Obama has absolutely no intention of changing our institutions, and certainly not of doing anything to actually eradicate poverty. Hell, he doesn’t even mention it, and I’m willing to bet he will do no such thing in a few short hours during his second inaugural speech.
Dr King was all for Lyndon Johnson’s War on Poverty, but totally against LBJ’s war in Vietnam. He saw military spending as inherently opposed to spending on those things that would actually help the American people:
A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual doom.
What, I wonder, would Dr King say about the wars Barack Obama has continued, the drone strikes he has authorized, the assassinations he has ordered, and the system of torture that he has institutionalized? Perhaps something like this, just substitute the county of your choice for “Vietnam:”
Somehow this madness must cease. We must stop now. I speak as a child of God and brother to the suffering poor of Vietnam. I speak for those whose land is being laid waste, whose homes are being destroyed, whose culture is being subverted. I speak for the poor in America who are paying the double price of smashed hopes at home and death and corruption in Vietnam. I speak as a citizen of the world, for the world as it stands aghast at the path we have taken. I speak as an American to the leaders of my own nation. The great initiative in this war is ours. The initiative to stop it must be ours.
Or this:
We in the West must bear in mind that the poor countries are poor primarily because we have exploited them through political or economic colonialism.
Or this:
It is a sad fact that because of comfort, complacency, a morbid fear of communism, and our proneness to adjust to injustice, the Western nations that initiated so much of the revolutionary spirit of the modern world have now become the arch-anti-revolutionaries.
Substitute “terrorism” for “communism” and Dr King’s words are every bit as timely in respect to the Middle East of today as they were to the Southeast Asia of the 1960′s.
And, later today, a proven corporatist who has greatly assisted the wealthiest among us in accruing even more wealth at the expense of the rest of the American people will cloak himself in the righteousness of Dr Martin Luther King’s memory as he’s sworn into a second term to do more of the same.
Martin Luther King would rise out of his grave and give Barack Obama a righteous, blistering, verbal slap in the face if he could, but he can’t, while this aging barbarian would give him a good rhetorical slap in the face from the crowd if I could, but I can’t, so I humbly offer this diatribe from my keyboard.
Dr King, there are some of us who really do remember what you stood for, fought for, and died for. I am truly sorry that your memory is being exploited by a man who is in many ways the antithesis of your dream.
cross-posted on Voices on the Square
Public domain photo by Dick DeMarsico, New York World-Telegram and the Sun Newspaper Photograph Collection



183 Comments

“The institutionalization of tyranny is the achievement of the Bush/Obama regimes of the 21st century. This, and not the Great Society, is the decisive break from the American tradition.
The Bush Republicans demolished almost all of the constitutional protections of liberty erected by the Founding Fathers.
The Obama Democrats codified Bush’s dismantling of the Constitution and removed the protection afforded to citizens from being murdered by the government without due process.
One decade was time enough for two presidents to make Americans the least free people of any developed country, indeed, perhaps of any country. In what other country or countries does the chief executive officer have the right to murder citizens without due process?”
Paul Craig Roberts …http://www.paulcraigroberts.org
The Roman Empire. Oh, wait…
What would really be cool is if that hideous Maoist MLK monument crumbled to dust at the very same moment!!!
The sad part of all this is that most Black folks are so used to getting crumbs, they can’t see what damage Obama has done and will continue to do to the Black community. Too bad you can’t survive on symbolism alone.
Obama and his Wall St minions are determined to savage the New Deal aided and abetted by buffoons like Al Sharpton, more concerned about protesting action figures that “trivialize” slavery than protesting against a Black prez determined to create a new feudal order. If, that’s not slavery, I don’t know what is.
If such a thing as sympathetic magic or a wrathful God really existed, either the Bible or the President would burst into flame.” Amen. A fine piece, Rec’d
MLK: I’ve got a dream.
BHO: I’ve got a drone.
@ADC: “What would really be cool is if that hideous Maoist MLK monument crumbled to dust at the very same moment!!!”
Heh! A statue built by a Chinese sculptor, as if there weren’t any black American sculptors available, who graciously gifted MLK with epicanthic folds. At least Obama was consistent; he outsourced for the labor.
I can see Dr King correcting President Obama using those very words.
Good job, Mr Barbarian. Is your first name really Ohio? :)
It’s going to be a nerve-wracking and exhausting next four years as Obama turns down no opportunity to back up the bus and run over us little people again. And again. And again.
Not to mention a nauseating experience as he and his minions tell us we have to sacrifice our standard of living more and more so their corporate masters can steal more and more of our collective wealth.
Meanwhile, the poor will continue to be castigated for being lazy “takers” who refuse to work for a pittance at whatever hours are set by Big Business, and programs such as food stamps will be cut to give the poor “incentive” to get off their collectively lazy bums. That’s already started, but I digress. More on that another day.
Got some links to those quotes?
King is best when one can see how he leads up to his best lines.
I’m not much of a linky person. They were pretty easy to find, though.
“I used the Google.”
–George Bush the Lesser
Not only the Black people who are fit for no more than crumbs. Social Security offices in this state are having hours of operation significantly cut, even though funds for their operation come from the SS trust.
WI Republicans, fully in charge of the state (now ranked 42 in job creation), are going to try to force 4 job searches a week by the unemployed instead of two, to remain qualified to receive UC benefits.
I doubt Martin Luther King would have seen this as a “travesty.”
I look forward to that other day. Unfortunately, there is much to digress about. :(
A good Martin Luther King Day to all, and thanks for the post, Barbarian.
I’m going to turn your wish that Dr. King’s bible would burst into flames to suggest that there may be a flash of light when Obomba lays his hand on it, and he is suffused with the need to have justice, truth and love as his guiding principles over the next four years and beyond.
When my old ‘God in Pencil’ post popped up again yesterday, Mr. wendydavis read it, and said the Lowell quote I used could have come from MLK.
Once to every man and nation
Comes the moment to decide,
In the strife of truth and falsehood,
For the good or evil side;
Some great cause, God’s new Messiah,
Off’ring each the bloom or blight,
And the choice goes by forever
Twixt that darkness and that light.
Though the cause of evil prosper,
Yet ’tis truth alone is strong;
Though her portion be the scaffold,
And upon the throne be wrong:
Yet that scaffold sways the future,
And behind the dim unknown,
Standeth God within the shadow
Keeping watch above his own.
