User Picture

Pittsburgh 7-Eleven Franchise Owner: Meet and Discuss Trans Slur Incident

By: PghLesbian Saturday May 11, 2013 1:32 pm

PETITION LINK http://www.change.org/petitions/owners-of-northside-pittsburgh-7-eleven-please-meet-with-community-members-to-discuss-incident-of-lgbtq-slur

 

On Thursday, May 2, 2013, I witnessed a clerk in a Pittsburgh 7-Eleven (Western Avenue on the Northside) using the word “tranny” at the register while telling an anecdote to a coworker and at least one customer. This was after a lengthy conversation about “fat women” and gastric bypass surgery that took place while I was in line.

As I approached the exit, I heard this employee say, “…and this guy, you know the ‘tranny’ who comes in here…” I immediately turned around and said loudly, “Did you just say tranny?”

He responded with a mumbled “sorry” and a smirk. The entire store went silent. I told him that “sorry” isn’t sufficient when accompanied by a smirk. I also said that the term “tranny” is offensive and demeaning and not appropriate in a business setting. He turned around and ran into the back office. I asked the other clerks for his name, and they told me it was “Bee.” I then asked if a manager was around, but there was none, so I left.

 

After getting home I tried to find the franchise information. I left a voicemail at the restaurant, then contacted 7-Eleven’s corporate offices and filed a complaint. The franchise called me within an hour and said that they were not sure it was one of their stores – she said it looked like that particular store had been sold and that I should work with corporate.

Corporate emailed me the next day and said they would need a few days to investigate. On Tuesday, May 7, I followed up with corporate and they expressed surprise that the franchise owner, whose name is Liz Ulstott, had not called me back. They followed up with her, and she claimed she had addressed it. The employee – I learned that his name was actually Brandon — acknowledged he used the word but said it was a private conversation.

I politely requested that the franchise owner meet with me and two members of the community to discuss the situation and my other concerns regarding the preceding conversation and the response by Brandon’s coworkers. I wanted to bring local trans advocate (and Northside resident) Eli Kuti and local Unitarian-Universalist LGBTQ minister (and Northside resident) Rev Dave McFarland together with the owners of this franchise to discuss the incident and the surrounding events, and consider how we can ensure that this store is welcoming and safe to everyone. They refused, and I was told that 7-Eleven would have no further comment on the issue.

So why am I sharing this on a national blog?

First, corporate is well aware of the situation but needs to realize that most people don’t draw a distinction between individual franchises and the larger corporation. They do not stop and think “Oh, that’s a franchise issue, not a reflection on the entire corporation.” No, they get a negative impression of the brand itself and thus, corporate has a vested interest in facilitating a meeting and ensuring the community that 7-Eleven is a welcoming and safe environment for all customers.

Second, one of the regional people who spoke with me didn’t know what the term “tranny” meant and even asked me how to spell it. When I offered her a few comparable terms (f*g and c*nt), she was shocked but still didn’t really understand — even though I know 7-Eleven has trans customers and I bet more than a few employees. So this is a bit odd.

Third, everyone has a connection to Pittsburgh. We call it the “Steeler Nation:” people all over the world love our city (and of course, the Steelers). Whether you live here yourself, your grandma lives here, you went to college here, or you came to Pride or Netroots Nation or Creating Change here, you have an interest in creating a safe and welcoming business community.

I’ve created a Change.org petition asking the franchise owners to meet with community members to discuss this incident. I hope you’ll consider signing it.

The petition has already gathered some notable signatories, including Pittsburgh City Councilman R. Daniel Lavelle, whose district includes this business and my personal neighborhood. Faculty and staff from the nearby community college, as well as other nearby business owners, have been vigorously signing and commenting; they don’t want our neighborhood to be defined by this ugly slur or 7-Eleven’s subsequent refusal to work with concerned members of our community.

I’ve also been approached quietly by several members of the trans community who don’t feel safe or comfortable signing the petition. As allies, I believe it’s our job to hear that vulnerability and step up even more, so I’ve been reaching out to PFLAG and other organizations that specifically exist to provide the support and encouragement people need.

