There are a lot of sources for information about Aafia Siddiqui. Principal among them, let me mention the timeline here, and the newly updated DrAafia.org. For court documents there is an out of date listing here, and more recent listing at NEFA, here. This piece in Boston Magazine is definitive for her early (with respect to the U.S.) biography.
So her biography. She was born in Karachi Pakistan in 1972, and according to the FBI wanted material issued in 2003, lived in Zambia, returning to Pakistan to start primary school. Her father was a neurologist (British trained), her mother, a "homemaker" but also an activist for spreading Islam, and possibly an active member of Jamait-e-Islamiya, a conservative Islamic political party in Pakistan. Her brother is an architect in the Houston area, her sister a neurologist in Karachi. She moved to Houston to live with her brother in 1990 and attended University of Houston for a year before transfering to MIT, class of ’95, where she majored in biology, and wrote one paper of note, a Carroll L. Wilson Award paper called, "Islamization in Pakistan and its Effects on Women." She lived in a women’s dorm, and joined the campus Muslim association, and maintained a table where she gave out literature on Islam.
She went to Brandeis for graduate school, getting her Ph.D. in Cognitive Neuroscience (Psychology department) under Robert Sekuler, dissertation title, Learning Through Imitation. It’s listed at UMI, I haven’t read more than the abstract, she did experiments on tracking and learning on computer screens, so it was visual memory stuff. During her time at Brandeis, she married Mohammed Amjad Khan, who was doing a residency at Brigham and Women’s Hospital as an anesthesiologist. During this time, they lived in Roxbury, she did numerous fund raisers for various causes, may or may not have contributed to organizations that were banned or were later banned, and, importantly to my mind, contributed to helping Bosnian orphans.
There is a bunch of stuff about her and her husband after September 11th, they were interviewed by the FBI in 2001. The subjects were her husband’s purchase of night vision goggles, he said for a safari in Pakistan, the FBI thought maybe to aid terrorists, neither was arrested, and they were also questioned on the fact that the people who rented their apartment when they gave it up got funding from the Saudi royal family, and bought out their deposit with it.
Also during that time, they had two children, Ahmed and Maryam, and there were allegations or suspicions of domestic abuse, and one domestic dispute that had something to do with throwing a baby bottle at Aafia cutting her lip.
If all that stuff seems trivial, it isn’t, it turns out, but that’s another story.
They went back to Pakistan in 2002, and the third child, Suleman, was born, and Amjad Khan presented divorce papers to Aafia’s parents, ending their marriage. Aafia makes one trip to the U.S. during December/January, her family says to look for a job, the FBI says to open a post office box for Majid Khan to facilitate a plot to blow up gas stations. It should be not that hard a thing to verify, she supposedly had interviews at two places, one of which was Johns Hopkins, but I haven’t verified the job interviews. The post office box key was among Uzair Paracha’s possessions when he was arrested, according to court documents and newspaper articles.
I am clear that these people tried to facilitate Majid Khan’s entry into the United States. The question is why. All parties agree (FBI, CIA, al Qaeda, the Parachas, Majid Khan himself, etc., etc.) that Majid Khan had been living in Baltimore and went to Pakistan in 2002. All parties agree that he left his asylum papers in Baltimore, and that he tried to get a new copy of them sent to him by having Uzair Paracha impersonate him in a phone call to the U.S. Department of State to request them (copies of asylum papers may only be applied for from within the borders of the U.S. was the problem). But the U.S. says this was all part of a plot (see below), and the others say that he was trying to arrange the new papers, and was told to go to a party where there would be people who could help him (the Parachas). That would not be an uncommon story in black market or word of mouth deals in that part of the world. All agree KSM was at the party, nobody agrees on whether or not the deal had anything to do with him, or therefore, with al Qaeda.
