Way back in January 2008, a certain presidential candidate gave a speech at Ebenezer Baptist Church, the congregation once served by Martin Luther King Jr. . . .
. . . “Unity is the great need of the hour.” That’s what Dr. King said. It is the great need of this hour as well, not because it sounds pleasant, not because it makes us feel good, but because it’s the only way we can overcome the essential deficit that exits in this country.
I’m not talking about the budget deficit. I’m not talking about the trade deficit. Talking about the moral deficit in this country. I’m talking about an empathy deficit, the inability to recognize ourselves in one another, to understand that we are our brother’s keeper and our sister’s keeper, that in the words of Dr. King, “We are all tied together in a single garment of destiny.”
Pause for a minute and let that sink in: “the empathy deficit is the essential deficit that exists in this country.”
We have an empathy deficit when we’re still sending our children down corridors of shame, schools in the forgotten corners of America where the color of your skin still affects the content of your education. We have a deficit when CEOs are making more in ten minutes than ordinary workers are making in an entire year, when families lose their homes so unscrupulous lenders can make a profit, when mothers can’t afford a doctor when their children are stricken with illness. We have a deficit in this country when we have Scooter Libby justice for some and Jena justice for others, when our children see hanging nooses from a school yard tree today, in the present, in the 21st century. We have a deficit when homeless veterans sleep on the streets of our cities, when innocents are slaughtered in the deserts of Darfur, when young Americans serve tour after tour after tour after tour of duty in a war that should have never been authorized and should have never been waged. We have an empathy deficit in this country that has to be closed. We have a deficit when it takes a breach in the levees to reveal the breach in our compassion, when it takes a terrible storm to reveal the hungry that God calls on us to feed, the sick that He calls on us to care for, the least of these that He commands that we treat as our own. So, we have a deficit to close. We have walls, barriers to justice and equality that must come down, and to do this, we know that “unity is the great need of the hour.”
These words were spoken in 2008, but they seem even more appropriate today. Those schools that were in trouble three years ago are in worse shape now, as every state in the country has been cutting back on funding, leaving every district to axe teachers and staff, raise class sizes, and defer maintenance. That “tour after tour after tour after tour of duty” has had at least one more “after tour” added onto it, and atrocities continue to pile up. Foreclosure fraud is rampant, the facts of the global financial crisis show serious legal problems for the bankers that created it, and yet the SEC is “taking a light touch” with the banks and bank executives apparently are getting Scooter Libby justice. (Have you heard the news? Goldman Sachs is likely to “face fresh embarrassment” over their role in the global financial crisis.) And as long as we’re talking about military action without congressional authorization, meet Libya.
If the need was great in 2008, it’s off the charts today.
But back to that candidate . . . skipping ahead in his remarks a bit:
However, all too often, when we talk about unity in this country, we’ve come to believe that it can be purchased on the cheap. . . We offer unity, but we are not willing to pay the price that’s required.
Of course, true unity cannot be so easily purchased. It starts with a change in attitudes. It starts with changing our hearts, and changing our minds, broadening our spirit. It’s not easy to stand in somebody else’s shoes. It’s not easy to see past our own differences. We’ve all encountered this in our own lives. What makes it even more difficult is that we have a politics in this country that seeks to drive us apart, that puts up walls between us. We are told that those who differ from us on a few things, differ from us on all things, that our problems are the fault of those who don’t think like us or look like us or come from where we do. The Welfare Queen, she’s taking our money. The Immigrant, he’s taking our jobs. The believer condemns the nonbeliever as immoral, and the nonbeliever chides the believer for being intolerant.
[snip]
So let us say that on this day of all days, each of us carries with us the task of changing our hearts and minds. The divisions, the stereotypes, the scapegoating, the ease with which we blame the plight of ourselves on others — all of that distracts us from the common challenges that we face, war and poverty, inequality and injustice. We can no longer afford to build ourselves up by tearing each other down. We can no longer afford to traffic in lies or fear or hate. It’s the poison that we must purge from our politics, the wall that we must tear down before the hour grows too late. Because if Dr. King could love his jailer, if he could call on the faithful, who once sat where you do, to forgive those who had set dogs and fire hoses upon them, then surely we can look past what divides us in our time and bind up our wounds and erase the sympathy deficit that exists in our hearts.
