“The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well. True coexistence is a must.” – Whole Foods Market, Jan. 21, 2011
In the wake of a 12-year battle to keep Monsanto’s Genetically Engineered (GE) crops from contaminating the nation’s 25,000 organic farms and ranches, America’s organic consumers and producers are facing betrayal. A self-appointed cabal of the Organic Elite, spearheaded by Whole Foods Market, Organic Valley, and Stonyfield Farm, has decided it’s time to surrender to Monsanto. Top executives from these companies have publicly admitted that they no longer oppose the mass commercialization of GE crops, such as Monsanto’s controversial Roundup Ready alfalfa, and are prepared to sit down and cut a deal for “coexistence” with Monsanto and USDA biotech cheerleader Tom Vilsack.
In a cleverly worded, but profoundly misleading email sent to its customers last week, Whole Foods Market, while proclaiming their support for organics and “seed purity,” gave the green light to USDA bureaucrats to approve the “conditional deregulation” of Monsanto’s genetically engineered, herbicide-resistant alfalfa. Beyond the regulatory euphemism of “conditional deregulation,” this means that WFM and their colleagues are willing to go along with the massive planting of a chemical and energy-intensive GE perennial crop, alfalfa; guaranteed to spread its mutant genes and seeds across the nation; guaranteed to contaminate the alfalfa fed to organic animals; guaranteed to lead to massive poisoning of farm workers and destruction of the essential soil food web by the toxic herbicide, Roundup; and guaranteed to produce Roundup-resistant superweeds that will require even more deadly herbicides such as 2,4 D to be sprayed on millions of acres of alfalfa across the U.S. . . .
In exchange for allowing Monsanto’s premeditated pollution of the alfalfa gene pool, WFM wants “compensation.” In exchange for a new assault on farmworkers and rural communities (a recent large-scale Swedish study found that spraying Roundup doubles farm workers’ and rural residents’ risk of getting cancer), WFM expects the pro-biotech USDA to begin to regulate rather than cheerlead for Monsanto. In payment for a new broad spectrum attack on the soil’s crucial ability to provide nutrition for food crops and to sequester dangerous greenhouse gases (recent studies show that Roundup devastates essential soil microorganisms that provide plant nutrition and sequester climate-destabilizing greenhouse gases), WFM wants the Biotech Bully of St. Louis to agree to pay “compensation” (i.e. hush money) to farmers “for any losses related to the contamination of his crop.”
In its email of Jan. 21, 2011 WFM calls for “public oversight by the USDA rather than reliance on the biotechnology industry,” even though WFM knows full well that federal regulations on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) do not require pre-market safety testing, nor labeling; and that even federal judges have repeatedly ruled that so-called government “oversight” of Frankencrops such as Monsanto’s sugar beets and alfalfa is basically a farce. At the end of its email, WFM admits that its surrender to Monsanto is permanent: “The policy set for GE alfalfa will most likely guide policies for other GE crops as well True coexistence is a must.”
Why Is Organic Inc. Surrendering?
According to informed sources, the CEOs of WFM and Stonyfield are personal friends of former Iowa governor, now USDA Secretary, Tom Vilsack, and in fact made financial contributions to Vilsack’s previous electoral campaigns. Vilsack was hailed as “Governor of the Year” in 2001 by the Biotechnology Industry Organization, and traveled in a Monsanto corporate jet on the campaign trail. Perhaps even more fundamental to Organic Inc.’s abject surrender is the fact that the organic elite has become more and more isolated from the concerns and passions of organic consumers and locavores. The Organic Inc. CEOs are tired of activist pressure, boycotts, and petitions. Several of them have told me this to my face. They apparently believe that the battle against GMOs has been lost, and that it’s time to reach for the consolation prize. The consolation prize they seek is a so-called “coexistence” between the biotech Behemoth and the organic community that will lull the public to sleep and greenwash the unpleasant fact that Monsanto’s unlabeled and unregulated genetically engineered crops are now spreading their toxic genes on 1/3 of U.S. (and 1/10 of global) crop land.
WFM and most of the largest organic companies have deliberately separated themselves from anti-GMO efforts and cut off all funding to campaigns working to label or ban GMOs. The so-called Non-GMO Project, funded by Whole Foods and giant wholesaler United Natural Foods (UNFI) is basically a greenwashing effort (although the 100% organic companies involved in this project seem to be operating in good faith) to show that certified organic foods are basically free from GMOs (we already know this since GMOs are banned in organic production), while failing to focus on so-called “natural” foods, which constitute most of WFM and UNFI’s sales and are routinely contaminated with GMOs.
