Missionary service is not the same thing as military service – a fact, and not just a semantic one – lost on Mommy, Daddy, and the Romney Boys. Donning a crisp white shirt and black tie to annoy the hell out of the good citizens of France from the back of a 10-speed is “service” to your church. Bleeding to death in a rocky Afghan Pass that a big flock of Mitt’s equally chickenhawkish supporters sent you to is service to your country.
Ann Romney, filling in for a hubby too pusillanimous to “serve” his campaign next to vicious warhawk Whoopi Goldberg, placed herself between the withering fire of Whoopi and her men folk. She’s due a Conservative Cross with Silver Dollar clusters for her bravery.
Goldberg fired the first round. “When I read about your husband, what I had read — and maybe you can correct this — is that the reason he didn’t serve in Vietnam was because it was against the religion.”
INCOMING!
BOOM! Medic, I’ve been hit!
“That’s not correct,” Ann cried out above the din of battle. “He was serving his mission, and my five sons have also served missions. None served in the military, but I do have one son that feels that he’s giving back to his country in a significant way where he is now a doctor and he is taking care of veterans.”
SON! Here’s my health care voucher. Take me to the Hamptons for treatment,” she screamed in agony.
As the Harvard Med School corpsmen carried her off the battlefield she croaked through tears, “So, you know, we find different ways of serving. And my husband and my five boys did serve missions, did not serve in the military.”
Powerful stuff. Battle action so daunting it approached being as hard as campaigning. When The View returned from commercial break, Whoopi stuffed a rag in Ann’s mouth and began to pour a champagne bucket of melted ice cubes over it. “So, when you’re facing these mothers whose children have not come back, how will you explain to them that your sons haven’t gone? Will you talk about the missions they’ve gone on,” Whoopi said as she beat the defenseless Anne with a rubber hose.
Oh, the vile eyebrowless bitch! The horror. The horror.
Through pain-clenched teeth, Anne whispered, “I would say it’s probably the hardest thing that a president and a first lady probably do is to comfort those that have lost a love [sic] one and have gone in harm’s way,” Ann continued before blacking out. “It is an amazing country, we have the most extraordinary fighting men and women, and we have to be so grateful for them. Of course, it’s hard, and I don’t think that any of us can understand the sacrifice [sic] that are being made by families.”
Poor Ann, she was too weak to even answer the question. Damn those socialist bastards of the Kenyan Self-Aggrandizement Force!
It’s easy to make light of the Romney family’s aversion to anything that doesn’t service them. It’s especially easy when they say things like this. Easy, but sickeningly funny.
There are so many ways their defense is a gold-plated load of crap from the finest Kobe Kow. For example, Mitt could’ve served in the noble tradition of Quakers – whose religion actually doesn’t allow them to fight in wars – serving as battlefield medics. That’s infinitely more compassionate, patriotic, and braver service than a bike trip through the European countryside.
Ann is right when she says the boys all served their compulsory Mormon missionary tours though – quite admirably in fact. Citizens around the globe must have really appreciated it when:
- Tagg served in Bordeaux.
- Matt served in Paris.
- Josh served in Leeds, England.
- Ben served in Australia.
- And, Craig served in Santiago.
Of course, the starving kids in Ethiopia probably would have appreciated it more if the boys had compulsorily served them – even if they did serve up the cold, thin rice gruel with a heaping, hot side dish of old-time religion.
Service by Not Serving
Ann says Ben “serves” the nation by treating injured soldiers at his private internal medicine practice in Boston. With a management degree from BYU and medical degree from Tufts, it’s probably damn good care too. I’m sure he offers an indigent veteran’s rate in thanks for their service to his country. As we know, compassion runs deep in the Romney family.
Tagg the Pugilist notwithstanding, Ann isn’t the only one who fights for the family honor. Last election, the boys toured Iowa on a comfy campaign bus from which they defended against charges that Dad might have a small stain in his pants by assuring everyone he was serving his nation too…by running for President!
Romneys, here’s the thing. I voluntarily served my country, and while I had the good fortune to serve under a democratic president who managed to keep us out of harm’s way, I’m proud of that. I would have accepted a combat job had one been needed, because that is what people in the military do.