But if changing our hearts and our minds is the first critical step, we cannot stop there. It’s not enough to bemoan the plight of the poor in this country and remain unwilling to push our elected officials to provide the resources to fix our schools. It’s not enough to decry the disparities of health care and yet allow the insurance companies and the drug companies to block real reform in our health care system. It’s not enough — It’s not enough for us to abhor the costs of a misguided war, and yet we continue to allow ourselves to be driven by a politics of fear that sees the threat of an attack as a way to scare up votes instead of a call to come together in a common effort. . .
Boy, did he nail it on that one. As far as I can tell, the politics of fear is what makes DC run these days, not only on terrorism but on the budget, health care, social security, and everything else.
I wonder what ever happened to that guy. We sure could use someone like this in DC to take on the fear-mongers.
Say, did you hear that President Obama is going to give a speech on Wednesday, addressing deficit reduction? As the Washington Post headline writer summed things up, “Obama’s New Approach to Deficit Reduction to include Spending on Entitlements.”
Before he speaks on Wednesday, maybe Obama should go listen to what that presidential candidate had to say at Ebenezer Baptist Church a couple of years ago.



96 Comments

The way the arc of Obama’s presidency has been going, it’s only a matter of time before he starts openly questioning his own birth certificate.
I keep wondering when the aliens came to earth and switched out Candidate Obama for his alternate/evil doppelganger President Obama
It’s really odd but this gives me some dark hope. I can’t figure it out. Maybe it’s just hopeful that anyone could say this at all in America.
Obama is a disaster. For the whole damn arc from that speech to today … and everything else.
Thanks, Peterr.
So true. And very, very funny.
If only we’d had someone like this during the continuing resolution negotiations over the last month to push some of the elected officials in the House and Senate to provide necessary resources . . .
here is the deal..the real deficit is about the Dems needing more money so they can stay in power so let’s stick it to the middle class ( they can’t stick it to the poor anymore) so the mega rich will pay their fair share to the Dems so they can stay in power and pretend they are on our side! What a scam! Hey learned from the best! The GOP!!
thanks peterr. great to read what candidate obama had to say.
“As the Washington Post headline writer summed things up, “Obama’s New Approach to Deficit Reduction to include Spending on Entitlements.”
Before he speaks on Wednesday, maybe Obama should go listen to what that presidential candidate had to say at Ebenezer Baptist Church a couple of years ago.”
while engaging in some wishful thinking (imo an occasionally necessary tonic to reality these days), i wish president obama, or better yet everyone else, would think about how the fallacy of composition applies to the federal budget. here is a bit from one of the best explanations i’ve seen (by randy wray):
deficit reduction isn’t only immoral, it’s also stupid economics.
is there any non-batshit-crazy reason to be promoting deficit reduction now?
i can’t think of one.
He’ll say anything, it sounds like he said something but in the end he stands for nothing, other than his fabulous paycheck now in especially in the future .
I think we need to do a series on this – Obama’s speeches during the primaries. It is not just projection and fantasy that caused people to believe he had some progressive principles.
He simply lied.
Yet another example of a speech that was sell tested & designed to deceive.
ack. my apologies for the messed up paragraphing.
You make a good point, and then take 1,000 words (metaphorically) to explain you point (with caveats).
You need a picture to remove the need for 975 of the 1,000 words.
The concept cannot be sold (explained) with as many words written.
However correct.
The simple explanation is that he had a very good speech writer. He certainly does not believe all those wonderful promises he made. He just lied.
Resources? Resources? All you need to do is fire the teachers.
(Edited by Moderator: I do hope you forgot your snark mark, but whatever, we do ask that folks avoid namecalling even if jesting in order to prevent possible embers that may flame up later, so to speak.)
Dya think.
Never convinced me though.
I remember being online here during his inauguration speech. Unlike his campaign speeches, I thought it was bland and filled with cliches. So I typed a blah, blah, blah comment.
