There’s a very big hole in the center of the story about the firing of all teachers at Central Falls High School in Rhode Island.
This article features quotes by students and teachers.
This one includes quotes by administration and union officials.
And this one includes quotes by education big wigs and pundits.
Notice the hole? It’s big, very, VERY big.
Where the hell are the parents?
I write this as I listen to my kids bickering in the background about the best way to present a science project which is due this week. I know exactly what phase they are working on right now, having finished a description of the process and the data chart and the graph of the data. And I will have a very good idea by the end of the afternoon whether the project is going to meet all the requirements of the project syllabus for a sixth-grade science class.
There’s another project going on here today, too; the older kid is working on chemistry and I’ll know by the end of the evening whether a paper has been completed in sync with an A.P. Chemistry syllabus.
Both kids will have shown me their grades on line by tonight, and I’ll have reviewed and signed my younger kid’s academic planner, reflecting the assignments and work done over the weekend.
School has taken up a big chunk of our weekend. OUR weekend, not just their weekend. This is my role as a parent, to answer some questions without actually doing their work, to find resources if they need them, to facilitate the learning process. And most importantly, to help set expectations. Failure is not an option here.
While teachers may deliver and teach the content, grade students based on the work performed in learning the content, they cannot do what parents are supposed to do. They already have to do far too much that parents used to do — like providing materials paid for out of their own pockets, when school systems have cut back deeply on spending, or providing food and even personal hygiene products when kids show up unkempt with empty stomachs, when some households have difficulty pulling together one meal a day. I know this because I’ve talked frankly and candidly with my kids’ teachers; parents who are paying attention already know which children in the classroom are challenged, because the situation impacts their own kids.
There’s nothing quite as heartbreaking as hearing from your own kid that a child in their classroom doesn’t have a winter coat because their family can’t afford one, or that a child has gone without lunch because the parents are struggling and not yet able to qualify for free lunch. Or that gifted children skip performances by the band, orchestra or other class because they do not have appropriate attire like plain black pants and their family can’t afford them.
And teachers often fill the gap. I know this, because I’ve volunteered to help them when they’ve talked with me about the frustrations they have with trying to make sure these at-risk kids keep up with the rest of the class, that the promise these kids have is realized in spite of their challenges.
There are other demands which further stress teachers, like unruly and undisciplined children who disrupt classes, or children at either end of the learning spectrum whose needs can chew up class time and more time after class. I hear about them every day when my kids arrive home from school and dump their emotional baggage accumulated from trying to learn in this environment.
So where are the parents? Most of the time the problems don’t surface until the child tells their teacher there’s a problem — like telling the orchestra teacher a day before a performance that they can’t attend because they have no pants, or telling the teacher they have a stomachache and can’t concentrate because they haven’t eaten. It’s not the parents telling the teacher there’s a problem; it’s the kids.
And where are the parents in Central Falls? Why was performance allowed to lag so badly that their representatives on the school board had to take such dramatic action? Why weren’t parents intervening far earlier by becoming more actively involved in the complaint process rather than waiting for the school board to do it for them?
Think about it: your child comes home with failing grades in multiple classes. What do you do?
I know what I’d do, but frankly, no kid of mine is going to come home with a failing grade. They’ll come home with a C and I’ll be sitting at the table with them while they do their homework every night until there’s a B and then an A in that class. There will be no television, no internet except for heavily monitored research, no video games, no cell phone, no texting until there’s a B in that class.
And there will be phone calls and emails with the teacher about the nature of the problem until we get the grade back up. One child in this household wasn’t turning in their homework on time; an email exchange helped fix that problem and bump up a grade level within a week, because the homework now made it in when due (and there wasn’t any television until this happened regularly).
Some parents will complain that they don’t have the money to make sure their kids get better grades. But this doesn’t take money. It takes personal discipline, and without exercising personal discipline as an adult, kids won’t have role models and learn how to acquire personal discipline of their own.
I expect push back about the ethnicity of this particular school district, too. Too bad. There are many school districts across the entire country where English is a second language for students and their families. Math achievement in particular does not rely on English as a primary language, as the students of Garfield High School in East Los Angeles proved under Jaime Escalante’s tutelage. Yes, they excelled because of their teacher, but their ethnicity and their poverty were not impediments. The challenge of their minority status was used as a spur to encourage them to work harder. Had parents been more engaged, the success rate in Escalante’s classes would have been even greater.
While the media whips up a frenzy over the bellwether case of Central Falls High School, while conservative pundits drone on about the need for for-profit charter schools and unions complain about the burdens demanded of teachers, ask yourself why we aren’t hearing more from the parents. Ask yourself how much responsibility parents are supposed to have for their children’s educational outcomes.
I’m reminded of the movie Parenthood, in which teenaged slacker Tod Higgins (played by Keanu Reeves) explains to his girlfriend’s mother Helen Buckman (played by Dianne Wiest): "You know, Mrs. Buckman, you need a license to buy a dog, to drive a car — hell, you even need a license to catch a fish. But they’ll let any butt-reaming asshole be a father."
The parents of the students of Central Falls High School have a major role in the failure of their children’s education; unfortunately, we can’t fire them since anybody can be a parent. It’s much easier to simply fire the teachers.



89 Comments




This was Arne Duncan’s strategy in Chicago — fire everybody and create chaos, in hopes that something good will miraculously spring forth. Studies so far show no academic benefit from this upheaval, but it is obvious that disrupting students’ academic lives — transferring them to schools across town, creating havoc in parents’ schedules and plans for aftercare, etc., is not good for kids or families.
Obama’s education policies are an extension of Bush’s. There is nothing in their approach that has been documented to be effective. But why let the facts interfere when you can feel good about punishing teachers for their students’ problems with achievement (based on standardized testing)?
That’s the shock doctrine – creative destruction.
But they never address the fundamental problems with this community. Why are the parents not more engaged earlier? If they’re transient, why? If they are challenged by English as a second language, why aren’t they discussing it with teachers?
The very few parents I have heard in sparse reports are also not college-educated, which means there’s another challenge. But leveling this entire school system by figuratively burning it to the ground isn’t going to address this.
Sounds like they subscribe to the adage “When in trouble, when in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout”
Which puts them close to be useless.
