In the months following the end of George W. Bush’s disastrous term as President, my Congressional colleagues and President Barack Obama worked tirelessly to create an economic recovery plan that could begin the difficult process of creating jobs and rebuilding our economy. Had I been in Congress at the time, I would have gladly voted for the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, and as a recent New York Times article by Jackie Calmes and Michael Cooper reveals, "the accumulation of hard data and real-life experience has allowed more dispassionate analysts to reach a consensus that the stimulus package, messy as it is, is working."
They continue: "The legislation, a variety of economists say, is helping an economy in free fall a year ago to grow again and shed fewer jobs than it otherwise would. Mr. Obama’s promise to "save or create" about 3.5 million jobs by the end of 2010 is roughly on track, though far more jobs are being saved than created, especially among states and cities using their money to avoid cutting teachers, police officers and other workers."
"It was worth doing — it’s made a difference," Nigel Gault, chief economist at IHS Global Insight, a financial forecasting and analysis group, explained in the article. "I don’t think it’s right to look at it by saying, ‘Well, the economy is still doing extremely badly, therefore the stimulus didn’t work.’ I’m afraid the answer is, yes, we did badly but we would have done even worse without the stimulus."
So despite the consternation of some pundits, it turns out the President was right. Stimulus relief worked, and Democrats in Congress keep working. Since I joined Congress earlier this month, my House colleagues and I have backed a number of bills that will strengthen small businesses and create more jobs.
For example, H.R. 3738 by Congressman Glenn Nye (D-Virginia) would offer $250 million in financing to help early-stage small businesses in technology sectors, and with loan returns, it’s self-financing. Another bill, H.R. 3014 by Congresswoman Kathleen Dahlkemper (D-Pennsylvania), would offer loan guarantees to small business health professionals to be used for the acquisition and installation of health information technology. Another good bill, H.R. 3737 by Congressman Brad Ellsworth (D-Indiana), would expand small business microloan eligibility and lending limits while lowering interest rates. When constituents ask me what I’ve done to help fix our economy at my three district town halls on December 5th, these are some of the bills I will highlight.
Like President Franklin D. Roosevelt and the New Deal Democrats before us, we’ve inherited a mess from a Republican administration, and we’re picking up the pieces to rebuild our economy, brick by brick, job by job, solar panel by solar panel. But if you listened to some of the pundits, you’d think President Obama and Congressional Democrats were responsible for our present economic downturn.
Some people seem to forget that President Bush turned President Bill Clinton’s $559 billion surplus into a $1.2 trillion deficit. Indeed, President Bush spent more taxpayer money than any of his six immediate predecessors, including President Lyndon B. Johnson. Under President Clinton, real discretionary spending increased by 0.1 percent. Under President Bush, real discretionary spending increased by 44 percent. To date, the Iraq War alone has cost the country more than $700 billion, and President Bush’s tax cuts for the wealthiest five percent of Americans cost more than $1.3 trillion.
The American people have made it clear that they prefer Democratic solutions to economic crisis. They want a proactive commitment to job creation, and they know that the federal government is able to provide some relief to local schools, job training programs, and senior centers devastated by state and local budget cuts.
Over the coming months, my colleagues and I will be back in Washington to try and bring some additional relief to American workers. There are plenty of good bills on the table that will improve the climate for small businesses, reinvest in jobs-creating infrastructure, provide incentives for research and the creation of green jobs, and offer targeted tax assistance for working and middle class Americans. We can’t afford to wait.
Congressman John Garamendi (D-Walnut Creek) represents California’s 10th Congressional District. You can follow Congressman John Garamendi on his new Twitter and Facebook accounts.



23 Comments




We need direct jobs, sir. This contracting culture isn’t creating jobs fast enough — we need government actually hiring people. And aid to states, before ours implodes. California faces dire straits ahead, as you well know; only direct aid can save our education, first responder, and public health jobs.