Aafia Siddiqui returned to Pakistan in January 2003 without finding a job, and lived with her parents in Karachi. In March, the CIA began interrogating Khalid Shaykh Mohammad. He mentioned her in his plot concerning Majid Khan, Iyman Faris, and Ammar al-Baluchi (KSM’s nephew). The plot was to use Majid Khan’s expertise in the U.S. energy infrastructure, to wit, he had extensive knowledge because he ran the cash register at his father’s gas station, to wreak havoc by blowing up gas stations, crippling the energy infrastructure. Iyman Khan, you may remember, is doing time for plotting to deconstruct the Brooklyn Bridge by climbing up on the suspension cables and attacking them with an oxyacetylene torch. Also part of the plan divulged by KSM was that Aafia Siddiqui had secretly married Ammar al-Baluchi.
The Pakistani and American authorities started rounding up the constituents of these plots immediately, grabbing Majid Khan and Ammar al-Baluchi during March. Both went to black sites until August 2006, and then Guantanamo Bay (where Majid Khan tried to commit suicide three times by chewing through his radial artery at the elbow, and was unfit for trial and whose case was dismissed by Susan Crawford on torture grounds).
On March 29, 2003, Aafia Siddiqui left her parents’ place by taxi with her three children, to take them to her uncle’s place in Islamabad for safe keeping since the FBI had issued a wanted notice for her arrest and it was "all over the TV" in Pakistan. They never arrived. NBC announced that she’d been arrested by the FBI. The Siddiqui family says Pakistani Intelligence took her, her Ismet mother said she was told by someone who came to the house on a motorcycle but didn’t remove his helmet that she should be quiet about it if she wanted to see her daughter or grandchildren again. Her family retained Elaine Sharpe in the U.S., and her mother traveled once to the U.S. to seek information about her, and got interrogated by the authorities when she did. The FBI subsequently denied that she was in their "custody" or that they knew her "whereabouts".
Aafia Siddiqui says she was injected with a drug and woke up in a cell, she is not sure where. She says she was interrogated by multiple people, and thinks one of them was one of her former classmates from MIT, both because of his familiarity with her work and his Indian accent (meaning that his Urdu or English sounded like he came from India). Binyam Mohammed and Moazzam Begg are pretty sure they saw her at Bagram, and Lord Nazir says he obtained documents that she was at Bagram, although he may mean that Prisoner 650 was a woman and was at Bagram, it isn’t clear.
Charges, meanwhile, continued to mount, with the FBI issuing a "terrorist most wanted" poster in 2004 with her on it among others. The prosecutor at the ICT-Sierra Leone trial alleged she was an operative who facilitated $30 million in blood diamonds in 2001 for al Qaeda, claiming to recognize her from the wanted poster. It’s highly unlikely, since she was just finished with her dissertation, was putting together a journal article, was supposedly baby sitting the neighbors kids together with her own in Roxbury at the time. Even other investigators feel that one is misplaced identity, since she would have needed to go to Pakistan, cross into Afghanistan, come out of Afghanistan, fly to Africa, do the deal for a week, then fly back to Quetta and become untraceable again in Afghanistan, and then make it back to the U.S. without being noticed, all in time for September 11th and her later inquiry with the FBI over her husband’s goggles.
She also morphed into an expert microbiologist working on biological weapons, who did her learning at MIT just the next building over from the anthrax lab and so forth (her biology degree was undergraduate, and it was a combination of biology and anthropology). She became a high ranking "fixer" for al Qaeda, and morphed into al Qaeda’s Mata Hari around this time.
She entered multiple missing persons lists, Asian Human Rights Committee, Pakistan Human Rights Commission of Pakistan, Amnesty International. She was one of the names that became a question mark when President Bush said he emptied the black sites in August 2006. Allegations from Binyam Mohamad and Moazzam Begg are that she was subjected to torture, that she was repeatedly raped, and that she "lost her mind" and they could hear her screaming. Binyam Mohamad says he was conditioned to dismiss her because the U.S. military put out a rumor among the prisoners that she was an informer. Note that most of Moazzam Begg’s comments were made about Prisoner 650 before she became identified with that prisoner, both Moazzam Begg and Binyam Mohamad said they recognized her from her picture (the one with her wearing the black shawl and looking unhealthy). She herself says she was tortured by threatening her children, and that she was shown a picture of her son (it isn’t clear which one) lying in a pool of his own blood. She also says she was kept in extreme isolation and tortured.