I’m not so sure that the parents are at fault here. I saw a teacher complaining that the reason they were fired was because their salary demands had not been met and the union talks fell apart, “like you know.” He seemed to be a dull fellow who had difficulty expressing a coherent thought, “ya’ know?” I also saw a tape of a very cogent sixteen year old hoping for a solution. People should understand that the district had a 97% failure rate for two years running. There were no remediations, no discussions or plans, and no better results. People rail against the Wall Street Titans who receive their exhorbitant salaries while they screw middle Americans and lose trillions of dollars. But where are these people when these tenured teachers demand more and more money for the same failure and lack of accountability?
The failure began years ago, not at high school. If these had been A, B and C students, they wouldn’t have suddenly dropped to 7% proficiency in math simply because their teachers weren’t spending 25 minutes more per day with these kids.
The system was failing in grade and middle schools, and yet only the high school is being held accountable, and it’s all because of union wages.
Ri-ight.
Great rant, Rayne. You are so right. I retired from teaching in June because of NCLB and the parents. Too many used poverty and language as an excuse. The same kids on free lunch came to school with $1.29 bags of hot cheetos. The moms and dads had expensive tatoos. I’d call them in for conferences, and they’d nod, make promises, and then nothing.
I’m really mad at Obama for the way he’s handling education.
DIANE RAVITCH (She’s long been known as an advocate of No Child Left Behind, charter schools, standardized testing, and using the free market to improve schools. But she’s had a radical change of heart, as chronicled in her latest book..):
Well, unfortunately, the Obama administration has adopted and is building on the foundation of No Child Left Behind. And as I explain in this book, I believe that No Child Left Behind has been a failed policy, that it’s dumbed down the curriculum, narrowed the curriculum. Our kids are being denied a full education, because so much time is being spent on test prep and on tests that are really not very good tests and, in some cases, even fraudulent scoring of the test. The kids are getting a worse education as a result of No Child Left Behind.
The Obama administration, however, has bought into this rhetoric of accountability and choice, and they’re actually taking the Bush policies to a greater extreme. There is more support from the administration, this administration, for choice, because they have no opposition in the Congress, because it’s a Democratic president and because they had all this money, this $5 billion, to use as play money with no authorization, no oversight from Congress.
They’ve said to the states in the “Race to the Top,” this competition that was just held, that the requirements to be considered are, first of all, that the states have to be committed to privatizing many, many, many public schools. These are called charter schools. They’re privatized schools. The Bush administration would have never gotten away with that, because Congress would have stopped them.
They’ve also required states to commit to evaluating teachers by the test scores of their students, which means that that will put even more emphasis on standardized testing, more drill down of test prep, more emphasis on basic skills. And also, it’s a very unfair measure, because it means that the students who live in poor communities, that they’re likely to get small gains, whereas the kids in the affluent communities will get big gains. And so, we’ll see the third emphasis of the Obama plan, which is close low-performing schools.
And Obama has said that he wants to see 5,000 low-performing schools transformed or closed, as we saw just recently in Rhode Island, where the only high school in a desperately poor community is supposed to fire all the teachers, close the school. And I think this is a terrible thing for public education. And I think we’re going to see a devastation of public education over the next—however long this president is in office, unless he changes course, which I hope he will, and doubt that he will.
http://www.democracynow.org/2010/3/5/protests
Oh, I know, my kids have gone to day care and preschool with parents like the ones you’ve described. One in particular really bugged the crap out of me; she had $700 cash for laser removal of hair on her legs, but she couldn’t be bothered with taking her son to a tutor for remedial math help. The parents were in a stand-off, not wanting to pay each other child support, and not wanting to take their son. He acted out by failing classes — and this child was in grade school. I can only imagine how worthless he felt being shuttled like baggage, and what kind of trouble he must be getting into if he was not helped by some other adult in his life (they’ve moved out of the area, have no information about what happened to them).
There’s also the opposite extreme, too, found more often in wealthier districts — the parents who call and scream at educators for ridiculous reasons, like too much homework. How are these kids supposed to compete with other students around the world if Mommy and Daddy are constantly stepping in and reducing their workload?
I think they were asking the teachers for more time but not more pay.
Bush’s compassionate conservatism is beginning to actually look benign compared to Obama’s compassionate capitalism.
Oh, the wealthy ones here put their kids in private school, district home school, or church school. Starting about ten years ago, as more and more Spanish speakers arrived, the hair color started changing. Now it’s pretty much a stream of dark brown hair.
But then I live in Tom Metzcer’s old town.
Kathleen Sebelius:
“I think the president would love to have Republican votes,” she added. “What he has is lots of Republican ideas: Selling insurance across state lines, making sure that we crack down very aggressively on fraud and abuse moving forward.”
Legacy admission to whichever Ivy spawned the parents followed by Regent U Law followed by ‘internship’ with someone like Heritage or Cato of course.
NCLB is going to cost my kids a year of education by the time they graduate from school — and they are both gifted kids at the high end of the achievement spectrum. They have to spend about one month a year prepping for the state’s mandated test, taking the test and then doing follow-up after the test. One month a year multiplied by 12 years of education and they are behind their peers around the world. I have to make up for that at home by encouraging higher level classes wherever possible along with extra work in addition to the core requirements, or they simply won’t have the full 12 years they need.
The part which really gets my goat is that my kids don’t need the testing. Not at all. The time and energy and resources should be spent on the kids who need it, who are readily identifiable without all these bloody tests. I’d rather the money was spent on early childhood programs and mandatory parenting classes for parents of at-risk children.
That’s exactly what happened. Nothing more than administrators blaming the teachers while taking more and more resources away from them. Meanwhile, no ones serving the kids’ interests or addressing their needs more than the teachers.
I noticed the boy king opened his mouth and inserted his foot again. Just like the Skip Gates incident.
When did Harvard start graduating stupid people?
A RegentU degree is worth shit in the hard sciences; it’s only good in jobs where one’s qualifications aren’t measured except by the amount of brown on one’s nose.
Chinese who are reverse engineering everything we still make are laughing at us.
And the teaching to the test is also one of the reasons that classes such as History, Civics, Art, Music (basically just about anything that is not grammar or math) get cut back if not eliminated completely.
My parents cared about our schoolwork, which is why we all did well. My father even ran for school board because it mattered so much.
What can be done, tho, for kids whose parents won’t care, or maybe even can’t care?
I believe every child has the right to a good solid education no matter what the average income of their district is. And I think Charter Schools suck good money away from the regular schools, yet I can also imagine the pure frustration of low income parents who care to get their children a good education amidst a sea of parents who won’t/can’t/don’t-know-how be bothered.
Oh, yeah. He’s big on Charter Schools too. I’m sure there are good ones, but I did a short gig in one as the director. Luckily I was granted a leave from my teaching job, because I could only take one semester.
