
Oscar Wilde Samuel Johnson* got it half-right: Patriotism is indeed one of the last refuges of a scoundrel, but bashing government employees is also a favorite refuge for those seeking to draw attention away from their own actions. Witness the case of the infamous Senator Tom Coburn (R-Oklahoma), who recently ordered up yet another Whoopeee! Let’s Race to the Bottom! report and got the arch-conservative-talking-points-distributing Moonie Times to push it for him:
About 77,000 federal employees across the United States — including lawyers, air traffic controllers, medical personnel and information technology specialists — had higher salaries in 2009 than the governors of the states they worked in, a new report shows.
The data from the Congressional Research Service could add fuel to a debate on Capitol Hill about whether the salaries and benefits of federal workers are too high compared with their counterparts in the private sector. The study was first reported by the Washington Times.
The information was requested by Sen. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), who has argued that federal workers should be paid less as the government seeks ways to rein in its deficit.
Let’s set aside the utter silliness of the idea that state legislatures and not the United States Congress and Senate should be dictating Federal salaries. (Gee, are there any other Congressional powers that Senator Coburn thinks should be given away to the states?)
Let’s also set aside the fact that Coburn has this upside down: The study shows that states don’t pay their governors enough. Governors must deal with lobbyists who themselves make far more than the governors do, and whose employers have CEOs who make millions. That’s just not right — no CEO should be making more than the governor of a state, much less the President of the United States.
Let’s even set aside the fact that the doctors and lawyers and air traffic controllers Coburn’s bashing are all people at the very tops of their pay scales, often in high-cost localities (much of Colorado, for instance, has extremely high costs of living, on par with New York City and San Francisco). Furthermore, these are people who in most cases had to work many, many years to get to these pay grades. Considering that Federal salaries top out well under $160,000 a year even in high-cost localities (and that’s only after ten or more years of service) and many new doctors and lawyers have well over $250,000 in college student loan debts alone (debts which are almost impossible to discharge via bankruptcy), what Coburn is doing is telling the best and the brightest new doctors and lawyers that he doesn’t want them working for Uncle Sam.
Let’s look at the interesting timing of this report.
Funny how Coburn decided to order this up just as the legal heat’s being turned up on his good buddy John Ensign — heat that’s starting to scorch Coburn himself:
Hampton’s attorney testified that Coburn took an active role in the negotiations between Hampton and Ensign, and that the role included proposing specific resolutions.
On May 22, 2009, the report states, Hampton’s attorney spoke with Coburn on three occasions.
In addition to the letter to the Department of Justice, the Senate committee sent another referral letter to the Federal Election Commission, stating that Ensign and others might have violated laws under that agency’s jurisdiction.
Hey, if I had something like that staring me in the face, I’d probably try to distract attention from it too.
(Crossposted to Renaissance Post and Mercury Rising.)




14 Comments

I find Coburn amusing because he is so dumb. He just sort of stumbles around and I realize that he can be toxic but he’s amazingly inept.
Great post. We are only 14 trillion in the hole so of course lets take a few thousand here and there and call it serious budget cutting. It is all a sham. Coburn is probably concentrating on the salaries of employees because he can’t count or do the arithmetic for anything over $200,000.00. BTW it was Dr Johnson who first noted the correlation between patriotism and scoundrels. http://www.samueljohnson.com/refuge.html
Thank you for writing your post. It’s good to note that people are keeping tabs o this trickster.
Here are a few more of Coburn’s “notable” legislative accomplishments and public comments on various topics:
an amendment to Credit Cardholders’ Bill of Rights Act of 2009 H.R.627 which s a provision allowing people to carry loaded firearms in national parks and wildlife refuges.
_____________________________________________________
In January 2005, during a Senate Judiciary Committee discussion about class-action lawsuits and silicone breast implants, The Washington Post quoted Coburn as stating:
“You know, I immediately thought about silicone breast implants and the legal wrangling and the class-action suits off that. And I thought I would just share with you what science says today about silicone breast implants. If you have them, you’re healthier than if you don’t. That is what the ultimate science shows…In fact, there’s no science that shows that silicone breast implants are detrimental and, in fact, they make you healthier.”
_________________________________________________________________
COBURN DOES, HOWEVER INDIRECTLY, MAKE A VERY STRONG CASE FOR ABORTION. He should be commended for that.
Although Coburn objects to legal abortion even in cases of rape, he has justified his position by noting that his great-grandmother was raped by a sheriff. In the U.S. Senate confirmation hearings concerning Samuel Alito, before the Senate, Senator Coburn mentioned that his grandmother was a product of that rape.
I wondered just why Coburn was going after federal employees. He does need to divert media attention from his and his “C” Street buddy Ensign’s less than holy activities, doesn’t he?
He is a target-rich environment, isn’t he?
What does Coburn have to say about the great disparity between compensation for state representatives and state senators vis-a-vis those in the national government? Maybe we should look at scaling back the salaries of congress in addition to reducing their health care and retirement plans and minutely scrutinizing every single investment they make for insider trading implications.
“Governors must deal with lobbyists who themselves make far more than the governors do, and whose employers have CEOs who make millions. That’s just not right — no CEO should be making more than the governor of a state, much less the President of the United States.”; and such could be an easy change to IRS statutes by simply denying any benefits-salary,stock options,etc.- paid to any employee that exceeds the salary of the POTUS to NOT be deductible as a business expense.
But let’s not forget all the ‘City Managers’ who also make more than the POTUS and governors.
Here! Here!
I, for one, would LOVE nothing more than that to happen.
Why some citizens are incessantly *complacent* and agreeable with pols at all levels getting paid high salaries & gold-plated benefits for life for them & their spouse… yet going nutty about public sector worker salaries & pensions… is one of life’s mysteries.
Have had this conversation with some conservatives I know, and most tend to want to run away from discussing it fully. It’s all the usual: they work so “hard,” so they “deserve” it. But all other public sector workers are slackers. Nutty.
Thanks for posting this. Yesterday a conservative who posts here regularly had big chunks of quotes from this spurious “report” with no attribution (typical of this “person” or sock puppet not to attribute or give links). It was posted in a thread apparently randomly bc the content of this report didn’t really relate to the subject matter of the post. This particular commenter often does comments of this nature.
Anyway, I kinda-sorta wondered where the “information” came from. Hard to dispute what you can’t verify, of course.
Now I see. Yeah, right, pull the other one.
The usual rightwing obfuscation. Have a kernal of truth hidden inside a skein of lies/spin/obfuscation without any real explanation for what’s really going on. Just like my local “nooz” paper regularly spews out Headlines about State pensions over $100k per year but, oopsie, just happens to neglect to mention that the “average” pension in my state is around $25k per year, and plenty of retired state workers make far less than that. Plus the “nooz” paper conveniently neglects to mention that most state workers contribute to their pensions from their salary; the pension contribution is skimmed off the top.
Coburn’s such a hack, though. Worthless, but one of Doug Coe’s “boys.” Beware of the “Family.”
Yup, yup, yup.
Samuel Johnson in 1775.
markfromireland
Thanks, MFI!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samuel_Johnson%27s_political_views#The_Patriot
I suggest that Mr. Coburn, Mr. McConnell and little Paul Ryan volunteer for a special federal deficit reduction program in which their salaries and health benefits will be exactly the same as newly hired Wal-Mart “associates”.
In addition to the letter to the Department of Justice, the Senate committee sent another referral letter to the Federal Election Commission, stating that Ensign and others might have violated laws under that agency’s jurisdiction.
Any word on who might and when a prosecution might happen.