(Crossposted from Renaissance Post.)
Yesterday afternoon, at a press conference to discuss the Tucson, Arizona shooting of U.S. Representative Gabrielle Giffords and over a dozen others — a political hit that has so far resulted in six deaths, a nine-year-old girl’s among them — Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik was quite clear on who he thought was to blame in egging on a mentally imbalanced suspect with ties to the right-wing racist hate group American Renaissance. From FDL’s Jane Hamsher’s liveblogging of Sheriff Dupnik’s news conference:
Says Giffords was the target, and that there were 2 incidents occurred in a “very vitriolic” campaign. Someone in an “angry audience” dropped a weapon out of their pants. Another incident where windows were broken out of her office. At her office at Swan and Pima right now, suspicious package being investigated.
The 22 year old suspect does have a criminal past. Says this is how “unbalanced people respond to vitriol coming out about ripping down the government. Arizona has become the capital. We have become the mecca of prejudice and bigotry.” Believes people who are unbalanced especially, like the suspect, are extremely susceptible to vitriol.
Interestingly enough, there has been an effort by the media organs that have served as enablers of the peddlers of vitriol to minimize, if not outright conceal, their roles in spreading it. One method is to simply pretend that Sheriff Dupnik — a man who, as an Arizona law enforcement officer, has been a first-hand witness to the effects of this media-promoted vitriol — didn’t say what he said. This method is the one used by Carl Hulse and Kate Zernike of the New York Times, who in this story on the shootings scrubs out Sheriff Dupnik’s comments on media-enabled vitriol helping to make Arizona the capital and Mecca of prejudice and bigotry as assiduously as various right-wingers such as Sarah Palin and Giffords’ Republican opponent Jesse Kelly have been scrubbing their websites of crosshairs and other implied threats directed at Representative Giffords. Meanwhile, Tennessee Republican Senator Lamar Alexander is ordering the press to stop talking about Palin and the Stalinesque “Commissar Vanishes” removal of this inflammatory material from right-wing websites; knowing how the corporate media usually leaps to fulfill the requests of their GOP allies, I suspect this will happen very shortly.
. . .
The other method is to adopt, as the GOP/Media Complex always does when it wants to deflect attention and responsibility for right-wing wrongdoing, the false-equivalency or “both sides do it so the right wing gets a free pass” defense. According to both the NYT’s Matt Bai (who apparently either “sourced” it from known right-wing operative websites RedState, Hillbuzz, or from the very cesspit of right-wing hate and lies, FreeRepublic.com) and Newsweek’s Eleanor Clift, both longtime peddlers of this sort of false equivalence as a means of shielding conservatives from facing the consequences of their actions, somebody’s taking down their own Daily Kos diary (the famous “My Congresswoman voted against Pelosi and she’s now dead to me” diary, in which the diarist, far from wanting to physically harm, much less kill Representative Giffords, merely stated a determination not to vote for her again or support in any way efforts to re-elect her) as a sign of respect for someone for whom he’d served as a campaign volunteer, is exactly the same as Sarah Palin’s and other wingnuts’ frantically scrubbing their websites in the wake of the shooting of someone who they spent months if not years targeting with crosshairs and other violence-inciting rhetoric and imagery.
Arizonans know better than to fall for this trick. Sheriff Dupnik obviously hasn’t. And David Fitzsimmons of the Arizona Daily Star was on CNN immediately after word of the shootings came out, and said without equivocation that the shootings were “inevitable” because of the rabid right-wing dominance of Arizona’s political discourse:
I’m pretty shaken frankly. This is a very surreal, dream-like experience. As a columnist who’s covered politics in this state, it was inevitable from my perspective.
The right in Arizona, and I’m speaking very broadly, has been stoking the fires of a heated anger and rage successfully in this state.
It’s stunning because Congressman Giffords was a centrist, a moderate, and I don’t know who the shooter is, but what could possibly motivate an individual to be enraged enough take down a moderate centrist.
CNN asked further about the atmosphere of Arizona politics becoming so tumultuous, and Fitzsimmons continued:
This is a gun happy state. I myself enjoy guns from time-to-time, I’m not against gun ownership.
But for this state, it has become a fetish. This is a intense gun culture and the politics of the state are far to the right, rabid right.
I was amazed when Congresswoman Giffords survived these last elections. It was very close. She had a tea party candidate running against her, yet managed to survive and win a second term.
This is very emotional for me. I grew up in Arizona, I’ve spent all my life here, and it has evolved into state that generates a lot of political heat. That’s as kind as I’ll be today.
It’s really tough for me because knew her. She held great promise as a blue-dog democrat. She was a very intelligent, articulate and informed congresswomen who thought a great deal about the future of Arizona.
It’s just heartbreaking for me that such an individual would be struck down.