Blogs started up to keep her memory alive, although according to Elaine Sharpe, during that period, her family thought she was dead.
Around June to early July, 2008, Yvonne Ridley of cageprisoners started writing and speaking about "The Grey Lady of Bagram – Prisoner 650", based largely on Moazzam Begg’s book and subsequent conversations with Mr. Begg. Lord Nazir (Britain) and Ismail Khan, a Pakistani cricket player turned politician, took up the cry, with first Ismail Khan, then Lord Nazir, then others linking Prisoner 650 with Aafia Siddiqui by about July 12th. She was subsequently arrested on July 17th in Ghazni by the side of the road, by the Ghazni police on an anonymous tip, with her son Ahmed. The U.S. military at first denied there had ever been female prisoners at Bagram (under the Geneva Conventions they must be held separately from the men with special considerations), and for even longer denied the existence of child prisoners in Afghanistan. Subsequent to Aafia Siddiqui’s arraignment, when things were heating up over the release of her son Ahmed, Lt.Col. Rumi Nielson-Green, CENTCOM spokeswoman, admitted there had been a female prisoner, that she had been Prisoner 650, but said she was not Aafia Siddiqui and was held from 2003-2005 and repatriated to her country of origin. The State Department has since reported to the U.N. that there have been 2100+ children held prisoner in Afghanistan for an average length of imprisonment of 1 year.
I think I’ll stop there, and see if there is interest in more, and in sourcing (since I wrote most of this from memory with my papers on the desktop).



27 Comments







I am confused by the timeline here:
So, Aafia Siddiqui is not the Grey Lady of Bagram? And, Aafia Siddiqui had been separated from her other two children before July, 17, 2008? And, we know little to nothing aout the status or whereabouts of the three children now?
Yvonne Ridley wrote the story about the Grey Lady of Bagram, Prisoner 650 before people linked that person to Aafia Siddiqui. At the time, the only thing known about the Grey Lady was that there was a woman whose screams were heard by prisoners at Bagram, and who was seen and who was housed with the men. Yvonne Ridley got the story from the book that Moazzam Begg wrote about his captivity after he was released. Then Imran Khan linked that woman with Aafia Siddiqui who was a person who had disappeared in Pakistan and was believed held by the U.S. The U.S. military claims they, Prisoner 650 and Aafia Siddiqui, are two different people.
As for her separation from her children, she was believed taken with her children, but they were used as a threat against her while she was imprisoned, as a form of torture, according to her. When she was arrested in Ghazni, only Ahmed, the eldest, was with her. Ahmed was held by the Afghan NDS (intelligence services) or Afghan police, or the U.S. military indirectly, from July 17, 2008 to September 14 when he was turned over to her sister in Pakistan. The youngest child, Suleman, is believed to be dead, nobody knows anything about Maryam, her daughter, there are rumors that she was sold. Aafia Siddiqui appears to believe that Maryam is also dead at times. The Pakistani government has been ordered by the courts to find the children, it so far has come up empty.
Her ex-husband, Amjad Khan, did a piece with the Pakistani newspaper The Nation in early 2009 claiming that she was never imprisoned and in fact lived in Karachi the whole time and that all three children are somewhere there (obviously the eldest is). As part of his argument, he claimed that the picture that was widely circulated showing her looking pale in a black shawl was a fabrication that her family had used before to claim that he cut Aafia Siddiqui with a baby bottle in Roxbury (although it wasn’t her family that originally alleged spousal abuse). But Yvonne Ridley did an interview with the governor of Ghazni that showed it was taken by his staff when she was arrested there (i.e. before she was shot). Fouzia, her sister, has filed charges in Pakistani court against Amjad Khan, originally for defamation of character, then for threatening them, and he was to have a bail hearing around now, I haven’t heard what happened. Nevertheless, his version of the story was instrumental in the narrative used by Sally C. Johnson to convince psychologists at Carswell, TX that Aafia Siddiqui was malingering, which she ‘proved’ by ‘proving’ to them that she had never been imprisoned.
