
Photo Credit: Ben Powless
This week, President Obama will find hundreds more people in front of the White House – us included – willing to go to jail for peacefully protesting the President’s short-sighted decision to approve the Keystone XL pipeline. President Obama’s decision on this enormous fossil fuel project will not be a quiet deal with oil industry lobbyists; it will be witnessed by millions of voters who had hoped that President Obama would have the vision to get America off of oil with a moonshot program for oil-free cars by the next decade. Instead, oil profits have been pitted against the world that our children will live in, hooking America to some of the highest polluting oil without moving America quickly to a foreign oil-free future.
For many Americans, Obama’s promise to begin to move the United States away from its growing dependence on fossil fuels and address global warming was foremost among his promise of change. For many more, it was Obama’s assurance that his Presidency would change a political system dominated by lobbyists and their narrow interests, instead of the public interest. President Obama’s commitment on both of these promises – to the volunteers who knocked on doors, the young voters who elected him, and the country he leads – will be tested by his decision on the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline.
If approved, the pipeline construction would allow greater exploitation of the environmentally destructive tar sands, ripping up some of the world’s last, most intact rainforests and wildlife habitat that has taken 10,000 years to evolve. The pipeline also threatens communities along its route with toxic oil spills. And by opening a new source of highly polluting tar sands, it could cause even more global warming, as James Hansen and 19 other prominent climate scientists have warned. This is why Keystone XL is opposed by Nebraskan ranchers, communities near the dangerous refineries in Texas, the nation’s largest environmental organizations, and so many more.
The State Department on Friday showed the extraordinary influence that the fossil fuel industry still has in Washington, when it absurdly claimed that the environmental impacts of the pipeline would be ‘minimal.’ While these State Department reviews are “welcomed” by the American Petroleum Institute, the Environmental Protection Agency objected to earlier drafts as insufficient. For a glimpse of how the State Department’s Keystone XL reviews could release such an unrealistic conclusion, look no further than Transcanada’s lead lobbyist for the pipeline, a former top campaign aide for Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. This appears to be the kind of cronyism with the oil industry that Obama promised to end, but with several major oil companies involved in the project, it really is just a glimpse of the enormous lobbying pressure the oil industry has brought to bear.
Any hopes these oil lobbyists had for the closed door deal they are used to is now long gone. This week, we will stand with hundreds of Americans and our allies who take the world that we leave for our children seriously enough to risk arrest in hopes that President Obama will take the security of our country and the world we leave our children seriously enough to cancel the tar sands pipeline and fast track his work to get America off of oil, period.
We’ll see you at the White House.
Phil Radford, Executive Director, Greenpeace USA
Daryl Hannah, Actress/Activist



34 Comments

Keep Obama’s feet to the fire. This is one decision he might be forced to delay until after the election (I believe he will green-light the project sooner or later). Make him pay a price. This action hits him where it hurts.
The media have mostly ignored this protest, but the arrests make it more of a news item. There’s hope the message will get out.
Lol of course he’ll approve it.
Or, he’ll create a ‘super committee’ to approve it. You’re dealing with a corporate criminal.
Sorry o is for sale beyond what we can afford.
“The pipeline also threatens communities along its route with toxic oil spills. And by opening a new source of highly polluting tar sands, it could cause even more global warming, as James Hansen and 19 other prominent climate scientists have warned.”
Mention who these communities are. Mention how the rights of the poor and indigenous people are being trampled upon again. This is just not a fight for an oil free future but a future where justice exist for all. Mention that this is a struggle going on around the world. Mention how the indigenous people of Bolivia are fighting from having their lands taken away from them. Mention how communities in the Gulf Coast are still struggling and are being lied to about eating contaminated food due to the largest oil spill in history. Mention that this is a fight for true freedom from an oil based oligarchy.
Sorry Mr. Radford – I could not disagree more.
