There will almost certainly be some hurricane force blowback from this War of the Sexes post, there always is. In fact, a post about male/female relations is the only post over which I’ve received threats of bodily harm – all from women. I’m not complaining about this. I’m not supposed to. I am male.
Jessica Bennett recently penned a Daily Beast article about Hanna Rosin’s new book, The End of Men. The crux of Rosin’s book, and to a degree Bennett’s review, is that men are becoming obsolete in the face of vastly superior female qualities. Bennett doesn’t completely agree, but gets in a dig at men anyway, “Perhaps it’s not the end of men at all – just the beginning of a newer, better version.” Jessica, with all due respect, thanks for implying I’m defective now.
If a man were to say that about a woman they would be branded as a bigot, as well they should be.
People recently ripped Congress for reproductive rights hearings that didn’t include a single women. Women – with many men at their side – howled, quite rightfully, that it was an unfair, gigantic blunder.
But many women feel abortion is exclusively “their” issue, one in which men can have no stake or input. Some believe men don’t even have a right to their own feelings and needs during extremely traumatic family planning decisions. Feelings, by the way, that many women constantly remind men they are completely devoid of.
However, I unequivocally agree women should have absolute, final control over their bodies – as men should have absolute, final control over theirs – but men aren’t completely superfluous either. Any family planning decision has consequences for men too and they deserve to be able to discuss them. To advocate men be totally shut out is just as lop-sided, short-sighted, and unfair as the Congressional hearings or Rosin and Bennett telling men what they should or shouldn’t be, feel, or say. Talk about it and then leave the final decision to those most effected.
Women on Men: A Chummy Patriarchal Club of Carefree Goobs
Many women feel, not completely without justification, that men dominated for centuries and now it is women’s time. Some also feel men are a chummy patriarchal club of carefree goobs who are unfairly awarded oppressive powers simply by virtue of external plumbing. If that were the case, I must have missed a number of meetings of The He-Man Women Haters’ Club. I didn’t get the paperwork certifying me as an absolute dictator.
No one gave me anything simply because I am male. The logic of automatic power, and fault, suggests that I be responsible for slavery 150 years ago, even though I wasn’t born yet and none of my relatives ever owned a slave. Just as I am not totally empowered because I’m male, I’ve never oppressed African Americans or women either. I freely accept the responsibility to help any disadvantaged group get legal and moral treatment equal to mine. If that means me giving up some of whatever advantage I have, that’s OK too.
That’s not to say society doesn’t give men a leg up sometimes. Many are better educated, though that is no longer true. Many make more money, though that’s changing (not quickly enough I might add). However, most men didn’t ask for or create those advantages and there is equal disparity among many groups of men. Even if women were in charge, which many seem to hold as their due birthright as women, the same would be true.
I’m Not Complaining About This, I’m Not Supposed to, I Am Male
But there is also a male downside, though I’m not equating them to women’s. Women almost exclusively get child custody and alimony in divorces largely because they are women and regardless of their suitability of income. Men overwhelmingly hold most dangerous, dirty, and menial jobs. Fighting wars, digging ditches, and working as garbage collectors come to mind. Though educational success has already swung toward women (higher grades and more and better degrees), there are hundreds of efforts to improve their lot. Male children, not so much. Even small things, like Take Your (Fill in the Blank) to Work Day, are issues. Some people apparently believe that daughters are the only ones who benefit from seeing, and being able to model, the success of their parents. “Girls rule, boys drool”.
There isn’t a day that goes by when most men aren’t reminded directly or implicitly that their emotions are defective or that they are sensitivity-challenged, incompetent oafs. They’re constantly reminded of how they make more money, benefit from male-only role models, oppress women, or aren’t subject to the same stresses of everyday life. Women have children fer chrissakes! Well, as a father, I’m here to tell you that being a prospective Dad ain’t no piece of cake either – especially when you’re treated as a mere sperm donor, if you’re recognized at all, during pregnancy and child rearing. Both jobs are incredibly hard.
Using some allegedly, arbitrarily defective male logic let me suggest that both men and women bring something to the table. Men can learn much from women’s superior ability to emote in many situations. Women could benefit from knowing that competitiveness or less emotive responses are not necessarily bad things sometimes. Men can, and many do, work hard to help women overcome truly unequal treatment inside and outside the home. Women might benefit from understanding that not every man is an evil oppressor and they shouldn’t treat all of us that way. But perhaps the most important thing women can teach men is an appreciation for their much vaunted nurturing and sense of fairness.
All I ask is that you practice what you preach.
Cross posted at The Omnipotent Poobah Speaks! More than politics, more than pop culture & humor



10 Comments

Speaking from my own unique perspective, what Rosin postulates is absurd and though this post is well come, it is in my mind alike to responding to birthers. In every group sub-group, community, etc., there are going to be a few uber-tribalists who will draw boundaries and manufacture neat, little boxes to put other people into. They’ll categorize those boxes as “us” and “them” and then exaggerate and even falsify reality to make the “them” as unsavory and marginal as possible in order to generate support for their bigotry and that, just in my own opinion, is even more absurd than what either Rosin or the birthers claim.
I agree.
I’d also add that I don’t completely disagree with everything Rosin says, though I do question much of it. She has some valid points.
I’m not particularly offended by it on a personal level. I just think it is useful to point this stuff out when it happens. Blame the Patriarchy on the other hand….but then, I don’t agree with a lot of the men’s rights groups either.
You’re right. Boxes are going to be the death of us all.
Valid points are what makes bigotry so seductive. There are welfare cheats for example, thousands of them, who have learned to game the system. I personally had a friend who bragged about not having to work. Though he was no longer considered a friend after that revelation, I acknowledge that those people exist. That doesn’t mean everybody or even most people on welfare are cheats but to the shallow mind, one cheat = everybody in the system are freeloaders and it must be scrapped. Kinda like when whole towns are wiped out because one person may have a connection with militants.
Not supposed to complain because you are a male?
Has the First Amendment been amended to exclude males again?
I’m not really sure what slavery has to do with gender issues, either.
But. then, I am worth only 75% of what males are worth in the workplace–and thrilled that the percentage is so much higher than it used to be–so I’m too busy working two jobs to keep up with the sorry state women put men into.
Yep…it’s all womens’ fault. Thanks for illustrating my point about tribalism and neat little boxes though.
Oops! Sorry! Misread your comment! Yep, I’m one of three machine operators in my division at work. I operate three pieces of equipment while my male counterparts operate one each. Guess who makes the least? Hint: That person is the only one without a penis.
Actually, that is not what my post did at all.
You replied to yourself. Did you mean that you had misread my post? ‘Cause my post was not an example of tribalism or of putting anyone into boxes.
In any event, kudos for saying you misread anyone’s post. In my experience very few posters ever make any kind of mistake.
That they admit to having made. *wink*
Yes. Totally misread yours. So embarrassed! I make a point of admitting mistakes when I make them, even to point them out. I figure if I do, however embarrassing they are, others will realize that admitting booboos is way preferable to doubling down.
I agree with many of your sentiments, but as you suggested such ideas are not particularly popular at a site like this. People of a more conservative bent are better able to see the shortcomings of whatever it is that passes for feminism these days.