So why all this effort?

It is important that business owners take steps to ensure everyone feels safe and welcome in their establishment. We believe a face-to-face meeting with a small group of community leaders can open a dialogue to create a welcoming environment. The meeting would include three people: a local pastor who is part of the LGBTQ community, a local trans man, and myself, a lesbian. All three of us live in the neighborhood.

Our goal is to simply ensure the owner understands that even a private conversation using an offensive and hateful slur sends a message to everyone in hearing range. Personal opinions need to be expressed in private, not while in uniform waiting on customers at a register. We’re not demanding that Brandon be fired, because we don’t want him to lose his job. Instead, we want Brandon to understand that the words he chooses to use while at work reflect on his professionalism and sends a message about the values of the business he works for. That’s a good life lesson for anyone to learn, but Brandon’s managers and the 7-Eleven corporate team needs to learn it as well. Finally, during this meeting we hope to discuss ways of ensuring that the community, both geographic and LGBTQ, feels safe and welcome in this store.

While I recognize that this incident occurred in a franchise, we are including 7-Eleven corporate in this petition in hopes that they will support our request and encourage their franchisee to sit down and meet with us.

Thank you again for signing the petition, and many thanks to Monica Roberts for her advice and feedback.

Could “Chick-Fil-A” be redefined = girl on girl sex?

By: PghLesbian Thursday December 1, 2011 2:52 pm

Last night, I tossed out a link to Facebook about yet the latest sordid twist in the lies and deception Chick-Fil-A has been using to deny their anti-gay agenda. I saw the story pop up here and there throughout the evening.

Then a friend, Leslie Fleisher, had this idea — what if we redefined “Chick-Fil-A” as girl on girl sex much in the way Dan Savage redefined santorum?  She specifically intended tribadism (can you imagine how many folks were looking that up on Wikipedia?) … and her suggestion had an overwhelmingly positive response from her immediate circle.

I wrote a brief piece about it and have had tons of hits. I am just so seriously tired of explaining to people why the milkshake and the chicken sandwich contribute to the hate. I had a lesbian tell me she takes her kids there because they like the cow. How do you explain that the cow doesn’t think your moms are a real family? But how do you not explain that?

If you google “Chick-Fil-A” and “lesbian” right this very moment, you’ll find tons and tons of articles from all sides of the issue, including a few more serious pieces from my own blog.

I wonder if the power of social media could change that?

Today (May 10, 2011) is Blog for Equality Day in Pittsburgh

By: PghLesbian Tuesday May 10, 2011 10:02 am

Last week, State Representative Darryl Metcalfe (R- Cranberry) introduced a harsh version of the so-called “Marriage Protection” Amendment in the General Assembly.  As chair of the powerful State Government Committee, he has the means to bring this to at least a committee vote and probably onto the floor. 

This is the fourth attempt in five years to pass an amendment.  In 2006, different versions passes and reconciliation was not possible.  In 2008 and 2010, the legislation did not make it out of committee. 

In 2008 and 2010, Pittsburgh bloggers united in opposition to this amendment by participating in “Blog for Equality Pittsburgh” events. 

Today, we are at it again in hopes of drawing attention to the impact Pennsylvania could experience under a newly elected Republican and significant changes in the General Assembly.  We invite bloggers around the nation, LGBTQ and allies alike, to join us. 

More information is available here.

Facebook notes, tweets and so forth are welcome, too.  Simply send your link to sue @ sitnscoop.com, post in the comments, via twitter @pghlesbian24 or whatever creative way you find to reach me. 

Pennsylvania is one of the key states targeted by Focus on the Family's “Ignite” strategy.  It is not unrealistic to expect the right to pour millions into this amendment while also beating back abortion rights and pushing for school vouchers.  It is imperative we galvanize the Pittsburgh LGBTQ community, long accustomed to socially conservative Democrats, to take action. 