Kids were taking English 9, 10, and 11 simultaneously, getting PE credits for riding their skateboards after school, and all kinds of crap. The board wouldn’t change to become compliant because they wanted their kids to hurry up and get to Stanford. As if…
Reagan’s trickle down will have nothing on Obama’s version of the same, except we’re now a debtor country.
Obama is about winning the Class Warfare for the top 2-5%. Are we going to just lay back and let him, merely because we should feel tribally compelled to defend him, right or wrong?
They were going to pay $30 per hour. Below their regular rate.
Out of one side of Anthony Weiner’s mouth:
Out of the other side of Anthony Weiner’s mouth:
Weiner, you don’t get to blame the Republicans for your failure to stand up to the leadership of the Democratic Party.
Sorry for the OT.
There is no OT here, because it’s all of a kind.
If parents don’t convey to kids that self-discipline and learning matter, then the kids have a much tougher slope to climb. We live in a nation that wants short-cuts, but for building relationships between work and home, we cannot afford short cuts.
Too much depends upon it.
The part of Obama that gives me a glimmer of hope is his background as a **community** organizer. You have to change the culture that allows parents to dodge their own responsibility for helping nurture their children’s education.
But personally, I’m pessimistic about any new school initiatives that fail to address the school-home linkages. Teachers have to be paid for their time spent interacting with parents, but parents (and grandparents) have to step up to the amount of work required to help out.
Outstanding post. Thank you.
My dad only had a 9th grade formal education (it was back in the day when arguments with teachers didn’t leave much recourse other than to drop out – his older sister was a math teacher) and he fully supported my mom when she went back to finish her degree.
So both parents made sure we studied. When my older brother was blowing off algebra, he moved in with our aunt for a few weeks so she could tutor him in math. He was not a happy camper on that one.
At the military high school I attended, we had 2 week grading periods with grades going to parents every six weeks. If you were flunking any course for a 2 week period, you had to spend the next 2 weeks going to nightly supervised study hall until that grade went up. Since it was military school, if you were in supervised study hall, you also had to be in full uniform so most of us did manage to work hard to be able to study in our rooms
“A RegentU degree is worth shit in the hard sciences; it’s only good in jobs where one’s qualifications aren’t measured except by the amount of brown on one’s nose.”
And when you add in the influence of earmarks in research funding of these hard sciences- the ‘RegentU effect’ may be overcome. Thus proving that they are the true equals of the people who believe in fossils.
It’s a handy dandy degree in any republican administration, – don’t scoff.
Jumping on the poorest and most discriminated against students in a state is a crime. Duncan in Chicago and Rhee in DC have shown no progress using the standard GOP argument, namely: “it’s the union’s fault.”
It turns out that the colossal failure of the GOP in Bush, Bush and Reagan has not stopped the Obamas appetite for GOP tactics.
What’s wrong with these people?
I have read nothing about this school’s class sizes.
The data I’ve seen claim a direct, and the only, correlation between achievement in school & class size.
It would be better to cut the superintendant’s busget to to his salary & a car, and spend the saving on hiring teachers.
I was a board member in a school district and led the effort to cut the overhead per classroom from &70,000 per class to $50,000 per class without pulling any spending whatsopever from any school. The school superintendant quit becuse we cut his salary.
My view was, if your are not in front of the children, in the school, you are overhead.
I suspect the numbers reflect those parents who were trying in spite of the system — like the 7% proficiency must have contained kids who were still achieving, but they were few in number.
The school board which did the firing was elected by the community, including some of those parents who were trying. The problem, though, is that they don’t have the tools to deal with the real problems, let alone the tools to identify the real problems.
And this is where I get really angry with libertarians, who believe that individuals in our society have the right to screw up if they choose to do so, and that schools should be private, not public. We all pay for this attitude over the long run, in the form of incompetence. Our country was built on public schools from day one, since the Puritans brought the concept of public education with them. We wouldn’t have become the largest economy in the world with what was once an enviable standard of living and freedoms without that public education system.
The Republicans overtly, Obama by subterfuge, both work against the wage earners. Class Warfare is no longer to be measured by party affiliation, – we have crossed our Rubicon. Time to confront the reality and adjust our actions to deal with this new, humbling, but all too real paradigm.
Excellent, really. Businesses take the same kinds of measures when trying to improve their performance in terms of productivity and profitability; they cut overhead and invest in production improvements. In your example we are talking about investing in educational outcomes, and reducing anything which doesn’t directly improve outcomes. Now there’s shock doctrine I can get behind.
NCLB has been a drain on resources, btw; I know of a nearby school district which reduced one teaching position and put that teacher in charge of the NCLB reporting process since the reporting was detailed, demanding and required for compliance. In the mean time, the kids impacted had to deal with a higher student-to-teacher ratio. Is that screwed up or what?
“The part of Obama that gives me a glimmer of hope is his background as a **community** organizer. ”
I would humbly offer up the suggestion that you change the brand of tea leaves.
“But it’s hard to give it up, especially since nobody told us it was a one-time deal. Ironically, our decline based on class thievery soon became become the perfect condition for its own amplified replication, as the regressive movement in America, starting with Reagan, began marketing an exacerbation of this effect, masked as just its opposite and channeling the fear and rage of economic insecurity into hatred and violence toward brown people, gays, women, etc. Aided and abetted by an ‘opposition’ party that went from consternation to crash to concussion to confusion to compliance to co-optation to collaboration and then finally to clones, the process has been really quite remarkable for its diabolical ingeniousness and its near complete success. ”
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/03/07-3
Oddly, even perhaps alarmingly, a slightly longer excerpt from this article was flat out moderated out of existence on another thread. WTF?!?
And the reason for inserting this excerpt now is…? We’re talking about education, not certain what your point is and how it relates to education, specifically to Central Falls High School and parents’ role in education.
No idea why the excerpt was mod-ed in another post, but let me speculate that you might have used an amount which would have been in excess of Fair Use norms. Overlarge excerpts could be seen as violations of copyright and put this site at risk of legal action.
Compare NPR interview with Ravitch with that of Democracy Now – which will continue tomorrow, I think.
http://nprcheck2.blogspot.com/2010/03/ravishing-ravitch-vs-hearing-her-out.html
Book Salon up at the Mothership with James Bradley’s The Imperial Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War hosted by Sen. Burt Cohen
Looks like Kansas City is closing half the schools.
This is a crisis, not only for the teachers who were fired, but for the entire community, state, and nation.