From their “business as usual” perspective, successful lawsuits against GMOs filed by public interest groups such as the Center for Food Safety; or noisy attacks on Monsanto by groups like the Organic Consumers Association, create bad publicity, rattle their big customers such as Wal-Mart, Target, Kroger, Costco, Supervalu, Publix and Safeway; and remind consumers that organic crops and foods such as corn, soybeans, and canola are slowly but surely becoming contaminated by Monsanto’s GMOs.
Whole Food’s Dirty Little Secret: Most of the So-Called “Natural” Processed Foods and Animal Products They Sell Are Contaminated with GMOs
The main reason, however, why Whole Foods is pleading for coexistence with Monsanto, Dow, Bayer, Syngenta, BASF and the rest of the biotech bullies, is that they desperately want the controversy surrounding genetically engineered foods and crops to go away. Why? Because they know, just as we do, that 2/3 of WFM’s $9 billion annual sales is derived from so-called “natural” processed foods and animal products that are contaminated with GMOs. We and our allies have tested their so-called “natural” products (no doubt WFM’s lab has too) containing non-organic corn and soy, and guess what: they’re all contaminated with GMOs, in contrast to their certified organic products, which are basically free of GMOs, or else contain barely detectable trace amounts.
Approximately 2/3 of the products sold by Whole Foods Market and their main distributor, United Natural Foods (UNFI) are not certified organic, but rather are conventional (chemical-intensive and GMO-tainted) foods and products disguised as “natural.”
Unprecedented wholesale and retail control of the organic marketplace by UNFI and Whole Foods, employing a business model of selling twice as much so-called “natural” food as certified organic food, coupled with the takeover of many organic companies by multinational food corporations such as Dean Foods, threatens the growth of the organic movement.
Covering Up GMO Contamination: Perpetrating “Natural” Fraud
Many well-meaning consumers are confused about the difference between conventional products marketed as “natural,” and those nutritionally/environmentally superior and climate-friendly products that are “certified organic.”
Retail stores like WFM and wholesale distributors like UNFI have failed to educate their customers about the qualitative difference between natural and certified organic, conveniently glossing over the fact that nearly all of the processed “natural” foods and products they sell contain GMOs, or else come from a “natural” supply chain where animals are force-fed GMO grains in factory farms or Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs).
A troubling trend in organics today is the calculated shift on the part of certain large formerly organic brands from certified organic ingredients and products to so-called “natural” ingredients. With the exception of the “grass-fed and grass-finished” meat sector, most “natural” meat, dairy, and eggs are coming from animals reared on GMO grains and drugs, and confined, entirely, or for a good portion of their lives, in CAFOs.
Whole Foods and UNFI are maximizing their profits by selling quasi-natural products at premium organic prices. Organic consumers are increasingly left without certified organic choices while genuine organic farmers and ranchers continue to lose market share to “natural” imposters. It’s no wonder that less than 1% of American farmland is certified organic, while well-intentioned but misled consumers have boosted organic and “natural” purchases to $80 billion annually-approximately 12% of all grocery store sales.
The Solution: Truth-in-Labeling Will Enable Consumers to Drive So-Called “Natural” GMO and CAFO-Tainted Foods Off the Market
There can be no such thing as “coexistence” with a reckless industry that undermines public health, destroys biodiversity, damages the environment, tortures and poisons animals, destabilizes the climate, and economically devastates the world’s 1.5 billion seed-saving small farmers. There is no such thing as coexistence between GMOs and organics in the European Union. Why? Because in the EU there are almost no GMO crops under cultivation, nor GM consumer food products on supermarket shelves. And why is this? Because under EU law, all foods containing GMOs or GMO ingredients must be labeled. Consumers have the freedom to choose or not to choose GMOs; while farmers, food processors, and retailers have (at least legally) the right to lace foods with GMOs, as long as they are safety-tested and labeled. Of course the EU food industry understands that consumers, for the most part, do not want to purchase or consume GE foods. European farmers and food companies, even junk food purveyors like McDonald’s and Wal-Mart, understand quite well the concept expressed by a Monsanto executive when GMOs first came on the market: “If you put a label on genetically engineered food you might as well put a skull and crossbones on it.”
The biotech industry and Organic Inc. are supremely conscious of the fact that North American consumers, like their European counterparts, are wary and suspicious of GMO foods. Even without a PhD, consumers understand you don’t want your food safety or environmental sustainability decisions to be made by out-of-control chemical companies like Monsanto, Dow, or Dupont – the same people who brought you toxic pesticides, Agent Orange, PCBs, and now global warming. Industry leaders are acutely aware of the fact that every single industry or government poll over the last 16 years has shown that 85-95% of American consumers want mandatory labels on GMO foods. Why? So that we can avoid buying them. GMO foods have absolutely no benefits for consumers or the environment, only hazards. This is why Monsanto and their friends in the Bush, Clinton, and Obama administrations have prevented consumer GMO truth-in-labeling laws from getting a public discussion in Congress.