~ James Russel Lowell
Good comments and quotes everyone. To oldgold: it’s not hard to extrapolate from King’s many quotes and speeches that principles and truth would trump color every time. He longed for the day that would matter more than the color of a person’s skin, remember?
Rec’d in sorrow over what this nation’s government and leaders have become. Soon we’ll all need to pick a side.
Can you see it brother, the mockery, the contempt? You have barely cast a stone of indignation at their mountain of deceit and fraudulence.
King, the “black commie”, succeeded by BS BS, oh, yes brother, blasphemes before Gawd hisself, WE ARE FRAUDSTERS.
Maybe even giving people the name of the speech or book, then. If they’re important enough to quote, they’re probably important enough to cite.
Of course you do! Obama’s never done anything you didn’t praise to the skies. Here’s some food for thought:
“To accept passively an unjust system is to cooperate with that system; thereby the oppressed become as evil as the oppressor.” And,
“The Darwinian concept of the survival of the fittest has been substituted by a philosophy of the survival of the slickest.”
–Martin Luther King
Your man is slick; I’ll grant him that. Now run along back to watch your hero’s coronation like a good boy or I will say “Nee!” to you.
I thought those quotes stood on their own. I just found lists of them using the Google, though HuffPo has some in a bit more context. Here’s a link for you, Peterr:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/01/16/10-martin-luther-king-quo_n_809701.html
Truth God’s scaffold, eh? Well, at the awful degeneration of these crown performances Gawd appears to have abandoned all hope.
Oh, I see it all right. The Ultimate Con Artist and Puller of Wool Over the Eyes of Millions uses the memory of one of the greatest Americans ever born as a prop, a gimmick, and a sales pitch.
That’s what I was trying to get at with the whole bursting into flames bit.
Thanks, Wendy. Don’t be too hard on oldgold, though. Mouth. Silver Foot. Born with, you know. o;
On second thought, g’head! Yes, that’s more in my character :D
Can’t speak for God as I’m a casual atheist, but as to the metaphor implied in that designation, I see it more as the scaffold being waiting for us to:
‘Rise like lions’ from our slumber, etc. As in: time to choose a side. When I was a young un, I read a book in which there was a long section about some Rabbis debating on argued translations of a Torah passage, and whether ‘shalt’ or ‘mayst’ was what God had meant.
But, lol! It seems like you may believe that God watches over these coronations, as if She doesn’t have more interesting stuff to do, like peek into star-forming clusters and stuff. ;o)
And that’s when change will begin. But only after those in the upper crust – the gated communities of foreign SUVs are forced to live the kind of hellish life the US has imposed on a good part of the world since it’s inception.
Remember the average German was very OK with Hitler and his policies as long as their life style improved or was not impacted.
Oh, no, brother. It’s a confederacy of con artists and they are awful, horrifying. Hope! Change! Racism is Dead!
They murdered King. The blackface is the only thing they needed on their puppet.
Dinnae mean to be hard on him, just reckoned I might help him recall Dr. Kings apparent thinking on the subject. I wanted to find a quote of his on education I vaguely remember so that I could bring this link from my post yesterday, so we’d think about this President’s burgeoning sellout of public education, and how it’s hurting the poor (students and teachers alike) in the inner cities and people of color disproportionately.
The things that Obomba’s both done, and in many more cases *not done* are why my feelings range from anger to sadness.
Obama would not be as nearly as effective in his role as false prophet if not for his legions of enablers. Chief among them are the various “progressive” congressional caucuses, mainstream liberal groups and mainstream media that have given a resounding thumbs up to his agenda of socialism for the wealthy and hell on earth for the rest of us. Congratualions on a second term Citizen Obama, may your plans of death and destruction be thwarted at every turn.
No argument here, brother. Obama and Hillary were the perfect foils, were they not? If you criticize the former, you must be a racist; if you criticize the latter, you must be a misogynist.
And all the while both of them dance to their puppet masters’ strings and are most well-rewarded. Slick. Real slick.
The family of Martin Luther King does not seem to agree with you.
Yeppers. This is the truth. It will take having their life styles flushed down the commode of hell before they see the light.
For them to experience the kind of atrocities we (the US) have give the world these last few hundred years. Only then will their be a willingness to see the truth.
“Drone”on brother! There is a special place in hell for Obama and when the fuck is he planning to return his Nobel?
I can’t argue with that, either. Well said.
I don’t suppose She’ll be lonely after her He-Gawd goes to Hell!
Doesn’t mean much coming from a family that has been eating itself alive squabbling over marketing rights to their father’s image. I’m willing to bet, MLK wouldn’t approve of his own children had he known what they’ve been up to these last 20 years. Waste of space.
Obama: Herbert Hoover does black face.
If they really believe that, then I submit they should look past the color of Obama’s skin and see through the veil of his flowery rhetoric, as I believe their ancestor would have done.
But you know; they may just be acting graciously. Besides, if they came out publicly with any misgivings that they may have, they would be pilloried by the M$M as acting pettily. They probably also have much more to lose than the likes of me.
Still, I DID make a promise to you.
NEE!
And if you keep coming back, I will continue to taunt you.
I see your Hoover and raise you one.
“Martin Luther King is the most notorious liar in the country.”
–J. Edgar Hoover
“What a maroon.”
–Bugs Bunny
Hey I gotta give old gold credit for coming to this post and offering a few objections. Give him a break. :)
I on the other hand, agree with your very well stated post and am happy to recommend.
Mr. Obama is a pale comparison to MLK.
They have exhausted farce, no? Or maybe soon they can have Ahmad-dinnah-jacket’s grandson for pwesident. I guess those are our enduring choices: ever degenerating tragedy or ever solidifying farce.
It seems kind of blasphemous to use Ariana’s ATM to get Dr. King’s speeches. Here are a couple of sites that don’t contribute to the blonde hypocrite’s cash stash:
http://www.mlkonline.net/speeches.html
http://www.juancole.com/2013/01/pleading-preserve-amendment.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+juancole%2Fymbn+(Informed+Comment)
The speech Dr. King gave at Riverside Church in 1967 was probably the one that signed his death warrant. In it, he eschews working solely for civil rights and states that his main concern is to get economic justice for all the people in America who are suffering and to put the strength of his movement into ending the war in Vietnam so that money could be used to fight the war against people starving right here in this country, regardless of their race or ethnicity.
RIP, Martin. We ain’t even halfway up the mountain yet.
