Yes, it’s the end of an era. The Blend has learned, from a trusted source in a position to know the details, that Joe Solmonese, President of the Human Rights Campaign, the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization in the country, will announce his departure next Tuesday. Solmonese will reportedly step down from the organization in December of this year.
His departure also signals, according to our source, the beginning of a larger staff shake-up in the HRC. The Blend can also report that a replacement executive director has been identified — it will be someone who is not currently on the HRC’s staff, but is currently a paid consultant that has worked with the civil rights group for some time.
During his tenure, the Human Rights Campaign has become a bedrock institution that has played a role in successes — a hate crimes law passed, the legislative repeal of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell — the extent of its leadership and success also depends on your point of view and knowledge of the back stories related to the hard work to make these gains happen.
We can review and critique the effectiveness of Solmonese’s tenure in the growth of the organization and political savvy in working with the Hill all day long, but it’s time to think about the job his successor has in front of him/her.
With the perception of the HRC leadership as the province of wealthy white gay men living in gay-friendly environs, there are several questions HRC — including its board — will face:
* What will this mean for bisexual and trans community members? The L and G in LGBT have had much more visibility not only in its leadership composition, but in prioritization of political priorities. Some of this is a result of political expediency, but no doubt influenced by the composition of its leadership, board and donor base. This leads to…
*Will more bisexual and trans staff be added with the staff shake-up? Unknown. Until Joe’s successor announces for lack of a better word, “battle plan” we won’t know if this means putting people who know bi and trans issues best in positions of influence.
* With DADT at bay, and DOMA on the ropes in court, will HRC put additional to attend to matters of equity in the trans community and speak openly about them? The new executive director will have to address this head on, particularly since Joe Solmonese was seen by many in the trans community as a political obstacle at the minimum, or an outright man not to be trusted. Representing HRC, Solmonese last spoke in public on transgender issues to a trans-specific public audience at the 2007 Southern Comfort conference. He was adamently 100% in support of a trans-inclusive Employment Non-Discrimination Act, but later changed his position on the 2007/2008 version of the legislation — effectively leaving trans rights behind.
* Will this shift signal a change to include more people of color in positions of influence? Like bi and trans issues, a stronger HRC will come from actually honoring the influence that a socio-economically diverse leadership team brings to the table. Will a change at the top move the organization in this direction?
* What kind of relationship will the HRC build with the LGBT media (including bloggers) and grassroots activists (like GetEqual) under new leadership? To be kind, there has been a tense and guarded relationship with activists and new media that work outside of the comfort zone of the HRC. The fact that these entities cannot be “controlled” or managed like a press release is old news – it’s how the game of politics works now; any person who succeeds Joe Solmonese has to grasp this reality and find out how to work nimbly with not only the Hill and the White House, but to engage with these entities.
They are not going away, in fact their existence moved the civil rights ball forward on DADT when traditional means of Beltway negotiation and hand shakes in closed door meetings dissolved into political inertia. That this influence is publicly ignored, but privately fretted about (yes Virginia, we have eyes and ears everywhere), should be a signal that precious wasted energy worrying about allies that use different tactics should be spent on how a powerful institution with access like HRC can leverage those differences without appearing to “sell out” or be in battle when the end goals are actually in alignment.
So now the commentary is left to readers – how does this prospective news affect your view of the potential of the Human Rights Campaign to rework its reputation within the elements of the LGBT community that have questioned its strategy and decisions regarding legislative focus and its image to the larger public? Is there any positive/negative fallout from this organizational shift?
Discuss. More to come as additional details emerge.
UPDATE: Chris Geidner at MetroWeekly has filled in a few more details that conflict with our source’s account, and identified the consultant.
Although Spaulding reported that “a replacement executive director has been identified,” four sources familiar with the situation describe that portion of the report as inaccurate — with one saying the process is just beginning and will not be rapid.
…Spaulding refers to the person she reported was identified as Solmonese’s replacement as “a paid consultant” who has worked with the organization. Metro Weekly has identified that consultant as Cathy Woolard, who most recently served on the senior leadership team at CARE, which describes itself as “a leading humanitarian organization fighting global poverty” and is based in Atlanta.
Although the sources say that no permanent replacement has been selected, none of the four sources were willing to say what, if any, role Woolard would play in the transition efforts at HRC.