However, I flew many humanitarian missions at home and abroad. My unit would have been one of the first into combat had those real socialists – the Russians – had invaded. Yes, I went to some very nice places in the 24 countries I traveled to, but I also went to a fair number of gravel strips that were too small to even have names. My war may have been Cold, but I practiced hard for it as did several friends killed in “safe” training accidents.
I served proudly and learned something about the men and women, like the Seals we often worked with, and their commitment to service and what it means. I’m pretty sure that almost 100% of veterans know something more about service to their nation, and what it means, than a kid taking a bicycle ride through Bordeaux.
The Romney’s political ambitions would have been well-served if they had served – or at least not tried to equate their “service” with the real thing. It cheapens their flag-waving promises to support our troops by hiding behind a pulpit – from which they could’ve easily served – that protected them from real sacrifice and service many regular Americans make every day of their lives.
It is insulting to serving troops and veterans.
The nation should be insulted.
I’m insulted. Damn insulted.
The Romneys should be ashamed of comparing their “service” to ours.
Cross posted at The Omnipotent Poobah Speaks! More than politics, more than pop culture & humor.




36 Comments

I saw that and had the same reaction.
In fact, I tried to imagine what the press would be saying if Romney were a Democrat instead of a Republican. They would certainly insist that anyone who equates missionary service to military service is de facto unfit to be Commander-in-Chief of U.S. military forces.
The bubble these people live in is dense, tight, airless and no light seeps in.
Like running for Pres…Ann has told us it is HARD. I guess we just don’t get it….
“That’s not correct,” Ann cried out above the din of battle. “He was serving his mission, and my five sons have also served missions. None served in the military, but I do have one son that feels that he’s giving back to his country in a significant way where he is now a doctor and he is taking care of veterans.”
Is Mitt’s son taking care of Vets for free or reduced rates or is he doing it because he gets paid?
If Mitt’s son was helping Vets at a reduced rate wouldn’t Mitt’s PR people have told us by now?
I wondered if/when this issue would finally show up.
I am in favor of conscription. For openers, it had much to do with finally cutting support for the war in Vietnam. Regular citizens got to see it first hand. There are other reasons to favor it as well.
However, I also believe in offering non-military alternatives besides the battlefield medical corps, such as the Peace Corps, in lieu of military. But NOT religious/church service (call it “mission” or whatever). And for that matter, I can’t understand the rationale for church contributions being tax deductible.
But I’m not advocating that out-of-hand. There really needs to be a serious discussion in the country, just as other issues in the closet. For now, it’s important to deny Romney a cover like this. Are we non-church people just screwed? How is that justified?
I served in San Diego, California, the Pacific and Indian Oceans and Operation Desert Shield/Storm but I wasn’t trying to Mormonize people. I too am insulted. When you put service to your imaginary deity before service to your country, you are unqualified to speak about what is “equivalent” to military service. No matter how one views military service, proselytism is not the same thing and does not have similar value.
I would be for conscription…except they will always leave exemptions open for the rich, (Romneys) and the connected, (Cheney), to be excused from service.
Maybe Mittens thinks that because he managed to kill someone while he was “serving” in France that is why his “service” is equivalent.
And before anyone jumps down my throat – I seem to remember that a Democratic Senator was demonized for this very thing (someone dying in a car crash where he was driving) for his entire life, in fact it is still going on even though he is now dead) and Mittens was not only involved in one crash where someone died, but two of them. While he was “serving”.
SO can we now demonize him for this.
Jes saying.
Speaking as a real veteran that is.
People like the Romneys don’t do military service–they might get hurt, or even killed, and where oh where would our economy be without the job creators?
Book Salon up with Jeff Connaughton’s The Payoff: Why Wall Street Always Wins hosted by Bill Black
Refer to the swiftboating of the Windsurfing Flip Flopper John Kerry.
Flip Flopper Flacido Domingo Mitt Romney (dork like Kerry) biking in France?
C’mon.
The Knuckledraggers have been brainwashed (Fox News Conditioned) into hating France in the first place.
What do they call the French and effete snobs like John Kerry – afraid to dribble Cheese Steak on his 200 thread count shirt?
Cheese Eating Surrender Monkeys. French Fries are Freedoom Fries.
Romney removed the skin from his Greasy KFC (which he would never eat in a million years to begin with).
Romney’s as easy a mark as that dork Kerry.
But they OWN the Networks and they want their goddamn tax cuts.
