Co-Authored by Phil Radford, Executive Director of Greenpeace USA and Aaron Viles, Deputy Director of Gulf Restoration Network
The BP disaster turns two this week. Two years since the nation was reminded that offshore drilling is dirty, dangerous, and deadly. Two years since the slow-motion disaster began changing our region, our communities, our ecosystem.
As we look back and assess where we are today, a troubling picture is emerging from the Gulf.
Throughout the foodchain, warning signs are accumulating. Dolphins are sick and dying. Important forage fish are plagued with gill and developmental damage. Deepwater species like snapper have been stricken with lesions, and their reefs are losing biodiversity. Coastal communities are struggling with changes to the fisheries they rely upon. Hard-hit oyster reefs aren’t coming back and sport fish like speckled trout have disappeared from some of their traditional haunts. BP’s oily fingerprints continue to mar the landscape and destroy habitats.
With these impacts already here, some scientists are alarmed by what they’re finding. Unfortunately their concerns are largely drowned out by BP and the “powers that be” shouting through very large megaphones that, ‘all is fine, BP is making it right, come and spend your money’. But the truth is far different. The Gulf of Mexico, our nation’s energy sacrifice zone, continues to suffer.
Of course, the Gulf wasn’t a pristine ecosystem on April 19, 2010. The coastal wetlands of the Mississippi River delta were in a crisis state, losing a football field worth of wetlands every hour due to our mismanagement of the river for flood control and dependable shipping lanes. This crisis has been greatly exacerbated by the oil industry being allowed to dredge 10,000 miles of canals through our coastal zone, removing marsh and increasing subsidence.
Louisiana’s coastal wetlands system is among the fastest disappearing landmasses on earth, diminishing at the rate of 18 square miles every year. The coastal zone is vast however, making up 30 percent of the nation’s coastal wetlands but is experiencing 90% of the nation’s wetlands loss, a total of over 1,800 square miles since 1932.
These wetlands are absolutely critical to our nation. Supplying $3 trillion annually to the U.S. economy, the Mississippi River and the Gulf coast create an international gateway for products like coffee, grain, seafood, oil, and gas. The Gulf coast has historically been the cradle of nearly one-third of the commercial fish and shellfish harvest of the lower 48 states. Critical for migratory birds, the coast is used by up to 40 percent of North America’s duck, geese, and eagle populations. Jazz, Funk, Zydeco, and Fats Domino were all born in southern Louisiana.
More importantly, Louisiana’s natural storm defenses – such as barrier islands, marshes, and cypress swamps – protect Louisiana’s coastal communities. Louisiana’s infamous levees need wetlands to survive hurricane-level storms. But in the face of rising sea levels and stronger storms fueled by climate change, rebuilding these wetlands is the only way to make South Louisiana, and all it entails, sustainable.
Listen to Greenpeace Radio Interview featuring Gulf Restoration Network’s Aaron Viles
With an estimated $50 billion price tag to re-engineer the lower reaches of the Mississippi River to reintroduce sediment and freshwater into the marsh to rebuild wetlands, this crisis demands a national commitment. In the face of rising seas, subsiding marsh, and increasing energy costs, coastal scientists estimate we have less than 10 years as a nation to begin the restoration process.
Here’s the irony. Despite the horrors the BP disaster has brought to the region, it also presents a unique opportunity to jump start this $50 billion restoration project. BP will be on the hook for an historic fine under the Clean Water Act, as much as $20 billion depending on how aggressively and effectively the U.S. Department of Justice pursues the super-polluter. The oil industry (well, one very large corporate representative) might finally be forced to fix what they broke in our ecosystem. Congress is considering a bill that would devote 80% of the Clean Water Act fines would go to gulf restoration projects. Congress needs to pass this bill without holding it hostage to anti-environmental legislation.
Two years after the disaster, it’s outrageous that this is where we sit. Two years after the Santa Barbara oil spill, Earth Day was born, and helped to launch the modern environmental movement. Two years after the Exxon Valdez spill, the Oil Pollution Act had been passed by Congress, raising the bar on how we deal with oil accidents. Yet two years after the BP disaster, we’re faced with horrible political gamesmanship, a vulnerable and threatened ecosystem, and struggling communities.