64 Comments

Hi, Pam. Nice to see you here. Welcome aboard.
Pam – recommended!
‘Bout time for new leadership at HRC. Long overdue in my opinion.
As regards this:
To my way of thinking the answer is clear; policy trumps access.
Access, schmaccess. The power resides in the membership, not the access, as playing that game has only diminished the membership’s desires.
If HRC gets it’s game on and acts like GetEqual, I’ll come back. (Quit them in 2006.) But not until there’s proof.
Hot Damn…! Break out the Champagne…! ;-)
This is clearly much more important than women’s rights.
Yes, because lesbians aren’t women.
“HRC can leverage those differences without appearing to ‘sell out’ or be in battle when the end goals are actually in alignment.”
This all sounds like so-called healthcare reform other than Obama wanted to appear to be in battle with the corporate lobbyists even though he was in alignment with them.
Golly gee. Haven’t seen any wimmin, including lesbians om these threads. Wonder how that could pissbly be.
Guess the author doesn’t count then.
I’m a woman.
Guessing that caving to PTB counts as winning.
Was that a cheer I heard go up across the land?
Thanks for the news Pam
Explain please, Kelly?
So if LGBT gets temporary normal human rights, is that sufficient for you to cave into to other PTB? Inquiring minds…
Not to bring into discussion the backlash that has happened to all other disadvantaged groups. Amerindiands have NEVER had any rights whatsoever.
Wimmin are still roughly in position they have been in since I came of age in 1960s.
add the snark tag.
Pam in the Lake!
As for HRC, meh. Good to see Armani Joe go, but it will take a Lot to turn that corporatized, veal-penned Titanic around.
*heh* Ya heard me all the over here, Ellie…? ;-)
Fuck, where’s the GD edit button? I meant to say LOT all caps, not Lot the bible guy.
Does this mean HRC may be leaving the Veal Pen?
Ta; I had hoped so. ;o)
Ok, so as usual I am in the dark.
Never heard of this group.
First time reading this diarist.
Per the diarist, it seems like Joe is Dawg-send to HRC and has single-handedly (ok a little hyperbole) changed the game and won major victories for LGBT.
And yet I’ve never heard of them. Someone want to clue in those like me who see the obvious disparity between, gee good job Joe, so now you gotta go???
And I’ve never heard of them.
And sharkbabe is saying they are a “corporatized, veal-penned Titanic”. WTF???
So someone please clue in this ignorant soul as to what’s going on.
Are we chering for the Roosevelt institute-like sell-outs?
pam! so good to see ya here and woohoo for the breaking news you are sharing!!!
tweeted and recommended
Lot the bible guy, wow.
If somehow you had worked that reference in to a comment I would be very impressed.
BTW, can you please expand on their veal-pen-ishness …?
For those of us like me who have no idea about HRC, can someone please comment on their Veal-Pen-ishness.
Nice to see you here. Pam.
Any idea if Joe is leaving because something resembling a no-confidence vote over bi-/transgender issues, and if so, have enough people lobbied for inclusiveness that the new choice might be advocating a bolder and more inclusive political agenda?
Seems funny the name hasn’t been leaked; when does that happen? ;o)
HRC has to make sure they don’t hire Troup Coronado though – heh.
Hej Blenders, great catch, Pam, and recommended!
It’s just heart-warming that Joe is cashing out./s
When it comes to *any* hardcore Veal Penner like the HRC, it’s hard to take them seriously until one knows who’s on the Board, where’s the money’s coming from and the org chart of the paid organization. Otherwise it’s just a makeover in a desperate attempt to retain a membership they don’t serve. In the past they never passed the test– like courting then running off former Massachusetts State Senator Cheryl Jacques– so I remain sceptical until proofs to contrary. Meanwhile, I am not holding my breath.
Teddy did a great diary that summarizes the backstory here:
http://my.firedoglake.com/teddysanfran/2010/12/20/human-rights-campaign-after-dadt-repeal-we-wont-have-to-say-a-thing/
(sorry, linky thingy not appearing for me and i forgot how to do it manually)
Pam, I just saw your piece on stages…It is wonderful…I will have to read it again. Such thoughtful work….Thanks (Sorry, OT)
I wish people, including media, wouldn’t refer to HRC as an “LGBT organization.” It’s an LGB organization. It lopped off the T when it threw us aside four years ago, with Barney Frank, in its failed attempt to get a half-assed version of ENDA passed. I always thought trans rights were human rights, too. Seems someone(s) in high places at HRC conveniently forgot that along the way, or never recognized that to begin with …
Wow – Pam in the house!