Yes, I’ve seen you write that many times, cmaukonen. And yes: I know the quotes akin to ‘The truth comes not to the man whose fortunes are dependent on his *not* understanding it’.
But you see only material privation as *the* tipping point to massive resistance, and I won’t even try to bring all the ones I consider part of the mix and have written about.
But I do have some daffy faith in what the global movements and awakenings are bringing in terms of demands for freedom, decolonization, ending neoliberal capitalism, crop monocultures and GMOs, the raping of the planet’s resources for profit and leaving its soil and water poisoned, including carbon climate change, etc. I’m seeing the possibilities that more and more people around the globe are feeling the heartbeat of the drum, and are responding.
I don’t even mind if you think your vision is clearer than mine; you remind me all the time of that. ;o)
And how about this: The NBA and the stations that carry their games are actually saying that, in honor of Dr. King, there will be nonstop basketball from 11:30 until after midnight.
Now if that isn’t a racist statement, I don’t know what is.
Bob Dylan – “It’s hard to be angry when you are fat and happy.”
Definition of “taunt”:
Gosh, I thought this was a forum for civil discussion. Are people allowed to express opinions that are different from yours?
Forgive them Father they Know not what they are doing !
I’d like to think “jibe” is what Ohiobarbarian meant, OG, at least that’s how I took it.
That should be “jive.”
http://www.zimbio.com/Black+History+Month/articles/265/Malcolm+X+House+Negro+vs+Field+Negro
Somebody’s gotta say it..
Oh no. That particular apocalypse will be the last change to come. It is exactly that possibility their ongoing revolution is engaged to exterminate. The world will end before these monsters allow their citadels to be breached.
Oh no, Hebraic fascism will be much more entertaining than Germanic.
How was I uncivil? It’s not like I did a Kelly Canfield and called you a lying piece of shit or anything like that. Or a Mark from Ireland and called you white trash.
All I did was invoke a bit of Monty Python and say “NEE!” to you. I didn’t even command you to get me a shrubbery. Touchy, touchy. Sheesh.
Lighten up. Taking Monty Python references seriously can have deleterious side effects on you health.
I welcome the addition of Malcolm X to this thread. Now there was a man with some fire in his belly. I always respected him.
One of my favorite speeches by Malcolm X. And oh so true.
Gagh! I just watched the mercifully short speech. And sure enough, our Fascist President wrapped himself up in the civil rights movements.
Didn’t say what he was actually going to DO about anything, though. And he didn’t mention “the poor” or “poverty.” Not once. Of course, he didn’t mention drones, either. He DID mention American Exceptionalism.
Ronald Reagan must be so proud of his protege’. Barf.
Thank God for Kentucky Bourbon and BEER.
Proud of his house negro.
Ok, brother.
I’m not sure what you’re driving at. I respected Malcolm X. I respected Dr King. I did NOT agree with either one of them all of the time.
I’m not sure what you are calling “religious lunacy,” either. And I really don’t get the two gay pastors thing.
I’m a simple barbarian. If you want me to understand, you need to hit me over the head with a rhetorical club sometimes.
Thanks for the pic, FDL mod.
Thanks for this post. I watched the pageantry for a minute, which is about all I could take of what looks just like a coronation. We do love our oligarchs, don’t we. And we love to tell ourselves pretty stories about them to take away the sting; baby-killing day isn’t until tomorrow, after all.
Here is brother Cornel West talking about Obama putting his hand on that bible (I know, as wendydavis pointed out, West voted for Obama again, but this is still worth listening to).
And here is Lupe Fiasco either leaving or being removed from an inauguration event after being critical of the king.
That is false.
Here is the speech.
Here are two quotes from the speech that explicitly mention “poverty.”
and,
Is there any chance ever that Barry would even approach sounding like this
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nw-X9wAVI
And thank you for saying it. It is important to bear in mind who Barack Obama a/k/a Barry Soetero serves.
“The few who understand the system, will either be so interested from it’s profits or so dependant on it’s favors, that there will be no opposition from that class.” — Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws” — Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild
This reply was intended to magilla. Sorry. I am new to this site.
All right. I stand corrected. I didn’t hear it, that’s all. My bad.
Even though the first comment is a bald-faced lie and the second is, also a bald-faced lie coming from Obama. Freedom IS reserved for the lucky in this country.
He still didn’t mention ERADICATING poverty now, did he? Even LBJ did better than that.
That was quick on the draw, though, OG. I salute you.
You have to click on “Reply” under the comment to reply to the particular quote. Don’t worry about it. Good Rothschild quote, too.
Dunno if your iconoclastic schitck is simply reflexive or you’ve misinterpreted what I said (or hoped I’d said…er…meant, lol), but I simply meant that we all make our choices everyday. And no, I don’t want to get into a discussion of ‘how free it really ain’t’ stuff.
I welcome the spiritual nature of the Idle resistance movement, and think that many of the ‘fat and rich’ or whomever are beginning to have some nagging awareness that shopping and owning shit…don’t fill the holes in their lives, and may start to hear the music and drumbeats that are in the air.
That’s all. ;o)
I have never experienced anyone in “addiction” where this awareness has stopped the addiction. Never !
Only when it impacts their lifes to the point of losing neraly everything, does this come into play.
Thanks for the tip. I clicked on reply and was taken to log in the first time (magilla reply) and thought I was still in reply. Log in took me to a basic reply. It is the second click after the log in that works. Thank you for your fine reflection on this distressingly ironic day.
Remember, I don’t chose one crazy earthling over another. All that Logos has driven your species insane.
Trauma is the nightsoil of evil:
That’s not Brother X but you must see the lunacy? That’s a good religion? Fark.
No slam against gays, brother, only sardonic mirth at the desperation of the masters’ farce.
I have renounced clubs (wink-wink).
Thanks, HFC. Gotta love Cornel West; he said it well, even if he DID vote for the SOB, and I mean that literally. As for Lupe Fiasco, well, that’s Fascism for you now, isn’t it? Those guys LOOKED like Secret Service, anyway.
“We are true to our creed when a little girl born into the bleakest poverty knows that she has the same chance to succeed as anybody else ………… ”
Rubbish! Equal opportunity is a myth thanks to Obama’s corporatist policies. It’s even worse when he mentions poverty to repeat
such rubbish.
The mendacity! it burns.
Thank you for posting my favorite hymn from my childhood. I thought everyone believed the words, which were haunting when sung to the tune of an old Welsh hymn.