Please also push for a direct stimulus of $750 to Social Security and disability recipients: this money goes directly into the economy. Anyone who thinks these Americans are food secure hasn’t been to a food bank lately. People are hurting, and without a COLA next year, more will hurt too.
Thank you for your service to California and the United States of America.
This 3.5 million number means nothing. You could as easily say that because 138 million Americans are currently employed that Obama has saved 138 million jobs.
I hate these “Whatever we did no matter how dumb or wasteful was better than doing nothing” arguments. What we needed was not something better than nothing but intelligent policy. The original stimulus needed to be around a trillion a year and much better structured. As economic conditions continue to deteriorate, the price of effective stimulus is now somewhere in the $1.3-1.5 trillion a year range.
As of Oct. 30, the Recovery.gov site lists 640,329 jobs saved or created. This is a far cry from 3.5 million. Indeed it would cover only 5 months of increases in the working population due to natural population growth.
And of course even 3.5 million, even if this were a real number, is a drop in the bucket. We have 15.7 million unemployed. 27 million un- or under employed.
Nomi Prins calculates the size of the current bailout to banks at $14.1 trillion. Call it $13.3 trillion because she includes the original stimulus in this figure. One-tenth of this is about what we would need each year to address our unemployment problems.
I applaud Rep. Garamendi’s efforts to create jobs. I do not applaud his throwing Obama talking points around and expect us to accept them uncritically. The truth is that Obama has done next to nothing on jobs. His scheduling a conference next month on jobs shows how far behind the curve he is on this. We don’t need another stupid conference. We need action.
Congressman, I do so hope your optimism is justified. As one of the long term unemployed, I have been despairing of anything for quite some time.
I still try to find decent employment but after five years, I don’t think you can blame me for being a bit skeptical when I see the dance in DC that does nothing but please the Banksters and the hell with the voters.
lets hear it for those top down green shoots… yay… Re-inflating that bubble, outsourcing our new green jobs -windmills to China. yah… as long as the GDP says the rich are growing richer doesn’t equal jobs. Monopolies of all types have to be busted up if we are going to have an environment where new small businesses can grow.
Holding stimulus money back from states for education unless they agree to privatize some of their schools is neoliberal capitalistic blackmail, and this is Obama’s policy. The race to the bottom.. yay…
http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/16020
Congressman, I hope you come back and respond to the comments here.
Thanks for reappearing.
Congressman,
The three top banks are giving out $30 billion in holiday bonuses.
How awesomely insulting is that, as more and more Americans struggle to survive without jobs, without homes, without food?
The
millionaires’billionaires’ soon-to-be trillionaires’ club, the top 1% of this country, the oligarchs, have 95% of the wealth, with MORE TO COME!!!!The Democrats and President betrayed us, because they are not doing enough to undo the injustices, gross injustices, of the Bush regime. To focus on one or two MAJOR issues: our government took our taxpayer dollars and gave them to the economic creators of the crises to rescue THEM with the rationalization that eventually they would trickle down help to us, which they are NOT doing. And the Obama government chose a team that was made up of the deregulators that caused the crises.
And Bush and now Obama are taking the taxpayer dollars to wage wars from corporate aggrandizing agendas in which the adult children of the working class die or become severely psychologically and/or physically wounded, as they fight the working class or lower classes of other countries whose leadership oligarchs are also cashing in.
Please respond to this. Thank you.
Thanks for coming back, Congressman. I, too, hope to see your optimism borne out.
“I applaud Rep. Garamendi’s efforts to create jobs. I do not applaud his throwing Obama talking points around and expect us to accept them uncritically.” ; concur completely and wonder why Rep. Garamendi doesn’t do anything but post here and not respond to comments? suspect it is because he, like all of the Congress critters, is spending two days a week raising funds for re-election purposes.
WHO (I know the answer BTW) is pushing for federal funding of all federal elections Representative Garamendi?
