I’m really ticked off right now. If I’d got this post out twenty-four hours ago like I’d planned I would have scooped every major paper by at least two hours; instead, I get to clean up after the parade. Oh, well.
Those of you following the JPMC debacle may have been idly wondering who’s going to take the fall for Jamie Dimon and the other malefactors. Well, the word I’d heard yesterday morning was this: Scuttlebutt among many on the Street was that along with the London Whale, Bruno Iksil, the person currently being sold as the proximate cause of JPMC’s current set of woes, would be sacrificed, along with at least one of his bosses — something that seems to have been telegraphed by this Reuters article depicting him as someone who only did what he thought his bosses would want or approve. And the boss most likely to get it in the neck, per the rumor mill? A woman, Ina Drew. Why? Because also according to the rumor mill, Jamie Dimon hates women in executive authority just about as much as does Larry Summers, and any mistake, whether made above them or below them in authority, is somehow the woman’s fault per Dimon.
And sure enough, news came early yesterday afternoon that Ina Drew was going to fall on her sword.
If what they say about him is true, Jamie Dimon must be smiling right now. He saves himself and dumps a woman at the same time, taking the focus away from what he allowed and encouraged and shoving it onto the sacrificial figures.
But his smile may not last long.
Elizabeth Warren, for one, isn’t messing around with blaming expendable people, men or women. She knows, just as we know with the Murdoch media scandals, and from the scandals of Abu Ghraib, that the rot starts at the top, and not with easily-jettisoned mid-level types; thus, She’s calling for Dimon to resign from the New York Federal Reserve Bank Board.
UPDATE: The Abu Ghraib and Murdoch parallels intensify. This excerpt from a May 14, 2012 Bloomberg article shows that Drew was doing what Dimon wanted her to do:
Dimon pushed Drew’s unit, which invests deposits the bank hasn’t loaned, to seek profit by speculating on higher-yielding assets such as credit derivatives, according to five former executives. The CEO suggested positions, a current executive said. Profits surged over the next five years as assets quadrupled to $356 billion and employees were given proprietary- trading accounts, current and former executives said.
UPDATE 2: So far, the Fail Whale himself hasn’t been touched, but Drew and two of her subordinates are gone. This is in line with what one of my scuttlebutters was saying — that Dimon would go after Drew and her power structure but spare Iskil. One wonders what dirt Iskil has on Dimon to make this happen. I’d avoid small planes and open windows if I were the Fail Whale.



25 Comments

I keep thinking of Abu Ghraib here — the (male) higher-ups whose policies created the climate for torture and abuse, and who tacitly tolerated if not encouraged the torture and abuse, sacrifice lower-level figures like Lynndie England to save themselves.
I dunno, PW; Drew had been pretty powerful and made the firm a whale of a lotta money (unfortunate pun), and Dimon was sure defending her here.
I’m gonna go out on a limb and say in finance, gender might matter less than you think. Might know, or guess more…depending who and if any of the rest of the London staff gets made redundant.
Crocodile tears, per various folks on the Street; of course he’s going to publicly say he’s sad to see her go.
Dimon’s allegedly quite glad to both ditch a woman and use the ditching to distract from his own actions, such as his allowing the hedging unit of JPMC to be used as a profit center.
But this is why I wish I could have got this out yesterday morning — if I’d beat all the other publications with the news, it’d be a lot easier to show the sexism angle.
Anybody ever seen Jamie Dimon and Bruno Iksil in the same room? I thought not.
I take it the various people on the Street you’re in personal contact with? Are they mainly women, then? Given the rest of his Swinging Dick profile, I’m not saying he’s not a sexist, or that he doesn’t feel antipathy for female execs.
Summers was notorious for it, certainly. The other two who’ve been named as possible fires are Achilles O. Macris and Javier Martin-Artajo.
In the end, it may be that I find the Bank’s financial arbitrage practices more interesting than the gender angle, though. The degree to which even the ineffectual Dodd-Frank is being gutted isn’t surprising, but it is dangerous as can be. And as for Dimon and Obama’s charade that they’re no longer friends: pure comedy.
But I was glad to see Warren calling for him to resign from the NY Fed (he should be fired, actually); the author of his biography ‘Last Man Standing’ has, too. ;o)
mistress of the universe,retiring,AFTER they hit the wall,all these people run at 150mph till they hit the wall
Sorry, this is ridiculous. Dimon is tossing subordinate executives out the door left and right trying to convince shareholders that the people REALLY responsible for their monetary losses are out and a major loss won’t happen again. Just because one of them turns out to be a woman isn’t evidence that there is some sort of anti-woman conspiracy or effort to purge women from high-ranking bank positions underway.
Hmmm, I’d get off that limb, if I were you, Wendy…
;0)
Srsly. Look at the list of the 50 most powerful people in finance.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-07/most-influential-50-people-in-global-finance-full-list-bloomberg-markets.html
There are exactly five women. Four of those are government officials. Exactly one is a banker. And that woman? She’s Indian, working at the uniquely nonsexist ICICI.
Gender isn’t an issue in finance in one way, tho. There are no women.
Rec’d. Great post.
It is sad that for women to be considered successful in high finance they must become as degenerate vampire squid as the boys. Maybe she can use her golden parachute to do something creative with the rest of her career.