This poor woman.
She disappears on March 29, 2003 and is arrested on July 17th [2008] in Ghazni by the side of the road, by the Ghazni police. These are the only two available “official” anchors for her whereabouts? And, in between? Coincidentally, there is a Grey Lady/Prisoner 650 at Bagram that the US claims is not her? Maybe the Grey Lady is not Aafia Siddiqui, but Aafia Siddiqui had to have been somewhere. And, I’m more inclined to believe Binyam Mohammed and Moazzam Begg than anyone from the US who might otherwise be expected to know.
Based on my limited experience with the relationship between spouses from the middle east, it’s not hard to imagine that Amjad Khan might give her up to try and deflect suspicion from himself. But, of course, that’s just wild speculation on my part.
Someday, maybe, there’s a hell of a screenplay in this. Thanks for the details you’ve been able to muster.
Oh, and ondelette, sleep is a necessary evil even for people like yourself.
{{{hugs}}}
Thank you, ondelette. Recommended.
As I read the above quote, into my mind came the thought: “..sounds just like that magic bullet theory of Senator Specter which became the official conclusion in the Warren Commission investigation of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.” There is no contorted sculpture of the bullshit that those in power will not foist upon us and expect reasonable people to believe.
Use of mind-altering drugs is a war crime, as is torture and rape and kidnapping and killing of children and using them to threaten their captive parent.
I have read 2 different versions of where she was picked up and arrested in a dazed state with vials of chemicals in her handbag; one states she was in front of the municipal police building; the other in front of the governor’s mansion. Either place spells ‘frame-up’ to me; where better to plant her with the planted chemicals but in a location where she would quickly be re-arrested in a mental state making anything she said “crazy”.
The FBI should be made to fork-over every scrap of evidence of whatever nature in Dr. Siddiqui’s case. Will it happen? IMHO, no chance. I expect her to meet with an ‘accident’ or ’suicide’, her case stamped “unsolved” and her 15 minutes of notice lost in the passing of time – just as the assassination of JFK has been.
Agree.
ART45, how can we overcome this Power that has taken-over our government?
It is more than unlikely, it was proven not to be true. Psyops..al Qaeda does not promote women to positions of power. While that might have been the plan, it will not happen now that in the nick of time she has 3 excellent lawyers. Not to say that the corrupt judge isn’t going to do his best to obstruct her defense.
*********
“The statement expressed the hope that the team will work in the best interests of Aafia Siddiqui and strive to get her home in a speedy fashion despite the challenges of time imposed by the court. “Each of these attorneys have demonstrated their skill and unwavering commitment to justice, and we trust they will apply their passion and dedication to Aafia’s case. “In addition, we pray that the diplomatic efforts by the government of Pakistan on Aafia’s behalf will continue unimpeded,” the statement said. “Her trial is less than nine weeks away and the presiding judge has made it clear that he does not intend to allow additional time for the new counsels to prepare or for the results of an independent investigation into the allegations made by the prosecution. “
http://www.draafia.org/2009/08…..-at-trial/
blue, at your link @8:
It was slimeball, Judge Mukasey, who started her down this road to “crazy”. Same squirming weasel who was confirmed by the Senate to become Attorney General even though he would not commit to the meaning of the word ‘torture’.
[blue, the ref to the song in a prior thread was about changes here, nothing more.]
Yup..I forgot to hit refresh, again. So happy to hear that answer from you. Hey..what do you have against weasels..’g’.
Charles Swift has actually been helping for a while now, having provided a letter to Muslim Associations around the country that it was legal to donate to a defense fund of a terrorism suspect. The issue of donations is huge in the Muslim community, since organizations can be declared terrorist and their donors retroactively targeted for material support.