First, “oil-free” cars?? Unless you are talking Flintstone-mobiles, they have to have a power source. Electric power – currently aoubt 70% produced by coal and nuke. Where do you propose to find the additional electric generating capacity?
Second, if this is just a feel-good game about mjoral rightness, then O.K. But if it is a question of total CO2 footprint, it must be remembered that Canada for the foreseeable future is going to be producing from the oil sands. The Alberta government is 100% behind it – the Canadian government has a clear Conservative majority recently elected. If the U.S. does’t buy, China is second in line. Which would mean additional shipping energy/CO2 use both for oil going to China and Middle East oil shipped to the U.S.
Third, if Obama actually had done something both about jobs and the green economy – then, maybe, he could have nixed XL. But since we are skidding into a full-fledged depression, there is no way that he will take the political and economic hit.
PS – Speaking of unemployment – have you checked North Dakota’s numbers lately?
Know that those of us who cannot be there are with you in thoughts and spirit!
All we’re trying to do is help President Obama keep his promise that under his presidency, the planet would begin to heal. That’s all we want: promises kept.
Is that too much to ask, really?
Sorry, he already sold out before anyone noticed.
North Dakota? That wouldn’t be the one and only state in the Union that has a state run banking system would it?
You should see the dirty, racist way the people of the Leech Lake Indian Nation here in northern Minnesota were treated on the leg of this pipeline going to the processing center in Wisconsin.
This is Obama’s idea of “green economy” and “green jobs.”
Hillary Clinton gave her approval to run the pipeline across the Leech Lake Indian Reservation.
My question is this:
When are all of these foundation-funded environmental organizations going to have the courage to stand up and call for Obama to be dumped and support the efforts to build a progressive third party in this country to challenge Wall Street for power?
It is not too much to ask that Obama keep the “promises” he made but it is too much to expect.
As far as employment related issues and this pipeline… they refuse to enforce Affirmative Action.
And as far as employment in North Dakota… do you like working for poverty wages without any rights?
Every arrest they make shines more light on the situation.
The most efficient course of action would be to basically do nothing to the protesters, ie. let them protest and ignore.
The corporate media will willingly ignore them. Unless you start arresting them and then even the corporate media will start to pay attention.
They made this misstep because they’re this stupid and sloppy?
No, they made it because they don’t really care what the peons think and now they don’t even bother hiding their contempt for us.
NO Tar, 0bamar!
OK but you need to be clear on a few things. First, an oil based economy is unsustainable – unlike the deficit. There is not enough oil under the ocean or in the tar sands to satisfy demand. Second, oil prices regularly rise and fall and cause economic disruptions and inflation. And third, the use of resouces to build a pipe line is just one more diversion that would be better spent on improving alternate energy sources.
I bet he creates a committee to do it. Needs some distance. I think Knut has it right though. In the end he will approve it but we have to delay it. Make him appoint a committee to study it.
Maybe it is just me but I think we have to introduce something more than environmental concerns to this. (but the is ok too.)We need to emphasize the need for alternate energy sources to reduce dependancy on corrupt regimes the world over and the real impact on our economy. That is after all what Obana promised us.
more like he will appoint a super committee to approve it if he follows his own precedence. He is without a doubt the most irresponsible president we have had in the White House. He won’t even take responsibility for his decisions. He makes them behind closed doors and then gets committees to report them to the nation.
OBAMATAR
That will be his epitaph if he approves the Keystone pipeline. OBAMATAR.
oil-free cars ?
How about plastic free computers too.
Oil may be unsustainable in the long term – but in the short term it is not. And, unfortunately, democratic systems increasingly appear to operate on the short term. Which seems to be shortening with every electronic advance.
I cannot offer an “easy” answer. I do know that if progressives and the near-worthless Dem Party appear to be quashing jobs and development at a time of record post-WWII unemployment they will be killed in the voting both – especially in places like Michigan, Ohio, and Penna.
