A few weeks ago, I wrote about the efforts of a big mining corporation named Strata to bulldoze its way past local opposition in Minnesota’s Big Stone Country, just as a bill designed to gut local control was making its way through the Republican-controlled Minnesota legislature. While that bill, HF 389, did manage to pass the House, it stalled out in the Senate and may (may!) be dead for what’s left of this legislative session. That’s good news for Minnesota as a whole, but while the HF 389 threat is (likely) gone, the problem with Strata still remains.
To recap: Big Stone County, Minnesota, has lots of Big Stones of granite and gneiss that are among the oldest rocks on the planet, in some cases dating back to the Early Archean Period — that’s 3.6 billion years ago, folks. (You can see some of these stones in the picture above, taken by James Robins.) These gigantic stones, the very ones Strata wants to blow up for concrete, are a prime scenic and tourist attraction, providing lots of jobs and millions of dollars each year for the Western Boundary Waters area as well as the county’s very name. By contrast, Strata’s planned project will only create 5 to 6 jobs at most and maybe $20,000 in tax revenue per year while costing a lot in wear and tear. What’s worse, the proposed mining site will be located near several homes, a bike trail, and a particularly beautiful part of the Minnesota River.
The tourism and slow food movement is growing out in the Upper Minnesota River Valley, and the corridor is extremely likely to be named a National Blueway outdoor recreation and natural area by US Department of Interior Secretary Ken Salazar within the next two weeks. It’s already one of Minnesota’s two America’s Great Outdoors Areas as designated by the DOI.
There’s a public hearing on the project on April 17, at 7 p.m., in Ortonville. If you’re a Minnesotan or know any Minnesotans you think would be interested in this, please spread the word as much as possible to show the county commissioners that people from across Minnesota care about their community. If you can’t attend, you can still submit your thoughts on this project by following the instructions laid out here.



5 Comments

Thanks for framing this in a way that allows readers to understand why this fight is greater than just land use issues in one county. Rural Minnesotans are also beset by a plague of permits to mine silica sand for fracking. It is a good thing we still have the ability to create interim ordinances–though ALEC member MN Rep. Mike Beard did his best to get rid of that tool for democracy.
Is the waterway in the background a canal?
It’s a 1980s-era “diversion” channel for flooding on the Minnesota River that the Corps of Engineers built. A total fail, and plans are in the works to mitigate it.
Such diversion projects were once quite popular–in the 1930s, the Whetstone River was diverted into Big Stone Lake to make up for low water levels caused by drought. Unforeseen consequence? Silt in the lake and now flooding. Plans are in the works to reverse this damage as well.
So does the area need another massive project, albeit commercial? Heck no!
Thanks, Grace! Welcome to MyFDL. Hope we see more of you. Feel free to write some diaries if you feel so moved.
Amazing. That’s about as old as the first lifeforms that we know of on Earth. How could anyone use that for concrete?