It’s well past time we hold BP accountable, demand better leadership from Washington DC, and take significant steps to restore the Gulf, and protect against all future drilling disasters. We hope you’ll help. Two years later and misguided politicians are not doing what’s needed to fix the Gulf nor are they changing the “energy as usual” policies that got us in trouble in the first place.
Greenpeace submitted nearly 50 Freedom of Information Act requests in the summer of 2010 during the BP Deepwater Horizon disaster for photos and information. These photos have never been released by the government. They were taken as the oil was hitting the coastline and, in many cases, in areas where the Coast Guard and BP were forbidding independent journalists or citizens from doing our own documentation by boat or air.
Greenpeace is still analyzing more than 20,000 images from the US Fish & Wildlife Service. Below is a map with a selection of 300 of never before seen images. Please comment and tag the photos where you can see oil, and birds or other signs of wildlife. Click here.



32 Comments

And in Northern WI, we get the regular appearance of people selling Gulf Shrimp out of the backs of small refrigerated trucks. I have not stopped to ask, but I see people stopping to purchase shrimp. I want to ask the people stopping if they are concerned about what they are buying.
For an even more damning assessment of the mess in the Gulf and the mutated fish we have Al Jazeera. There is evidence of shrimp genome changes. Not only are they born with no eyes but no eye sockets.
http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/features/2012/04/201241682318260912.html
You couldn’t pay me to eat the shit coming out of the gulf. Two years ago next month, we ate all the oysters we could get our hands on, knowing full well we’d probably never be able to eat them again. We’ve had to go from a mostly fish-based diet to meat. Thank you BP.
Where are the DEMOCRATS?
Democrats? What are democrats? Who are they and what do they represent? They are an unknown unknown to me.
The passive American public is just pleased as punch that they no longer have to grease the pan when they fry their seafood. It’s such a time saver.
What is this thing you speak of, “Democrats?”
Clearly they are opposite Walker in WI, but other than that, sorry I cannot help.
Sorry I missed the reply button somehow @ my number 7.
I do not think that word means what you hope it means.
The people in New Orleans are eating the seafood from the gulf. I know, I am one of them. sort of. My family lives down there and when I go visit we enjoy the “bounty” from the Gulf. It scares the crap out of me. And the population doesn’t seem to understand what has happened. Or they have forgotten it. Or my family has forgotten it. So, if the locals are that out of touch, is there really hope for restoration?
Shitbird Jindall says the “seafood” is being tested.
Booby doesn’t say who is doing the testing.
I’d guess that if any testing exists, it is being performed by the same people Obama had doing it – BP.
Well, there’s your problem right there.
I’d like to see what Greenpeace was writing at the time. I seem to remember that a lot of environmental groups (Sierra Club and Green Party come to mind) didn’t front page BP oil disaster for weeks. When was the first time Greenpeace wrote about it. A link would be nice.
Well, it took at least a month to assess how much oil was leaking. /s
You catch my drift.
And the dispersant was known to be safe.
And the Coast Guard was in charge.
Sorry, pardon my manners, great post.
Yes, it took 2 years to figure this all out.
BTW, I’m hosting PUAC tomorrow morning. It’s an update on my bee girlz. Should be fun.
If you can stomach it, this video from AJE:
“It’s almost two years since BP’s oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Now, scientists say they have found deformities among seafood and a great decline in the numbers of marine life. Dahr Jamail reports from New Orleans.”
They were doing those great logos and unfurling banners that pissed mr zero off.
The university in florida was having their water samples confiscated, besides green peace were the only ones present that I remember.
Meanwhile, on the left coast, we are finding evidence of exposure to radiation from Japan’s tragic tsunami… ssshhhh! don’t tell anyone, the official word is it won’t hit there for another year.
So, we are all going to have to move to the middle of the country where there is only a drought going on.
tornado alley………..oy
Many years ago, my family had a timeshare in North Padre Island. When offshore drilling began in the Gulf of Mexico, the beaches became littered with little oil blobs, hardened by the salty water but then resoftened by the hot sun. The horizon, which had once been ocean, became littered with dozens of oil rigs, each with its own black plume. The beach front no longer smelled of the sea, but smelled of oil. Even at my young age, I worried that gulls might eat the oil blobs.