Although Congressman Dennis Kucinich (Democrat, Ohio) recently introduced a bill in Congress calling for mandatory labeling and safety testing for GMOs, don’t hold your breath for Congress to take a stand for truth-in-labeling and consumers’ right to know what’s in their food. Especially since the 2010 Supreme Court decision in the so-called “Citizens United” case gave big corporations and billionaires the right to spend unlimited amounts of money (and remain anonymous, as they do so) to buy media coverage and elections, our chances of passing federal GMO labeling laws against the wishes of Monsanto and Food Inc. are all but non-existent. Perfectly dramatizing the “Revolving Door” between Monsanto and the Federal Government, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, formerly chief counsel for Monsanto, delivered one of the decisive votes in the Citizens United case, in effect giving Monsanto and other biotech bullies the right to buy the votes it needs in the U.S. Congress.
With big money controlling Congress and the media, we have little choice but to shift our focus and go local. We’ve got to concentrate our forces where our leverage and power lie, in the marketplace, at the retail level; pressuring retail food stores to voluntarily label their products; while on the legislative front we must organize a broad coalition to pass mandatory GMO (and CAFO) labeling laws, at the city, county, and state levels.
The Organic Consumers Association, joined by our consumer, farmer, environmental, and labor allies, has just launched a nationwide Truth-in-Labeling campaign to stop Monsanto and the Biotech Bullies from force-feeding unlabeled GMOs to animals and humans.
Utilizing scientific data, legal precedent, and consumer power the OCA and our local coalitions will educate and mobilize at the grassroots level to pressure giant supermarket chains (Wal-Mart, Kroger, Costco, Safeway, Supervalu, and Publix) and natural food retailers such as Whole Foods and Trader Joe’s to voluntarily implement “truth-in-labeling” practices for GMOs and CAFO products; while simultaneously organizing a critical mass to pass mandatory local and state truth-in-labeling ordinances – similar to labeling laws already in effect for country of origin, irradiated food, allergens, and carcinogens. If local and state government bodies refuse to take action, wherever possible we must attempt to gather sufficient petition signatures and place these truth-in-labeling initiatives directly on the ballot in 2011 or 2012. If you’re interesting in helping organize or coordinate a Millions Against Monsanto and Factory Farms Truth-in-Labeling campaign in your local community, sign up here: http://organicconsumers.org/oca-volunteer/
To pressure Whole Foods Market and the nation’s largest supermarket chains to voluntarily adopt truth-in-labeling practices sign here, and circulate this petition widely: http://www.organicconsumers.org/articles/article_22309.cfm
And please stay tuned to Organic Bytes for the latest developments in our campaigns.
Power to the People! Not the Corporations!




54 Comments

Recommended. I’d recommend it three or four times more if I could. It’s taken millions of years to produce a genetically diverse and adaptable source of food for humans and non-humans. This information — the genetic coding inherent in this biologically diverse system — can never be replaced and should not be a commodity which companies like Monsanto and the rest can use to create an oligopoly. This is a 21st century version of the enclosure debacle.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enclosure
Thank you. This type of sell-out has been going on for years. Behemoths like Dean have been buying up certified organic producers and converting them to “natural” producers. The Cornucopia Institute has an excellent chart of the demise of independent organic producers.
organicconsumers
Thank you for this post and the incredibly important information that you have shared within it. This entire post should be front paged and shared in every nook and corner of the internet and blog sphere.
We can argue amongst ourselves over politics and every other topic that can come to mind and access importance in varying degrees, but our food system and the health of the foods we grow and consume are the essential thread of life that will ultimately determine if we survive as a species.
It is of utmost importance to not only us but our future generations ( I have 3 grandchildren ) I fear for daily. I also have a good friend that is one of the organizing and founding partners of the Non-GMO project in Marin county, California. He heads up the Good Earth Natural food store in Fairfax and was influential in getting all of Marin County to go Non-GMO…after this post, I intend to have a long conversation with him.
Glyphosate’s Impacts on Human Health and Plant Life
Don Huber, Global Research, December 10, 2010
[blockquote]….
Glyphosate doesn’t kill weeds directly but shuts down their defense mechanisms so pathogens in the soil can mobilize and kill the weeds. Glyphosate completely weakens the plant, making it susceptible to soil borne fungal pathogens.
That is one reason why we see an increase in plant diseases. Glyphosate causes plants to be more susceptible and greatly stimulates the virulence of pathogens that kill plants.
….
There are more than 40 diseases reported with use of glyphosate, and that number keeps growing as people recognize the association (between glyphosate and disease).
….
Glyphosate is the single most important agronomic factor predisposing some plants to both disease and toxins. These toxins can produce a serious impact on the health of animals and humans.
….
