It’s interesting to see how much of the content of our Elite Media Overlords is devoted to pretending the sequester is no big deal — or is strictly Obama’s fault, as if the Republicans didn’t help plan it and didn’t trumpet it as a huge victory when they signed off on it back in 2011. Witness, for example, this piece by Glenn Kessler in last Friday’s Washington Post. Lots of denial going on, that’s for sure.
Ironically enough, Friday’s WaPo also had this piece by Lisa Rein, which does a reasonably good job of pointing out when and where the harms caused by the sequester will manifest themselves. She put some focus on the cuts being forced at the US Department of Agriculture, whose Food Safety Inspection Service is responsible for inspecting all the red meat and poultry processed and consumed in America; fully a third of her article was devoted to the furloughs planned for that single USDA agency, and the efforts of various entities, especially representatives of the meat industry and the Republicans whose political campaigns they fund, to pretend in the face of all the evidence that sequestration wouldn’t hurt and the furloughs didn’t have to hurt, either.
In other words, they’re mostly still stuck, publicly at any rate, in the first stage of Sequester Grief — denial.
But there are signs that the denial is wearing off and they’re moving into the anger phase, as more energy is being devoted by the Republicans, the far-right falangist billionaires that love them, and the media outlets run by those billionaires, to putting all the blame on Obama as the effects of the sequester start to become undeniable. From a recent James Rosen article:
House Republicans, among them the head of a key oversight panel, threatened Friday to call Cabinet secretaries and other executive agency managers before congressional hearings on how furloughs are applied in the wake of forced spending cuts.
[...]
“If they’re laying off TSA agents and air-traffic controllers, and yet (Transportation Secretary) Ray LaHood’s office is still getting cleaned each night, come on,” said Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, chairman of the regulatory subcommittee of the House Oversight Committee.
Shorter Jim Jordan: Damn, chasing my own tail hurts when I finally bite down on it.
Back in reality, Rosen deftly undercuts Jordan’s chest-thumping dominance displays thus:
Republicans have accused Obama and Democratic congressional allies of trying to gain political advantage by painting doomsday scenarios about the immediate impact of the forced spending cuts, which the Republicans say amount to only 2.2 percent of this year’s projected $3.8 trillion federal budget.
But about two-thirds of the total budget is exempt under the 2011 Budget Control Act, which requires $1.2 trillion in forced cuts over a decade if Congress can’t find other reductions. The automatic cuts, called sequestration, were to have started Jan. 1 of this year, but a short-term deal pushed them back to March 1.
The exempted spending – including Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security benefits, and wages for active-duty troops – means that hundreds of discretionary military and non-defense programs will experience an effective hit of 6.6 percent or more.
What’s left that’s cuttable must, by the terms of the sequester, be cut across the board. This was intentional. The sequester was deliberately designed to be so painful that it would force all parties to the negotiation table, and its creation was celebrated by key Republicans, including John Boehner and Paul Ryan.
It’s going to take awhile for the full effects to be felt, mainly because legal and administrative requirements in many government agencies require thirty days of advance notice before furloughs are to take place. But the effect of this will be to concentrate the furloughs in those agencies into the last quarter of the government’s fiscal year, which ends September 30. That will intensify the impact on the various industries that depend on government aid and oversight to function. That, in turn, will intensify the calls by the representatives of those impacted industries for a fix of some sort — and the only fixes possible at this point are either a complete cave by the Tea Party Caucus on revenue increases, or a way to kick the can further down the road, preferably after the 2014 midterms. (Of course, either of these would have to be dressed up in pretty pink face-saving ribbons to keep the Teepers from revolting over them.)
In other words, expect to see the bargaining, depression, and hemi-semi-demi-acceptance stages show up sometime this summer.
Photo by Robert Couse-Baker under Creative Commons license




55 Comments

I am depressed because I have accepted that my country is non-functional, mean and stupid.
Altenmeyer’s book on authoritarian mindsets — one I found out about from reformed Republican John W. Dean — states that authoritarian types often have trouble with abstractions; they often can only see the effects of an action when that action directly affects them.
Well, here come some actions that will directly affect them. They won’t like it one bit.
Very good piece, PW. Given the never-ending stream of braindead yammering flowing out of Washington (Congress, the WH and the “Elite Media Overlords”), we might want to consider adding item #6: The “Psycho-Idiocy” stage.
The level of stupidity and self-destructiveness is truly remarkable.
It is for this reason that I rarely engage in debate (if you can call it that) with right-wingers. Trying to get through this sort of hard-wiring is like trying to teach calculus to a cage full of hyenas.