Every time I hear talk of offshore drilling, that’s the image I see. You can bet all you money that there will never be oil rigs off the coast of Kennebunkport.
Precisely.
The election may hinge (marginally) on the price of gasoline, and you want the Dems to take on a major oil company? Good luck with that. Besides, how could BP possibly pay for a clean-up; all their resources are going into the cover-up, and all those tee vee ads telling us that everything is ship-shape and hunky-dory. Come on down, the water’s fine.
Maybe a little OT, but the Obama administration’s failure to mention climate change, in favor of the Axelrod approach is instructive:
Robert J. Brulle: “What I see going on here is that Obama is following the rhetorical advice of David Axelrod and groups like ecoAmerica, who argue that the American public is unwilling to deal with climate change.
“So rather than make the case for climate change and the necessity of action, this approach focuses on “clean” energy and research and development as a way to make a transition to a different energy mix. This is considered the popular, no pain, “energy quest” approach that relies on a mystical belief in R&D to address climate change.”
Another important dynamic is that the hospitality dependent sector of the Gulf Coast is also pushing the “everything is fine” message. Hard. So let’s not ask the American public to think too hard or deal with actual data.
There is no political pay-off here, so Dems will not only fail to raise the profile on this issue, they will actively participate in the cover-up.
On this issue, like so many others, the attention of Dems is focused on the attention span of voters, not on the reality. The attention of voters depends on the volume and strength of media coverage. And the corporate noise machine consistently pushes the media message into the neutralizing “he said – she said” vacuum.
Rahm was right, he just got the target wrong. We are a nation of morons, ruled by stupidity.
“…they no longer have to grease their pan when they fry their seafood…”
Major coffee-spew. :o)
And: Phil Radford: “…where is the response?”
I think it might be coming in November…for this and a host of other reasons…
Well, as to the timeframe for admitting that the oil/shit was hitting the fan, 24 hours after the well blew, the head of the Coast Guard in the GOM region held a presser and stated flatly that no oil was leaking from the wellhead.
Since there were no submersibles of any sort at the bottom at that time, I assume she had quickly put on a mask and snorkel and held her breath for the 5,000 foot dive down to check that out before she began flacking for BP…which the Coast Guard and NOAA (with prodding from Obama) excelled at, from start to finish, of the whole shittaree.
Bigchin: “Where are the democrats?”
Lesseeee…
I know! They’re having a big “centrist” round-pound with Obama in the basement of the White House.
or off shore wind turbines. ruin the view.
Well, our elected officials and people in positions of power, like the Coast Guard officials, are all in thrall of the “new ‘science’ “.
And the basic tenet of the “new science” is that common sense is to be avoided at all costs. Just because a major oil rig exploded, with the well head not intact, doesn’t mean we can say that there is oil escaping. Not until we test that theory in a dozen labs, with a dozen peer-reviewed reports.
Even if the woman had indeed gone down there personally, using a snorkel, she wouldn’t be able to report oil was escaping – after all, that would only be “anecdotal” observation. (Though that would be quite a depth to go to using snorkel only!)
“That would be quite a depth to go, using snorkel only.”
Just my point. She was talking out of her ass…
“common sense” would have dictated that it was highly likely that with the platform having exploded and nearly a mile of pipe flapping and disintegrating in the ocean, there would be surely be substantial amounts of oil gushing into the Gulf of Mexico. But saying that that would have instantly made BP into the corporate ogres they are, and it would have put pressure on Obama to do something about it, a lot sooner than was the case. By having the United States Coast Guard holding Heckle-and-Jeckyll pressers with BP, they could snarf and goorple for weeks, as they did, and give BP time to give the GOM one hell of a corexit enema. “Controlling the situation” was predicated on one thing: Out of sight-out of mind.
Which was why people, including but not limited to, reporters, who were taking video and stills of, for example, pelican rookery horror-stories, were threatened with arrest and fines of tens of thousands of dollars.
At that point, I decided that no matter how bad the republicans were and are, supporting Barack Obama again was not an option. Letting him get away with letting BP commit this, and then counting on them to report truthfully on the situation, was not an act of stupidity: it was the act of a corporate criminal allied with other corporate criminals.