Boy did I get attacked.
Obama was always talking about empathy with political foes, in “purple states.” His administration would be similar to Bush’s, but more competent, he told us in 2005.
Obama Sep 2005, DKos
Who was his speech writer and what happened to him. As I typed above, as soon as O got to the inauguration, his speeches changed.
Also, who did the research on what would sell in his speeches.
“I’m talking about an empathy deficit, the inability to recognize ourselves in one another, to understand that we are our brother’s keeper and our sister’s keeper”…
Especially if our brothers and sisters work for Goldman Sachs, it’s hard work being a MOTU.
Okay. I get it. The president made a great speech full of ideals. But, if that got him elected, didn’t he ever figure that people down the road would write an article just like this one?
Oh, what tangled webs we weave, etc. He never thought he’d be called on his lies?
High sounding rhetoric is little more than a break in the average person’s life. Most people don’t even have time to listen – too busy just trying to keep themselves and their families alive.
Obama would do well to point out that waging two wars and at the same time lowering taxes was/is an historical precedent in America, or any place for that matter. To be surprised at the huge deficit/debt burden we’re running today is to be incredibly uninformed and he was taking it upon himself to inform us.
To pay for the war of 1812, the federal government imposed a sales tax. The first income tax law was enacted in 1862 to pay for the on-going Civil War. So what do Congress/Bush do to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan? Taxes are lowered. Pure idiocy.
Been looking at Monster.com all morning. My eyeballs feel like they’ve been scrubbed with sandpaper.
Never convinced me either – which is why I didn’t vote for him. Unlike most of my friends, I watched what he did rather than listened to his pretty words. None of what has happened since has surprised me.
“But, if that got him elected, didn’t he ever figure that people down the road would write an article just like this one?”
O gave that about an much thought as W gave to what he would say when no WMDs showed up in Iraq.
Obama is getting away, or at least attempting to do what Bush43 couldn’t. The social safety net will some be a thing of the past. Congressional & grass roots Democrats can’t let this happen.
Well, those were the days when anyone not worshiping at the feet of the Messiah was automatically a racist.
If I had time I’d dust off the ol’ Irony Meter and do an article on FDL Comments on Obama, Then and Now.
Sorry this has been such a long, hard slog for you. Have you seen any increase in job ads there? You’re our eyes, Peg.
I’m just tired of being so naive. I might have to back out of politics altogether.
To: Obama
From: Paul
“There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans.”
—Paul Wellstone
Back in college I studied, among other things, mathematics and computer science. There were few pictures. We students managed to get our degrees, regardless.
Once upon a time I had signing authority in a bank. To get that, I memorized the bank’s SPM, the Standard Practices Manual. There were no pictures. Somehow I figured it out.
The bank sent me to seminars in loss prevention and lending practices. There were few pictures because some of the concepts didn’t lend themselves well to images.
The bulk of what is in this post is quoted from another source. That source has good information, but apparently no pictures.
Sure, a pie chart might get the point across, but not as completely as the mind thinking about the relationship between the three groups of spenders/savers and how the balance sheet works.
Occasionally we are just stuck dealing with the awful language.
Wait… We aren’t referring to German?
Entschuldigen Sie mich bitte.
KISS? Everyone visualises the economy as a self-circumscribed “pie”-with the edges defined, and limited, so that “debt” and “deficit” are seen as limiting spending (like “households”,but households, and dependent states can’t create money). In reality, it’s a balloon, with the government able to expand the amount of spending at will, and the ONLY constraint is inflation, which can only happen when we reach full employment (and then the spending policies can act to constrain that effect). So when Cheney said “deficits don’t matter” he was right, the only problem was, he was pushing spending for corporations, and tax cuts for the wealthy, which creates greater income inequality and does NOTHING for the working class.
I was less convinced by O’s campaign speeches, albeit I confirm that they *sounded* good. I also found O’s inaug. speech to be vapid, and that vapidity continues mostly unabated since then.