Ah. Now I know. I see you.
Brother.
In solidarity,
The Horde
Sister Davis, that’s not my schtick. Brother mauk’s philistine realism is not too contagious among the indigenous, is it?
Touche’. How can the opportunity for a little girl born in East Cleveland be the same as one born in Marin County, California? Or the Hamptons on Long Island?
Ain’t happenin’. Thanks for the dose of sorely needed realism.
What follows, uproarious laughter or regicide (or both?)
Thanks. For the record, I was far more civil with him than he and his ilk are with others who dare to disagree with them on their blogs and threads, if I do say so myself, and I do say so.
I don’t mind being disagreed with; in fact, I welcome it, but I have this annoying habit(to some) of demanding the same in return.
What’s different between BHO and MLK is that neither Obama nor his parents endured anything in common with what King endured. Or most of my neighbors, for that matter. That’s just a fact. Obama pretending to be a black American is just that: pretense. It should be offensive to black Americans. It is to me, and I’m not even black.
How can I phrase this politely? Let’s see…
Okay. I do not share his version of reality, and believe we may inhabit different portions of the multiverse. (I will try not to add that I’m glad of that fact.) I’ll avoid speaking Hippie talk about what we create by always going with Teh Bitter. I know you thank me for that. ;o)
@ Old Soul; you’re welcome; I dinnae know it was made into a Welsh hymn. I’m not Catholic, nor am I a Believer, but since some recent duress has caused my brain and soul to break apart a bit, there are few pieces of music I can abide. Oddly, some of them are Gregorian chants. How strange is that? lol!
Multiverse? Michael Moorcock? Damn that Elric and Stormbringer, anyway. They’re never around when we need them. No better than the Spanish Inquisition, lol.
I’d love to hear Moonglum’s take on all this.
Or, maybe, that’s why Obama’s speech was so short. The Secret Service was afraid the albino Melnibonean would put in an appearance! It all makes sense, now.
It was a wonderful expression of democracy, today’s Inaugural.
President Obama continued to represent the broad beliefs that Dr. King and his SCLC pressed for.
He is indeed Dr. King’s dream — a man who is judged for his character instead of by the color of his skin.
And I do pity the writer of this piece. Not so much a “barbarian” as a silly person, missing the flow of what is happening.
Great post, Ohio Barbarian.
Pretense ? You are a lot kinder than I am. I would have suggest the end result of a cow grazing for hours.
I may vomit….excuse me. Involuntary protein spill.
Well, what can I say? Clearly my Viking ancestors have been in the oh-so-polite civilized lands longer than your Finnish ones. Guess it’s rubbed off more.
I can’t disagree with you on this point, though. Haakaa-paale!
Ohio’s got the flow right–we’re all just circling the drain, unless of course you are Barack and family, Clinton and Family, Goldman Sachs, Timmy Geithner, Erskine Bowles, Nancy Pelosi, DiFi, Big Oil, Big Pharma and all the other elitist crooks controlling the country.
Well your ancestors did discover the new world first. Then decided it wasn’t worth discovering.
Where as mine came from the Balkans and stayed.
In Finland that is. Then again it reads good any other way.
I haven’t seen the new memorial in D.C. honoring King, but I’m told it contains not a single reference to his God.
I think the devout Reverend who led a non-violent revolution for “all of God’s children” would be horrified that future generations re-write who he was in order to avoid offending bigots.
When was King EVER afraid of offending bigots?
Great post. There are many who are good and soon it will start to show.
He is being judged by the author of this post, and most of the people commenting, based on his character, as that character is reflected in his polices and priorities.
Honestly, this is just exactly backwards. I voted for him in 2008 almost entirely because of the color of his skin, racist that I am. Or let me be more precise: I let Barack inhabit the skin of my imaginary First Black President, the one who actually would fulfill some of Dr. King’s dreams. It became apparent that Barack Obama was no such person almost immediately (FISA, as one glaring example). Four years later it is as clear as it could possibly be that Obama is a corporatist and that the specter of an awkward Mormon millionaire as king was the slightest bit more uncomfortable for our nation of bigots than one more term for the anti-gun, socialist Muslim. Or whatever. As Glen Ford says, were MLK alive today, he’d be disrupting today’s events.
“President Obama continued to represent the broad beliefs that Dr. King and his SCLC pressed for. ”
I’m going to do you a really big favor and assume that’s true. Here’s my response in that case: “Belief without action is the ruin of the soul.” (Edward Abbey)
“He is indeed Dr. King’s dream.”
And, I am “…missing the flow of what is happening.”
Well, you’re right in the middle of the flow, that’s for sure. Dude, dudette, whatever: Barack Obama has absolutely nothing to do with Martin Luther King’s dream. He’s not even a black American, and he has done absolutely next-to-NOTHING to help the impoverished in this country.
George W. Bush did more. At least his tax rebate paid the rent for a month. You don’t even know what I’m talking about, do you?
I suppose your “flow” relates to skin color, which shows just how skin deep your comment is.
Then, you have the audacity to say this:
“(Obama)is indeed Dr. King’s dream — a man who is judged for his character instead of by the color of his skin.”
Character? Obama’s CHARACTER is very similar to Mussolini’s. He’s a Fascist, you see, by Mussolini’s definition of the term, which is that fascism is synonymous with corporatism, which advocates the use of governmental power to advance corporate interests.
And just when has the Obama Administration done anything but this, lad or lassie? Character is more than skin-deep, you know. No, you probably don’t.
You insult Dr King by proclaiming Barack Obama as representing his “broad beliefs.” You also insult my intelligence, and that of most of the readers on this thread, by doing so.
In a more elegant and honorable age…alas!
Your pity is irrelevant. Reality will come home to roost. I don’t think you’ll like it. I look forward to your discomfiture.
No, my relatives died in Greenland during the Little Ice Age because they failed to adapt. Sad, but true.
I haven’t seen it either, in its entirety. You’ve got a good point about King not being afraid of offending bigots, though.
You said it right there. This one comment sums it up entirely.
Only those who have been through, experienced themselves the same thing as others in the same situation can honestly say they empathize and feel solidarity for these people.
Everything else is unmitigated bull shit.
I know. When someone relates to me a situation they are going through that is the same as or very similar to a situation I have gone through, then I can honestly say I feel it. In my gut.
When this is not the case – when I have not experienced this, I cannot not and I say so. I do not give out BS talk about how sorry I am and how I feel their pain because the truth is I cannot.