Apparently the sequester was Obama’s fault, since he is the president and all. Jack Lew, then director of Obama’s Office of Management and Budget, and now Treasury Secretary, and Rob Nabors, the president’s legislative affairs director, brought the notion of a “sequester” to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid. As the idea rapidly evolved: A failure of Congress (via its “supercommittee”) and the White House to agree on substantial deficit reductions would trigger automatic, across-the-board budget cuts. This would force the Committee (and Congress) to act, and deflect blame from the White House. Obama signed it into law but it didn’t work the way it was envisioned.
Regarding the sequester, probably most people have a hard time understanding why a roughly two percent reduction in excessive government spending should be a problem (85 billion vs. 3.6 trillion) when many households are going through financial belt-tightening.
Thanks PW.
Recommended
Tweeted.
Obama envisioned it as a nuclear-option-style threat to compel cooperation, and Boehner and Ryan eagerly and proudly signed off of on it.
I suspect that Obama (and to an extent Boehner) didn’t reckon on how four-plus decades of the Southern Strategy, where tax cuts for the rich are sold to white Americans as a way to cut programs suspected of helping black people, have addled the brains of the Republican primary voter nearly past redemption.
About the only way it can be done is by turning their own memes back on them — such as by pointing out that the lion’s share of “Socialist” bailouts and tax breaks go to the industries that took their jobs to China and stole their pension money to finance the new Chinese factories.
Outsourcing US jobs to other countries is and has been US government policy, even using US taxpayer dollars via USAID to train workers. That’s a major function of US embassies. So it’s disingenuous to blame corporations which have no mandate to provide for the general welfare as the government does.
I’m at the candy stage:
My momma always said, “The sequester is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get.”
Apologies to Forrest.
Meanwhile SecState Kerry has given away over $300 million on his current visit to the needy overseas and he hasn’t even finished is trip yet. Didn’t he get the word?
Oh really? Care to provide documentation for that assertion?
Don’t worry, we’ll wait.
And $300 million is maybe what we spend in an hour (assuming what you said is true and you’re not relabeling something else just to make a point). Nice try, I’m sure it impresses people who are mathematically challenged.
It’s gonna be a long, hot, nasty summer for us all weather aside.
Great post PW, FB’s on my page and highly rcc’d.
There’s so much trash lie crap out in the msm it’s no Wonder our populous is completely for the most part, ignorant on all this.
Most self declared liberals I know still are into the blame the GOP mode, they have NO desire to realize that Obama is HANDILY a major part of all of this.
Or that it’s all a tool of the corporate fascists and Pete Peterson’s, the Catfood Commission that Obama convened, etc.
Amen Sistah, effing amen indeed.
Short of violence, the 1% capitalist fascist bastards and bastardettes have us all at their mercy. N we’re gonna suffer more n more.
I can think of ONE particular action I’d like to see them experience where the sun don’t shine.
“All the way up, coach, with a red hot poker.”
*G*
Sorry, but placing the emphasis on the GOP is inappropriate… unless it is explicitly stated that the cuts that Obama is holding out for are to the safety net i.e. SS et al.
That is because the scale of the scam being perpetuated by both sides must be made clear in order to properly assess the situation.
Book Salon up with David Brin’s Existence (Novel) hosted by Siun
??
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2013/03/03/kerry-egypt-aid/1960165/
Rut-roh. I’ve heard about these ideas/truths, but when you put it that way, makes things look really ugly on the climate change file, huh. :-(
Quote Of The 1st Quarter, and posted to my FB page.
That. Was. SpecTACular.
*G*
Kudo’s to DonBacon for the setup.
Feels like the old days . . . ;-)
Here’s most of it:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2013/mar/03/kerry-releases-us-aid-egypt
I call BS Don.
The corporations own and operate US Government in their own best interests.
It’s called corporate fascism. They are NOT exempt and the government is NOT the sole source.
I ask you to deny this, cuz I wanna see THAT spin.
*G*
Dang, yep, JUST like the old days! *G*
Yeah, he got the word. From corporate owners, AIPAC and LIKUD, who are all in synch for their own interests.
Come on Don . . . who you tryin to distract, cloud or bamboozle?
Oh, I see now, Don – you’re comparing the relative pittances given to USAID (often for humanitarian reasons) to the trillions in huge tax breaks given corporations — and our nation’s refusal to put up impediments to offshoring the way that nations like Germany do (mainly because German corporations don’t control the German political process to the same extent that American corporations control the American political process).