It worries me though that Aafia Siddiqui herself has still not yet approved the team. One lawyer, Elaine Sharpe, was actually requested by her last year, so maybe she will, but she had requested Muslim attorneys. Part of the problem all along has been paying for it. She didn’t feel that she should accept the charity of the Pakistan government with so many more deserving people back in Pakistan to tend to, partly because she views herself as not having a ghost of a chance at trial anyway.
Thank you for providing more information than I could have gathered, as well as all the interesting theories.
I could actually do another post of equal size on all the theories. The Pakistani press is replete with them, and Aafia Siddiqui is one of the poster children there for all the “disappeared” (there are over 4,000 of them, with the U.S. believe complicit in 400 or more). The fight over the disappeared literally brought down the Musharraf government in many ways, so it’s quite a big deal there.
We did get confirmation last week that the plots came out of KSM under torture, confirming what Andy Worthington had conjectured. According to the CIA documents, the only plots he spoke about before he was tortured concerned Heathrow Airport, because he knew that Ramzi bin al Shibh had been captured already. That makes it hard fact that the plots used in U.S. court against Uzair Paracha, and against Aafia Siddiqui, and by military commissions against Saifullah Paracha and Majid Khan were taken under explicit torture, waterboarding, no possibility of only CIDT, and are therefore illegal to use in any form in a judicial proceeding under the CAT. The documentation that Jeff Kaye points to about Ali Soufan’s “interviews” failing the common Article 3 test leans in the same direction for Abu Zubaydah, but so far we don’t know for sure that the information that caused the attempted and final arrests of Binyam Mohamed and José Padilla were taken under torture directly (some of the information on them may also have been taken from Ibn al Shaykh al Libi, as well).
As bad as it may seem, information derived from CIDT is not banned by the CAT, as Article 16 specifically mentions only Articles 10, 11, 12, and 13. It is banned in U.S. courts under U.S. law, though, I’m waiting to see the government’s argument that the “interviews” the FBI conducted on Aafia Siddiqui in Bagram (at Craig Field Hospital) are somehow legal because of lack of U.S. presence and lack of charges and ‘only’ CIDT.
I would love for you to do some more, particularly if you can bring in some of the stuff from the non-English language Pakistani press that seems reasonable.
Thank you so much for all your hard work. Please do as much as can. This is all very important.
“In March, the CIA began interrogating Khalid Shaykh Mohammad. He mentioned her in his plot”..
*********
I have not seen written proof of that anywhere.
“Also part of the plan divulged by KSM was that Aafia Siddiqui had secretly married Ammar al-Baluchi. “
*********
No proof of that was ever shown. Aafia and her family deny this US story.
“On March 29, 2003, Aafia Siddiqui left her parents’ place by taxi with her three children, to take them to her uncle’s place in Islamabad for safe keeping since the FBI had issued a wanted notice for her arrest and it was “all over the TV” in Pakistan. “
*********
No arrest warrant in March /03. The FBI released a picture of her on a ‘person of interest” poster on May 26/04. Not a charge of terrorism…ever.
http://www.camerairaq.com/2004…..wante.html
There is plenty to document that KSM mentioned Aafia Siddiqui and that the subsequent wanted posters were due to that, specifically. In fact, KSM later disavowed the whole plot about Majid Khan, and specifically said that Ms. Siddiqui got named because she came from a prominent family and he recalled seeing her name, and had to name names. No, she did not marry Ammar al-Baluchi, they just said she did. Yes, the U.S. government did put her all over the TV in Pakistan as wanted, no, there was no arrest warrant, even up until 2008 she was only ever “wanted for questioning”, officially.
I was documenting what accusations and plots were made (those of KSM were done under waterboarding, specifically, it now turns out) not what the facts are.
ondelette, I answered your question (Thai/GITMO ?) back here, last comment.
Do you know when Zubaydah arrived in GITMO?
A team of officials from Langley were dispatched to observe his last waterboarding session. They wouldn’t have gone to Thailand, would they?