The (re)election of an openly gay Pgh City Councilman – why it matters

By: PghLesbian Saturday January 22, 2011 10:15 am

(Adapted from a post at Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents … 

In 2011, Pittsburgh faces an exciting opportunity to support our first openly gay City Councilman in his bid for a second term.  Councilman Bruce Kraus was elected in 2007, unseating the incumbent in a race in which his identity as an openly gay man was not a significant issue.

Since then, Councilman Kraus has made his mark addressing quality of life issues in his district, including vandalism and other criminal conduct by patrons of the district’s very significant strip of bars and late night establishments.  District residents applaud Bruce’s commitment, noting that he himself is out picking up litter nearly every weekend.
From 2 Political Junkies, a Pittsburgh political blog, District 3 resident Maria Lupinacci writes

 Bruce Kraus is seeking a second term on Pittsburgh City Council for District 3. This is my district and I’m a longtime supporter of Kraus (poll watcher, heck, I’ve stuffed envelopes at his house) and I couldn’t be happier with my choice. He’s a solid member of the progressive alliance on Council. I can’t count the number of times I’ve seen him walking my district. I also greatly appreciate his efforts to get a handle on the vandalism and violence that have unfortunately become features of the South Side’s nightlife.

 

Local Blogging – a lesbian perspective

By: PghLesbian Tuesday December 21, 2010 7:59 pm

December 29, 2010 marks my fifth anniversary as Pittsburgh's largest LGBT blog and the only one driven by a lesbian voice.  Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents began as a simply glimpse into the life of a lesbian and has grown to be an important critique on things political, cultural and economic as awell as the lives of local lesbians. 

Over the past years, the blog became increasingly driven to politics — from the national Casey-Santorum campaign to the increasing social conservatism of Western Pennsylvania Democrats.  That brought increasing heat to me and, unfortunately, many of the other issues I focused on were lost in the politics. 

Still, the impact was undeniable.  I became the first LGBT blog listed on the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's blogroll.  I was invited to participate in the “Women in Media” advisory committe for the Women & Girls Foundation of Southwestern PA.  I rallied the heterosexual bloggers to participate in two “Blog for Equality” days to oppose the PA Marriage Amendment. 

Pgh Stonewall Chapter Endorses Specter Over Sestak

By: PghLesbian Sunday April 25, 2010 10:06 pm

Pennsylvania is wrestling with two statewide Democrat primaries. The Governor's race is split between four candidates, two from Southwestern PA (Pittsburgh) and two from Southeastern PA (Philadelphia). There's also the race to fill Pennsylvania's Senate seat, featuring incumbent and recent Democrat Arlen Specter and challenger Congressman Joe Sestak.

Consider the impact of the Steel City Stonewall Democrats endorsement.

Pennsylvania: A Queer Perspective on Candidate for Governor Dan Onorato

By: PghLesbian Tuesday March 16, 2010 10:48 am

For the past four years I’ve been blogging about Pittsburgh’s LGBTQ community at Pittsburgh Lesbian Correspondents. I cover political, cultural, and a wide range of general interest topics. I recently spearheaded the second “Blog For Equality Pittsburgh” around yet another attempt to amend Pennsylvania’s constitution to protect marriage for the LGBTQ community (as I write this, the outcome of the Judiciary Committee vote is yet unknown).  Over 20 bloggers, gay and straight alike, contributed thoughts both political and personal on an issue that resonates across the Commonwealth.

The gay establishment in Pittsburgh considers me divisive because I openly talk about how the institutions in Pittsburgh and Allegheny County fail to lead when it comes to LGBTQ issues here in Southwestern Pennsylvania.  I’m generally considered a pain in the ass because I talk and talk and talk about LGBTQ issues which in SW Pennsylvania translate into a lot of admonishing of institutions that fail to lead when we need them. I also like to complicate things by bringing up issues around class, socioeconomic status, gender, race, and so forth.

Given the above, this is my queer perspective on candidate Dan Onorato, currently Chief Executive of Allegheny County. First, the good news about Mr. Onorato. He signed the Allegheny County Non-Discrimination into law in 2009.