Micronutrients such as manganese, copper, potassium, iron, magnesium, calcium, and zinc are essential to human health. All of them can be reduced in availability by glyphosate; mineral nutrients are less in glyphosate treated plants. We are seeing a reduction in nutrient quality (in food crops).
There are also reports of allergic reactions, such as stomach lesions, produced by the Roundup Ready (genetically modified) gene.
….
It’s hard to find an acre in the US that hasn’t had glyphosate applied on it in the last three years.[/blockquote]
And that’s not mentioning the animals studies, showing increased stillbirths, sterility, organ malformation.
What’s particularly insidious about the Alfalfa contamination is that Alfalfa is a perennial cover crop used by organic farmers to increase soil fertility, replacing nitrogen which other crops, such as corn, deplete.
Deadeningly sad news. And there had been such a movement toward sustainable and organic gardening and farming. Even our local Soil Conversation District was taking part.
here’s an example of capitalism failing completely.
what the hell does alfalfa have to be “MODIFIED” for.
The Alfalfa we have is just fine.
meanwhile there are now superweeds, which require new, stronger chemicals to kill them, with more volume of chemicals. they are expanding rapidly across the continent.
and roundup resistant canola is now sprouting everywhere and is a weed.
This is beyond stupid. I hate this.
Excellent post. Recommended. The more I know about Monsanto the more disgusted I am with them.
Canadians can no longer grow non-GMO contaminated canola thanks to Monsanto and the complicity of the government. A farmer in Canada who had grown canola for 50 years and saved his own seed was sued by Monsanto when his fields were found to contain some genetically modified canola. How did it get there? Wind and insects, of course, the way plants have been pollinated for millennia. Incredibly, the courts sided with Monsanto. This would be risible if it weren’t so tragic for everyone. We are headed for famine in our future as we increasingly rely for our sustenance on a shrinking plant gene pool. 98% of the world’s seed crop is now controlled by just seven companies. We should all be very afraid, furious and courageous enough to tell Whole Foods and their kin to go to hell. Grow your own, boycott Whole Foods and rage in the streets.
If you’ve only ever mown a suburban lawn, it may be hard to fathom what a big deal this is. Alfafa is not a cute little urchin with freckles and a cowlick. It is grown absobloodylutely everywhere there are farm animals to feed.
It is also trucked hundreds of miles or more on open flatbed trucks, ten bails high, weighting tens of thousands of pounds. Nearly every cow that comes to market and other animals too will have eaten it for part of their life cycle. Ditto those used to produce milk. Intentionally or otherwise, its seeds will find their way into the entire ecosystem. The impact of this sell-out is enormous.
What a great diary. This sort of stuff breaks my heart, especially the capitulation on issues regarding deeply toxic products like roundup.
This important post deserves to be widely read. And that inspite of the fact that it caused me to let out a giant OHHHHH SHIT!
Thanks for this important diary.
I grew potatoes without pesticides or herbicides in my organic (not certified) home garden. I pulled a couple weeds to control them. Mulched for weed control and water conservation.
The neighbor grew potatoes, “cleaned,” his garden with roundup, twice, in the early spring, before planting. He was infested with the Colorado potato beetle and lost all his crop despite additional dusting. I had an outbreak of soldier beetles from my composted hay. Soldier beetles eat potato beetle larve. I have potatoes enough to share in good quantity.
What more is there to understand?
Wow, veal pen r us.
So sad, so disgusting.
When you hear discussions of GMO seeds, as a report I heard recently, there is never any mention of the fact that many of them are that “roundup ready” stuff, which carries with it the fact that Roundup will be used on the crop.
That radio report did not go into the effects of using Roundup on the farmers and farm workers.
Sigh.
Amy Goodman interviewed Percy Schmeiser (the Canadian farmer) last September. You can learn about his battle with Monsanto here:
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/9/17/percy_schmeiser_vs_monsanto_the_story
Its funny I worked at a farm that claimed to use minimal chemicals I never saw a bug or animal eat a tomato even after a rain or after the tomato fell to the ground.
I never saw an earthworm in the fields after a rain. Now you say thongs are getting worse.
As more and more weeds get chemical resistance the more farmers are going need workers to pull weeds since their is a limit to how toxic a chemical can be to kill weeds, bugs, fungus, keep birds, chipmunks etc away and still be considered *cough* safe for humans.
Granted we are not at that point yet but there is a reason why rural americans die sooner than urban americans they used to live longer than urban Americans until the early 90′s.
When did genetically modified crops get widely used?
While mortality rates in the United States overall have declined over the past few decades, mortality rates in metropolitan and non-metropolitan areas have diverged since the early 1990s. Figure 6 shows that, since 1990, non-metropolitan mortality has declined at an average annual rate of only 0.73 percent, significantly slower than the metropolitan rate of 1.27 percent.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/cea/factsheets-reports/strengthening-the-rural-economy/the-current-state-of-rural-america
As much as 30 percent of Northern California’s garlic harvesters are under-aged children. Kids as young as six years old have voted in state-conducted union elections since they qualified as workers.