To support the students, teachers and community of Central Falls and learn more about this crisis facing the community, you can visit http://www.centralfallskidsderservebetter.com. There is an online petition, and ways to get involved.
We need to do better, and we can if we work together.
http://www.centralfallskidsdervebetter.com
OMG. This kind of crap makes me wish there was a way for the feds to take over schools like the feds have certain businesses — but then we’d have Arne Duncan running them. Gah.
It looks as if education has been a lagging indicator of the problems we have in government. Nobody of any real value wants to serve in the public sector, so we end up with idiots as leaders. Leadership by default, in other words. And then they run the system into the ground. Doesn’t appear to matter if it’s the U.S. Senate or the local school system, but we don’t have a lot of competency in leadership.
“The latest possible solution for Kansas City is the plan Covington submitted to the school board last week that called for closing 29 out of 61 schools to eliminate a projected $50 million budget shortfall. Covington also has said he wants to cut about 700 of the district’s 3,000 jobs, including 285 teachers. The school board vote is Wednesday.
“The proposal has stunned the community.”
The same thing’s happening all over: LAUSD, Seattle, you name it. KC looks like a pretty bad case.
Neither of those links work, one of them contains spelling error, too.
I am reluctant to sign any petition without knowing more about the organization driving it; there are a lot of right-wing organizations which are stumping for charter schools under the guise of getting better education for kids. Simply do not believe that our kids’ education should be a profit center.
I never said anything about the failure occuring only at the high school level. I agree with you. I’m sure it started in grade school with the same teaching methods. Pass them along at any expense, whether or not they are prepared. Fail a few. It’s needed.
I’d like to see districts tell administrators that if they aren’t teaching, they don’t need the certificate, or, if they really want to keep it, they can teach at least one class a year.
Oh, I like that. Better yet, fill in as a sub at least once a week across the school system so they get a better handle on how kids are doing in all classes.
Rayne, I worked with a guy who did spend time making sure his kids did their homework, and trying to get the schools to pay attention to their needs – they were in the foster-care system for years – but what he ran into was administrators who preferred that parents not be involved because the parents might upset the administrative applecart by making them actually do their effing jobs. (The one he tangled with was very proud of having a PhD in education, but couldn’t seem to deal with people in the real world.)
I keep on wondering how much of this is because of how being an adult is actually frowned up nowadays.
The ad men want us all to be walking Ids, with a thin layer of Ego to fake adultness just enough to hold a job and make credit-card payments, but without the strength to withstand constant manipulation by Madison Avenue. Buy that GameBoy! Buy those pink Hello Kitty shoes! Feed your every impulse so long as we can make a buck from it!
Why do I feel like I just accidently stumbled on to the set of The View ?
Rayne, thanks for the diary! As a teacher I have a horse in this race. Just a few facts to correct some misunderstanding in some comments (data about the school, Central Falls High School, can be found here:
http://www.eride.ri.gov/reportcard/09/ReportCard.aspx?schCode=04108&schType=3
and here:
http://www.publicschoolreview.com/school_ov/school_id/71493
According to the 2009 School Report Card given by the Rhode Island Dept. of Education, Central Falls Senior High School graduation rate was 52.2% compared to the district average of 52.1% and a state average of 73.9%. The US national graduation rate is 71%. The average urban graduation nationally is 53%. The national suburban graduation rate is 71%.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/22/education/22dropout.html
Central Falls actually exceeded their target score of 75.0% proficient at English/Language Arts — a pretty impressive score for a school with a very high population of English Language Learners.
They missed their target in Mathematics (63.2%) by scoring an average of 52.8%. The subgroups that did not make the target were African-American, Students with Disabilities, and English Language Learners, although all the first 2 groups were within a 5 point margin; the ELL group was 16 points below target.
The school actually met 9 out of 13 targets set for them by NCLB and the Rhode Island Dept. of Education’s standards.
To paint the entire staff and faculty as lazy, incompetent, greedy teachers who don’t care about the students is offensively wrong. Under NCLB there is no wiggle room to show the growth of the other subgroups (White, Asian, Native American, Hispanic) who all made, or nearly made, target. NCLB is an all-or-nothing proposition.
The mean scores in math and ELA were equivalent to the district’s overall scores and were only 8 points below the state average in reading, 8 points below the state average in math and 0.8 below the state average in writing in grade 11. Hardly the vast depths of failure that the media and some unfortunate commenters have trumpeted here and elsewhere.
http://www.eride.ri.gov/reportcard/09/prof_reports/04/0404108/SchReTest040410811.pdf
The issue with contract negotiations is easy to explain also. The superintendent basically told the members of the union that they had to accept her imposed working conditions or face termination with no negotiations to take place. Agreement to her offer would mean setting a precedent that contract negotiations are not necessary and contracts can be imposed at will by superintendents with no recourse for the members of the bargaining unit, a very foolish offer to accept in these times of drastic budget cuts and loss of school funding sources.
It is always easy to scapegoat teachers, who have students for about 20% of the time during one week. There are 168 hours in a week. The average school day is 6.5 hours and that would mean the kids are actually in school only 32.5 hours a week. The other 135.5 hours are divided up between sleeping and family time (or not).
Rayne is right to call out the lack of accountability for parents who are in charge of their children the other 80% of the time but no politician will touch that with a 10 foot pole, since parents are voters and donors. So instead we decide, with Obama’s and Duncan’s blessing, to destroy the careers and livelihoods of around 100 school employees who willingly work in one of the toughest, most challenging schools in the state.
Funny that a recent study showed that Duncan’s antics in Chicago failed to produce the desired results — the schools where the staff and faculty were fired and replaced by “good” teachers in charter schools didn’t actually “fix” anything. And this report was produced by the group that supported Duncan’s initiatives and did the initial research for the project:
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/downloads/CPS.pdf
I find it particularly interesting that the Board of Education, the Superintendent and her staff, who actually are in charge of the schools in this district and who set all policies and approve all spending, were never considered for mass firings, not to mention the State Dept. of Education which is the ultimate CEO of all schools in the state. The buck stops lower on the totem pole, it seems.
“This should not be surprising. The blueprint of Renaissance 2010 [Duncan’s signature program is Chicago] lies in a report titled “Left Behind,” produced a year earlier by the Commercial Club of Chicago. The report mapped out a strategy for schools to more closely align with the goals of the business elite. Central to that strategy was the creation of 100 new charter schools, managed by for-profit businesses and freed of the city’s local school councils and teachers’ union—groups that historically have put the welfare of poor and minority students before that of the business sector.