Why are German corporations — which operate in an environment with far more taxes and regulations defending workers’ rights and health than obtains in the US — far less eager to outsource than are American ones? One reason is that German law mandates that corporations with more than 500 employees must have a board of directors composed of at least one-third regular workers; in companies with more than 2000 employees, the employees get to vote to full half of the board of director seats. Even companies as small as five employees have arbitration rights that don’t exist anymore in the US. Aside, of course, for the large group of Federal employees, the last bastion of what used to be America’s thriving middle class, and one of the few remaining parts of the 99% that haven’t had the pensions of its members stripped from them by their employers.
Yep, and thanks for the reality.
Wish more would wade in on this.
Corporate fascism driving it all. BOTH sides in on the scam.
From township, to village, to city, county, state and national erected offals, all of them, guilty, GUILTY, GUILTY!!!!!!! ;-)
Yeah, we KNOW that. PW knows that.
This is NOT the focal point of PW’s comment you reply to.
I don’t think . . . . ? PW?
Someone says X.
Someone expresses doubt that X is true.
Someone links to info indicating X is true.
Not a judgment about the significance of X.
Not a judgement on the post itself, about which I agree with zapkitty.
Nice.
Thanks. Sums it all up nicely.
Altho, my pops was part of USAID/USOM collaborations in SE Asia in the 50′s n early 60′s . . . you ever see Catch 22? Or read it? (I assume both given yer obvious knowledge levels)
It’s true. Back door criminal cash enterprises under the guise of USAID . . our family lived it, suffered from it in the end. That’s another story for another time . . . ;-)
So, I’m no fan of USAID mock efforts to aid foreign countries. The strings attached and the lives at risk are to high a price to pay. Just ask those in Benghazi Affair.
The point is that the FOXies want everyone to think that Boehner et al wanted no part of it when they eagerly backed it.
The sequester was supposed to be “the nuclear option”. If you are old enough to remember growing up in the era of Mutual Assured Destruction, you will remember the idea propounded by nuclear-weapons advocates like Henry “Why We Must Arm to Disarm” Kissinger that having a large arsenal of nukes was necessary to ensure that any Soviet nuclear attack would be met with one that would be equally if not more devastating. It was supposed to make the very idea of nuclear war so horrifying that no one would contemplate it, much less attempt it.
Ironically, it was eventually found that maintaining large banks of nuclear warheads was really not a good idea, for various reasons (one of the biggest being cost). However, the concept of the “nuclear option” — the trump card so destructive it could never be played — still seduces the imaginations of people (like Obama and Boehner) who grew up in that era and seek out variations on it with similar perceived powers to compel.
Here you go, La Snarka.
The U.S. – Kazakhstan Public – Private Economic Partnership Initiative (PPEPI) is a unique initiative aimed at improving the business environment for Kazakhstan’s investment and trade community, both foreign and local, through broad-scale economic policy reform. In close collaboration with the Prime Minister’s Office, the initiative will work to develop an attractive, transparent and predictable investment climate.
PPEPI was conceived in the summer of 2007 by Frank Mermoud, Special Representative for the Commercial and Business Affairs at the U.S. State Department, and Prime Minister Karim Massimov of Kazakhstan. The PPEPI ‘pillars’ were identified as major challenges to the continued expansion of Kazakhstan’s dynamic investment and trade environment. The program is administered by the American Chamber of Commerce in Kazakhstan (AmCham) under a partial grant funded by the Kazakhstan government and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).
The day-long Forum, sponsored by Procter and Gamble, brought together experts from a wide range of institutions to explore key issues in economic integration and trade policy in Kazakhstan.
Michael Snowden, U.S. Consul General:”. . .These are just a few examples of the United States’ active technical assistance program to promote economic development and integration in the Central Asia region, which in turn should lead to more prosperous, well-governed and stable societies in Central Asia.”
Ernst & Young in Kazakhstan annually performs a compensation and benefits survey – an increasingly important tool to assess current trends in the labor market. This year’s salary survey contains compensation data for over 558 cross-industry positions, the structure of compensation packages, benefits and other HR policies and practices. This year 91 companies participated in the survey, representing international and Kazakhstan enterprises operating in various industries with wide regional coverage – Astana, Almaty and 14 regions across Kazakhstan.
PricewaterhouseCoopers gave a presentation on best practices in performance management during the September meeting of the Atyrau Human Resources Working Group. The presentation outlined how to set goals and objectives, employee feedback and performance appraisal strategies, and barriers inhibiting performance management programs. Another presentation by Schlumberger focused on performance management practices in use at Schlumberger. The Schlumberger program is based on diversity, internationality, learning, and people as key elements in operations.