Some 800,000 under-aged children work with their families harvesting crops across America. Babies born to migrant workers suffer 25 percent higher infant mortality than the rest of the population.
Malnutrition among migrant worker children is 10 times higher than the national rate.
Farm workers’ average life expectancy is still 49 years –compared to 73 years for the average American
http://www.ufw.org/_page.php?menu=research&inc=history/12.html
the mortality rates of first-generation immigrants are consistently better than that of U.S.-born Hispanics. But he said the difference between these groups is seldom statistically significant.
In 2007, the Public Policy Institute of California found that the average lifespan of a Hispanic man in that state is 77.5 years, compared to 75.5 among white males and 68.6 among black males. The lifespan of Hispanic men was topped only by Asian men, whose average lifespan came in at 80.4.
In 2008, the National Center for Health Statistics released a study showing that the overall mortality rate for Hispanics in 2006 was 550 deaths per 100,000 people, compared to 778 for whites, and 1,001 for blacks.
http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/editors_picks/2009/7/7/the_hispanic_paradox_us_hispanics_live.htm
http://my.firedoglake.com/thingscomeundone/2011/01/16/the-hispanic-paradox-is-greater-than-we-think/
Farm Chemicals were my first guess as to why the death rates for rural Americans and Hispanic farm workers are so high compared to urban Americans and other Hispanics.
See the excellent documentary, Food Inc, which has a whole segment about Monsanto in particular and how they are suing smaller farmers everywhere bc of the cross-pollination of the small farmers’ crops with Monsanto GMO seeds that are brought via wind and insects. Every time Monsanto wins the court cases, mainly by grinding under the small farmer thru excessive litigation and/or bought off hack judges. It’s disgusting.
I’ve known about Monsanto, Dow, DuPont, Bayer, etc for years, but my leftie friends who saw Food Inc with me were totally shocked. Had no idea. It’s beyond horrifying… like a dystopian sci-fi novel.
We are so screwed, I’m afraid. There have been activists fighting against the GMO movement for at least 3 decades that I know of, but the dominos have fallen over time.
As always, follow the money…. I’m completely unsurprised by the “capitulation” by bribery of Whole Foods, etc. I never shop in Whole Foods bc I know that they LIE about their food products and charge up the yin-yang for falsely advertised food.
Are not farms a great source of exports? Does the EU not ban genetically modified crops have not starving african nations rejected American food aid because they don’t want their crops in better times to be rejected by the EU?
This action can get how many of our farm products banned assuming more genetically modified crops follow?
We lose the EU we lose parts of Africa for exports if we do this. What crops does South America send to the EU they won’t want those seeds either I’m guessing that leaves us Asia and Russia as big markets?
Farm policy is suppose to help us sell farm products or did I miss something?
Thanks for this important post. I cannot recommend it highly enough as citizens are mostly very unaware of the deep impact that BigAg has had on our food supply. The capitulation by Whole Foods and the others is absolutely no surprise to me. They are a huge business run by corrupt greed-heads out to make as much profit as possible. Do the math: they’re gonna lie, cheat, steal and plunder to make as much as they can bc that’s the way it is these days in these United States. EFF the customer; the customer is a prole and always there to be cheated and ground under; only the fat cats at the top matter.
The mind-boggling thing is this: whatever do these corp fat cats and elites think is going to happen to them, their kids and grandkids?? Their greedy gluttony blinds them to the very facts vital to our existence.
I’m afraid this is only going to get worse, not better.
There’s many family farmers in the USA who have been similarly ground under by Monsanto, like the one in Canada. When the politicians wax lyrical about family farms, let the buyer beware!! Believe me, politcians could give a stuff about smaller farms; they’re only interested in BigAg and the sweet sweet payola that they get from them.
Remember that Tom VileSack was the one who fired Shirley Sherrod without a moment’s hesitation. Sherrod was advocating for the Black Farmers & Native Amer farmers. I’m sure BigAg was pressuring VileSack to go after Sherrod the second there was the golden opportunity to do so, and I don’t think it was accidental that well-known fabulist, Breitbart, made that little fake video. He was paid and instructed to do by the likes of someone from Monsanto.
These people are vile criminals. Make no mistake. See the excellent documentary, Food Inc. Really worth while.
I guess this is this is what the “famine” horse of the apocalypse symbolized.
Famine won’t be some mythological skeleton on a horse…it will be gmo foods causing a worldwide food shortage.
Yes, Big Biz appears to have a stranglehold on national politics, and local action is the logical response. However, federal preemption of state and local laws could be used to tie local action in a knot. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/21/AR2009052104016.html
Therefore, look for Big Biz to push for that next.