Business leaders have long had influence over America’s schools. In the early 1900s, the business sector influenced how large school districts were consolidated and managed. In the late 1900s, and into the era of No Child Left Behind, the Business Roundtable (the top 300 business CEOs in America) influenced how policymakers narrowly defined “standards” and “accountability.” Today, public debates on education are too often framed by business principles, and certain assumptions go unquestioned as they gain dubious status as simply “common sense.” These include the assumption that improvement comes when schools are put into competition with one another, like businesses in a so-called free market.
“Duncan’s reforms are steeped in a free-market model of school reform, … but research does not support such initiatives.”
See, it is by DESIGN that the “too big to fail” bankers and corporate titans are not held accountable by any means while dedicated, self-sacrificing school teachers are to be made the sin offering of the current administration. It makes one weep.
You said:
Yeah. Where are those people the FIRST time their kid brings home an F on a paper? how about the first time they bring home an F on a report card?
That’s when the failure starts. Not eight to 12 years later after years and years of this repeatedly let-down. Not after missing all kinds of parent-teacher meeting opportunities, not after missing all the school board meetings, not after failing to cut off all the electronics in the household until the school work gets done over years and years.
The failure starts at home, and it can be stopped both at home and again at school in the first 3 to 5 years of school. By high school it’s really almost too late, because we are talking about populations of young adults who can walk away from school if they choose to.
And no, it’s not the tenured teachers and their unions who are the problem. Sit down and talk with a few of them some time about the average work day and the crap they have to deal with in order to get kids to pay attention and do the work.
Only in America do people complain about teachers; nearly every other culture (save for the worst of the third world) have respect for their teachers. It’s part of the systematic dumbing down that we bash educated professionals so consistently. And we never hold parents accountable except when it’s too late, like after little Johnnie has shot up the school.
There’s something called the “back” button. Feel free to use it if you’ve stumbled.
Rayne great article up until this point
“Some parents will complain that they don’t have the money to make sure their kids get better grades. But this doesn’t take money. It takes personal discipline, and without exercising personal discipline as an adult, kids won’t have role models and learn how to acquire personal discipline of their own.”
Find this paragraph really arrogant. Do you have a full time job? Have you ever struggled or do you come from a privileged background? You expressed some empathy earlier in your piece and then started blaming struggling parents later.
I know families in Appalachia who have two working parents working 50 or more hours a week making minimum wage. They can barely catch their breaths when they get home and pay their bills (which often exceed their paychecks) let alone help their kids with work that they barely understand.
Money may not be the issue, but having money can often provide the time for parents to spend time with their kids making sure their school work is being completed.
Socialist (gasp) Worker article on Obama Union bashing:
http://socialistworker.org/2010/03/03/answering-attacks-on-teachers
Um, you spent a lot of time asserting a string of problems that relate back to struggles in the household. It’s not hard to imagine where finances, time, and relational disruptions might be grossly getting in the way of parent activism… then you whipped out this little guy:
If both parents are working two jobs to get by, where is that time supposed to come from? What about a single-parent household where the child themselves is expected to work too, so the family can scrape by? If they can’t afford food, where in the hell is this computer with its internet access supposed to come from? Taking away cell phones and video games from kids, who don’t have those luxuries in the first place, hardly seems like a remedy; no?
Nearly one-third of the people in that city, Central Falls, are earning incomes below the federal poverty line. That’s more than double what students at Centennial High School in Gresham, OR are facing, and problems with time, money, and broken homes are already extreme enough to make an expectation of broad parent intervention pretty onerous.
You already know this though, so I don’t get the expectation. Grinding survival will trump children’s school responsibilities every single time.
The problems are a lot bigger than administrators, council, members, parents, teachers, and students.
Gotta agree with Leen and Nathan on this one. Yes, parents do need to be involved but how realistic this expectation is varies wildly from school to school, from family to family.
Plus, I’m wondering if parents know that they cannot afford college, they may not know there is financial assistance to send their kid to college, even if that was a goal. Many times it isn’t a goal because they’re going to expect their kid to get a job, if they don’t already have one, just to help make ends meet right now.
Not everyone is acquainted with the college prep track.
While I support Rayne’s commitment to her children and their schoolwork. Sounds like a privileged back ground.
Nothing wrong with that except when one is unable to imagine that there are millions of children who do not have a parent waiting for them when they get home. Just a T.V. and many do not have computers at home. In this part of Ohio (Appalachia) they figure that close to 50% of the kids do not have access to computers at home.
Is this tough for some to imagine?
Rayne have you ever thought about tutoring some of these kids who are struggling and the the parents are under the gun with work outside the home/
Education is yet another area where the Obama Administration has turned out to provide nothing but a bunch of pseudo-republican failed policies. As a candidate, he railed against the fallacies of NCLB approach, but on January 20, 2009, he embraced them with a vengeance. Hard to believe he has his head that far up his a**, but he does…
My folks were the first college-educated people in their families. My father literally chose the college he went to based on whether it had an entrance fee or not (the other school wanted 20 bucks – he went to the school which had no fee). They came from dirt-poor backgrounds, really hard-scrabble, and they managed to get through college. Dad actually shoveled snow to pay his way through school; after shoveling for hours every day, he’d study and help take care of me.
My parents worked separate shifts for years to ensure that four of us had a parent at home most of the time. Mom worked 3p-11pm and 11pm-7am shift as a nurse, while dad worked 8-5 as an engineer. We were latchkey kids for two hours a day once I was old enough to watch the younger ones. Homework was done immediately after school, before starting dinner and taking care of chores like laundry. There was no doubt in my household that education was the most important thing in our lives and that any C on a report card would be greeted with a grounding until the grade was elevated.
I’ve paid for my own college education out of my own pocket, and I’ve scraped by at times in my life on money from pop bottle returns. I know what it’s like to be poor. And I’ve helped raise a stepson when we didn’t have a lot of extra money, drove old ratty cars and did our own repairs on everything in order to make sure we had the money to make our mortgage and child support payments every month as well as buying school clothes and supplies. Conversely, we’ve also said no to a lot of things we could have done instead because it was more important to be home with kids than it was to be out partying with other young adults our age.
And right there is the biggest single problem I see with parents these days — even among my younger siblings who are raising young families of their own. Parents do not know how to say no to themselves, let alone no to their kids. They can’t say No, I don’t need a new cell phone, I don’t need to go out to dinner, and they can’t say, No, you can’t watch TV until your homework is done. It’s about personal discipline. If you’re going to have kids when you can’t afford them, then you’re going to have to have the discipline to care for them. Ultimately nobody else is responsible for their discipline except you, not even the school and teachers. School isn’t for discipline, it’s for education.