You raise a good question about who his speech writers are. Perhaps the crappiness of O’s current “speeches” are reflected of an “austerity” measure to pay low rates for crappy speechwriters??
see picture here:
http://neweconomicperspectives.blogspot.com/2011/04/perfect-fiscal-storm-causes.html
i’ve been trying, in different ways, to say this for well over a year. if you can explain it where i have fallen short, please do… and i will quote you repeatedly (with your permission).
(jmo, but it’s hard to explain something once and have it stick when it involves a paradigm change. imo it has to be said/written a lot and in different ways for it to start to sink in… evidence of which will then be along the lines of, “of course, i always knew that.”)
He’s Bush with a pseudo-intellectual facade. Total fraud.
Got a link for that gem from Paul Wellsone?
While I hate to agree with Joe Wilson on anything, my main comment is: YOU LIE!
Like the lawyers in the Tribe letter, we should collect a letter of ministers and point out the inconsistencies…..
We all knew that W was working solely & only for the upper 1% (which always included W and his extended family). There was nothing ungenuine, disingenous or surprising about who W “worked for.” The Great Pretender definitely is a much bigger fraud than W, more’s the pity.
And he wonders why Democrats are pissed? What part of his being is not wholly compromised to money and power? How he could have any credibility with anyone now is a mystery to me.
Hard to say for sure but there is an uptick if anything.
Obama bad cop/ GOP crazy evil cop
What ever happened to good cop bad cop?
How about:
“Once social change begins, it cannot be reversed. You cannot uneducate the person who has learned to read. You cannot humiliate the person who feels pride. You cannot oppress the people who are not afraid anymore. We have seen the future, and the future is ours.”
– Cesar Chavez
Now we have to work at it.
«
And he wonders why Democrats are pissed?
Bullies are always surprised and outraged when their victims hit back:)
If Obama wonders why Dems are pissed it because WE are having an effect.
DU has it as:
“There are forces within the Democratic Party who want us to sound like kinder, gentler Republicans.
I want us to compete for that great mass of voters that want a party that will stand up for working Americans, family farmers, and people who haven’t felt the benefits of the economic upturn.”—Paul Wellstone
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439×795027
What Obama says as opposed to what he does… Hmmm.
Aren’t we beating a dead horse here?
I believe as much out of his mouth as I believe in the tooth fairy.
What a worthless joke of a president!
thanks for reading. source is randy wray, student of hyman minsky and author of Understanding Modern Money: The Key to Full Employment and Price Stability
more here:
http://www.levyinstitute.org/scholars/?auth=287
For a long time, I had not seen a single Help Wanted sign in my neighborhood. But, I saw a couple last week. One was at an Auto Zone, and the other at a pizza joint.
I heard a story on the radio about a fellow who had been an account exec at a bank before he was laid off. He found a temp graveyard shift data entry job for $10/hr. This seems to be the big trend. I supposed underemployed is maybe slightly better than unemployed. But, still. As I said before, what a slog.
Peterr,
Last Saturday I disagreed with your Marian Anderson post and said so.
This post I agree with.
That’s the best idea I have heard all day. :)
I am sure if makes you feel really nice to say “I told you so” but I am not sure that was the objective of the diary.
Obama said X was needed, and he flip-flopped after he got the liberal votes he needed. He said things which made people think he was a progressive, and then he changed his mind. Or he was lying from the beginning – though I am not sure how you were able to see into the future in 2007.
Obama is suppose to be putting taxes on the rich on the table now to fix the budget. I would link but no actual numbers are in the article and much of what Obama actually says he later backs away from so why bother.
Still I think Obama is playing Lucy with the football and he thinks we will Charlie Brown and run to the football and him like we did on healthcare.
But thats not going to happen. If he wanted my support he could have fought for healthcare or walked a picket line in Wisconsin.
Oh – the empathy deficit?
We took care of that when we got Sonia Sotomayor on the Supreme Court. No longer a problem.
Obama will continue to govern as a conservative while posing as a “liberal” until his base is willing to tell him to go to hell and begin exploring primary options. So what if a primary challenge weakens the chances of Democrats in 2012? At least Republicans will motivate a truly leftist alternative to this smiley face “feel good” fascism.