I’ve heard the Dimon is sexist, but factually, it’s still a very very very sexist world and seems, esp of late, to be just getting worse.
I know little about the mucky-muck higher ups on Wall St, whether at JPMorgan or elsewhere, to comment with any authority. Yet I duly note, fwiw, that Dimon is doing his best to *sacrifice* someone else and accept less than zero responsibility for what happened under his watch.
FWIW, also duly noted that he dumps not only apparentely one of the few alpha females in his line of “business,” but the two males have decidely foreign names. Coincidence???
Whole thing stinks, regardless.
We need much better finanical regulations, and that’s the end of it.
great comment
Sure, Obey; anything you say, Obey. But we were speaking not of your list’s measures, but JP Morgan Chase’s relative value of them and Dimon’s even more specifically. Don’t have the time to count, but…
On the other hand, I watched the Frontline piece, which was chock full of female banking executives. But okay, Obus Profundus; women in finance are rare enough to deserve special mention here and there; not a particularly good ad for parity. ;o)
Well …. MY list is longer than YOUR list…
Just sayin’
;0)
Another big parallel with Abu Ghraib is the way the brunt of higher-level accountability fell to Janis Karpinski instead of, oh, say, Geoffrey Miller.
I suspect many of the old boys in the General’s club probably feel the same way about women members as Dimon does.
Bragart.
Besides, I’ve heard it’s not the size of your list that matters … per se.
Oh take HER side, why don’t you.
Typical.
Good to see you K. Was getting worried you might have had the bright idea of putting skates on your bike this time, and then taking that for a spin on the lake, only to realize that … it’s spring…
;0)
Yes, dear, and I will leave the low-hanging fruit jokes of that sentence alone, esp. since kgb…didn’t. ;o)
But sure; had she been a male, he wouldn’t have
fired heraccepted her resignation. And he would have replaced her with another female.(deleted the rest; ain’t worth niggling over with references to Blythe, et.al. ‘delivering for Daddy’ and all that shit), especially since he’s my favorite Swinging Dick on the Street.)
Let’s just agree: Your feminist cred vastly outweighs mine.
Kidding aside, I don’t mean to argue over this stuff. There is a pattern worth remarking tho, in my opinion. There was Zoe Cruz dumped by Morgan Stanley when it should have been Mack. Erin Callan taking the brunt of the blame for Lehman when it should have been Fuld. And now Ina Drew.
Do I weep for these women? Of course not. But it is a symptom of a nasty sexist/misogynistic streak in finance. Is that the biggest problem in finance these days? probably not either. But it’s one more datapoint in a larger pattern, right?
Actually all the facts point to the opposite, in finance, gender matters ALOT. It’s a boy’s club- with an emphasis on boys. There was tons of discussion when all this was going on if women had been proportionately represented in finance- our gender tends to be more conservative and more risk averse- we might have escaped the damage that was caused to the economy.
Dimon is on the record as saying oopsie before. How many times does HE get a free pass for not knowing what the hell he is doing while in charge of the financial behomoth?
“just because one of them turns out to be a woman”….. So far, the only confirmed ouster, is a woman. The rest were being considered for ouster, but haven’t actually been fired, can you say “beard”?
And why is she being let go BEFORE Bruno is? The man who made the trades is not fired first?
I’m willing to bet if something else comes along in the news cycle to knock this off the FP, they will forget about firing Bruno
Two separate issues, imo, cwaltz; Dimon and ‘finance’ in general. Please read at the link I provided, and PW borrowed a quote from telling how ever since her Chemical Bank (I think it was) days waaaay back, Drew was all about maximum risk, though she stayed out of the limelight on purpose (not a rock star like the would-be Swing Dicks (will we ever coin a term like Swinging Huevos? Not likely, but still…)
That’s all I’m saying: One Brush doesn’t always Paint All.
Free pass? Cripes; I blogged about financial regulation a hundred times at least since 2008. Again, to me, the larger story is the fact that this administration, the Fed, other regulatory agencies, Congress, the Big Banks and their lobbyists, are making sure all this continues, and offers a few bogus cosmetic changes that they recede from over a short time.
Ask yourself how many ‘journalists’ and Obama supporters still offer Dodd-Frank crap (and largely unwritten when o’Bomba signed it) law as “The most sweeping regulation since the Great Depression”, forgetting that it was the ONLY puny financial re-regulation.
Put the fuckers in jail. They’re collectively killing millions around the globe with their greed.
Doesn’t anyone else see the calling out of Drew’s sex as ‘sexist’? Isn’t that similar to calling out color as being ‘racist’?
I’ve a hard time feeling any sort of sympathy for anyone who “earned about $1.2 million a month over the past two years.” no matter their sex or skin color or religion or anything else.
Walker’s rollback of equal pay in WI is much more an outrage than Dimon’s sacrificing Drew(and ,believe me, she will ‘land on her feet’ a whole lot easier than MANY others who have lost their job.
Think about why I’m comparing this to Murdochgate and Abu Ghraib.
Who is getting away scot-free while everyone’s attention is focused on the people getting the ax?
Interesting — so far, things are playing out so that Iskil the Fail Whale survives even as Drew and her power structure within JPMC gets gutted.
In other words, your beard hypothesis tallies with what one of my Wall Street scuttlebutters was saying: That Iskil would be spared and Drew and her people disposed of because Dimon was glad to seize on the chance to take out a woman.