Jeff Rosenberg reports that the teabagger wing of the Minnesota Republican Party is attacking efforts by state and local officials to keep them from practicing typical Republican voter-intimidation tricks:
Minnesota Majority, the group that is organizing gangs of thugs to intimidate voters on election day, is trying to turn our very polling places into partisan battlefields.
The law in Minnesota is simple: It says that no campaigning is allowed in the polling place. Voters must be allowed to exercise their right to vote peacefully, without being beset by partisans. The right to peace and privacy while voting is a fundamental part of our right to vote.
Now MN Majority and the North Star Tea Party “Patriots” are suing Hennepin and Ramsey counties for the “right” to outfit their voter-intimidation thugs with Tea Party logos and campaign slogans.
These groups are part of the umbrella far-right group “Election Integrity Watch”, and they’re trying to push to wear Tea Party slogans that despite their claims aren’t even close to being disguised as non-partisan. The lawsuit won’t get very far in court, but that’s not its point. Its point is to be part of the climate of fear and intimidation that the Republicans are trying to create in order to keep younger and poorer voters from voting.
A good chunk of the fear-and-intimidation gambit is to imply, heavily, that those who are poor, non-white, or between the ages of eighteen and thirty have no business trying to vote, and that any efforts made by them to vote are “illegal”. This is done in part by suggesting that “vote fraud” is a far more common problem than it really is:
“Voter fraud. It’s a felony.” So reads the “wanted” poster–style type on new fliers being distributed by Republican and tea party groups ahead of election day. What they don’t say is it’s also exceedingly rare. As Democratic Rep. Keith Ellison characterizes such efforts as “voter intimidation” — citing distribution of posters in traditionally DFL-leaning areas like college campuses and bus stops in lower-income neighborhoods — Hennepin County provides the Minnesota Independent with data that shows only .00006 percent of votes cast in 2008 were done so fraudulently.
How do we stop this, so close to Election Day? By getting out the word that it’s your legal right to vote if you’re poor, a college kid, or someone who has brown skin of any shade. The fine people at the non-partisan Election Protection group are working to do just that. If you see or suspect any instances of attempted voter suppression, call them at 1-866-OUR-VOTE.
In addition, if you know someone who needs somebody to vouch for them at the polls, do so (it’s perfectly legal, despite what Republicans like to imply):
If you are a registered voter in the precinct, you can vouch for someone seeking to register. When a registered voter vouches for another, the only thing they are affirming is the identity or residence of the voter, or both.
Vouching is not a statement of affirmation of anything else: not citizenship nor other disqualification from voting, such as a felony conviction, or a court-ordered guardianship. Part of the scare tactics employed by the voter suppressers to discourage people for assisting others to vote is the intimation that the voucher is guarantying everything about the qualification of the person being vouched for. Not true. The person registering makes affirmations about those things, and lying about them is a crime.
But a voucher is simply a substitute for identity and/or residence documents.
There are many situations where a voucher is the only way a person, constitutionally entitled to vote, will get the chance.



27 Comments

Every election, more of the same. I just don’t understand why they can’t try winning on the strength of their ideas.
Oh wait…
They really scored big when they got ACORN out of the way.
Minnesota AG Lori Swanson Turns Her Head To Corruption
October 15, 2010
By Walter Hudson
“Remember back to December, 2004… Mike Hatch was the Minnesota AG and Lori Swanson worked alongside Hatch as the Deputy AG/Solicitor General. The American Thinker featured a story about a lawsuit that came out of the Attorney General’s office at that time, one that sued Capital One “for failing to state in its advertisements that it could increase interest rates on credit cards.”
It was a “truth in advertising” case.
A eyebrow-raising settlement requiring Capital One to pay $749,999 was reached in 2006. This settlement should make most of us in Minnesota stand up and take notice.
Why? Well, there was a Minnesota statute in place at the time which basically stated that when there is a settlement of $750,000 or more, the entire settlement MUST go to the state. In a settlement of under $750,000 (such as $749,999) the AG has some discretion as to where the money goes. The exact statute is as follows: [Minnesota statute 16A-151] : ‘A state official may not commence, pursue, or settle litigation, or settle a matter that could have resulted in litigation, in a manner that would result in money being distributed to a person or entity other than the state.’ An exception is… if the settlement amount is less than $750,000.”
I would say that this should be a trans partisan concern. Instead, demagogues in each party are permitted to spin and cram an obvious scam into their particular frames, as always, leaving the scammed public confused and effectively neutered.
I’m sure that was the intent. It was actually a two-fer that ACORN was hounded into the ground.
Not only did ACORN do a lot for registering economically disenfranchised voters — who tend to vote more left than right — but they also did away with the largest housing advocacy group who could put pressure on the banks and Congress regarding foreclosure fraud and subprime mortgage fraud.
MN is not the only state in which this kind of thing happens. There was a sizable settlement about a year ago with a bank here in Michigan and the AG here tried steering it to an area that had not been damaged by the banks, in an effort to curry favor before his gubernatorial primary bid.