Obama never offers us shit without taking it back later. However when Obama offers us shit it means he wants something from us NOW in exchange.
I wonder what he wants now? Sure he wants a second term but I think he wants something from us now?
Maybe he wants our support to cut SS, Medicare, school funding etc in return for tax increases on the rich at least until the budget is fixed?
Of course the rich will either never get a tax increase or the tax increase will have so many loopholes it won’t be a tax increase.
Its a shell game the peanut under the shell has or will be removed from under the shell before we even try to guess which shell the peanut is under.
Government by Carny Tricks!
Focus on getting left-leaning candidates elected in your city, county and state next year first then work on getting one elected from your Congressional district.
A very simple litmus test: Do you believe that privatizing public services is the right way to go? If they say yes in any way, shape or form, you’re dealing with a neoliberal and that should be the end of that candidate.
Josh Marshall thinks Obama’s budget deal “isn’t that bad”. The guy has moved out of Pennsylvania, Pen to Veal, Pen.
I would add that the answer should be “no” and ANY equivocation should be the end of that candidate.
When faced with the choice between homicide and suicide….ha. Always go for the choice that’s healthiest for you. *g*
See, the problem is, he is a progressive. He wants to do whatever he can to keep the present system viable for the people that count. That’s what progressives do, don’t threaten the system, just try to make it more like you want it to be.
I think people who are opposed to what’s going on in this country now need, not just another party to represent them, but a different label with which to identify themselves. The label “progressive” is being used because liberals are too fucking scared to call themselves liberals any more.
People who are fed up should start identifying themselves as radicals of one shade or another. The GOP since 1980 has been full of radicals and they’ve changed everything they aimed to change so far. They’ll get their way with Social Security, Medicare, and anything else. Why? Because people in this fucking country are too afraid to confront them even though they see so many friends and relatives suffering from the policies of the radical Republicans (and I don’t mean that in the good, 1865 way).
Of course I could be wrong Obama could want to persuade us to stay in Iraq longer given the recent unrest in Iraq and the Arab world Obama very well might need a troop increase in Iraq to keep the U.S puppet regime in power.
I am open to other ideas about what Obama wants but he wants something and he is waving tax increases on the rich under our nose to get it.
Again those tax increases are given O’s past actions fake but still he is offering so that means he wants something from us.
The U.S. has come so far in the last 200 + years. Why it’s even elected a black man president! Isn’t that proof enough the system is awesome? To bad he along with the last 4 other Presidents have been moving the country in the wrong direction, unless of course you’re a war criminal, white collar bankster, crony capitalist, merchant of death or a dip shit news anchor.
If somebody’s planning to primary Obama they better have their campaign on the ground running yesterday. Unless and until the Regressives come up with a candidate who isn’t batshit crazy or incompetent corporate and Wall St money is going to Obama. He’s done more to rend the social fabric of the country than any Regressive in the last 80 years.
Agreed!
You couldn’t have picked a better time. Baseball season just started and the NBA finals start April 17th.
There is always the general election and a third party candidate. George Soros could do a Ross Perot.
How are the defenders going to spin this one? According to Plouffe, Obama wants to cut medicare and medicaid and even put Social Security on the table, in conjunction with tax increases on the rich. Since tax increases are a non starter, I foresee a “compromise” in which everything is cut: Medicare, medicaid, social security and those taxes on the rich.
Blue Texan’s regularly scheduled post is up: Congressional Republicans: All Our Presidential Candidates Suck
He is doing what Bubba was chosen to do.
People were pissed after Reagan/Bush and then Bush so they voted for Bubba. What did Bubba do? Pushed through legislation that the GOP couldn’t get away with: NAFTA, GATT, WTO, Extension of the death penalty at the federal level, evisceration of welfare, illegal bombing of Yugoslavia, and a fistful of war crimes in Iraq.