(Of course, since Fitzsimmons works for a mainstream corporate paper, he was soon forced to apologize for saying what everyone already knew.)
Fellow Arizonan Jeff Biggers also mentions Arizona’s vitriol-fueled political climate, and cites Arizona’s extremely loose gun laws as an additional factor. And Daily Kos diarist BoyBlue, the former Giffords campaign volunteer and the very person who right-wingers and their mainstream-media allies seek to demonize as a way to deflect attention from their own actions, has this to say:
i am going to the local Dem precinct meeting Monday and i WAS going to bring up why i was upset that Gabby voted against Pelosi for leader, feeding into the media narrative that NINETEEN fellow Dems don’t like her and think the 111th House as too far left. Well, OBVIOUSLY THAT won’t be happening. it’ll be emotional and all about what Dupnik courageously said about vitriol and what it leads to. My mom is an RN and says that Gabrielle is not out of the woods yet. I’m an atheist so I won’t say “pray”, but keep the hope alive and keep sending positive thoughts her way that she a) lives, b) can recover a semblance of a good life after such a traumatic brain injury, and, just maybe, c) can eventually return to Washington.
What I plan on saying Monday is that there needs to be a secret service type thing for members of Congress. Her local office was practically DESTROYED over her voting yes on the health care bill. For voting yes on a health care bill? wow.
Later, BoyBlue states this:
I never thought i’d make it into the NYT. Ever. But being a part of her campaign against this odious Jesse Kelly last year, there’s NO WAY this thing was NOT from disgruntled supporters of HIS. Kelly’s supporters were so rabid and bigoted against Hispanics that even casual volunteers to Gabby’s campaign feared them. They attacked my truck cuz i had Giffords paraphernalia all over it when i was trying to leave the October gay pride festival in Tucson. They were there to harass gays. Can you imagine that? his campaign people went to the Tucson gay pride to harass gay people!!!
I guess they just couldn’t STAND that he lost. Rabid just ain’t the word for it. Obviously. I am STILL sick to my stomach over this (I puked when they mistakenly declared her dead today). I have a picture of her and i at her November victory party and i cannot look at it without crying. Just as a statement, I am putting 2010 Giffords for Congress campaign material all over my new hybrid to show support. I have STILL been told to “fuck myself” by Kelly brownshirts whenever i wear Giffords t-shirts out. To this day!!! CRAZY.
BoyBlue also has a fresh diary where he takes on the right-wing-hatched and Matt-Bai-driven nonsense about him. It’s worth checking out.
UPDATE: At least one Republican senator — speaking anonymously because he or she knows full well what would happen to him or her if he or she wasn’t anonymous — has laid the blame for this squarely at the feet of the Republican Party and its conservative allies. As Jon Aravosis says:
Let it be noted that the Republicans control the majority of talk radio and cable TV shows that try outdo each other. The GOP controls talk radio. From Dr. Laura to Limbaugh to Hannity, O’Reilly, Beck, Savage and the rest. As for cable TV shows that try to outdo each other, CNN doesn’t even try to do shows like that, MSNBC is new to the game (and in any case, shows left and right), whereas FOX News has given the GOP an entire network all to itself and has been broadcasting vitriol, with incendiary hosts and guests, for 15 years. There is no equivalence. And finally, the town halls. Who has been using angry mobs to disrupt town halls in a manner that is one hair away from violent? Republicans. Not Democrats, but Republicans.




17 Comments

Digby has a list of right-wing hate incidents:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/nothing-to-see-here-folks.html
When Tweeting this, the hashtag to use is #BothSidesDONT
McViegh, Palin, Oswald, Beck, Hinkley, Dobbs, Sirhan, Limbaugh and now Loughner….all peas in a pod.
That is a mind-boggling list. And that is “only” what has made it into media coverage.
I’ve noticed today that there seems less of the “both sides do it” dodge than of “this is not the time to discuss politics.” So outrageous of the leftwing extremists to politicize this tragedy by pointing out this is precisely what the ‘baggers and media bigots advocated.
Right wing radio is beyond horrible, as is FOX News. But I wonder what drives people to listen to this crapola.
I tend to think it’s the absence of reality based news being pumped out by what used to be considered moderate or even liberal establishment media.
Who wouldn’t want a 2nd opinion after listening to folks like Robert Samuelson, David Brooks and Tom Friedman?
Robert, David and Tom don’t pump out hate speech. But what they do pump out is absolutely crazy. It drives people away from mainstream sources and lends credibility to right wing ranters.
I want a list of every GOP talking head who ever threatened Gabby I want to research their advertisers and moneymen and boycott them. Surely the police are complying such a list now but will it be made public.
We talk facts but we are rude when we do so the GOP talks violence but thats not been mentioned in the news.