“Held initially in Thailand, and later in Poland, he is one of 14 “high-value detainees” transferred to Guantánamo in September 2006. At his tribunal in 2007, he denied being a member of al-Qaeda, and made a point of mentioning that he had been tortured. He has not yet been put forward for trial by Military Commission.
The prisoners held on Diego Garcia “
http://freedetainees.org/1619
Thanks, blue, you always come thru with the goods! So, Pakistan, Thailand, Poland, Diego Garcia, Gitmo 09/2006. We are told (/s) that the techniques were ended in 2005. Yet, one of those memos on EW’s postings showed that permission was given in 2007 for some ’special technique’ to be used on one of the HVDs…IMO, doesn’t matter what they spoke or wrote – lies to excuse and cover their crimes bothers them not. Lords of The Lies, they were and continue to be.
And he suffered mental problems from a head wound received prior to his originally being picked up.
Well, I guess that’s o.k….after all, Pres. W said he got his instructions from God to launch a crusade and ravish Iraq and ‘free’ all those people [no matter that about a million and half of them were killed in the process…so??).(enlarged /s)
Ondelette, I answered your question re CIA interrogators here at # 28.
(Sept 20/06)
“The Bush administration had to empty its secret prisons and transfer terror suspects to the military-run detention centre at Guantánamo this month in part because CIA interrogators had refused to carry out further interrogations and run the secret facilities, according to former CIA officials and people close to the programme.
The former officials said the CIA interrogators’ refusal was a factor in forcing the Bush administration to act earlier than it might have wished.
Senior officials and Mr Bush himself have come close to admitting this by saying CIA interrogators sought legal clarity. But no official has confirmed on the record how and when the secret programme actually came to an end.
John Negroponte, director of national intelligence, who was interviewed by Fox News on Sunday, said in response to a question of whether CIA interrogators had refused to work: “I think the way I would answer you in regard to that question is that there’s been precious little activity of that kind for a number of months now, and certainly since the Supreme Court decision.” “
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/57e6…..e2340.html
Here is an excerpt from Der Spiegel regarding the re-arrest of Dr. Siddiqui with the handbags of chemicals and a computer(?? she is 5′4″ and is lugging about a computer?):
[The entire 3 page article is all worth reading. I apologize for the length here, ondelette, but there seemed to be no good cut-off point.]
Computers are pretty portable these days. There’s a woman here who’s 5 feet even, over 50, and carries one around every day.
acquarius74 @ 20 and macaqueman @ 21: In general, I have been dismissing arguments about her size and physical capabilities, although I don’t dismiss those that say it requires knowledge of the gun to fire it. The size arguments were originally put forward outside the courthouse by Elizabeth Fink, her first public defender in 2008. I think even a child could probably at least pick up the gun and, if they knew how, shoot it without hitting anything. And macaqueman is right about lugging computers, although many other reports say she was not picked up with a computer but with a ‘jump’ drive.
I originally (for a year, in fact) dismissed the photo of her in the black shawl, thinking it had been photoshopped for various reasons. It hasn’t, but it was taken in low light which is why the colors are somewhat off. It was taken the day before she was shot, many people mistakenly think it was from her courtroom appearance at arraignment 2+ weeks later, but it wasn’t. The blue in the foreground below her face is the burqa she had on when arrested, it goes over the rest as you probably know.
The whole circumstances of the actual arrest and shooting are varied. Initially, there were reports that she and her son were wearing explosives, as well. There are divergent reports from the time of the arrest on whether or not she intended a suicide mission against the governor’s mansion in Ghazni. It really doesn’t make any sense to claim that that was happening and claim she was a mastermind, masterminds don’t blow up provincial mansions in the boondocks in Afghanistan, and a third venue for where they were was on the Kabul-Kandahar Road, which would be a place for someone to be dropped off if they were expected to be waylaid.