No, I’m not tutoring. There are programs available in our schools for this.
I work on other programs for kids, like coaching the robotics team. I also work with college students who are interning to develop political careers. Between these things and my political activism I do plenty; I do have to exercise personal discipline of my own and say no when it encroaches on my own kids’ time.
[edit: You know Leen, I'm torqued off. You really made a huge assumption about my background. You don't even have a clue about the scope of my personal life, only what you see in these little black-and-white boxes. I actually have helped a number of single mothers, some on an ongoing basis. And I know intimately that bad choices and toxic attitudes can and do make for a lifetime of crushing poverty for many Americans; I see it up close and personally. Don't ever presume to know a thing about my background.]
Jane Hamsher hosted
Please Welcome Randi Weingarten, President of the American Federation of Teachers
It was a wonderful discussion. I share with Randi that a dear friend who had taught in the New Orleans school district 35 years ago had been part of a team who started an after school program for parents who felt like they were academically unable to help their children, that they themselves did not have the skills needed.
“Leen March 4th, 2010 at 8:59 am 32A dear friend who is a retired teacher taught in a New Orleans school district 35 years ago. She said they made a concerted effort to provide classes for parents in the evening to help them help their children. She has shared that this program helped the kids finish homework, raise scores and set the parents more at ease with their own gaps in reading, math, etc.
Do you think after school or evening classes for parents helps students improve?
Also can you talk about the size of the classrooms at the “chronically troubled” school where the teachers were fired?
Here is Randi’s response to what took place in New Orleans
Randi Weingarten March 4th, 2010 at 9:04 am 40In response to Leen @ 32
The point of making schools centers of community where we can co-locate services like classes for parents is a great idea. We should have one stop shopping so art, music, after school programs, health and social services and programs for parents are at the same school in which their kids attend. That was a great idea in New Orleans, and we should do it more. I have seen schools really work for kids when these kind of services are coordinated or even done at the school site.
Class size is a very important proxy for personalizing and differentiating instruction
OKay Ive returned. Im in agreement with Leen and Nathan also.
Rayne, you do make some important points, but theres an undercurrent of privilege and condescension in your tone that quite frankly annoys me. Maybe its just naivete.
Are these teachers required to be bi-lingual too?
Sounds like you have worked hard and had two very caring and motivated parents. Are you now a stay at home parent?
You make a lot of great points about discipline etc. I know you are able to imagine that there are millions of kids who do not have parents who are as motivated or as caring as your parents were and you continue to be.
Some kids do have parents who care and do not have the time to sit with their kids. This is why after school programs are so critically important I have met parents in little Appalachian towns who are frazzled after long days at work making pathetic wages.
I do not come at this topic of caring for children, homework etc from a naive perspective. I had two working class (card carrying union members) parents who would drag themselves home (I was the oldest kid in a large Catholic family) to dinner made (I often made the dinners) and a house filled with kids issues. There was laundry to be done, lawns to be mowed, newspapers to be delivered etc etc.
My parents were overwhelmed as so many parents are these days.
I raised 3 daughters (who are now all adults) and did much of this on my own due to ex having addiction issues. I focused, pushed, encouraged my kids like you are doing Rayne to finish homework, complete projects, and excel. All 3 qualified for partial to full scholarships to terrific schools (small colleges give the best packages).
But I am still able to understand that not all families or parents are able to provide their children with this kind of support.
I think after school programs focused on parents academic weaknesses is so important. Done with encouragement, support and understanding for how often academic failings are cyclical.
I was a high school teacher. The parents who came to Open House were the ones whose kids were doing well. The at-risk kids’ parents I called at home and sent notes to never–NEVER–came in to see me.
It was the spoiled kids from somewhat more well-off than average families who were the most grievous burden. The kids were entitled little shits who could count on their parents to raise hell to the principal whenever the kids were caught stealing, starting fires, or committing serial sexual abuse and bullying harassment. Disrupting class time as a disciplinary issue requiring a parental call-back or a visit with the teacher never even made it up on the radar screen.
School serves as a terrific exercise in gaming the system, doing as little as possible and getting away with it, dodging responsibility for shit like cheating, playing cynically on parents’ own overinflated sense of entitlement and ill-remembered experience with public education to divide and pit natural allies in a commonwealth end3eavor–education– against each other.
Looking at the ungovernable mess our nation has become, I’d say school as figured above just flat-out works. Just not for anything good.
Now this is another matter. In Ohio the amount of money spent on each student is not the same in each district. If you are in a wealthy neighborhood or district in Ohio a student may have 12,ooo spent on them and in a poorer district the kid may only have 8,ooo spent on them.
It has been determined by Ohio’s Supreme Court that this is unconstitutional but this disproportionate distribution of educational funding still goes on in Ohio. Another strike against poorer less privileged kids.
With Governor Strickland taking this issue by the horns things are moving a bit
“Volume 4, Number 7
Editor’s Note: No one can really know whether the Ohio Supreme Court that declared the state’s K-12 school funding system unconstitutional in 2002 would think that the new funding system in House Bill 1 meets the constitutionality test. That’s because the court, in its final major ruling in the long-running DeRolph v. Ohio, also took itself out of the case, effectively ending it. But the issues surrounding the case have lingered since then, leaving the state in a perpetual dither about whether every student has the resources he or she needs to achieve. With sweeping new education and funding reforms passed by the Ohio General Assembly this summer, the question remains whether these reforms have brought constitutionality to the Ohio school funding process. Perhaps the final arbiter of the case should be William Phillis, the executive director of the Ohio Coalition for Equity and Adequacy of School Funding, the group that backed the plaintiffs who sued the state nearly 20 years ago. Now that the reforms are in place, we asked him to give his ruling on whether the state has met the mark set in DeRolph.”
My oldest daughter is a teacher in Colorado she reports similar situations. Although she does say that she tries really hard to make the parents of at risk kids feel really welcome and let’s them know never to be afraid to share if they are unable to help their kids with their work. (gets quite a few phone calls at night from some of these parents asking questions about the homework and my daughter spends the time with them on the phone (many do not have computers) explaining the work. Their school district is looking into starting a program to help parents so that they can help their kids..