I think we should sue CNN for saying both sides are doing this!
great summary.
From Central Canada, I listen to the radio at night, and get a lot of American stations.
The hatred /misinforming ignorance that can be heard from all across the Northern states, on am radio, is stunning.
There is nothing even close to that in Canada.
The hatred and ignorance that dominates the am radio in the USA is shocking to anyone outside that country.
wasn’t it just last week, that someone media figure said that Michael Vick should be killed, for his dog cruelty acts?
and wasn’t it just a few weeks ago, that leading policital figures were saying that Julian Assange, should be executed?
There is definitely a streak of cruelty, maybe of old testament revenge, or hillbilly/biker gang style vigilante that is prominent, and accepted in the USA.
maybe it goes hand in hand with the belief that government can do nothing right.
I don’t know.
It’s primitive.
It’s also reinforced by very rich people who use it to keep their taxes low.
By the way, know how a lot of the right-wing blogs and radio and TV networks out there, including many that are subsidized by some of these very rich people, are pushing the “he’s a liberal” theme? Guess again: http://lauramartin.tumblr.com/post/2680767575/jared-lee-loughner-is-a-registered-republican-giffords
I was just subjected to the Harold Ford finger wagging and admonition “both sides do it” and then later Joe Scarborough was saying how embarrassed the left would be when the shooter turned out to be a “pot smoking liberal”. How many pot smoking liberals do you know that profess a love for “Mein Kampf”?
The shooter appears mentally ill regardless of his political beliefs. This whole “both sides do it” however is hogwash. If one compiled a list of left vs. right wing commentary, blogging, campaign speech, etc., one side would be very heavily weighted over the other in regard to views like “watering the Tree of Liberty with blood” “make Democrats afraid to leave their homes” “2nd Amendment remedies” and the like. (Google those terms if you want to see some really sick vitriolic hate and violence promotion) One group is far more likely than the other to parade around political events wearing firearms and camouflage and openly intimidating any opposition thought or presence. I don’t recall any Democrats inviting constituents to come shoot an M-16 with them. I don’t recall Democrats picking a new Party leader making one of the criteria how many firearms they owned or any Dems confessing to feeling inadequate because they only owned 4.
Dems/liberals/lefties generally confine their threatening behavior to threatening to stay home and not vote, threatening to write-in a more liberal candidate, threatening to form a third Party, threatening to form issues coalitions and the like. Daydreams of retribution seem confined to imagining perp walks that never happen or impeachment hearings that will never occur (just re-confirming their wussylike belief in the Rule of Law as opposed to assault weapons).
I’m sure there are deranged individuals with liberal leanings who are walking human timebombs that mirror their counterparts on the right. They just aren’t being given the open encouragement to act on their impulses the way the right, right wing candidates and the right wing media is constantly giving re-inforcement to the violent impulses of their followers.
So, Harold Ford, show us your list of “both sides do it”.
Beck and Limbaugh need to be taken off air, PERMANENTLY!
Let us not forget that Joe Scarborough began his legal career defending a family friend who shot and killed a medical doctor who provided health care services to women. So Mr. Scarborough by historical proof would not know a right wing extremist if he was personally introduced to one or sat next to him in court.
Mr. Scarborough made it all about himself this a.m., how his wife was crying with her fists shaking because he himself has done Congressional meet and greets FIVE YEARS ago. Scarborough didn’t know Giffords, probably never gave her invitation onto his show and she probably wasn’t one of the people he was glad handing the other day when he was on the House floor, but ego maniacal people like Scarborough will always think that events are about them.
What side of the aisle uses the phrase, lock and load; don’t retreat, reload; let’s target our opponet? Which side of the aisle had a campaign worker stomp on the head of a protester? Which side of the aisle comes armed to civilian protests? Which side of the aisle vows to come armed the next time? There is one side of the aisle that is stirred, disturbed and bothered by representative democracy and there is one side of the aisle seeking armed insurrection. I know which side is which. I only wish the talking heads would get a clue.
This is much more to the point than gun-control legislation. Bought speech and professional liars are at the root of the problem – not guns.
Note that Matt Bai is #29 on the Salon Hack Thirty list. They ought to expand it to a Hack 300.
They always come out wit the false equivalence argument.
The Right is guilty and they know it, only a matter of time until links are made.
All the cable news outfits (especially FOX) have provided a platform for these right-wing psychos. They’ve let them get away with calling Obama “Hitler”, saying that he’s not an American citizen etc. with impunity. Now they’re like cats covering up shit trying to paint this Loughner character as anything other than one of the right-wing psychos they’ve been carrying the water for. I guarantee that if Loughner were to say anything the MSM could spin as “leftist”, they would milk that for all it’s worth. The cable news networks don’t want to accept responsibility for giving these right-wing psychos a platform.