Obama was selected by TPTB in order to do what a Republican never could: weaken or, if possible, eliminate Social Security, Medicare, and other programs that allow people who are old or disabled to live with any dignity, extend the power of the executive branch to wage wars without congressional approval, get people in this country accustomed to seeing news articles about an American being treated like a terrorist in Gitmo so torture becomes accepted, continue the looting of the treasury and standby while critical infrastructure collapses from lack of maintenance.
He used the cadences of Martin to lull people into seeing what and who they wanted to see. He used his blackness, combined with rhetorical flourishes, to make people think he’d actually be allowed to change everything Americans knew needed to be changed. He lied, he knew he was lying, and he did a wonderful job. I hope Michelle and her mom and family are very proud of how he manipulated his race to fuck over everyone except the rich in this country.
There’s not a 3rd party candidate with a snowball’s chance in hell. Soros is not native born, he’s Hungarian iirc.
Even I have to admit, this is quite a turn around for Obama. If I were one of his supporters, I would be quite confused.
McCain was born in Panama wasn’t he:) but yes I get your point.
Eureka! We have found the elusive common ground! ;)
I think he’s lost his compass again. It’s as if he vacations inside the beltway sometimes. Sorry, John. The budget isn’t exactly progressive.
Or inexactly, for that matter.
Yep the Bowels Simpson plan will be the rational alternative.
From US Representative Michael Honda, a member of the House Budget Committee and the Congressional Progressive Caucus, we get this very interest alternative budget to the Ryan Plan – but has Gergen discussed this as “serious”, or, indeed, has it gotten any Sunday media play?
http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70§iontree=5,70
Over 10 year Window
• Deficit reduction of $5.6 trillion
• Primary spending cuts of $869 billion
• Net interest savings of $856 billion
• Total spending cuts: $1.7 trillion
• Revenue increase of $3.9 trillion
• Public investment of $1.7 trillion
• Budget surplus of $30.7 billion in 2021, debt at 64.1% of GDP.
Obama lied about his positions on issues to beat Hillary – a health excise tax he opposed and but later actively worked to enact, a public option he advocated and then later actively worked to oppose, an individual mandate for health care coverage which he opposed and then supported; and of course those matters of civil liberties and his science and energy policy. But we still have popular support for progressive policies and even have majorities in both parties to oppose SS cuts and to raise the payroll cap. Can we work around Obama?
Well, I suppose he needs his legacy.
OTOH, perhaps the Pentabrains have intercepted communications from space aliens indicating the cyborg invasion fleet will target Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan or Pakistan. Being unsure of which, they do what they’ve always done.
Occupy them all! At great expense!!! Forever!!!!
By losing our shirts, we’ll save planet earth?
Well, that goes a long way towards explaining our Godzilla of an embassy in Iraq.
Nah. Too practical. Planning ahead is so un-American.
Or… Or perhaps they imagine the space aliens will bring their credit cards so the corps absolutely must be there! Yeah. That’s it. We’re there to save Macy*s!
It’d make more sense if the aliens wanted to invest in derivatives. We’ve got lots of those.
Multiple wars dumped onto the national debt as we slash taxes for the bastards who got us into those wars in the first place?
All of this voodoo economics makes my head swim. I need some coffee.
Invasion of the Body Snatchers might explain where Mr. Obama went. Either that or the realization that this emperor, too, wears no clothes except those of imagined imperial splendor.
Obama’s supporters fell all over themselves answering the political equivalent of a Craigslist personals ad.
In their forlorn and painful disappointment (while they wait for their test results at the clinic) they *should* be looking for how *they themselves* were *so desperate to be suckered*, so they won’t keep making the same mistakes.
But so far they’re just looking for a new ad.
.
“They say I’m pedaling false hopes.” – Obama, in this same speech
Research.
http://www.blackcommentator.com/48/48_cover.html
The stimulus of the payroll tax reduction for one year was sold out by Obama in 4 months.
The only new stimulus this economy will get from Obama is new military spending.
Yet we pretend he is the only choice possible for the Democratic Party in 2012 because we can not get a more ethical and backboned person with a left of center bent to run after we on the left eviscerated Hillary.
The 2012 election at the national level is one that I will sit out.
All is not well with OBAMA black base?