[Video] Ann Romney & Whoopi Goldberg on “The Video” re Military Service
Mitt received a draft deferment?
Meanwhile,
- excerpt “Mormon church appointee aided CIA on terror,” The Spokesman-Review, by Jim Camden, Oct. 18, 2012
I keep feeling a push to vote Green, but then I read this hideous stuff, this cowardice and manipulating of reality, and am so depressed I find myself back to voting for Obama.
As someone actively involved in countering military recruitment in the schools, I find the Romneys and their sons to be the scum of the earth, those Masters of War who would profit off war while refusing to share any of the burden. I know through my work with veterans how much the military takes from young Americans lives, and the Romneys still can only cry “Not enough, I want more.”
FYI re a strategic voting proposal initiated by folks including Daniel Ellsberg, Cornel West, Frances Fox Piven, Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon for making a progressive vote count for President: “Defeat Romney, without illusions about Obama”
Yeah, I heard about the Ellsberg piece. How are you mzchief? It’s been awhile.
Last time I checked neither R nor O had been awarded a DFC.
Maybe they deserve such for flying to their campaign events?
Oh, layin’ down the links as usual (another FYI for PDXers).
Not necessarily defending Obama, but he managed to reach military age during one of the extremely rare periods when the US wasn’t “at war” with someone. Unlike Romney – there was an actual draft going on. Or the Romney sons – two actual wars.
And yes, you can join the military when there isn’t a war. But during a draft – a special religious exemption? Come on! Cluck cluck cluck…
As for deferments, much depended on local selective service boards. It does not surprise me if Mitt got a deferment for Mormon stuff if he lived in Mormon country.
I received (and renewed)student deferments, as long as I kept a C average. (Back when education counted as a contribution to society.) After graduating, I received an employment deferment for teaching at a high school that served Fort Devons (teaching Army Brats. Not a fun job, since Ft.Devons trained tunnel rats with a dismal life term expectancy. Lots of sad and hurting kids in my classes).
But my selective service board did NOT give deferments for religious service. However, there were more grounds for Conscientious Objector status, which usually landed you in a medical corps with no weapon.
It’s OK If You Are A Republican =IOKIYAAR
We have two different laws, one for the wealthy and one for everyone else.
Will the liar liar pants on fire candidate get away with Romnesia?
the Rmoney idea of service IS a funny thing.
I’ve been stumping the conservatives I know with this one. If you like it, pass it on.
“At least one of these three things, all stated by Mitt Romney in the 2nd pres debates this week can’t be true. If it is true then the other two can’t be true. Can you tell which one that is?
“I’m going to make sure you get a job. Thanks, Jeremy. Yeah, you bet.” -
“I’m going to create 12 million new jobs.” –
“Government can’t create jobs.”"
Same with Quakers, who could get draft exemptions and were my forebearers. There were other sects, too.
I joined USAF in 1969. I’ve never been especially liturgical in any version, so there was no button to press. Yet I don’t begrudge those who were, and did. No problem with Obama, either, regarding other things he needed to to do with his life.
This is all hookum, a non-issue nowadays. Or it ought to be. There are other reasons not to vote for R, maybe some for O as well.
I’m voting for Stein, a “none of the above.” It has nothing to do with the draft, lack thereof nowadays, or religion.
The Quakers got draft exemptions as Concientios Objectors (CO’s) and in most cases were required to do other things as ‘replacement duty’.
The Mormons OTOH received a ‘special exemption’ from reporting for the draft on account of this missionary service. Not on account of CO status. Lots of Mormons later volunteered for military service after they had completed their missionary service so that was not it. They are not opposed to military service.
I do feel that people who have done deliberate things to get out of the military when so many others were forced to participate against their will, should not be in the position of cheering this country on to more idiotic wars. And I appreciate when someone who has not served in the military for whatever reason, is more circumspect and thoughtful when it comes to sending our troops into harms way.
Having served myself, I have always found that it is the people who have served who are the most reluctant to commit our troops to another battle. They are the ones who truly know the full costs and thus try the hardest to make sure we really have exhausted all of the other options first. That is why it is important whether someone has served or not. It doesn’t disqualify someone – it is just something to add to the mix.
BTW, just because someone is of the female gender does not mean they have not served, or could not have.
Like I said, I have served, and am not male.
