Originally published on the Occupied Chicago Tribune.
This is a true story

Photo: Firedoglake
CHICAGO. In a school with some of the poorest kids in Chicago, one English teacher–I won’t use her name–who’d been cemented into the school system for over a decade, wouldn’t do a damn thing to lift test scores, yet had an annual salary level of close to $70,000 a year. Under Chicago’s new rules holding teachers accountable and allowing charter schools to compete, this seniority-bloated teacher was finally fired by the principal.
In a nearby neighborhood, a charter school, part of the city system, had complete freedom to hire. No teachers’ union interference. The charter school was able to bring in an innovative English teacher with advanced degrees and a national reputation in her field – for $29,000 a year less than was paid to the fired teacher.
You’ve guessed it by now: It’s the same teacher.
It’s Back to School Time! Time for the editorialists and the Tea Party, the GOP and Barack Obama’s Education Secretary Arne Duncan to rip into the people who dare teach in public schools.
And in Arne’s old stomping grounds, Chicago, Mayor Rahm Emanuel is stomping on the teachers, pushing them into the street.
Let’s stop kidding ourselves. This is what Mitt Romney and Obama and Arne Duncan and Paul Ryan have in mind when they promote charter schools and the right to fire teachers with tenure: slash teachers salaries and bust their unions.
They’ve almost stopped pretending, too. Both the Right Wing-nuts and the Obama Administration laud the “progress” of New Orleans’ schools–a deeply sick joke. The poorest students, that struggle most with standardized tests, were drowned or washed away.
One thing Democrat Emanuel and Republican Romney both demand of Chicago teachers is that their pay, their jobs, depend on “standardized tests.” Yes, but whose standard?
Here is an actual question from the standardized test that were given third graders here in NYC by the nation’s biggest test-for-profit company:
“…Most young tennis stars learn the game from coaches at private clubs. In this sentence a private club is….” Then you have some choices in which the right answer is “Country Club – place where people meet.”
Now not many of the “people [who] meet” at country clubs are from the South Side of Chicago — unless their parents are caddies. A teacher on the South Side whose students are puzzled by the question will lose their pay or job. Students on the lakefront Gold Coast all know that mommy plays tennis at the Country Club with Raul on Wednesdays. So their teacher gets a raise and their school has high marks.
And while Mayor Rahm promises kids in “bad” schools new teachers (the same ones at lower pay) at high-score schools, in fact, they are never actually allowed in.
But Rahm, after all, is just imposing Bush education law which should be called, No Child’s Behind Left.
You want to know what’s wrong with our schools? Benno Schmidt, CEO of the big Edison Schools teach-for-profit business is a creepy, greedy privateer. But he told me straight: that before Hurricane Katrina, his company would never go into New Orleans because Louisiana spent peanuts per child on education. He made it clear: You get what you pay for. Not what you test for.
So the charter carpetbaggers slither in, cherry-pick the easy students, declare success. The tough cases and special ed kids are left in the public system so they can claim the public system fails.
Here’s what the teacher who was terrible at $70,000 but brilliant at $41,000 told me:
It’s simple. When you look at the drop-out rates in New York (41%) and Chicago (44%), the solution offered is to pay teachers less. They punish those who dare to work in poor schools where kids struggle and you can bet that “washing away” half the kids in our schools is, in fact, exactly what they’ve planned.
It’s notable that, when he lived in Chicago, Barack Obama played basketball with city school chief Arne Duncan, but Obama sure as hell didn’t send his kids to Arne’s crap public schools. Those are for po’ folk.
His kids went to the tony “Lab” School in Hyde Park. Obama believes what Duncan believes and what Romney believes: there’s no need for universal education and no need to spend money on it. Yes, they like to say that “children are our future.” But they mean the children of China are our future, the Chinese kids who will make the stuff we want and the children of India who will program it all for us.
After all, how much education does some obese kid from Texas need to stack boxes from China in a Wal-Mart warehouse?
Education is no longer about information and learning skills. It’s now about “triage.” A few selected by standardized tests or privileged birth will be anointed and permitted into better and “gifted” schools.
The chosen elite are still very much needed: to invest in India and Vietnam, to design new derivatives to circumvent the laughable new banking laws, and to maintain order among the restless hundred-million drop-outs squeezed out of the colon of our educational system.
Democrats’ Bantustans, Republicans’ Value-less Vouchers
The Obama/Duncan/Emanuel plan is to create Bantustans of un-chartered, cheaply-run dumpster schools within a government system. But Romney and the GOP would give every child a “choice” even outside government schools with “vouchers.”
Of course, the “vouchers” don’t vouch for much. Romney’s old alma mater, Cranbrook Academy, runs at $34,025 a year, not counting the polo sticks and horse. The most generous voucher program is Washington DC’s, beloved of the GOP, which pays about $7,500, or if the student’s “choice” is Cranbrook, about 2 months of school. Hyde Park Day School Chicago is $35,900. To give each kid a real choice, not just a coupon, means a massive increase in spending per pupil. I didn’t see that in the Republican platform, did you?
The experienced teacher in Chicago who took the pay cut was offered one consolation. She was told she could make up some of the pay loss by quitting the union and saving on union dues.
So that’s the program. An educational Katrina: squeeze the teachers until they strike, demolish their unions and drown the students.
Chicago’s classroom war is class war by another name.
Class dismissed.
Greg Palast is the author of the new book Billionaires and Ballot Bandits: How to Steal an Election in 9 Easy Steps. For two decades, Palast was an investigator for Chicago-area unions, including the Chicago Teachers Union.