When you talk about the “privileged.” Makes me think of my youngest daughters (who is in her last year of college in Boulder) and her roommates. All three roommates who are really wonderful young people have six parents who are Doctors or lawyers. My daughter jumped through all of the hoops, followed all of the rules to get in state status (brought down the tuition considerably) All three of her roommates lied and figured out how to get in state tuition by claiming they were independent of their parents (complete lies),borrowed on their own, and then were able to get in state status. All three sets of parents make 250,ooo-350,000 combined incomes. I make 35,ooo a year and these privileged kids are paying the same tuition that we are paying.
These kids parents all plan on paying back their kids loans within the first year after their kids graduate. Often the rich and privileged know how to game the system much better than the peasant class. And they feel fine doing it
NoI did not assume. I asked relevant and logical questions.
I clearly hear that you have struggled in your life. But
Have you been able to be a stay at home parent?
I’m torn on this. I live in the KC suburbs. I used to live in KC proper, but we moved so that our kids wouldn’t be in that school system. So, you could lay some blame at our feet for the state of that school district. If enough people who have the resources move, the district suffers. We are well educated and, although not wealthy by any means, we are better off than many. We were fortunate enough to be able to make that choice and from a personal point of view there was no debate: we knew our kids would be better off in another district. But most people don’t have that choice. (Incidentally, KC is talking about closing so many schools because they are now 1/2 empty. I’m not saying I’m all for their plan, but it’s not all as draconian as it might sound without details).
Even though we now live in a suburb with decent schools, I’m not happy. Like Rayne, I resent the time lost every year due to testing. The entire first QUARTER of every year is used to review what the kids were supposed to have learned the previous year. My kids did learn it and don’t need the refresher, so they sit idly for an entire quarter. That really burns me. And then come spring there is the campaign for test preparation. Figure that of the school year about 1/3 – 40% is review or just for testing. No wonder we aren’t competitive on a world level!
Several years ago I was invited by my school district to participate in a focus group on special education. I was invited because I had a special needs child. There were other similar groups looking at other problems within the district. Among the parents in my group were a single mother of limited means and an executive at a major oil company. The subject of parental involvement came up as it always does in these discussions. When it was my turn I said that I would gladly participate in a dialogue with the school but I was not interested in being preached to or talked down to. The administraters present were speechless while every parent understood what I was saying and agreed with me.
The district I live in is largely middle and upper middle class but does have several elementary schools designated “economically disadvantaged”. We have tried to establish cub scout programs in these schools which invariably fail after a year or two. They fail because we are unable to retain sufficient adult leadership. We also struggle getting those that are willing to the required adult training classes. The confict is universally the demands of their jobs. In many cases, more than one job. These people work in retail sales and other jobs that do not conform nicely to a 9 to 5 schedule. In many cases they work two jobs to earn less than I do working one. Instead of doing homework, their older kids are feeding, bathing and supervising younger ones.
I commend the author for her attention to her children’s education but she clearly has the good fortune to be home in the evening. Is not providing a roof and something to eat not a parent’s first responsibility, even if it means waitressing at Denny’s while your kids should be doing their homework?
Even in comfortable middle class school districts we cling to a curriculum designed a hundred years ago to feed assembly line workers to manufacturing plants while adhering to a schedule designed 200 years ago to accomodae the needs of an agrarian society. Challenging these norms is met with substantial resistance even in schools that appear to be performing well.
“we cannot solve problems with same level of thinking that created them to begin wtih”
“School serves as a terrific exercise in gaming the system, doing as little as possible and getting away with it, dodging responsibility for shit like cheating….”
We are clearly preparing the privledged few for careers on Wall Street!
Excellent after school programs are so important for kids who do not have the good fortune to have a parent at home waiting and willing to help them. I salute Rayne for her commitment. But many kids do not have this situation.
After school programs, programs for parents in the evening that will help them learn how to help their kids. Many of these parents need someone to call for help, and they need to feel o.k. (so many feel ashamed) about asking for that help…just as the kids do.
bingo. When I challenged these kids and what they were doing they all came at it from a superior we deserve it sort of attitude. They are truly in training for Wall Street. Grow up thinking it is perfectly acceptable for them to scam the system.
Getting computers (on loan or something) into the homes of kids at risk is also so important. There is a huge tech divide out there
Rayne “And where are the parents in Central Falls? Why was performance allowed to lag so badly that their representatives on the school board had to take such dramatic action? Why weren’t parents intervening far earlier by becoming more actively involved in the complaint process rather than waiting for the school board to do it for them?”
This is a question the MSM should be digging into? Are the parents working? Working two jobs?
You said,
That certainly looks like an assumption to me.
You’re loaded with all kinds of suggestions, Leen. Why don’t you do something with them and then come back and tell us what kind of success you’ve had.
Sometimes the reason programs can’t find sufficient adult leadership isn’t because people are working. Sometimes it’s because other parents view these programs as no-cost after-school dumping grounds for kids who have absolutely no interest in the programs. And sometimes it’s because the kids are challenging and the effort proves very unsatisfactory for the adults.
Been there, done that. Had a competitive robotics program one year which parents undermined by sending kids to it as if it was daycare, really hurt the kids who were in the program for the right reasons and struggled with their submission to a competition because the other kids continually shredded their work.
Oh, and the “good fortune” you believe I have is a deliberate choice. My spouse travels a lot and I work from my home office. We could both do the 8-to-5 drone stuff, but that would mean my kids would probably have to change schools more frequently and they’d be on their own more frequently (and his employees would get pink slips after the business got shuttered). You may argue that some people don’t have the luxury of choice, but they frequently do and don’t realize it, or they don’t want to make any personal sacrifices which may come with certain choices. I gave up a sure thing with regard to my career path in order to be here; the “good fortune” came at a price.
fixt.
on the schooling thing, the biggest diff in my life was Australia. the answers were in the books. homework didn’t count toward final grades.. exams and projects were the most important, as was the last year in school.
(learned more engineering (matsci/chem/physics) in ausi HS than in the first 2 years of us collage for engineering)
Amen!!!!
My daughter teaches high school math in a poor school district in Lynchburg, VA. She loves kids, and loves math, but will be quitting teaching after three years. She has 5 classes per day, each of about 35 students. The majority of her students are between one and five grade levels behind. A significant portion of them live with grandparents, foster parents, or in a govt “home”. They are overwhelmingly poor, on street or pschy drugs, angry, abused, and hating the world. Now, how the hell is she supposed to teach these kids math???? It’s ridiculous. The parents don’t return phone calls to her, the kids tell her to “suck my dick”, she’s been threatened with violence, etc, etc, etc. Then, of course, there are the other students who are trying to learn while all of this is going on. It’s really frustrating for her and the students.