It’s a national problem.
Oh, and the AG is a Republican here in MI.
“I would say that this should be a trans partisan concern.”
Please, let’s be a bit more clear about what it is you’re trying to say.
Tell us how you come down on this incident.
If you are saying that the people of Minnesota were scammed by Hatch and Swanson then say it.
If you’re saying you’ve discovered some common ground with the folks who published that article then just say it up front.
It occurs to me to wonder why, if the GOP is as ahead as everybody is saying, are they taking a chance sending their goons out and filing frivolous lawsuits that they know they’ll lose? It seems to me like awfully high risk behavior to suppress the vote for people convinced they are going to sweep the elections.
There you have it, then. The rot is the making of our government elites, regardless of Party.
Look how easy it was for Obama, with much help from the MSM, to con the non Third Way Democrats into swooning over his promise of change and hope, and how long it took even a small faction of the better informed left to sort of see the light.
Can we really, so mercilessly blame an equally conned into stupid, by the Right, faction of Republican voters for being rolled by their knights in shining armor? Are we incapable of identifying and separating victims of a corrupt winner take all system, from their well heeled instigators, – on both sides of the partisan divide?
Only in unity, will the american public find a way to beat back this assault of the kleptocratic, lawless State.
It’s time for people to reject the MSM narrative, and for the left to start putting their advantaged brains to better use, than eagerly supporting that narrative, against their own best interests.
For a person who uses terms like ‘conned’ ‘swooned’ and then professes ‘unity’ you have a ‘narrative’ to sell, it seems.
Perhaps,because ‘everybody’ may be wrong?
Maybe the mainstream media has been telling us they’re super ahead so that we won’t show up? Part of the voter suppression efforts?
This incident, seems of the same kind as the Fraudclosure scam, The Wall Street bailout, subsidies to FIRE sectors, etc.
It affects all, regardless of Party identity, and is perpetrated with equal gusto by the elites of both Parties.
Living in a ‘Red’ district in Floriduh,my vote may be worthless. But vote I will,and buy two years supply of popcorn and beer.
The Dims came right to their aid didn’t they?
I’m not selling anything that shouldn’t be obvious to anyone willing to be objective. If you think the next two years are good for beer and popcorn, you are unserious, imo.
They take such chances because a painful slapdown is unlikely.
And look for the GOPTP to run amok with spurious claims of voter fraud .
quasi-O/T: At some point in the last few hours (half-day of work, half-day of GOTV) I’ve begun to think that Reid might eek this one out, as Dems who missed out on early voting find their hearts skipping a beat when faced with the ubiquitous Angle ads. Here’s to a massive Dem turnout next week :)
Having voted in every election since 1972,I’ve seen ‘the end of the world’ avoided a number of times.If your candidate doesn’t get elected, start right NOW to get them elected. It’s two years.
Insanity, it prevails. MSM helps it along. Of course they are all Corporate Monopolies and there is no real context.
Look over there! GOPterror!
The press is on board – selling “the poor and lower wage persons will not want to vote” and “unemployed will not go to polls”.
This on CNBC – but with no reason given.
I may have the network wrong – been watch CNN today so it may have been CNN.
The MSM does one thing and one thing only-sell products. It’s fill in between ads. If the Dems loose they’ll sell it that way in an ‘I told you so’ celebration. If the Dems win,it’ll be ‘upset2010!’ with furrowed brows. A big sell.
And more to the point,if I seem ‘unserious’, we have to remember Obama still has veto power. Even IF a huge Repug win is coming-I don’t believe it for a second- he still is the president and will be til 2012. So cool your jets and dig in. Get involved locally. Work for better Dems and work hard.
Characterizing the giving of a portion of the settlement money taken from a large corporation that makes it’s profits by swindling consumers, to ACORN, a not-for-profit group that advocates for those same consumers seems to me to me to be an inspired bit of karmic justice, and a far cry from the same old crooked machinations of people like Pawlenty and Bush whose MO is upward re-distribution of the country’s wealth by tax cuts.
As much as I might agree with those who thought Hatch an asshole, his manipulation of the settlement total so as to maintain control of its ultimate distribution is not evidence of corruption.
I think you’d have a hard time finding many progressive Minnesotans who wouldn’t agree that in hindsight, we’d have been much better off today if we’d held our noses and voted for Hatch, Pawlenty has been a disaster.
CNBC. It figures.
By the way, why don’t you link to the source of that article you shared as evidence that “They all do it”.
You can read the whole thing here;
Northstar Tea Party Patriots: A Coalition of Minnesota Tea Party Patriot Groups.
If a youngster comes from a household where the parents are more aware of politics and what’s really going on, the chances are that s/he will be less inclined to be cowed by the false GOP lawsuit.
You’re going straight for the wishbone, it seems. Two numbers in this settlement $ 750,000, and $ 749,999.
Whenever the government settles with corporations: they do not have to admit guilt, and the penalty is but a fraction of illicit gains. Prime recent example being Mozillo settling for 60mil on a 140mil scam.
If you like that, say so.