I’m sure you’ve all seen polls showing that the general public strongly supports the various ALEC-inspired “voter ID” bills and constitutional amendments being pushed by Republican-controlled state legislatures across the country. That was definitely the case in Minnesota: As recently as May of this year, a Minnesota Poll conducted by the StarTribune showed 80% support for the GOP’s proposed Photo ID ballot amendment to the state constitution.
That was then, this is now:
Slightly more than half of likely voters polled — 52 percent — want the changes built around a photo ID requirement, while 44 percent oppose them and 4 percent are undecided.
That is a far cry from the 80 percent support for photo ID in a May 2011 Minnesota Poll, when the issue was debated as a change in state law. Support among Democrats has cratered during a year marked by court battles, all-night legislative debates and charges that the GOP is attempting to suppress Democratic votes.
Since this is a referendum on changing the constitution, a mere plurality won’t suffice. It must have at least 50% “yes” votes to pass. It had 80% back in May, and it’s dropped to 52% now — and that’s without much in the way of a general campaign on the “vote no” side’s part.
What I find particularly interesting is the indie vote. Independents generally side with the Republicans in favoring this ballot amendment, according to this poll — but I wonder if that will continue to be the case once the word gets out statewide on how much it will cost state and especially local governments, the latter of which are already having a much harder time meeting their budget goals since the state Republicans voted for more austerity.
As I mentioned last week, I suspect that the cost argument is what, if explained and disseminated widely, will most strongly resonate with many voters. It certainly is the one the state Republicans seem to fear the most.



16 Comments

You know what to do, folks. Pass it on!
The biggest hurdle to overcome is the complacency of those who believe, “If its not a problem for ‘middle class’ white people, how could it be a problem for anyone else?”
Tweeted. Recommended.
Other than Holder’s DoJ helter skelter approach to suits, why are the Dem’s so quiet on the issue?
voter disenfranchisement, meh
additional costs, BIG DEAL
Welcome to America in 2012
” indies” are the epitome of low information white folk. How do you reach them?
Is there any sign in the statistics, or anecdotally, that some of these indies may also be finding that they’re actually not one step away from being the 1% – like maybe they have a loved one who’s elderly, or disabled, or works long hours, and would be disenfranchised by these laws? Or would they just consider that a necessary martyrdom?
As an example, voter registration in Oregon cost more than $9.7 million during the 2008 election, a cost of $4.51 per active registered voter or $8.43 per voter registration transaction (adding new or updating existing voter records).
So? Those costs are covered by existing taxes; it’s the necessary cost of electoral participation. The added cost of a voter ID as administered by laws like the one in MN is neither fair nor necessary, as you’d know if you’d been paying attention.
A-yep.
What’s the difference between “necessary cost of electoral participation”, and “neither fair nor necessary”?
Why spend $10M for voter registration when the voters could just show up and vote. There’s no need for registration.
The Dems have been squawking like holy hell. The GO/Media Complex doesn’t take their comments seriously even though they’l give lts of consideration to people like Michele Bachmann.
I can tell that the Republicans are scared shitless the indies will fnd out about it. That’s why they had the CAE try to pooh-poh the fears raised by county clerks statewide, but as Max Hailperin showed the CAE’s math is rather dodgy.
You hit it on the nose in terms of cost, when you cite the small percentage of people actually caught engaging in fraud and compare it cost then this becomes a no brainer.
That’s the thing: This amendment costs a lot, creates long lines and more bureaucracy, and keeps ten of thousands more legal voters from voting for every actual fraudster it might stop. Once people figure out that enacting this thing means fewer cops on their streets and fewer road repairs, it goes down like a lead balloon.
Good to know. Thanks.
Wish we had a federal election law. No good reason why we don’t.