Until and unless society gets sorted out enough so that people stop having kids they can’t take responsibility for….we as a society need to bypass the parents and do it for them. Poor kids need to have good protein/veggie/carb based breakfast/lunch/dinners provided at the school. All public schools need to put back music, band, theatre, and phys ed programs. First of all it gets kids creative juices flowing, and secondly, what better way to keep them out of trouble after school??? Classrooms should be no larger than 15 students per teacher…and there should be a dedicated tutor in each classroom so that any problems get caught pronto before someone ends up 5 grades behind and hopeless!
Teachers educate the next generation…they should be paid a wage commensurate with the value that they provide to society. They should have good healthcare benefits, good vacation benefits, and a good wage. A starting wage in Los Angeles should be $50,000.00/yr, moving up every year. After 10 years they should be making atleast $100,000.00/yr. English as a 2nd language should be eradicated. This is America, we speak English. English is spoken worldwide by business people, educators, etc, etc. Kids need to speak English bottom line. They go in to a special class to learn English, when they are done, then they get tested and put into the appropriate grade level to continue with their education. You don’t want your kid a yr or two behind, then teach them English before they get to school. If the kids an unruly asshole, they kicked out and that’s that. They go to a school for problem students, they have no business being in a learning environment if they aren’t there to learn. If you have a teacher that clearly doesn’t give a shit, or isn’t qualified in some capacity….goodbye. Teachers don’t have any business in a learning environment if they aren’t teaching effectively.
My mother, both of my grandparents, and my g-grandmother all taught in the public school system. They all said it was wonderful, heartbreaking, fulfilling, terrifying, frustrating, and rewarding!!!!! I think that’s the nature of the business. You are dealing with young people who have good homes, bad homes, good intentions, bad intentions, they’re smart, they’re not so smart, etc, etc. They are people. However, so as not to become a savage, theocratic, oppressive country it is VITAL that we educate the hell out of our students to the best of our ability. If we as a society have to feed, clothe, and house some of those kids…so be it….what are the real options???? Bigger jails, bigger prisons, more nasty republicans elected into office!! More racism, less health and happiness? It doesn’t bode well for us a society or country to not take care of our own.
I agree with the author that parents should make sure that their children get what they need, and insist that they go to school and learn, etc, etc. That’s how I raised my kids and I’m a big believer in it. I live in Los Angeles and we have shitty schools so I sent my kids to very expensive private schools. I always wanted a 3rd child, but could never make enough money to do so without detracting from what I was able to provide for the two I already had. So I didn’t have any more children. I used birth control…and I had an abortion. It was the right thing to do. But until people are a little more rational in their reproductive choices and actions, somebody has to take care of the children.
The government is broken. It’s run by Corp America, idiots, and criminals (both sides of the aisle). It’s the reason I am all for Charter Schools and private schools. I think we should do everything I listed above for public schools, but the government isn’t going to do that. We have Dems in Congress/Senate/WH and still can’t do anything worth a shit for the everyday person in this country. So don’t denigrate Charters and Privates as educational options. Somehow these kids have to be educated.
Well, good luck to you who still have kids in school! I’m glad it’s over for me. My daughter is going back to college and into medicine. (pediatrics, as she loves kids!) BTW…we have a little English grandbaby who is now 7 months old…and cutest child ever, of course!!!! She was born in the COMMUNIST/SOCIALIST/DEATH PANEL loving NHS English healthcare system. Her mommy had to have a C-section and they were in the hospital for a few days. Didn’t cost a cent and they got lovely care. A Nurse came to the house every week for the first month to help on breastfeeding, to check baby health/weight/feeding/etc. So nice for the new mommy not to have to bundle up baby and go to a doc office. Again, didn’t cost a cent. The new mommy is married and her husband is supporting her and baby in a lovely manner. They have no money problems at all. But….she gets 400lbs/mo in mommy allowance for the first 6 months, because that’s how they roll in England with new mothers. She is also eligible for full dental benefits for the first yr of babies life, so she has gotten all her dental work done, including some cosmetic resurfacing! For FREE!!
I don’t know….but living under a socialist/communist/dictator regime sounds pretty good to me!!
for Americans: 400 British pounds = 605.84 U.S. dollars
http://www.google.com/search?q=400+GBP+in+USD
” I gave up a sure thing with regard to my career path in order to be here; the “good fortune” came at a price…”
I too took a substantial pay cut in choosing my family over my career and the costs have been great but the benefits even greater. But I still make more working 25 hours a week than many of those i am talking about make in 60.
i am teaching two, one hour enrichment courses at my son’s high school. i am on the BOD of his recreational basketball league in addition to coaching and hold several volunteer positions in BSA. None of this would have been possible if I were spending 12 to 15 nights a month in a hotel room.
My apologies for the typos in the site: http://www.centralfallskidsdeservebetter.com/
I believe this is a site created by the Teacher’s Union. No right wing organization!
So, your theory is that the teachers are never wrong? LOL. BTW, I never said that the parents don’t share in the blame, or that the children are little angels. All parties are responsible, but the discussion here centers around the failure of the teachers. Arguing that the parents are at fault won’t exonerate the dead wood in the school system.
I am not the one claiming
“Some parents will complain that they don’t have the money to make sure their kids get better grades. But this doesn’t take money. It takes personal discipline, and without exercising personal discipline as an adult, kids won’t have role models and learn how to acquire personal discipline of their own.”
You are the person making such arrogant claims.
And my dear the hours that I have put in with children who have less than.
access are too many to count. Too bad you are incapable of truly reflecting on your own arrogance.
Hope you take some of your time and check out what it is really like for people who work outside the home and do not have the money or time to be waiting for their children at the kitchen table when they come home from school.
Sounds like a perfect opportunity for volunteering to help these kids
Teachers are the easy scapegoat. Instead of looking at the numbers in the classroom, after school programs, pay of the teachers versus hours put in, funding cuts, economic conditions of the area, working situation of the parents (minimum wage jobs). Often no one at home.
Blame the teachers instead of examining the whole picture
Rayne I apologize if you were insulted by my questions. Felt your post was incredible and pointed out some outstanding points as I stated. But also felt that it did get a bit arrogant in places. Asked logical questions in response to some of your assertions.
Again I repeat that your example of being focused on your children and their academic experience is wonderful. But really do believe that there are many parents who really wish they did had the time to help their children but are overwhelmed working and paying bills, etc. Along with some parents inability to help their children because they are often ashamed about their own academic weaknesses.
Peace
She does volunteer. She does after school one on one tutoring for any student who wants the help. This is a daily offer of 2-3/hrs per day.