Pam: Pam’s House Blend:
http://www.pamshouseblend.com/
Jane announced recently that she would be cross-posting, migrating diaries, I forget the exact term…to the Lake. Great addition.
Wendy, I meant your piece when I wrote in Pam….sorry. On the grief stages. So well written and good comments. Thanks (Again, OT…sorry)
Thanks for the kudos, all. The Blend is slated to debut on FDL as its own channel on Monday.
Right now we’re hunkering down here in NC for the hurricane…
Hmmph! I don’t see how the HRC can be less trans inclusive without Solmonese. Maybe he and Aravosis can get together and form TARPA, (Transgendereds Aren’t Really People Anyway)
Bet they do. Or a reasonable facsimile thereof.
Thanks, RevBev; really happy that you liked it. The framing worked somehow, and it seemed enough others agreed to have justified the effort. Might do another Tipping Points diary; more seem in the air. Seems go to think them through, and offer new ones. ;o)
John too? Ouch; that’s messed up; didn’t know, Margaret.
may you ride through unscathed
and Welcome to the Lake!
Google Salon and John Aravosis and you can probably find his anti trans screed pretty easily.
Good luck. It is a very engaging analysis…I’ll be watching.
Really? I left The Blend because there was a lot of cyber bullying going on there. Not blaming you or anything Pam but I hope some of those people find a way to behave themselves at the Lake.
Whoosh. Rats; I used to read there a lot, and correspond with him a bit. Feh!
I’ll try to remember to look soon; sigh.
Pam, Welcome and thank you for the post. Recommended.
I corresponded with him quite a bit in the early days of the internet when he was known as john@gayadvocacy. One of his early targets was “Dr” Laura and the whole community pitched in and wrote letters and signed petitions and got her show moved into the wee hours. Aravosis declared victory and then opened the floor for suggestions. I suggested that since transgendered people only had the “right” to work and support themselves in five states, (at the time), we should work toward a universal right to work, (this was a long time before ENDA was even introduced), whereupon Aravosis pitched his first full on anti trans rant. Several years later in 2003, I found Americablog in the dark days of W and was a regular there for years. In fact, I was going to be one of the early beta testers. I figured that since the internet was new and communication clumsy during the days of gayadvocacy, maybe we misinterpreted each other and I gave him the benefit of the doubt. When Frank and Solmonese threw transgedered people under the bus in an effort to pass ENDA, he was only too happy to support that position, despite the fact that there was zero chance W would ever sign it. I left Americablog then, not altogether voluntarily but with a lot of rancor. I drifted until I found my home at The Lake.
What a great first post for our move to FDL! Pam is a wonderful editor-in-chief, for sure.
@Margaret August 26th, 2011 at 11:29 pm
Thanks, Margaret, for the history. It’s to the Lake’s benefit. ;o)
It just makes me sad about Aravosis, not that my pain is a patch on your hard break-up with him and the site. We talked recipes a lot; I was learning some Greek.
All my best,
wd
Autumn! Welcome. I never had the chance to thank you for standing with Dan Choi and the others. You represent the Navy and Trans veterans well. :)
I am so happy PHB will be here, and especially happy this is the first post–such good news–to announce the arrival of one of my fave blogs. Autumn, I hope you’ll be posting lots too.
I look forward to seeing progressive change at HRC, more people of color, more transpeople, more embracing of all socio-economic classes.
xoxoox
Thanks Wendy but I would never insist or expect you to dump Aravosis just because of my experiences. I can only tell you what happened and you have to make your own judgments. I’ll make this promise though: That I have not, nor will I ever embellish those events to make him sound worse or myself more innocent.
Thank you. Your warm sentiments are very appreciated. =)
They are quite sincere as well. I don’t know if you remember me from The Blend but I’m a trans ex enlisted squid too.
Thank you Lisa.
Btw, don’t forget the bisexuals! They are the largest of the LGBT community’s big four subcommunities, but at the same time they’re even more invisible and forgotten than trans people.