Unfortunately, that’s all I got folks. Mr. Onorato has been in office for nearly 20 years, including six at the helm of the County and I can give you one concrete examples of positive support for our community.

It is certainly not for lack of opportunity.

As County Chief Executive, Mr. Onorato had six years to take action. At no point was the creation of a Human Relations Commission on his radar. When the ordinance was introduced in July 2008, it took him until April 2009 to issue a statement of support. I will give him points for attending the signing ceremony!  

Yes, I’ve been told he was working behind the scenes. But that’s easy to say and difficult to prove. He didn’t come to a January 2009 rally that turned out nearly a dozen other elected officials in support of the ordinance. He didn’t respond to questions about it submitted to his cyber town halls. http://www.pghlesbian.com/…

Mr Onorato undoubtably touts the County Non-Discrimination ordinance as a sign of his progressive credentials. That would be more credible had he been a leader on this issue, rather than remaining silent for 10 long months. It would also be more credible if he took care of his own house and put domestic partner benefits in place for his team.

The most glaring example of an Onorato leadership fail has been the fact that Allegheny County employees do not have domestic partner benefits. As noted above, Mr. Onorato is not a new County executive; he has been at the helm of county government for six year. During that six years he has not once mentioned offering County employees domestic partner benefits or even mentioned that he wanted to do so but was unable. Six years at the helm and Onorato has steadfastly refused to take action. Yes, it is a complicated negotiation with labor unions involving fair labor practice standards. Still I maintain that he lacked the political will to expend his political capital to make this happen. The Cities of Pittsburgh and Philadelphia made it happen. The State of Pennsylvania made it happen http://www.pghlesbian.com/… . Even the Court system http://www.pghlesbian.com/… has made it happen.

Domestic partner benefits are not a very controversial topic in terms of LGBTQ issues. This is precisely why a failure on this issue is a very important indicator of a candidate’s sincerity as an ally. A letter of support in 2009 does not an LGBT ally make.

The last time I heard him publicly speak on LGBT issues, Mr. Onorato took refuge behind his “good Catholic boy” upbringing.  This was his justification for coming along so slowly on LGBTQ issues. That translates as someone who will always play it safe when it comes to our civil rights. In spite of his words, his record does not suggest he would extend his “good Catholic neck” on HB 300, hate crimes protections or other statewide issues that require strong allies to help our community step out of second class status.

His position on choice affirms my belief. Mr. Onorato is anti-choice, but crosses his heart that he won’t take action to change Pennsylvania’s legal status quo for women’s reproductive status. That is pandering, not leadership. Pennsylvania’s women and girls deserve better.

It is all well and good to acknowledge that some “good Catholic boy” politicians need to take baby steps, but that’s not an acceptable mentality from the Governor.

Pennsylvania’s LGBT community deserves an ally who believes that we are equal citizens in this Commonwealth. We are realistic enough to recognize that it will be an upward battle to gain our equal rights, but we deserve more decisive action than Dan Onorato has brought to the table in the past twenty years.

For the record, I'm supporting Joe Hoeffel and I believe you'll find many LGBTQ persons in Southwestern Pennsylvania follow suit.

Pittsburgh Bloggers Plan Blog Swarm on Marriage Amendment

By: PghLesbian Thursday March 11, 2010 8:38 pm

For three consecutive sessions, wingnuts in the Pennsylvania Senate have tried to pass a so-called “Marriage Protection” amendment to the State Constitution.  They were harrowingly close in 2006, a little further away in 2008 but hoping three times the charm in 2010.

SB 707 was introduced by Senator “We alllow gays to exist” Eichelberger and is currently sitting in the Senate Judiciary Committee.  Four key members of the committee are from Western PA – Senators Joan Orie- R, Mary Jo White – R, Wayne Fontana – D, and Jay Costa – D.  Also on the committee is Senator Daylin Leach who has introduced legislation to legalize same sex marriage. 

A vote is expected on Tuesday, March 16, 2010.  White is considered “persuadable” based on previous statements doubting adding discrimination to the state constitution. (I say state and mean Commonwealth.  You understand.)