Actually, Congressman, you should be glad you weren’t around to vote for the Stimulus. Your constituents might just remember that the CBO predicted the recession would end in the second half of 2009 and want to know why we spent a trillion dollars on something that was expected to happen anyway.
Hey Teddy,
The stimulus package did provide some direct relief, particularly for schools, and I’m with you on the need to maintain teachers and support staff. In Contra Costa County, portions of which I represent, more than $110 million is going to K-12 public schools, and statewide, the estimated education allotment will be $11.8 billion.
Many of the transportation projects in the stimulus (and omnibus transportation legislation I will work on over the coming year as a member of the House Transportation & Infrastructure Committee) will involve direct hires for infrastructure construction as well. From a policymaker’s perspective, transportation projects are attractive engines of job growth, because good roads and reliable public transportation are good for business and commuters, and because it’s simply easier to keep track of the number of jobs directly created by federal relief.
As for public health jobs, most of the potential employers and most of the need for new hires are by definition in the private sector, although it’s worth noting that roughly two-thirds of all hospitals in the U.S. are non-profit (another 20% are public).
I’m flexible on the precise dollar amount, but I agree on the importance of cost of living adjustments for Social Security and those with significant disability. Some ARRA funds went to the Social Security Administration to speed up claims processing, but you’re right, we can and should do more on this front. If you have specific legislation in mind, please feel free to call my DC office.
Hello Hugh,
The New York Times interviewed a number of economists for their story, and they came to the conclusion that we are on track for roughly 3.5 million saved or created from ARRA. The Great Depression didn’t end during FDR’s first year in office either. In my home state of California, less than half of all stimulus funds have been distributed to date, and some businesses are hiring in anticipation of receiving relief dollars. ARRA was not perfect, but economic development is occurring and the pace is picking up. ARRA was historic legislation that has helped stabilize our economy and directly created or saved jobs for hundreds of thousands of people to date (indirect jobs created by stimulus is a worthy separate conversation although difficult to calculate). And again, we’re far from done with jobs legislation.
Hello dakine01,
I wish you the best of luck in your job search. It might not be much comfort, but I assure you that job creation is my #1 priority
I support a speedy withdraw from Iraq and oppose the troop escalation in Afghanistan. In Iraq, we’ve spent more than $700 billion and more than 4,300 American lives, and it’s got to stop. You are also very correct to point out that for the brave men and women in a combat zone, the mental and physical scars of war continue long after the war is over. For all my remaining days, I will never forget the devastation I saw when I provided emergency relief in Ethiopia following a famine partially instigated by civil war in the 1980s. With every vote I cast that has an impact on foreign policy, I will remember the site of innocent children dying before my eyes.
I also find it disturbing that many bailed out banks seem intent on distributing huge bonuses to their executives. I have no control over what happened before I arrived in Congress, but I do have a say on the future. My primary goal is to create and support legislation that will put our people back to work, and I expect to take on consumer protection and financial regulation issues in Congress.
Thank you Jason.
Wow, you are back, Congressman!
I haven’t followed your thread, but thank you for visiting, checking back, engaging. What a fine example you are setting.
I agree with Hugh almost entirely on this with the exception that I think the original stimulus package should have been 1.6 trillion, mostly focused on saving state-level jobs and new jobs around re-inventing the economy. Congress should also have prohibited any stimulus funds and manufacturing jobs from going overeas through contracts.
I think the emphasis we see shaping up now on balancing the budget is ridiculous. We should not even be thinking about budget balancing until this depression is done and our unemployed people are back to work. Once that’s done there will plenty of tax money flowing into the Government to reduce the deficit, and we won’t have to worry about deficit neutrality.