Public bisexual representation at the HRC, and other LGBT orgs, is very important if one wants to truly embrace diversity in an LGBT civil rights organization.
Margaret, I took your advice and did the google on Salon and Arevosis, and it made me sick.
“Sometime in the late ’90s, a few gay rights groups and activists started using a new acronym, LGBT — adding T for transgender/transsexual. And that’s when today’s trouble started.”
Wow. I’m dumbfounded.
In other words: All marginalized animals are born equal. But some are more equal than others.
I’ll say it until the pigs on the animal farm finally understand it. Trans rights are civil rights. Trans rights are human rights. Period.
Franorama World August 27th, 2011 at 5:01 am
Yep. Personally I don’t see any difference between what Aravosis said and what Frederick Douglass did when he threw the female suffragettes under the voting rights bus or what any racist teabagger says about, (insert minority here), and it astonishes and disgusts me that anybody who claims to be liberal or progressive still has anything to do with him.
Buh-Bye, Joe! Don’t let the door slam on your worthles ass on the way out!
The HRC is very good at raising funds for politicians who give us crumbs and claim they’re cake.
Gay Power comes from the streets — not from the suites.
I like that! :)
HRC is one of several GLBT groups with a self appointed ‘leadership’ who drain resources with endless fundraising to pay unnecessary and very high salaries to themselves while they act as agents, as a front group, for the Democrats. The salary Solmonese pulled down was close to half a million annually, enough to help fund a shelter for GLBT youth kicked out of their homes by bigoted parents.
They stand in the road blocking equality for everyone because of their relationships with the Democrat Party and with the Obama campaign. Their relationships with Democrats aren’t collaborative or those of equals. On the contrary, they subsume their interests and those of the LGBT communities to the electoral needs of the Democrats. If Log Cabin Republicans or GOProud had any substance they’d do the same but they’re largely insignificant.
We won’t have a real movement for our communities until we convene a national convention of elected delegate and form a genuinely democratic, mass action oriented, militant national organization with a democratic internal structure and total, declared independence from our enemies, the Republican and Democrat parties.
I was with you until the last paragraph. I don’t think the solution lies in creating another top down majority rules organization. We have plenty that follow that model.
How do LGBT homeless teens find representatives in the delegate group?
Yep. Just another “organization” that no matter how pure the intentions and goals when it starts off, soon begins to abandon it’s stated goals to service itself. If human rights are ever universally accepted and respected, organizations like HRC, NAACP and all the rest will suddenly have no reason to exist. That seems to me a fundamental conflict of interest.
No, I believe you, dear, and hear you clearly. Can’t even say why I hadn’t read there much lately, except that my time is at a premium any more. But ever since I read your great piece on how they ‘forgot the ‘T’ as they unwound DADT, I’ve been more aware.
And by the by: I posted your piece at my Posterous for a time, and have sent it to friends wanting more information on transgendered people, and the issues.
How does an organization with full internal democracy and an elected leadership qualify as top down?
There are no democratic movement organizations with a mass action, militant perspective at this time and that, plus the usual rancid kowtowing to our enemies in the Democrat and Republican parties explains why the Democrats DOMA is still on the books and why ENDA or even better, a constitutional civil rights amendment, is not on the books.
“How do LGBT homeless teens find representatives in the delegate group?” How is that not obvious. By meeting at youth centers or at local LGBT Centers, electing a delegate or two and bugging those with money for transportation and housing at a convention. The anti-Vietnam war had dozens of democratically run conventions free of domination by Democrat warmongers and we always managed to include young people, including GI’s from bases across the country.
What insurmountable difficulties do you have you come up with that can’t be solved by dedication to internal democracy and inclusiveness?
I get it. Your perspective is that we all pretend to be cynical, give up on the fight and continue to be dominated by Democrats and Republicans.
No thanks.
My prediction some time back was that it would follow the suicide-by-bipartisanship model of the Obama Administration and hire Ken Mehlman, though I’ve heard more recent scuttlebutt that it is going to take the pure Republican let’s-insulate-ourselves-from-allegations-of-racism-by-putting-non-whites-into-positions-where-it-seems-as-though-they-have-actual-power route, with the only question being who HRC’s Michael Steele will be.