You need that “Been there, done that” part to connect on a personal level.
“Belief without action is the ruin of a soul.”
Damn. That’s good. Thank you.
It seems, like the King family, African-Americans do not agree with you.
http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/progressive-movement/report/2012/12/04/46664/the-obama-coalition-in-the-2012-election-and-beyond/
And I’ll bet there were more that a few that did it because he was black and they knew this would “stick it to that white honky”.
The fact is, OB, that were he alive today, an 84-year-old Dr. Martin Luther King would have graciously appeared if invited and used the occasion to call out the American people and not the President. Dr. King was not just words, and he was not just actions, he was also a presence and he knew how to use that presence in productive ways.
You don’t go all Stokely Carmichael over Barack Obama’s ass by trying to use Dr. King. It just doesn’t work. Try Malcolm. The argument works better. But that makes the particular day irrelevant and so as well the idea that it was travesty.
Well, Myrtie Evers-Williams and John Lewis do not consider it a travesty.
You see, in 1964, Dr. King would likely have delivered the invocation at George Wallace’s inauguration if invited. And would have talked to Alabamans and Americans in doing so.
That’s who he was.
The American people are not the ones who are killing innocent people with drones or dismantling education and the social safety net. I’m sorry but I just can’t conjure up an MLK who would stand next to our war criminal president and use the occasion to “call out the American people” instead. For what, voting for him instead of impeaching his ass?
Furthermore, if “that’s who MLK was,” he’d probably be alive and serving in Congress or perhaps as head of the RNC today. There would have been no need to silence him.
I understand why many African-Americans(gods, how I hate hyphenated words, no matter) would be glad to see someone who looks like them elected to the highest office in the land, and to see tens of millions of people who don’t look like them vote for that man.
In 2008, I was one of those others.
I understand why so many black Americans want to give the first black President the benefit of the doubt, and why they hope against hope that he really wants to deliver for them.
They’re wrong. He’s never going to deliver for them. I know this. Why? Because I live in a predominantly, and I mean at least 75%, black neighborhood. And Obama hasn’t done one solitary thing to help them. If he had, I’d have noticed.
I’m relatively poor, you see.
He hasn’t even TRIED. I do not dispute your statistics. They don’t matter. He has not, and he will not, do anything to even attempt to alleviate poverty in this country. FDR and LBJ did far more, hell, even NIXON did more, and that is an inescapable truth. An inconvenient truth for cheerleaders like yourself, but a truth nonetheless.
Obama likes poverty, because poverty makes people desperate and more exploitable by the people who back him. Their skin color does not matter. Poor people are good for capitalism, because they provide cheap labor, and the cheaper the better.
Martin Luther King understood that. Obama probably understands that and does not care. You…I don’t know whether you understand that or not, but somehow I doubt that you will directly address this point.
Do you consider that, were Dr. Martin Luther King to appear on stage with Barack Obama, today, that he would not mention the use of drones? That he would not mention the perilous state of the Rule of Law, or the criminal fraud of Wall Street?
And if, perchance, Dr. King did mention these things, that he would “call out” the American people?
Would he chastise the American people for these things, would he praise them, what do you imagine, TD, that he would do.
As you have told us “who he was”, what do you imagine he might actually speak about? About gun violence in this nation, and not mention the reality of perpetual war? About the reality that health care in this nation is shameful, and not mention the flaws in continuing a for-profit system of health “insurance”? About poverty and make no mention of the huge shift of wealth to the top .1%?
What do you think MLK would speak about, would seek to draw our attention and actions toward?
I consider that you have raised some important perspectives about what mattered to MLK, TD, and I recall what he said about the silence of the “good people” … I suspect he might make mention of that concern agin, today, what do you think?
DW
My point is that Barack Obama is the antithesis of what Martin Luther King was trying to achieve, especially in regards to poverty in this county and around the world. My point is that Barack Obama having the unmitigated gall to swear the oath of office upon Dr King’s Bible while attempting to wrap MLK’s legacy around him is a despicable act.
I don’t give a damn about what Evans-Williams and John Lewis think. Their thoughts bear no more weight than mine, or yours, for that matter. Just because they are black doesn’t matter. And MLK would agree with me on that one.
And, somehow, I don’t see Dr King agreeing to give the invocation for an unrepentant George Wallace. Maybe he would have; we will never know. Even if he did, he would have made Wallace very, very uncomfortable.
And don’t tell me what I can and cannot do on a blog. That’s arrogant presumption on your part.
Good point on drones. What he would do is use the American “we” and call for an end to using drones for killing. Look how he treated LBJ on formal occasions. At rallies or in speeches in other setting, yes, he would be very pointed about who it was that making the decisions. But not at an inaugural.
Thinking of Dr. King as a Republican member of Congress is a pleasant thought. But my guess is that strategically he would have liked not to weaken his influence that way.
I imagine that Dr. Martin Luther King, after having spoken out against Obama’s policies and actions, would have been barred from the inauguration.
IMO he would mention drones, Wall Street, and rule of law but framed these as American issues. Remember that most Americans right now are fine with all of these things mainly because they don’t know what is going on. He would chastise the American people just as he did on Vietnam or he would frame it in a “some say” and “others say” but “I say” rhetorical form without calling out the President by name. Privately in conversation with the President he would not doubt be more direct.
But remember the form in which he would speak would be either as an invocation of as a benediction. It would be short so it could not include a laundry list of points.
I was simply going along with your suggestion of “who he was” because you were making him sound like every other sell-out, soulless politician. Perhaps he would have campaigned against Obama and kept him from ever winning a second term. We can speculate all we want but we can’t twist MLK into someone who’d be accepting of this level of executive power being used to kill babies abroad and starve them here at home.
Well said, hfc.
So then, MLK would have said “we” are better than that, than making use of drones?
What might he say about other things? “We” deserve a better behaved elite? “We” deserve a better Rule of Law?
What better visions for “where” … “we” ought, as a society, a nation, ought to “be”, or “go”, do you imagine that he might share?
And, again, how would he address those who say, “Drones save American lives” … would he ask, “But what of the question of war, itself? Saying drones save lives does not raise the moral question of war, nor does it address the issues of the consequences of the wars we have already waged.”
Would he raise questions such as these, or would he speak to American “exceptionalism”.