13 Comments

Fine piece, Greg, and thanks.
A blogging friend said on the boards yesterday that at that moment he had vowed to use the term ‘corporatize’ instead of ‘privatize’.
thank you for laying it out.
Certainly don’t vote for these mobsters posing as our leaders! Oust them all! Go Chicago teachers- you are our heroes! In their face!
I suspect that o and rahmbo were stunned by the feistiness of the Chicago teachers. I certainly hope that they can force some changes. I can’t imagine, however, that rahmbo will absorb any humility or o will rethink his corporatization ideology.
Im grieve for our students, no matter their age. My Sister and I attended a school which was, and remains, subpar. The caveat is that we were still, for some obscure reason-fear of parental retribution, springs to mind.
My Sister is among the premier Municipal Utilities Lawyers in Texas, while I have had some modest success in my own technical endeavors. To punish teachers for their inability to both train young people to pass high stakes tests while also being expected to educate them at the same time is ludicrous! I am sure we all are aware of how few graduates, HS or University, ever read another book subsequent to their graduation.
Union crushing is the end all, be all now, and to my great chagrin, the people who should be the most vociferous opponents of this policy are absolutely delighted to watch and cheer it on. I suggest class envy is, without a doubt, far more prevalent among our (literally) poor Right wing friends. What a propagandistic coup!
To use New Orleans schools as explemary of anything is a very cruel joke. The Chartres just carried on a long tradition of exclusive education.
Both parties are pursuing exactly the same educational (and other) policies. They even showed the same anti-public education movie at both the RNC and DNC. Jill Stein is the only one who found her walking shoes to actually go out and be with the striking teachers. Education – http://newprogs.org/blog/2012/01/14/education-under-democraticrepublican-uni-party
goNPA–
Spot on.
Unfortunately, the so-called “left” chattering class leaves this very salient point out of every conversation, regarding the gutting of our public school system by this administration (with their “Race to the Top” programs, etc.).
Blue
Greg,
Fantastic work, as always. I seem to recall reading that Charter Schools don’t even improve performance among their cherry-picked (perhaps “cherry-blossom picked” is better, given how white the picked ones are) students…the kids get the same test scores they got at the public schools, it’s just that We Don’t Need YOUR Kind Charter School has kept the low-scoring riff-raff out, so the “average” is higher. Did I remember that correctly?
The Obama has never attended a public school in his life, right? So he’s a Law Review Editor who wrote no articles, a Constitutional Law “professor” who never taught a class, and a “school reformer” who’s never actually been to a public school. What a guy.
Hail, The Obama!
(Whoops, I didn’t notice this was a cross-post; Greg may not be reading these comments. My bad.
It’s that darn public school [and State University] education of mine! Where was Arne Duncan when I needed him?)
Let’s privatize the federal government.
Surely, an experienced CEO, an experienced military officer (to serve as CIC, and a great board or directors would cost a hell of a lot less than the White House and Congress.
And probably get better results.
As far as foreign relations, the CEO can appoint someone to be in charge of that, but, for pity sake, close all the embassies. In the era of satellites, the internet, etc. physically stationing people in foreign countries is anachronistic. And spy vs. spy also can be conducted better by modern means.
A modest proposal.
Thank you. I did not know that.
I was going to vote for her anyway. However, every new thing I learn about her makes me happier about my decision and it’s good to be happy about a decision.
I feel bad for anyone voting for Obama out of fear of Romney.
Every time Democrats have voted out of fear, Democrats have taken the country further right.
Something has to check that continuing rightward direction of the country. I am hoping that the change of a healthy third party vote will do that.
Pal-ing around with his wealthy friends.