As for the shooting events, Reuters reported at the time that the Ghazni police said she was unarmed and approached the Americans to complain about treatment by the Afghans and was shot point blank. The Americans claim she yelled ‘Allahu Akbar!’ and ‘I want to kill Americans’ and fired two shots which missed and then a translator grabbed the gun and wrestled with her, and the warrant officer then shot her twice with a 9mm pistol. Since both bullets struck her in her torso, it seems very unlikely she had both hands on a gun in a struggle with someone else when she was shot in the frontal torso. BTW, in the court transcripts from her competency hearing on July 6th, it is possible to find out that the FBI officers present and possibly the translator were women. Don’t know about the warrant officer.
That she passed out from the wounds is undisputed. What’s weird is that she lost part of her intestines, and possibly a kidney and a spleen in surgery in Bagram, and she lost consciousness, yet the medical officers at Bagram called it a non-life threatening injury. Maybe they have different standards, a bullet wound to the abdomen that causes loss of consciousness is normally treated as life-threatening.
The stuff in her bags doesn’t make sense, to the point where the notes were interpreted by Thomas Kucharski (forensic psychologist, for the defense) as evidence of delusional disorder. There were really screwball plots to concoct biological weapons that only killed certain ethnic or political or belief groups or only killed children or adults, and stuff like that.
A Ph.D. in cognitive neuroscience with an undergraduate degree in biology doesn’t think like that, unless delusional or psychotic or forced to write things or something. There’s also the matter as to how someone like that goes insane in this manner, consistent with prolonged isolation, and recovers without treatment in some ways, also consistent with extreme conditions that get relieved.
And there is the whole matter of her being “interviewed” by among others, the agent who was there at her shooting, starting the day after her surgery and continuing for the entire time she wasn’t fit to travel, every day, like Ali Soufan’s interviews of Abu Zubaydah. She didn’t know what had happened even to Ahmed at that point, and was in a restraint bed, supposedly lit up 24/7. And the children, and a lot of other problems with the whole “re-arrest”, and the whole woman in a burqa by the side of the road thing on a road that’s particularly dangerous.
And the dates don’t match in some of the forensic testimony by the government in the competency hearing. And the FBI listed her languages as Arabic and English (She supposedly hangs around in Afghanistan for years and never picks up either Dari or Pashto? A Ph.D. who already speaks Urdu and English and spent some of her formative years in Africa? I don’t buy it.), and other such off the wall stuff.
The Der Spiegel article is now out of date, she has been ruled competent to stand trial (which was a farcical proceedings from my point of view). I believe she is competent except for tangential thinking and impulsive behavior, and she wanted to be ruled competent, but the whole thing was weird, procedurally and factually.
acquarius74: I can write about the theories and other details, like above, in another installment. I cannot provide access to non-English Pakistani reports, by which I believe you mean Urdu? I am learning Hindi, but cannot read the Urdu script, and anyway do not have the vocabulary or ability to read a newspaper yet, sorry (although I did make it through a Hindi article about the swine flu in Mumbai).
About the GITMO thing: The shock to human rights groups when President Bush transferred them to GITMO in 2006 was that there were 14, instead of the 34 missing and believe to be in black sites, Aafia Siddiqui among them. I think she’d have caused an uproar if she’d been amongst the transferees.
Can anyone explain to me why, other than a few short stories in the NYT, the M$M can’t see an incredibly important and interesting story that could capture a Pulitzer and bring this tragic story the visibility it deserves? If it is made into a movie someday, it won’t help Aafia or be shown soon enough to make a real difference, but it will sure make a lot of government leaders look disgusting beyond words. My faint hope is that the top guilty officials will watch it on a prison TV.
The Pentagon won’t give them permission. Neither will the handful of media owners that control the news. It is the same as with Sibel Edmonds’s testimony. When someone who is credible finally speaks after being gagged by Ashcroft since 2002, why is there silence? When someone tells you that past and current senators are bribed and blackmailed, why is that not of interest?
********
“The complete transcript of Sibel Edmonds’ under-oath testimony, may now be downloaded here [PDF]. The complete video-taped testimony follows, in five parts, below…”
http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7374