Cornel West: Obama is ‘another black mascot’ of ‘Wall Street oligarchs’
Princeton professor and famed black intellectual Cornel West has long been a supporter of President Barack Obama, but he’s recently changed his tune.
In an interview last week, he suggested that Obama has sold out and become “a puppet” of powerful interests, merely promising change and not delivering. West warned that this would trust the U.S. into a “democratic awakening” the likes of which the nation had not seen in decades.
Appearing on an MSNBC panel recently, West remained outspoken.
Amid a very heated discussion of whether President Obama is doing enough for black people in America, he called the president “another black mascot” of “Wall Street oligarchs.” This made civil rights activist Al Sharpton extremely unhappy and the discussion essentially disintegrated from there.
This video is from MSNBC, broadcast Sunday, April 10, 2011.
http://www.rawstory.com/rawreplay/2011/04/cornel-west-obama-is-another-black-mascot-of-wall-street-oligarchs/
Al Sharpton is trying to save the Clarence Thomas aka”OBAMA” in the WH.
Good Luck, once OBAMA becomes the new Clarence Thomas, Obama can kiss 2012 good bye
Black un-employment is about 40% and climbing
When it comes to talkin pretty Obama can sell ice to the eskimos. And when the eskimos get hungry he’ll tell em to suck ice.
Ohplease. Those transparent teleprompters Obama, e.g., uses, which the TV cameras keep outside the frame and render invisible, is de facto deception. No? What would you call it? Our *leaders* have used them since they were invented.
So of course he’s contemptuous of us and cynical. He’s innocent in his own mind: “Lying in the defense of dishonesty is no vice” — Sen. Barack Goldwater.
The day after he needed Democrats to turn out the vote for him.
Here’s a picture of Obama’s economic plan.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/nationaalarchief/5371990429/
It’s pretty easy to see what’s wrong with it.
Yes, I’m in with more outright lies, hubris, disdain, and cynical manipulation in 2012. Can’t wait for his campaign charade to begin.
Suggestion, label the series: Betrayal
Good old Obama, master of middle class rape.
“He lied, he knew he was lying, and he did a wonderful job. I hope Michelle and her mom and family are very proud of how he manipulated his race to fuck over everyone except the rich in this country.”
Hey, Michelle lied, too. Remember her convention speech about she and Barack coming from people where “your word is your bond”?
What makes you think that Obama isn’t doing what George Soros asked him to do?
To me, Soros represents the controlled left.
For example, Soros is currently funding a huge economic pow-wow at Bretton Woods NH. Guess which word this bunch of Soros funded experts fail to utter: Fraud
http://www.thewashingtonnote.com/archives/2011/04/the_fraud_quest/
“dip shit news anchor.”
Haven’t heard that one before. Like it. Short, concise, accurate.
“We have an empathy deficit”
Yes, and Obama followed that up with two words: “Predator Drones”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WWKG6ZmgAX4
The word is Betrayal. Betrayal far greater than Mr Read My Lips, No New Taxes(Bush Sr).
By running Obama in 2012, the Democrat leadership is giving the Presidency to the Republicans.
I didn’t forget the snark mark. I thought the snark was obvious.
you are quoting someone who uses this formula:
Domestic Private Sector Financial Balance + Fiscal Balance – Current Account Balance = 0
this formula is always true, even if the sun explodes. It’s also not relevant if people tire of inflation.
Why don’t you agree with paul krugman and me?
http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/03/25/deficits-and-the-printing-press-somewhat-wonkish/
yeah watched that segment here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=diqr921cx6A
right. It couldn’t possibly be worse. (cue worst president ever)
because krugman misrepresents mmt and has created a strawman in its place.
http://my.firedoglake.com/selise/2011/03/26/paul-krugman-gets-it-wrong…-again/
http://my.firedoglake.com/selise/2011/03/29/why-paul-krugman-and-we-need-to-take-mmt-economists-seriously/
http://my.firedoglake.com/selise/2011/03/29/pavlina-tcherneva-modern-monetary-theory-and-mr-paul-krugman-a-way-forward/