Tweet
I am just hearing about this. Are any of you familiar with this story?
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-and-their-comrade-capitalists-targets-of-spire-law-group-llps-racketeering-and-money-laundering-lawsuit-seeking-return-of-43-trillion-to-the-united-states-treasury-2012-10-25
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/43-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-awaits-obama-white-house-and-banks
Major players in the Obama White House have been targeted in a law suit by Spire Law Group who is responsible for recovering 43 trillion in laundered funds and racketeering that has been linked to major banks, crony capitalists, and government officials. This scheme based in New York will be party to the biggest federal government lawsuit in history. The government will attempt to recover 43 trillion in taxpayer’s funds disbursed during the 2009 bailout that totaled 787 billion to supposedly save the US financial markets from a massive collapse while funding infrastructure projects through out the US such as roads and bridges that were badly in need of repairs, yet only 6% of the money was ever used for such purposes.
Corrupt bailout evidence never acted upon
As many such as Rush Limbaugh had charged, the massive bailouts used for AIG, General Motors, Chrysler Corporation, a number of banks, even broadcasting companies, was apparently disbursed for other clandestine purposes such as slush funds for Democrat election campaigns. Yet, that’s not all.
Continue reading at NowPublic.com: 43 Trillion dollar lawsuit awaits Obama White House and banks | NowPublic News Coverage http://www.nowpublic.com/world/43-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-awaits-obama-white-house-and-banks#ixzz2BmNSfSzJ
20 Comments
I think someone did a diary on this here a while ago.
I remember reading that the law firm behind this law suit has now set the law suit up so that only one entity benefits from any recovery.
I could have been reading the article incorrectly, so please feel free to correct me.
This “lawsuit” is nothing more than yet another scam by Mitchell J Stein, who has created the Spire Law Group in order to file this lawsuit. He was arrested in December of 2011 for market manipulation and fraud. Shortly later he was disbarred and Mitchell j. Stein and Associates became the Spire Law Group. The man is a charlatan and a con artist. It took me about fifteen seconds of using google to get the whole, sordid story, including some conspiracy theories about why the great Alex Jones is silent on this “issue”. Nothing to see here but another entitled crook trying to profit off of peoples’ misery.
reports that “WSJ~More Scandal Rocking DC: Spire Law Group names Holder, Geithner, In $43 trillion lawsuit–RICO & Money Laundering.” Our good friend Glen Beck announces; Eh, 0bama on his way to prison?
We Can Stop This Lets put the Doberman Back on His Leash, m’Kay? Who has a Website as low quality as Spire’s AND a private jet? Exactly.
But, but, Stein was “a big Clinton supporter”!
“Spire Law LLP appears to have no business registration in any of the three states they claim offices in, and they also list a person retired since 1999 as the only traceable contact info on their 250 year experience website….”
But as the “Mad Jewess from WSJ has repeated four times! “People are dead!” Sounds a lot like that Vince Foster thing again…
Preface) Read it and weep…..Komrades.
1) You DO realize that people are DEAD? Out of nowhere?
2) People are dead. Its not a comspiracy (sic)
3) Look, people are dead. Thats the most important thing
4) And? There are DEAD people involved, here.
Also: “I still think it telling that the Only two Presidents to issue interest-free United States money as required by the Constitution, rather than interest-bearing Bankster money, were both shot in the head in public.”
“Wow… Even Infowars, Alex Jones, Rense, Max and Stacy – all silent on this or writing it off as a hoax. These are strange days indeed.”
Claim is Bullshit…
But it could be a megaconspiracy-it shut up Infowars, Alex Jones, Rense, Max and Stacy! OMG!!!!
I had a bit more respect for the OP at one time…
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/43-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-awaits-obama-white-house-and-banks
And the other 2 links:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/major-banks-governmental-officials-and-their-comrade-capitalists-targets-of-spire-law-group-llps-racketeering-and-money-laundering-lawsuit-seeking-return-of-43-trillion-to-the-united-states-treasury-2012-10-25
and
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/43-trillion-dollar-lawsuit-awaits-obama-white-house-and-banks#ixzz2BmNSfSzJ
Any proof, or perhaps you are just a Edited by Moderator. Attack the arguments, not the person Why don’t you get a job in construction and leave the politics and big issues to real Americans. Much of that stolen money went to pay people like you, so I guess you are just protecting your sugar daddies.
Uh, fwiw, since you are a new registration, we tend to NOT attack individuals in comments here at FDL and partner sites. You do not know the commenting history of Margaret nor her personal history and your attack is a bit unseemly to say the least
What the hell is your problem? Why the hostility? We were asked our opinions and I reported what I’d found? Why so adversarial?
Flagged.
BTW: I left links to support what my comment said. They are in those little blue words.
shills@FG @#9 offends me. Margaret’s attack on Mitchell J. Stein is not what we normally call an ad hominem attack, it was direct and personal, but not the least concealed in innuendo. She stood right up and accused him of being a charlatan.
Further I am not prepared to consign people who have jobs in construction to the pit where they have nothing to say about politics or “the big” issues. And I sure as hell don’t plan to call any of them unreal Americans, not to their faces anyway.
Uh, fwiw, seems the “stolen money” seems to be very much at issue in the case. Which item will be decided in court, not in blogs.
“They are in those little blue words.”
Ouch! Now that’s ad hominem. But it was your shot.
Nothing ad hominem about that description of what a link looks like nor what I said about Stein. His arrest and disbarment are both a matter of public record. Where’s the “attack”?
Oh pulease, Margaret. What you said about Stein was legit, but the “little blue words” shot was clearly intended to sting by calling into question the competence of shills@FG.
I don’t care; more power to you. You were attacked first, it was your shot. But let’s call a spade a spade.
I didn’t call anybody names, impugn anyone’s patriotism or suggest anyone was swimming in stolen money but have it your way. False equivalency lives.
OK.
I was just asking since I am unfamiliar with this. Sorry if asking questions is a bad thing to ya?
Oh and thanks for the replies so far.
So the consensus seems to be there is a dubious nature to this lawsuit/story?