I live in one of the mormon battlegrounds, here in SoCal. As they were fighting the deadly scourge of people asking for their civil rights the white shirted creeps were seen touting passage of Prop 8. I wonder how much money mormons put into that campaign, designed to prevent civil rights for gay people? Did those creeps get combat pay? Further, if mormon missionary service is to count as military service, willard will have to remember the service requires one have integrity and honor. Someone who lies like willard does surely would never qualify as having either of those attributes. C’mon romneys, give us all a break. We’re getting pretty tired of all your horseshit, as if we should just roll over and vote for you. We know too much about you, ain’t gonna happen. You’re lying alone would disqualify you in a honest society. You know, one unoccuppied by fux news and ole limpdick. One more thing, someone who is perhaps either a direct or indirect surrogate of yours put a ‘device’ into one of my tires. Very cowardly, which of course made me immediately think of you and your boys.
So why is it OK for Obama to never be in the military, but Whoopy must jump in and attack Ann Romney because her family did not serve?
OK for Obama, not OK for Romney’s sons?
The concept of the all-volunteer military is just wrong. Of course our “ruling class” is not going to serve when service is optional, because THEY have options.
All-volunteer is ruing the military, too. Over 40% of returning servicemen now claim they have PTSD. Of course, if you are recognized as disabled, you get money for life from the government. Wheeee!!!
Attacking Ann Romney is like attacking a defenseless kitten. This particular kitten seems really really unsuited to any kind of campaigning. For example, some sad appearance when she talks about how Seamus loved going on vacation with them, even if he had to travel for 11 hrs. on top of the car!
Where are the people who have outlawed Sharia Law when you need them?
“The Romneys should be ashamed of comparing their “service” to ours.”
Ruling class families like the Romneys have no shame. It is what allows them to be members of that class. Of course they don’t go kill and die. That is what middle and lower class people are supposed to do. The job of the Romneys and their ilk is to march on a road of other people’s bones.
I did three and a half years in the infantry during Gulf War Part One, and I’m not sure how service to MIC-related corporations and other war profiteers is more honorable, noble or patriotic than service to one’s imaginary sky god. Compared to the murder and theft that the US military has visited on the people of the Middle East over the last 20+ years, Mormon missionary works seems positively benevolent.
Want to apply a check on the abuses of the US military? Make service truly voluntary, meaning that one can quit at any time.
“As someone actively involved in countering military recruitment in the schools . . .”
Keep it up. You are doing the Lord’s work.
Unlike the 47% who actually have skin in the game, I’m a great believer in conscription with a very big clause for national elected officials. Immediate conscription of the nearest military age relative (with no health issues) of every Congress critter, president, vice-president, sec of state and sec of defense into a front line unit. After training, they would have to serve on the front lines – either as a medic or as infantry. Period.
I think a lot of the Iran talk would disappear if one of the Romneys and the McConnells and the Boehners were going to go there. Which is why I think that clause should exist even if we never reinstate conscription for the masses. If you think this is important enough to send your daughter or son…
This claim of “service” is not surprising. You will also remember that they have said if you add their charitable contributions (church tithing) of 10% to their very low tax rate of 14%, you get a much higher number.
They seem to have a problem separating their service to their church and their responsibilities as members of society.
“Bleeding to death in a rocky Afghan Pass that a big flock of Mitt’s equally chickenhawkish supporters sent you to is service to your country.” Actually, that isn’t service to your country either. This country (FSVO “country”) is not served by its citizens (or non-citizens) dying in wars of aggression, and the US hasn’t fought a defensive war in my 61-year lifetime.
Would the writer care to admit that any US soldier who dies in Afghanistan now is there because Obama sent him (or here) there? Obama escalated the Afghan war, and tried to extend the one in Iraq. Would Obama count as one of “Mitt’s equally chickenhawkish supporters”? I ask merely for information.
“the vile eyebrowless bitch!” wrote the brave pseudonymous columnist. Misogyny in defense of Our Boys is no crime.
You really don’t know, or are you just a willardbot lying for the lord? The romney’s are strong advocates for war, starting with willard pumping up Vietnam while hiding in France. To me advocating for war means leading by enlisting, leading on the battlefield, not spending your time in SoCal fighting gays. Our friends on the right have spent the last four years hating on Obama. They haven’t seen hate like willard will generate if elected. Ungovernable comes to mind.