Btw, it’s apparent now that the Administration has made the decision to escalate in Afghanistan. If you vote for this expenditure that we can’t afford, please don’t come back to us later crying that we can’t afford to incur deficits for making new jobs, funding health care reform, education reform, new infrastructure, or new alternative energy investments. As long as Congress is wasting $2 – 3 Trillion over 10 years on foreign wars, I don’t want to hear about how this nation is just too poor to afford the public investments we need. If we’re too poor it’s only because you folks won’t tax the wealthy and stop the wars.
You need to work to re-institute progressive taxation now! And you also need to stop the wars. They’re not improving our national security. They’re decreasing it. And they’re taking Government expenditures and making them overseas.
Sir You are the problem, because the Congress has caused every prolem this Country has and not fixed one.
Trying to make people believe that the short term jobs created by the stymulus are something to celebrate, should be cause for impeachment.
Why don’t You and your buds in the Congress put this Country back to work, instead of playing games and talking like you’ve done a great job for us.
Get us off foreign oil in two years using existing fuels. Start building water power to replace the coal fired power plants, and you wouldn’t need cap and trade. Fix all of our infrastructure in two years. See there are things that would do it with less money tha you have already spent.
Fet off your ass and do something instead of trying to make us believe you guys are doing great.
Congressman, can I broach another major issue here for you if and when you revisit?
I am an advocate for single payer medicare for all. And the cronyism brought about by excessive lobbying of corporations is now blocking a revolutionary … or more evolutionary … opportunity for the US to finally join the rest of the industrial nations in providing UNIVERSAL health care for all. It would save $400 billion a year instead of costing us just under $1 trillion in 10 years. It would enhance quality of health care. It would make it what it should be — a human and civil right.
But can the group think of Congress, both Houses, so dependent on lobby money for campaign financing, so enmeshed with lobbies and their overwhelming donations, even fathom of a health care system that is universal. To say that is in our future is to ignore the people now dying prematurely and those suffering from trying to survive without medical support.
It would be a fiscal answer and a moral answer for what is happening now and would not postpone a definite crisis of unsustainability that will happen after the “reform” with its serious problems and injustices eventually kicks in.
I asked once in a diary if the President or a member of Congress knew that if their stance on health care would help save 45,000 lives a year and make health care in this country humane and affordable, would they jeopardize their job security to save those lives and enhance all citizens lives in this country by bucking the status quo prsssure of a party ignoring the commonn good? That would be a mighty reward. Would it be worth it to be a one termer, to say so be it but to go the moral way not the pragmatic way, either as Prez or Congress person. I think a lot of ordinary Americans would say yes in a heartbeat. Even to save one person. Congress and Prez ask Americans to risk their lives in war. Would they sacrifice a job, not even a life, for their mandate as reps and caretakers of their real constituents, the citizens, not the corporations with their amoral profit agendas?
I have been researchng the Rolls Royce “government-socialized” type health care you in Congress have, not only for this term, but now forever once you are in that exclusive club. How can the Congress people who enjoy such luxurious, nurturing plans, doom others to have inadequate, skimpy ones? There is a terrible gated-community exceptionalism coming out of our leadership in Washington. Celebrated and not called out by the elitist media.
Can you help me grasp this and even offer any suggestions for how we as advocates for universal health care can raise the consciousness of our leaders, who feel so lost to us, and to our over-trusting of said leadership fellow citizens?
This statement certainly gives me great hope in your capacity for empathy, Congressman. May you be the Johnny Appleseed of empathy for our Congress. That clearly became a targeted attribute for Repubs during SC hearings. As if Dems should apologize and not celebrate such capacity.
well said, lets.
Congressman, I have to give you points for having the guts to post here, where criticism will flow, uncensored, unless it is singularly rude and way off-topic.
Have you read Arianna Huffington’s recent post about the importance of creating new jobs (with some suggestions on how!) in which she asks if the ongoing unemployment crisis will become Barack Obama’s Katrina?
I think it’s a question worth asking. I posted an excerpt of her post myself, along with a two-part video linking the selling out of national security with the outsourcing of industrial jobs. Mind-boggling…