The linked article has been taken down.
reply @ 28 (forgot to click the reply button)
Ok fine, let’s get this straight.
PW took on Don Bacon. Questioned something he said.
YOU call PW on X, but post a link that PW and I and all of us have read and know. The X you refer to is not the X PW was calling out Don Bacon on, I don’t think. GO over it, again, and again, review this little small detail.
MY not so humble opinion is you jumped the shark on PW. And were factually wrong in doing so.
End of story.
So Gaius Publius thinks sequestration was planned from the beginning by O to result in cuts to SS, Medicare and Medicaid. Anyway, that’s what O’s economic advisor, Gene Sperling, says. See America Blog, front page. O wants safety nets cuts to be his legacy. Gaius says, OK. Let’s let him have it.
Yer on fiwer today . . . I’ve NEVER agreed with you so much!
LMAO, hope u r 2. :D
Here’s a more current one, La Snarka. Clinton using USAID taxpayer dollars to help India, a major source of US jobs.
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Secretary of State, May 8, 2012
New Delhi, India
I want to highlight a new Millennium Alliance initiated last year by USAID, our development agency, and the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry that is supported by the Government of India. This public-private partnership will help fund development solutions that deliver sustainable results for people and can be shared across the world
December 20, 2011
Today USAID is announcing a partnership with the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI); one of the largest microfinance organizations in India, Basix; and an Indian venture operation, Infinity Innovation Fund. The focus is to source and scale development solutions being developed and tested in India that will benefit vulnerable populations across the country and the rest of the world.
The Millennium Alliance: An India-US Innovation Partnership for Global Development will raise $50 million in seed capital, grants, loans, guarantees, and technical support for base of the pyramid solutions.
What’s your point?
Every person, agency you name has ties to corporate profiteering, be it US or Khazki based.
That whole thing reads like a Sunday School Primer on how to take foreign countries and their $ potential (be it natural resources or opium) and fold them into IMF protocols to fail and be taken over.
Gimme a break, yer an amateur in these regards. Yer gonna hafta lift yer leg a lil bit higher if ya wanna run with THESE dogs.
Apparently my reference was to the wrong $300 million.
Uh, aside from your comments about links, yeah, that’s how this shit plays out.
It’s been obvious from his first term, long ago. With or w/o Gaius, Sperling or anyone else.
All one needs to know for a baseline on Obama and who he represents, is to review his admin and cabinet picks in his first term.
This is kindergarten stuff. ;-)
Same peoples, same agencies, same hustles, same processes and procedures since Vietnam.
Why do you dig yer hole deeper?
Killin me, just killin me.
?
I didn’t know which $300 million donbacon was talking about, just saw something about that amount and made an assumption, which you say isn’t what PW or donbacon were discussing. I was acknowledging what you said @33, since you’re following the conversation in more detail, but again forgot to hit the reply button.
How about this:
All federal legislators go on half-pay, and show up a couple of days per month to pass continuing resolutions and such. Otherwise, they stay in their home constituencies and work on their 2014 campaigns. It’s not much of a change really.
Nothing good can pass this session, so let’s just call it now. Some of the members might even donate some of their time to local charities, or do some pro-bono work for cash starved governments in their home states.
If nothing changes in 2014, same deal. Eventually conditions will produce majority government one way or the other, and we can proceed with a brave new socialist/randian future. Whichever.
Phoenix Woman, Obama’s defenders are also in denial.
The purpose of the sequester was to force agreement to the “Grand Bargain”, which would have included cuts to Social Security.
The TBoggs of the world like to say, “No Social Security cuts happened, therefore Eleventy-Dimensional Chessmaster, stupid liberals!”
But you can’t have it both ways…1) Obama didn’t want Social Security cut, and 2) the sequester is the fault of the GOP.
As Atrios says, we are ruled by idiots. And Obama is one of them.
~
Nice post, PW.
People might also be interested in my diary, also on the Sequester and the number 5, now up.
Hey donbacon.I never realized your love for corporate imperialism is as pathological as your love for Israel .Kerry hasn’t given one fucking dime to the poor ,except as the grist for austerity to annihilate them via IMF demands .
The rioting in Egypt against this austerity is resistance against such impoverishment and the pro-Israel pawn ,Morsi ,and the CIA thug front known as the Muslim Brotherhood .Do you think the young Egyptian intelligentsia don’t realize the IMF is a loan-sharking operation run out our Treasury Dept .in accord with and guidance by the Israel lobby ?