Obama did nothing for the entire first year. Then he putzed around the last year and a half. If he would have made it a national priority to develop renewables – like Kennedy’s moon speech – then he could have said “No” to the pipeline.
But the way things are on the ground politically today – there isn’t a chance. Unless, of course, you want House, Senate, White House, and the Supreme Court to be entirely Gopper – - which they may be anyway.
No offense but, the pretense that Obama is still any kind of potential ally–if we just appeal to the angels of his better nature–has long since been proven false.
We do not make political progress, moving forward, until we identify him openly as the political enemy he is, until we move AGAINST him, and against this evil, quite obviously failed system.
Thankyou for making this statement, because it gives me the opportunity to make a point
ND’s unemployment, or lack thereof, is very much attributable to the fact that much of its economy is subsidized through the federal government. The largest economic generator in the state is agriculture, which has been supported through federal farm programs since FDR’s time.
I’m not sure if tourism or energy is number 2, but regardless, the new oil drilling that’s taking place right now isn’t the result of new finds (yes, I know about the Bakken formation) in the Williston Basin. The oil was always there, and the oil companies knew it was there. It just wasn’t economically feasible to extract it when oil was 30 and 40 dollars a gallon. What has changed is the fact that all the wars have driven the price up to levels sustainable for development
And since the subject has been brought up. There are oil spills right now in Williston at the confluence of the Missouri and Yellowstone
Pics at the link
http://www.fishingbuddy.com/fuel_for_the_oilfield_hater_s_fire
Can we like lobby for a law that all people who accept a job from Keystone move, with spouses and children if any, to the path of the pipe so we know all will be safe and sound?
Also, please, all lawmakers and others on the lobby-take who have a part in the permits etc., even if we have to build a new white house in North Dakota. Think of all the jobs in residential construction industry!
…hmmmm. And I have another plan for frackin’ tea bags…
Hey, BTW Mr. Radford, I could not AGREE with you more. Someone recently said they could not DISagree with you more. (Well, could not understand that complicated comment about the “oil-free car” etc. Geez, where was he when…well never mind. You know, this is all just a feel-good game for moral grounds or something anyway.)
But, Mr.Radford, you remind me of why Greenpeace was the first outfit I gave permission to get into my bank account monthly. The first outfit on the planet with the balls to buck the, you know, system(s). And with NO regard for trading principles for employment statistics yet! That will get you tore up even on a Progressive blog! You sure know how to play that feel-good game. Got a good game plan for those Canadians? They’re tough you know. HA! I hear they even have a plan for keeping loggers employed in a post-forest era!
Bad policy is just that –bad. We do not need this.
The journey begins with the first step. This could be it.
Obama embraces ******
**edited for racist term**
man is souless,like Rummy
oh forgot he was the prince of Peace
***** Tar?
**edited for racist term**
The complete and utter silence of the MSM on this oil pipeline is deafening.
no worries for them,they will retire on pristine beaches somewhere
The Tar-Baby is a doll made of tar and turpentine used to entrap Br’er Rabbit in the second of the Uncle Remus stories. The more that Br’er Rabbit fights the Tar-Baby, the more entangled he becomes. In modern usage according to Random House, “tar baby” refers to any “sticky situation” that is only aggravated by additional contact.
this was my intent
BHO is stuck with the TarBaby imo…but he could get unstuck by leaving it alone…seems like a perfect metaphor
what he’s been doing is call for expanded study (usually from EPA) and then sends another agency in quietly through a side door – in the case of fracking in the Delaware River Basin, it was the Army Corps of Engineers, With West Virginia’s Mountaintop Removal Mining permitting (2nd largest MMR operation ever approved in the state, it was BLM
regardless of outcome, I am deeply grateful to this Coalition and all those citizens in DC for bringing a righteous light — this WH had no reason to expect a sustained, united effort — there will be consequences
correction on edit: that poisonous travesty in West Virgina was also approved via Army Corps of Engineers