I consider that it is precisely questions such as these that MLK would raise, that he would suggest that our myths of superiority are killing our collect soul and that money is NOT all that matters, that absolute power corrupts and destroys democracy, that the condition of planet Earth is central to our well-being and very survival.
What do you think, TD?
DW
It’s more pragmatic to go “all Stokely Carmichael over BO’s ass” by using Mr. X? Just what kind of pragmatism are you hawking, Mr. Dem?
“But not at an inaugural.” How bourgeois! Not fitting for the occasion! Not socially correct! What would the Right People say???
Really? Now, with the benefit of time passed and 20/20 hindsight and assassination, Martin Luther King has achieved middle class respectability?
It wasn’t so when he was alive. At least not in white middle class circles. I remember. I was a child, but I remember.
Might he elaborate as to why most people do not “know what is going on”?
Would he suggest that the people are inattentive, or might he suggest that secrecy and media stenography play a role in the not knowing?
Would he come right out and say that “we” are all responsible for what is being done in our names, or might he make clear that too many of those things “we” are not permitted, not allowed, to know.
Might he mention Obama declaring Manning “guilty” or would that not be “politic”?
I think we recall very different Doctors King.
While I agree that he would make use of subtlety and a somewhat nuanced build-up to his main points, I do consider that he well realized the “house” was afire and might, just possibly, suggest that some people have, rather deliberately, been playing with matches …
DW
Not when I was in my late teens. Blacks – regardless of income – were pretty much persona-non-Grata in most white middle class circles.
You read that symbolism different from the way I do. In that act, the Presidents shoved the fact that the country is not going back in the face of those who think they can turn the clock back. The only legacy of Dr. King that Barack Obama can claim is the legacy that black people in the South can turn out in large numbers and vote for him. To claim Dr. King’s legacy of moral authority you have to be willing and prepared to die for speaking out. That is not Barack Obama’s way. Most Americans understand this.
Myrtie Evers-Williams and John Lewis aren’t just black; they risked their lives and lost loved ones and friends in the struggle. They personally knew Dr. King. I trust their judgment over what is appropriate for and observance of Dr. Martin Luther King Day, which is after all just a saints day in America’s civil relgion.
Dr. King called to an unrepentant nation to repent–over and over. He would call for Alabamans to repent and know that Wallace was an Alabaman. You have to understand the Christian theology of repentance that informed Dr. King’s life to understand how that works.
I was not telling you what to write. I was using a cute way of telling you that rhetorically your thesis does not work. And that there were criticisms that you could make that would.
O man. The Doc signed his own death warrant. If he knew he could resurrect, that there Dem might be burning in hellfire.
I would say that most people don’t know what is going on because they do not want to know. Like the Germans who live just outside of Buchenwald did not know what was going on there.
Dr. King might have been person non grata in middle class conversations but he fundamentally was in style of operating middle class. He knew how to interact with the business folks and politicians he inevitable had to negotiate behind the scenes with.
The inaugural is not just bourgeois, it is one of the high holy days of the US civil religion. Dr. King would not have broken the solemnity of the occasion with remarks that would caused his style to be talked about to the distraction of his content. Of course, both would be criticized anyway.
Where Dr. King was not totally middle class was in his understanding of political economy and power. And that is why J. Edgar Hoover was on his case.
If you are talking about a speech at a rally, you are likely correct. But not an invocation or benediction at an inauguration.
The first is not “claiming” King’s legacy. The second is not practical.
How did BO claim King’s legacy again?
I’m saying that BO didn’t make a claim at all.
Wow. That’s what the 1% says.
Cute? You were trying to be cute? Never mind. I’ll leave that one alone.
I was beaten up walking home from elementary school on an almost daily basis because my parents supported the Civil Rights Acts publicly. I know this, because the 5 or 6 other white kids told me they were beating me up when they did so. Even though they didn’t even know what a Negro was in our lily-white neighborhood.
You do not understand. You clearly weren’t there. And you should not trust Myrtie Hyphenated or John Lewis’ judgment over your own. It does not matter what they lost “back then” as far as credibility goes. Besides, none of this even addresses my original post.
Let me spell it out for you: Martin Luther King was a true populist. Barack Obama is a true fascist. For Obama to invoke Martin Luther King’s legacy is anathema, at least. I found this whole charade profoundly disgusting.
Does this make sense to you?
Ah. “the President shoved the fact that the country is not going back in the face of those who think they can turn the clock back”. He done all a black man for pwesident can do.
Are you receiving the larger picture, Mr. Dem?
I consider it entirely possible that MLK might suggest that those playing with matches are ill, suffer from a pathology, that society must not only find ways to protect itself from such pathologies, but that it must erect new measures of success other than the accumulation of obscene wealth and unlimited power, that “security” is too easily become enslavement and that “secrecy” is inimical to democracy, as is unfettered capitalism.
We have to assume that MLK would be wise enough to realize that the economic travail of the moment did not “just happen”, but required the dismantling of specific protections, that “official” violence is not about “protecting” the many but about silencing dissent, domestically, and controlling resources, internationally not “keeping the peace” as the necessity of “defense”.
MLK might well counsel compassion when dealing with the frightened ones who “legitimized” torture, who ride rough-shod over the Rule of Law, or are driven to amass great wealth despite the harm that might cause individuals, society, the species, or the planet, yet I cannot imagine that he would dismiss the wide and destructive swings of the past decades as “acceptable” or easily remedial through good thoughts and gentle persuasion … I suspect he would have called on the people to actively and non-violently resist the aspirations of world dominance and total social control through the destruction of Constitutional rights and foundational principles.
I consider that MLK would speak to these things, in measured, compassionate, and yet very clear terms. That he would say that things cannot go on as they are … or calamity and devastation beyond imagination will ensue.
I think both his vision and his courage would not have shied away from from sharing the necessity of truth, of humanity, of tolerance, of courage, and of understanding.
He would not have politely refrained from laying responsibility where it truly lies … even though that is the chosen political “philosophy” of this moment and this place … in all the “systems”, and in the “hearts and minds” of those who benefit from that philosophy, be they in the political system, the economic system, the military system, the legal system and so on … a man who was not afraid to die would not quietly go “along”, would not embrace a “lesser evil” … would not even pretend to do so.
DW
I guess I do read that symbolism very differently than the way you do. Very.
Barack Obama has nothing in common with Dr King. Nothing. Even his enemies conceded that King was real. Obama’s nothing more than a puppet in a suit.
He is not worthy of respect; any more than John Boehner or Mitt Romney are.