If Egypt’s authoritarian rulers take that IMF bribe money ,Egypt’s sovereignty will be surrendered to Israeli rule under Morsi ,and the resistance knows it , as evidenced by their hatred for the knave Kerry and his ” gifts to the poor ”
How are you going to get America to sacrifice blood and treasure for your Israel agenda in Iran unless better propaganda is put forward ?
I’m going to have to side with don on this one. Giving 250 million out to a foreign entity while potentially laying off hundreds to thousands of Americans is politically tone deaf.
Even more tone deaf is promising a billion more in aid while telling Americans they’ll need to pull their belts tighter and experience austerity. We’ll be laying off teachers here while giving Egyptians the money to build a better democracy. That’s just plain dumb.
You are applying a psychological analogy to a political decision. Balderdash! Three stages of grief, my too-large briefs!
You mention denial and anger, but where is the acceptance? I suppose that will be forthcoming when Obama caves to the Big Bad Republicans and we are told that we just have to deal with it. Bunk. Hokum. More accurately, Kabuki.
That is all this is, kabuki. A show to persuade the poor, ignorant masses that we must learn to accept our lot, as decreed by our neofeudal overlords of capital and finance.
Me, I went straight to anger and stayed there long before sequestration was a twinkle in the eyes of Obama and the Orange Man from southern Ohio.
Or maybe Obama, Boehner and the majority of Congresscritters really didn’t see this coming. Maybe they are stupid enough to paint themselves into their respective corners. That is a distinct probability. But rest assured, they’ll find a way to save the defense contractors while finding a way to screw the American people for their corporate masters’ benefit.
If they don’t think of a way, someone like Jamie Dimon will.
If this is true “pointing out that the lion’s share of “Socialist” bailouts and tax breaks go to the industries that took their jobs to China and stole their pension money to finance the new Chinese factories.”, then this is a good thing, no?
This blame game between the dems and pubs is all bullshit based upon a false choice of how we prefer to be politically sodomized by austerity to enrich the same banksters who collapsed the economy and triggered the excuse for this austerity scam that any child could deduce as a vehicle ,not to reduce debt ,but actually increase it ,pursuant to hobbling the economy for imposing a corporate takeover and imposing rule via indentured servitude .That’s not a hypothetical of hot rhetoric ,it’s happening now,right under your fucking noses
Ranting about Kerry giving away money to Egyptian elites to be oppressive for Israeli stability ,oncoming wars with which we will be involved ,and a constricting economy for which our austerity will continue to subsidize foreign interests , means debt will continue to soar as these non-computed outlays are combined with welfare for future bankster bailouts ,transnationals ,and a military machine to enable the entire ball of imperial wax , including a criminal-industrial complex to cage ourselves for resisting this fascist coup d’Etat of finance and civil liberties .Then ,do we assume interests rates will never rise on this sinking ship ”
When any public servant speaks of taking food stamps from the poor while immunizing elite special interests from sacrifice ,especially foreign or international Wall St. moochers ,this politico should be hanged for treason.
There are solutions for easily and quickly reducing debt ,but our masters want to destroy the economy via austerity ,as evidenced with Wall.St. being very content with austerity versus austerity in this sequestration conflict .
I don’t know if it was ever Republican v. Democrat.
However, for the past several decades, it’s been plutocrats v. the rest of us.
That’s pretty much how I see it too. They’re going to dazzle us with cries of its not our fault, its theirs. Meanwhile BOTH sides of the aisle don’t give two figs about the electorate as anything more than a pawn in their game of political chess.
Our problem as a nation is not the liberals, or the conservatives. It’s the duplicious and lying politicians that are encouraging us to break up into teams yet again and tear each other apart while they work on the details of looting and pillaging what is left of wealth in this country.
I refuse to lay the blame of this on only Obama when I know Congress played their part in this. I refuse to put this squarely on the backs of the GOP when I know Obama was the one to come up with this and even now is willing to sacrifice seniors on the altar of austerity. I blame BOTH parties.
The Sequester….I got nothing….Now Benghazi-Gate, Woo Hoo, lots of spy craft and JSOC. That has all the Drama Queens, Crazy Mac, Southern Belle Lindsey and the new guy, going moon bat looney. The Three Amigos sequel.
But this is a great Post and I think I might understand the Sequestering…Fiscal Cliffy thing…or whatever the next crisis that the Billionaires try to inflict on us.
I agree with you. Apparently, going from “Democrat versus Republican” to “plutocrats versus the rest of us” is a very hard paradigm shift.
what part of these politicians are totally corrupt paid off bribe taking liars do you all not understand?
there is no point to any of this unless you view them as they are and understand their total devotion to working only for the top 1%.
PERIOD.