
You may have heard the BBC, the AP and even Huffington Post report that the kill-the-gays part of the anti-gay bill currently before the Ugandan Parliament — a bill backed and funded and influenced (if not outright written) by deep-pocketed American Christian antigay activists — was removed from that bill.
Don’t believe it.
Box Turtle Bulletin’s Jim Burroway points out the following:
But despite these latest reports you’ve read — or the fifteen or more before them — the death penalty has not been removed. That can only happen when the full Parliament decides to vote on the Legal and Parliamentary Committee’s recommendation to remove the death penalty from Clause 3. And that will only stand the greatest chance of happening if the Legal and Parliamentary Committee actually recommends making that change — which its members claims was done but can’t show you the committee’s draft report because its a “secret.” Which should be a red flag the size of North Korea’s because the last time the Legal and Parliamentary Committee claimed it recommended removing the death penalty, it actually did no such thing.
What short memory spans everyone has. It was just last week when the BBC – per its usual jumping-the-gun instinct – announced that the decision to drop the death penalty was a done deal. In case you’re counting, that’s at least the third time the BBC announced the death penalty’s demise, and its third announcement proved just as wrong as the earlier two.
[...]
But as we’ve said repeatedly, it has never been removed. And we will never tell you that it has been removed until and unless, you know, it has been removed – which has never happened in the bill’s entire three year history. Although the bill’s supporters have done their best to try to convince you otherwise.
The Ugandan Parliament is currently embroiled in controversy over two Petroleum Bills which, if passed into law, will effectively turn over the nation’s newly-discovered oil wealth to one person: The Energy Minister, who is a presidential appointee with no oversight from Parliament. The government will want to distract the people’s attention from what they’ve done, and just as corrupt American politicians whip up antigay fervor as a cover for their own misdeeds, the expectation in many quarters is that the Ugandan government will use the Anti-Homosexual Bill to distract from this bit of oil-related corruption. (That’s probably the main reason why they haven’t passed the AHB yet — the Petroleum Bills must come first, and then the AHB will likely follow almost immediately.)
What can we do about this? Contacting your legislators would work — Barney Frank in particular is working on this issue. Putting pressure on Uganda’s president to veto it has worked in the past, and from the frantic efforts made by the bill’s backers to defuse that pressure with lies, it’s likely that it can work again. One option is to sign the CREDO petition set up to do just that. The signatures will be hand-delivered to the Ugandan Embassy in Washington, DC.
You know what to do.
UPDATE: Keep your fingers crossed — there is a growing chance that the controversy caused by the oil bills may delay their passage long enough to keep them from being voted on before the Christmas holiday break. Since the AHB is wanted by the government as a distraction device to be kept in reserve on passage of the oil bills, this means that the AHB is delayed as well. Delayed, but not dead.



17 Comments

What gets me is that homophobia in Africa is largely a Western import, an artifact of colonialism. The link to the NYTimes article seems to have Africans speaking of it as part of their native heritage. By my understanding, it wasn’t.
-stewartm
Thanks for posting the petition link, PW.
IN addition to petitioning the government of Uganda, we need to show our State Department that this isn’t acceptable and that US aid must stop if this bill passes.
Thanks, PW; I’ll sign, and Teddy’s right. And US default policy in general in Africa is hideous.
It’s not — it’s the product of missionary indoctrination, not a part of indigenous culture. The people behind the biggest push are rich American Protestants like Howard Ahmanson.
Given that the Obama administration has continued a long tradition of US assistance to the brutal Museveni dictatorship, dishing out millions in military aid (drones included) since 2011, this probably won’t end well. I suspect the bigots will be allowed to enact any laws they desire, provided they render proper allegiance to their American benefactors.
The US is starting to talk about sanctions — finally — while Germany is actually implementing them, in the form of a three-year aid suspension. The suspension is officially in response to Uganda’s incredible amount of corruption (it’s considered the most corrupt state in a continent full of corrupt states), but the talk is that the AHB is a factor.
Interestingly, many GLBT activists warn against sanctions, at least those applied after the fact:
Of course, considering that the latest round of antigay bloodthirsting is being promoted — in Uganda as in other African nations — by rich American Christians, it’s ironic to see the cynical Ugandan politicians waving the banner of independence over their “right” to do what Scott Lively tells them to do.
Evangelical dipshits: “How were we supposed to know that telling Ugandans gays were evil and wanted to rape their kids and destroy their families would have negative consequences?”
So are vaccinations. So what?
“a bill backed and funded” by the Christian evangelicals. But the article you link to doesn’t say that. It only says that they share the anti-gay sentiment and believe in things like curing gay people of their gayness. Not that I agree with them. I DON’T. But the evangelical leaders in question say they are opposed to a bill that would impose a death penalty on gay people, and that when they went to the conference in question they weren’t aware the bill was going to be brought up. If you want to assign responsibility to them through their moral support of the overall anti-gay agenda, that’s something different. It’s not the same thing as saying they “backed and funded” the legislation itself. They say they don’t back it, but if you have evidence they helped to fund the legislation, it isn’t in the article. You need to have more evidence than that they showed up at a conference and are not gay friendly.
As a puppet of the United States, Uganda must carry out President Obama’s anti-Gay agenda:
Obama let his apparent hatred of Gays show by, despite enormous pressure, refusing to stop deporting people for being Gay until late September 2012, about one month before the Election:
He kept that hateful paradigm working against Gays in the US as long as he possibly could. If he really did not hate Gays, he would have extended those Rights his first day in office, not on potentially one of his last days in office, as an act of desperation and/or a cynical Election ploy.
Obama now has people believing his lie that he supports equal marriage, when he was using “Gay marriage” as an excuse to deport people, and he is still withholding Federal partner benefits from spouses of Gay US Government employees.
But he can get away with worse affronts to Human Rights in Africa than he can here.
I think the Uganda Government is required to crack down on Gays, or they won’t keep getting the money, weapons, and “Military Advisors” [Mercenaries and spies] from Obama:
I noticed that within days or weeks after President Obama sent a delegation to the inauguration of Liberian President Ellen Sirleaf, she launched an anti-Gay publicity initiative.
It’s important because the ex-colonial African states also have pride in their independence and their heritage, and a disdain and resentment for their colonial past.
Linking homophobia to colonialism could be a first step to a cure. To do that, though, you’ll also have to link colonialism to Christianity.
-stewartm
Linking European colonialism to Christianity is often done by those religious groups that were fairly well organized and part of the power structure before the Europeans arrived. Many if not most of these groups are Islamic in nature.
Heh! That would require them to admit that gays are human and deserve to be treated accordingly.
Go here and read the whole thing:
http://www.boxturtlebulletin.com/slouching-toward-kampala
Also take a gander at this:
http://wthrockmorton.com/2009/11/23/college-of-prayer-the-ugandan-parliament-and-the-anti-homosexuality-bill/
Howard Ahmanson, the guy who in essence bought the African branches of the Anglican church, has been the mover of this stuff.
Well I did go to the last link, and he establishes a connection between the group COP and the legislators, but they say they don’t endorse the bill. Anyhow, I still don’t see anything that shows they backed and funded the bill. What I do see is that they associate with the anti-gays in Uganda, but Rick Warren apparently disassociated himself from them. I don’t like these guys, but just because they’re anti-gay doesn’t mean they endorse this bill. To me what you’re saying sounds too much like, “if you hang out with a communist, you must be a communist.” But given how extreme the Ugandans are, I agree the Americans should vehemently denounce them.