Because there is NO difference. The color of their skin does not matter.
Perhaps you don’t get that because you are comfortable enough not to feel the anger that is building. We live in dangerous times. Do you not feel that?
TarheelDem was arrested and detained for an extended period of time in Chicago last year while there covering the NATO Summit protests.
To suggest that TD is not aware of our current socio-political climes is absurd.
Very well. Please, if you may, explain Mr. Dem’s defense of BO’s symbolic abuse:
BO did it cause he had to?
Uh huh. But did Mr. Dem?
I’m not claiming to speak for Mr. Dem, nor to agree with his position here. Just simply pointing that unlike most of the people who comment here, TD has done time recently for his beliefs and political associations.
I imagine a resurrected Doc would be throwing the money changers out of our temple. “Rhetorically”.
Anyway. BO ain’t worthy of mentioning King’s legacy. ‘Tis a travesty just as brother Barbarian said.
Lupe Fiasco seemed to use his inaugural event appropriately.
He has one half of the same enemies Dr. King did. And minus the Secret Service would likely suffer the same fate. No matter how unworthy he might be.
Yep. Pretty much.
Life goes on:
Minus the Secret Service he wouldn’t be pwesident. Black neocon doesn’t resonate for you, does it.
Mr. Fiasco, though, plays the man for the masses:
Ah ha ha ha. Mr Fiasco. Fucking dupes.
How many times has this happened to her by now??? Talk about a Dog Soldier.
Being a black neo-con no great protection against the RushBo NRA members who think they’re gonna strike a blow against muslim commie fascism. It sure didn’t help Colin Powell become President.
You don’t admit the black neocon is an asset? You don’t think Rushbo is an asset? You don’t think them NRA assholes are given the willies if they get a little too far out of line?
You don’t think Mr. Powell was expended?
Mr. Dem, please keep up.
One fine comment, DW. Dr. King was all about lighting the dark corners and striving to love our enemies (toughest gig ever). But he didn’t veer away from anger as I remember it, even though he could moderate his prose and modulate his tone when he delivered his messages.
Ah…this has degenerated into a “I’m a more progressive than thou” thread.
I cried when they shot Medgar Evers
Tears ran down my spine
And I cried when they shot Mr. Kennedy
As though I’d lost a father of mine
But Malcolm X got what was coming
He got what he asked for this time
So love me, love me, love me, I’m a progressive.
You can look good while you are doing evil. That is O’s signature.
…He is indeed Dr. King’s dream — a man who is judged for his character instead of by the color of his skin…
*heh* Indeed, He is being judged for the content of his character, as cmk quipped earlier, ‘Hoover in Blackface’…!
Nice job, OB…! But, you’re still an ornery cuss…! ;-)
Pretty much the main reason why Blacks voted the way they did. Let’s not pretend here. I’m Black and have asked many of my relatives, friends, etc why they are voting for him again and their answer was always the same-”He’s Black.” End of story.
Where the hell did that come from, Kris? Since when does getting arrested give one credibility? Or not getting arrested, for that matter? What does that have to do with Barack Obama using Martin Luther King’s color and bible to cloak his own agenda, with which I know you disagree, in the raiment of righteousness for the sake of propaganda?
Which was the point of the original diary entry.
Or was it my “comfortable” remark that struck a nerve? I’m guessing. I don’t know. I do know that latte’ liberals whose net worth is a hundred times or so more than mine, which is about a grand or so, tend to get upset by things like that. IOW, people who have a vested interest in maintaining the current system because they still benefit from it get a wee bit upset when someone like me comes along and says they would love to see the whole thing come crashing down soonest.
But I didn’t say that here, did I? That may not be it at all. So what provoked your ire, moderator?
Nowhere, no how, no way did I ever suggest that Tarheel Dem was not aware of our current “socio-politico climes,” as you put it. I disagreed with his interpretation of what MLK would have done if he was alive today, and claimed, accurately, that I remembered the times in which he was alive. But that doesn’t explain your reaction, either.
Damn this venue. Facial expression, tone of voice, body language cannot be conveyed. I think we may misunderstand each other in some way, but I don’t know how to accurately convey the thought. It’s very frustrating.
What the hell. I don’t understand why you reacted the way you did.
I can’t help being ornery. It’s in my genetic code. At least I admit it.
Thanks, CTuttle.
That’s got to be the most honest comment I’ve ever seen here.
…”He’s Black.” End of story…
I’ve asked many of my local friends why they’d voted for Obummer; “He’s from the Isles”…! *gah*
Thanks to all of you for a great discussion. ‘Nite all. Happy Second Term.
Ha!
Sorry, couldn’t help myself there.
Do these masters know how to run a demockracy or not?
Good night and Good luck, O Barbarian.
Wow. The casual bigotry in this comment is breathtaking.
I know that black people love it when white people condescend to them and tell them how they are being taken advantage of but they are to race blind to see it so you’re here to white’splain it to them.
I know, I know…some of your best friends are blah blah blah….
Wow, we’ve got it all here, alternate realities, whitewashing history and speaking for the dead.
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
Not to mention many comments about a speech that wasn’t listened to.
That comment gets another cha-ching in the FDL jar.
Thank you.
There was no bigotry. It’s very clear that all people love Martin Luther King, who was a man for all people. Not all now love Obama, and many see the fundamental difference between the two, a difference Obama himself pointed out when he accepted the Nobel Peace Prize and then proceeded to go to the dark side a la Dick Cheney, who was as white as you might wish to paint him. This is not about color. This is about what each man stood for, and in Dr. King’s case died for.
Thank you, Ohio Barbarian, for staying with this long thread and meeting each comment with the respect each deserves, making your counter arguments. The last few did degenerate somewhat, but you are not to be blamed for that. Excellent diary.
Recommend.
… good comment jedi929 … can/will line up on this with you
It has become and is down to being about this then isn’t it?
B.H.Obama is doing what G.W.Bush was doing /wanted to do but gets Ds to back Obama(D) while doing so which G.W.Bush(Cheney) could not/did not. Meanwhile Zealot Ds keep playing 3 Monkey politics when it comes to what B.H.Obama has done/not done as ObamaBush while still being so willing to label what Bush/Cheney did as Being So/All Bad.
The logic needed to twist the politics like this? Wall St./capitalist ptb /1%/10% must be happy that the money they spent to get B.H.Obama elected twice was so well spent as means to get G.W.Bush agenda done using a D POTUS and D conducted WH to do it. Who else could attack SS so easily while doing GWOT X 10 in ways Bush/Cheney would like? The political stealth in this MO excells.