Roundup Ready alfalfa can’t drift much because the vast majority of alfalfa grown is harvested before it blooms. It can’t be pollinated before it blooms, so it can’t spread. There are a few places, mostly out west, where alfalfa is grown for seed rather than hay. From what I understand special precautions are taken in those places to prevent drift. I believe organic rules do allow for some drift, however. I’m not sure of the percentage.
Deregulation of RR alfalfa is not conditional. APHIS was talking about making it conditional but decided against it because RR alfalfa isn’t a plant pest. Deregulation is unconditional, meaning no isolation distances or geographical restrictions. “Coexistence” is a word used to describe a dialogue between organic farmers of alfalfa and the vast majority of farmers that want to use RR alfalfa.
I don’t think there’s anything to be afraid of with genetically modified seed. All RR alfalfa seed is is a sort of high tech version of what horticulturists do all the time with plants, a kind of grafting.
The GMO companies like Monsanto, and their co-conspirators like Whole Foods Inc and government tools like Tom Vilsack, are truly committing crimes against humanity and the environment. These people are threatening environmental catastrophe.
You are highly misinformed. When alfalfa is harvested you never get every single plant. The ones that are left behind bloom and pollen “drifts”. Not just drifts but is carried by animals and insects, and the wind and water systems. It soon contaminates everything for miles around. It only takes a couple of seasons and everything is contaminated.
Then there is the cross-contamination. The RR gene has also been shown to “jump species” in some cases. It turns up in the weeds that are growing next to the alfalfa. The blooms from those weeds get carried too.
Organic rules prohibit ANY GE stuff. Zero. RR alfalfa seed is not a high tech version of what horticulturists do all the time. It is a highly unnatural version. The resultant second generation does not breed true and is why Monsanto requires the farmers to purchase new seed every year – because they cannot control where the inserted gene appears in the second and subsequent generations. Yields of GMO plants are usually lower than non-GMO so outputs will go down, effectively causing shortages – as they have in every other crop this gene has been spliced into.
The RR gene has already had the effect of creating Roundup resistant weeds – defeating the very purpose of the thing. So not only is the entire world’s food supply contaminated with this thing, it doesn’t even work that well any more, and the damage caused to the ecosystem is unmeasurable and cannot be undone.
We need to be very afraid. Unfortunately your attitude is naive and dangerous and is what got us into this mess and cohntinues to allow the proliferation of this destruction.
What is the source of your information? Any scientific journals or other objective sources?
Also, when you write, “It is a highly unnatural version,” what do you mean?
What environmental catastrophe? Look, Monsanto is a big company, sure, and I agree that Whole Foods Inc. and what it does is basically a gimmick, and there’s a certain amount of b.s. to it. I think drinking bottled water is sort of b.s., too, but a lot of people pay for the privilege of drinking it. Yeah, Monsanto is a big company, but so is Microsoft, so is Apple, so is IBM. They make the computers we use: does that mean that they are involved in some sort of conspiracy that involves computing? None of us controls what those companies do, so does that mean we should be afraid of their products?
To our newest paid troll, you’re way out of your league here.
Do you eat a lot of Apple/IBM/ Microsoft products? Lead poising might explain your post…
Whole Paycheck
Food$ involved? ‘Nuff said. I’m still boycotting them. I don’t buy anything from snOr_ganic Valley and FallowStonyfield Farm either. I buy from non-bankster owned sources. By the way, there is no such thing as “weeds” (a meme made up by the Big Petro/Chem/Pharma wholly-owned subsidiary of the banksters) as that is often Mother Nature’s source of medicines for humans if the humans are aware enough to take the hint.There are tons of scientific articles and objective sources out there – many of which have been referenced multiple times in innumerable posts on the subject by myself and others far more expert on this subject here at FDL and at more scientific blogs and sites spread across the internet. I am not going to do all this research for you.
Highly unnatural version means exactly what it says. A natural change in a plant results in something that can be replicated into the next generation through seed-saving. Nothing that is done by GE can be replicated into the second or F2 generation. Why do you think Monsanto refuses to allow seed-saving? Because it doesn’t work!
Of course there is the money thing too.
Did you even read the original post?
GMO genes such as the RR gene cause environmental havoc with natural systems – including beneficial soil organisms, non-target insects including necessary pollinators, and new research is showing organ damage in small animals and birds who eat these crops.
It is probably only a matter of time before these same problems show up in the people who eat these crops as well.
And then there is the damage to all organisms from the widespread application of Roundup itself – a highly toxic herbicide.
Read the post above for a description of the damage it causes.
Plus there is the fact that GMO crops do not produce as much of whatever it is that they are – meaning that especially in the area of food crops – they not only do not help “feed the hungry world” as Monsanto likes to claim, they make the whole problem of hunger worse!
