The Commonwealth Fund on Tuesday said that the U.S. healthcare system has declined since 2008 with a current “score” on 42 indicators of healthcare quality, access, efficiency, equity, and healthy lives of 64 out of 100.
So our top dollar (double the cost in other countries) health care system had more preventable deaths that could have been prevented by timely and effective medical care than any of the other 15 industrialized countries included in the report, while our average infant mortality rate is 35% higher than rates in the top-performing states, and other high-income countries have infant mortality rates that are significantly lower than our best-performing states. Indeed if we matched the French results, 91,000 fewer infants would die prematurely each year.
Perhaps our fear of medical bills when uninsurred is the problem, since in 2010, 81 million adults were uninsured, up from 61 million in 2003. And its not like spending 1 dollar in 5 on health care holds back our ability to compete in this world, or to create jobs in America. Indeed its not like our mental health is affected by 40% of working-age adults in 2010 having medical debt or problems paying medical bills, up from 34% in 2005.
Then there is our efficiency when we do not force everyone to use a single effective administrative system, with the U.S. scoring only 53 out of 100 in that category, which looked at whether patients were receiving duplicative services and whether hospitals had high readmission rates, among other indicators. Seems 44% of adults reported that they didn’t have a primary care provider in 2008, and only half said they received all recommended preventive care. If the U.S. did as well as top performers, 38 million more adults would have a primary care doctor and 66 million more would receive all recommended preventive care. Also one-in-four elderly Medicare beneficiaries were prescribed a “potentially inappropriate drug.” But the kids are the future, as one-third of ages 10 to 17 are overweight or obese. Perhaps Insurance companies as claim managers for Medicare, pushing shorter hospital stays as cost savers, may not be working given 20% of Medicare patients hospitalized for certain conditions or procedures were readmitted within 30 days in both 2003 and 2009.
But its best to look at the bright side – there was more public reporting of quality data than in previous years; more hospitals adhered to recommended protocols to prevent surgical complications; the percentage of adults who smoke declined from 21% in 2004 to 17% in 2010; and a greater number of people were controlling their high blood pressure than in previous years. And we have the excuse that most of the data in the report came from 2007-2009, which was before the passage of the Obama Affordable Care Act (ACA).
So if you believe that the current 25% of the population in 15 states that lacked health insurance will have meaningful health coverage post the ACA mandate required in 2014, as the states come up with the money to follow ACA’s requirement that the threshold for Medicaid be changed so more low-income people will be eligible, so perhaps we need only wait. And perhaps our weak “primary care foundation and from inadequate care coordination and teamwork” will be fixed by the ACA trying to encourage team-based care, including accountable care organizations and giving primary care doctors bonus payments for coordinating care of their Medicare patients.
Anyone for single payer basic care for everyone paid for by a payroll tax and cost controlled by a national budget that sets the reimbursement rate for that basic care that must be accepted or lose your license?



4 Comments




Thank you for this diary, papau. I was blown away to read that Obama is pushing changes that will make us even more unsafe in U.S. hospitals than we already are.
One of the changes is that hospitals would no longer have to keep detailed infection control logs.
Who do you think this “efficiency” will help? It is designed to help hospitals hide their shocking infection rates. As someone who has worked in hospitals for many, many years, I can assure you that you NEED to know a hospital’s infection statistics before you roll the dice by having a surgery there.
Another “efficiency” is that hospitals would no longer need to inform the federal government immediately of patients who have been harmed by being tied up in restraints. Instead of providing adequate staffing to maintain the safety of patients who become confused or agitated, more patients will end up being “restrained,” which will lead to more injuries and deaths.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/19/health/policy/19health.html?hpw
Three weeks ago I was taken to the ER with crushiung chest pain and shortness of breath. Oh, and no insurance. The suspected heart attack as pneumonia with pleurissy. I begged for the cheapest options as I knew what I was in for. So 2 nights in the hospital on IV antibiotics, blood tests plus one CT scan which I objected to since the chest x-rays showed everything already, came to $39,600.00. That was the minimal level of care which I insisted upon. And one of my injection sites erupted into a huge infection that is still healing 3 weeks later. Hospitals will make their money one way or another and nothing short of a full takeover will do anything to control costs.
So is there a redo of Medicare and Medicaid regulations to appease the GOP and save the Hospital industry $1.1 billion http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2011pres/10/20111018a.html – this is great way to show your heart is with the base? I am retired and was not even aware of the change.
Actually State rules also control in this area – so perhaps this could be a pass on this for Medicare/HHS and a kick in the pants for each State’s medical licensing folks.
A heart attack showing up as classic left arm pain and redness 7 years ago was mis-diagnosed as a septic inflection requiring 9 days of hospitalization and massive drugs – the Florida Hospital bill was over $40,000 with a co-pay via the doctors of several thousand. A routine check after getting back to Boston a week later showed the heart damage and I was in for an immediate heart operation that was 6 figures – thank god I was still working with excellent employer provided insurance.
A spinal pain (causing by poor posture from walking “funny” to avoid a massive uptick that was occurring in my always constant gout pain) got me a bill of over $7000 for an echo on blood flow through the gout area (because of the heart history?) before I could get some pain killers out of that same Florida hospital.
I just wish Boston winters were not so cold, that my grandkids lived in Boston rather than Florida, and the cost living in Boston was as low as Florida.