B.H.Obama using MLK legacy? Obama can and is. Why? Not because BHO is actually doing what MLK talked about — BHO is not doing so. The optics in B.H.Obama using MLK legacy and doing so make BHO look/sound good and not a Big Sell Out POTUS. Too bad MLK cannot/could not step up and tell/show us how B.H.Obama is being dishonest/misleading about what MLK said/did.
I’m going to second juliania’s comment @152.
Thank you, Ohio Barbarian, for this very useful alternative view about today’s “proceedings” …
My appreciation, as well, to everyone who engaged worthwhile discussion and inspiring speculation in the comments.
Recommended to the thoughtful consideration and tolerant understanding of everyone at FDL.
DW
Predictable that the Purity Popes and Authoritarians of the Left have Declared What One Must Agree With.
And that some of these comments are racist, whether the commenters themselves realize it or not.
Hey, I like(d) a particular comment.
I made a $ contribution here.
Said so.
What’s the beef?
You call it condescending, but some of care deeply what’s happening to blacks and Hispanics and the poorest in this country, TBogg. We actually look into the statistics and tables concerning unemployment, wealth disparity with whites, unresolved foreclosure issues and subprime rates given unethically, vast over-representation in prisons and cradle-to-prison pipeline laws and (il)legal court proceedings; the administration’s embrace of the heinous Race to the Top corporatization of inner city schools, and the correlative firing of experienced black teachers in favor of less expensive newbies and the quick turnarounds with high percentages of them…and we’re racist enough to find it just plain wrong.
Some of us are racist enough to have believed and hoped that America’s first black President would really embody what he’d promised in the campaign…but didn’t…in spades.
Some of us are racist enough to be glad that Hispanics are projected to be in the majority by 2045. Some of us are even racist enough to love the Indigenous Idle No More movement, and feminist and ageist enough to glory that it’s a woman-and-youth driven movement that may turn this continent around for the better.
But please; keep on saying we’re condescending in trying to change the status quo.
a LOL and a “ding!”
You totally Rawk, M’dear…! *g*
Have to second this comment as well.
What CTut says …
;~DW
The condescension comes from your contending that you know what is best for the people you are purporting to champion than they do themselves.
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
{{{{WD}}}}
I’m not sure I get your meaning, oldgold. Do you mean that blacks and Hispanics wouldn’t like to see those issues and statistics I mentioned reversed, or at least ameliorated?
Aren’t lower unemployment rates always preferable? Among black youth, iirc, the rate is over 40%. Foreclosure relief could be unwanted? Changing drug laws to keep non-violent drug users out of prison, or fighting for a jobs bill, or bailing out people, not Wall Street…would be unwelcome? I can’t imagine that my list constitutes anything ‘they wouldn’t want for themselves’. Set me straight, I guess.
That is not what I meant and you know it.
Look at the comment and its progeny that TBogg referenced.
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
Ah, the old “any white person who dares to criticize Obama must be a racist” argument. Tell that to ADC14, if you dare.
Interesting that I, a descendant of slaveowners, have more empathy with black people than you do. I admit the sins of my ancestors, and my neighbors don’t hate me because of my genetic code anymore than I look down on them for theirs.
We can’t help what our ancestors were to each other, but we CAN choose how we treat each other in the now. That’s what Martin Luther King was all about, and that’s what you either don’t understand or choose to attempt to manipulate for your own selfish ends.
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
Glad somebody appreciated that; thanks, ET.
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
No. Barack Obama sleeps with the same enemies of Dr King. The same enemies of economic justice who Dr King challenged. Race is irrelevant on this point. Dr King understood that, and you are too intelligent not to do the same.
I don’t care who you are, that’s funny right there!
NO personal attacks are allowed on Firedoglake. -MyFDL Editor
You seem to have confused ‘empathy’ with paternalism.
Although I must say, your appeal to your own authority of having descended from slaveowners is a novel twist on the old “some of my best friends…”
The BEST post and comments I’ve seen since I’ve been here! Keep it up. I just want to fight for what Dr. King’s message meant to me. FREEDOM, JUSTICE, EQUALITY. We must keep our eyes on the prize. PEACE p.s. Obama is no Dr.King.
Peace friend. I love your diary, and almost all of your opinions expressed herein. I was responding to this –
from your comment @124 to TarheelDem.
I read that as you suggesting that TD does not understand what’s really going on, and my comment was just my attempt to disuade those suggestions.
If I offended, I’m sorry.
And you’re correct – the internet is a terrible medium for emotionally charged conversations. Always will be, I fear.
Go in peace, Ohio Barbarian. You did good here.
Walk softly Barbarian, the mods are enforcing discipline and we don’t want to lose you.
I’m one of the privileged that got to see and hear Martin in person in Detroit. I was only 14 but it left an impression that changed a White boy from Alabama into a radical.
We will never know what could have been if he had survived but it would have been a very different world. He was becoming much more radical and militant and lost much of the Liberal White support. That weak support was being replaced with the growing anti-war movement which along with the poor peoples movement and his leadership would have been a dynamic force.
With RFK and MLK there was momentum for a peaceful revolution that might have had a chance to really change our direction as a nation.
Well, and truly, said, wayoutwest.
DW
Right. I’m sure Black people much prefer that failed white people humorists/griftwits come to their defense against progressives. That’s Paternalism Done Right.
Praise TBoww!
Perfect! I was about the same age at the time. I believe if all who were changed as humans by those two powerful souls would get off our collective lazy asses and demand our still hoped for dreams of peace and justice, maybe this time it will work. If not, game over. Sharpen the pitchforks and light up the torches! See you all in D.C.!
If you don’t mind, mtquinn, I would add Malcolm X to that small group who were transformed and transforming the the intellectual and revolutionary stage … of awareness and action when each one was gunned down … all three had experienced events which were changing their levels of deep understanding and broad compassion … each were asking ever more fundamental questions and moving beyond, well beyond the profound perceptions each had, already, come to realize and practice, each were on the edge of exposing the deepest fault-lines within the legal, the economic, and the political systems … it is no mere coincidence that all of them were silenced … and none were killed for the reasons popularly “believed” to be behind their murders.
DW
Cripes, I’d considered adding X to be added in the stream above, but didn’t have the time to make my case for it.
Good on ya, DW!