Yes – an environmental catastrophe on many levels.
cal222:
go read this post:
http://my.firedoglake.com/organicconsumers/2010/07/26/top-10-reasons-to-label-genetically-engineered-foods/
And be sure to click on ALL the links posted in each line. There is plenty of research for you to digest. Although I think it will all be lost on you.
My favorite is the one where the third generation of hamsters has fur growing in their mouths after eating GMO food. Yeah – we all want that for our grand-kids.
Right wing extremists dominating both organic food and renewable energy.
Here in Oregon, PGE gets it’s renewable energy from Green Mountain Energy. Largest stockholder of Green Mountain are the Wyly Brothers. Bush Pioneers. Money for Swift Boating. The Wyly brothers gave the GOP 10 million since the 70′s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Wyly
Makes supporting renewable energy through PGE impossible.
I can’t think of a better way to say what ya did, nor do I have much to add to it.
Nicely said Sz . . . bravo.
R’cc, both diary and comment.
Wow.
Thanks.
The more comments I read the more I realize there’s LOTS more to add to this conversation . . . n I thought Sz said it all for me.
EdVe, you laid it on rather grandly yer own bad ass self I hafta add.
I continue to be dazzled by folks in these forums . . . *bowstoall*
Canolo resistant to chems is good . . . it makes an incredible vegetable oil that’s healthy for saute and cooking . . . especially for frying for those who still eat fried foods . . . we can’t . . calories are killing us, by by fried in any shape or form . . . lesigh, fried potatoes in so many forms . . . how I long for you and some sea salt and british vinegar.
They been ugly for decades . . . DFH’s told me so, long after I cut my ponytail off . . . ;-)
Great comment . . . some of which has also been my experience going back to the early 70′s when I was a teen/young adult.
Yeah, but we’re missing the capers, lemon and wine butter sauce.
;-)
Thanks again for all you do for us readers ma’am . . . H/T.
Sweet, thanks Loky.
Nlo shnit.
Ain’t that bitchen . . . .
Bless FDL n its Pups . . .
Sigh, ‘no shit’ was what that was ‘sposed to read . . . n thanks again Bill.
*G*
Hell, PG&E tried to push a proposition that would shut down city efforts to DO green energy in CA. This was recently in the last general or congressional election . . . ’08 or ’06, I forget.
Luckily, CA voters woke up from their stupor JUST in time to beat it back . . . LeSigh.
I’m sure Monsanto feels that more and more pressure will force the EU to capitulate when they are the only holdouts. Disgusting.
I stopped buying Horizon products when they were purchased by Dean Foods. I switched to Organic Valley. Now, I need to rethink that choice. Can you recommend another brand of organic dairy products?
I used to do most of my shopping at WF. Then I noticed they were carrying very little in the way of organic produce. Last year I began growing my own organic vegetables.
~~~fixed~~~
I read that study. By the 5th generation they are unable to reproduce. Are GMOs just one of many of the PTB’s solutions to population reduction? No, this is not conspiracy theory.
Aldous and Julian Huxley talked about ways in the future to control populations. Bertrand Russell followed suit. Margaret Sanger was a big proponent. Jacques Cousteau said, “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.” (1991 UNESCO Courier).
Bertrand Russell:
http://www.crossroad.to/Quotes/fascism/Bertrand%20Russell.htm
More recently, John Holdren had to defend his writings in Ecoscience (1977) in which he discussed using sterilants in the water supply to reduce population. He dismissed it pretty much by saying it was written three decades ago. The book was co-authored by Paul and Anne Ehrlich.
Whatever is going on, there is no denying that fertility rates have been declining.
http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/health/March-April-08/Italian-Study-Indicates-Falling-Sperm-Counts-.html
http://planetearth.nerc.ac.uk/news/story.aspx?id=297
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/11/101128194013.htm
http://www.lifesitenews.com/news/archive/ldn/2008/jun/08062613
I’m normally all in favor of wanting supporting documentation, but sometimes plain ol’ common sense should be enough.
Common sense tells us that “zero drift” is a practical impossibility, if for no other reason than because sooner or later someone will screw up…
Monsanto will, if they have to, play the long game. If it takes 10 years for drift to make a meaningful impact, well, they will still be standing when the fruits come home.
They have been at it since 1901.
Monsanto corporate behavior has been so awful they have their own “watch” site.
http://www.monsantowatch.org/
“Factsheet: Monsanto’s Sordid History
From the Center for Food Safety
Monsanto, best know today for its agricultural biotechnology products, has a long and dirty history of polluting this country and others with some of the most toxic compounds known to humankind. From PCBs to Agent Orange to Roundup, we have many reasons to question the motives of this company that claims to be working to reduce environmental destruction and feed the world with its genetically engineered food crops.
* Headquartered near St. Louis, Missouri, the Monsanto Chemical Company was founded in 1901. Monsanto became a leading manufacturer of sulfuric acid and other industrial chemicals in the 1920s. In the 1930s, Monsanto began producing polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). PCBs, widely used as lubricants, hydraulic fluids, cutting oils, waterproof coatings and liquid sealants, are potent carcinogens and have been implicated in reproductive, developmental and immune system disorders.
* The world’s center of PCB manufacturing was Monsanto’s plant on the outskirts of East St. Louis, Illinois, which has the highest rate of fetal death and immature births in the state. By 1982, nearby Times Beach, Missouri, was found to be so thoroughly contaminated with dioxin, a by-product of PCB manufacturing, that the government ordered it evacuated. Dioxins are endocrine and immune system disruptors, cause congenital birth defects, reproductive and developmental problems, and increase the incidence of cancer, heart disease and diabetes in laboratory animals.
* By the 1940s, Monsanto had begun focusing on plastics and synthetic fabrics like polystyrene (still widely used in food packaging and other consumer products), which is ranked fifth in the EPA’s 1980s listing of chemicals whose production generates the most total hazardous waste.
* During World War II, Monsanto played a significant role in the Manhattan Project to develop the atom bomb.
* Following the war, Monsanto championed the use of chemical pesticides in agriculture, and began manufacturing the herbicide 2,4,5-T, which contains dioxin. Monsanto has been accused of covering up or failing to report dioxin contamination in a wide range of its products.
* The herbicide “Agent Orange,” used by U.S. military forces as a defoliant during the Vietnam War, was a mixture of 2,4,5-T and 2,4-D and had very high concentrations of dioxin. U.S. Vietnam War veterans have suffered from a host of debilitating symptoms attributable to Agent Orange exposure, and since the end of the war an estimated 500,000 Vietnamese children have been born with deformities.
* In the 1970s, Monsanto began manufacturing the herbicide Roundup, which has been marketed as a safe, general-purpose herbicide for widespread commercial and consumer use, even though its key ingredient, glyphosate, is a highly toxic poison for animals and humans. In 1997, The New York State Attorney General took Monsanto to court and Monsanto was subsequently forced to stop claiming that Roundup is “biodegradable” and “environmentally friendly.”
* Monsanto has been repeatedly fined and ruled against for, among many things, mislabeling containers of Roundup, failing to report health data to EPA, and chemical spills and improper chemical deposition. In 1995, Monsanto ranked fifth among U.S. corporations in EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory, having discharged 37 million pounds of toxic chemicals into the air, land, water and underground.
* Since the inception of Plan Colombia in 2000, the US has spent hundreds of millions of dollars in funding aerial sprayings of Monsanto’s Roundup herbicides in Colombia. The Roundup is often applied in concentrations 26 times higher than what is recommended for agricultural use. Additionally, it contains at least one surfactant, Cosmo-Flux 411f, whose ingredients are a trade secret, has never been approved for use in the US, and which quadruples the biological action of the herbicide.
* Not surprisingly, numerous human health impacts have been recorded in the areas affected by the sprayings, including respiratory, gastrointestinal and skin problems, and even death, especially in children. Additionally, fish and animals will show up dead in the hours and days subsequent to the herbicide sprayings.
* In the 1980s and early 1990s, Monsanto was behind the aggressive promotion of synthetic Bovine Growth Hormone, approved by the FDA for commercial sale in 1994, despite strong concerns about its safety. Since then, Monsanto has sued small dairy companies that advertised their products as free of the artificial hormone, most recently bringing a lawsuit against Oakhurst Dairy in Maine.
* In August, 2003, Monsanto and its former chemical subsidiary, Solutia, Inc. (now owned by Pharmacia Corp.), agreed to pay $600 million to settle claims brought by more than 20,000 residents of Anniston, AL, over the severe contamination of ground and water by tons of PCBs dumped in the area from the 1930s until the 1970s. Court documents revealed that Monsanto was aware of the contamination decades earlier.
http://www.monsantowatch.org/index.php?page=none
On January 27, the Obama Administration made the damaging decision to approve the unrestricted cultivation of genetically engineered (GE) alfalfa. This means GE alfalfa can be planted without any federal requirements to prevent contamination of organic and non-GE crops. It also means that GE alfalfa does not have to be labeled, making it difficult for consumers to identify and avoid. This decision, to support big business at the expense of individual choice, sets a precedent that could lead to the deregulation of other GE crops, in spite of the fact that genetic engineering has not been conclusively proven safe. Don’t stand by while well-funded and well-connected biotechnology interests are given the power to eliminate marketplace choice. Demand that President Obama protect your right to choose products free of genetic engineering! http://ota.capwiz.com/ota/issues/alert/?alertid=24747501