The left has fought tooth and nail as the proliferation of surveillance devices, both privately and publicly installed, continues apace.
I believe that this is an error.
One, we’ll never roll back the surveillance devices because they give to their controllers the irresistible superpowers of being in more than one place at once, and being invisible.
Two, we should welcome, not oppose universal surveillance.
The recent importance of chance police video of George Zimmerman has highlighted, not for the first time, the crucial evidentiary material contained in the records of such surveillance as to which the government is willingly (or inadvertently) subject.
Per contra, whole police departments have gone to court to oppose citizen cell phone videos conducted in the public streets.
To date, law enforcement, who would put cameras everywhere, fights cameras in the one place an honest cop wants it-the interrogation room, so he cannot later be accused of improper force.
This is another of the super powers of surveillance-the power to disambiguate. Instead of the victims word against the aggressor, the camera/recorder/gunshot locator, etc, brings clarity out of attempted perjury.
Viva Surveillance, may it be frequent, pervasive, and UBIQUITOUS
Thus, complete transparency in government. Nothing is said or done outside the public eye.
If they want to watch us, we get to watch them.
Speaking as a retired stripper, it’s only fair.
No shame in our game, no shame in theirs.




64 Comments

The global surveillance camp – sounds like hell.
No, you have to embrace the transparency…(Think Gauze Shirts…)
Can the guys at least wear codpieces?
What part of “no shame” are you having trouble with…
1984
One problem… the bad guys are the ones who usually remember to erase the evidence.
I’ll bet $10 the inventor of the shredder was right winger.
Rex: sounds like you’ve arrived at the same point David Brin did, with his “Transparent Society“, over a decade ago.
In a nutshell: the powerful are able to watch US, no matter how we object. The choice is whether WE can watch the powerful.
Wikileaks is a step in that direction.
If it is OK for them to video then it is only fair that we video their every move!!
Not exactly-in 1984 the cameras only went one way
Shredders? SHREDDERS? SHREDDERS??!!”
Har, har, har. Legacy media….
Now if you’re talkin’ serious magnetic fields, we gotta problem.
I did say live “streams”, right?
Not only fair, it is essential.
W-leaks is the beacon.
Privacy more often cloaks the enemies of the people in their crimes than the people in their indulgences.
Let’s expose our indulgences in return for exposing their crimes. It’s a good deal for us.
I have become illiterate with the passage of tinme…never heard of him till your post, notwithstanding he wrote The Postman, of which I have heard.
What a dolt! (me, not him.)
thanx, btw…
It has nothing to do with shame. It’s a question of esthetics.
So this is a variation on the old “I’ll show you mine if you show me yours” thing?
This is very un-FDL-like.
To play the hand you’re dealt and not complain about it?
And then game it?
It’s revolutionary.
Well, as we all know, the head…droner…is not a republican. And his administration is ensuring that Bradley Manning is getting worse treatment than some of our military who’ve killed innocent Iraqis and Afghans.
And he seems to have no qualms at all about having “Homeland Security” up our butts like a giant proctoscope.
Oh. I’d post my visual refutation (apologia??) but this is a family site…I do have testimonials…
Technology is not by itself evil. It depends on what class it serves. At this time in history it seems to be serving the ruling class but that can all change and then technology will be revolutionary.
The “tell” was when they backed off the “war on terror” but bought right into
FatherlandHomeland SecurityAlways worked for me…
You can have a new and different hand to play? Cool, sign me up. Til then, we have no real choice.
We may have to get over afew neuroses, but that’s probably to the good.
Hypocrisy hates cameras…
Lately, at least when it comes to the technology of the booby trap, technology has been all on the side of the trappers, not the boobies…
I strongly oppose the proliferation of surveillance cameras. The pros do not outweigh the cons.
Yes, I read your link. I was thinking more in terms of robotics and how in more and more industries technology is permanently replacing jobs. If this is a trend, then in period of time, millions of people will be out of work and will not be able to buy back the products the robots are producing.
And then this country will collapse, including the one percent.
Your opposition has been noted. Now smile for the camera.
I think you are right. Technology will not go away we just need to control it and use it in the interest of the 99%.
Out of jobs, of course, being a good thing. We should free human creativity from the deadening need to make inventory of one’s waking hours.
Of course, to actualize this plan, we need a visionary, like The Last Liberal President, someone with the un-capitalist concept of a guaranteed national income.
Excuse me for a moment, brain too tight, blam-splat ahh, that’s better. Now, just let me scrape these off the wall, right then, “back into the skull you go”.
Now, where were we?
As long as we cannot manage abundance…so far we’re doing a shitty job.
Sharing is just so,…so…*femmy.
*Disclaimer, my third wife, the hooker who turned me out as a stripper, said (and she wasn’t trying to insult me) I was the femmiest man she knew.
I think you are correct, Surveillance is unstoppable, lets embrace it and put it to public use. If I have an actual choice between total exposure of everyone and total opacity, I’ll take exposure.
The first step would be that ALL financial transactions, even down to credit card transactions be public records. ALL income tax returns would be public records.
The PTB have all this info now, letting them be the sole possessors of that info puts them in control advantage.
Already whistleblowers providing emails and other records have been useful in exposing malefactors.
Thinking back to small village communities, no one had privacy, everyone knew everyone else’s business, it worked even if uncomfortable at times.
The important thing is that those in positions of power be totally exposed and if eliminating privacy altogether is a way to get there it would be worth it.
It would take a revolution to do that and I don’t think the 99 percent would even go along with that. They are too enraptured with technology.
It’s not like we have any privacy left. We have maybe the illusion that by tinkering with our facebook settings we are setting some (soft) limits, but that’s only those who are truly intechnorate. (cf illiterate, innumerate, etc.)
If we could “free human creativity” I can only imagine the problems we could solve.
Which is precisely why we have to find the “points d’appuis” for turning the technology on the oppressors. The cell phone as guerilla camera and guerilla detonator is maybe the easiest example
I’m still working on how the drone thing is turnable…no big ideas yet.
Actally, not an if. Check out the intertubez, it’s a self wiring, self programming, self booting entity. Not unlike a newborn, who is three times smarter than you or I or anyone on the planet not burning glucose at the rate the baby’s brain is.
Maybe, but how “enraptured” can you be when you are being made permanently under or unemployed?
Rex, could not find this “intertubez”. Sounds interesting.
Unemployed is the goal–the only difference between “unemployed” and “on sabbatical” is the inner attitude.
Herewith (an admittedly utopian) thought experiment.
We cap personal income at the “happiness number”, spread the resulting surplus around, and share equally in the staggering productivity increases soon to come (like from 3d printing, and stuff).
I’ll stipulate (reluctantly) to sharing within national boundaries, but against my better judgement.
Can we eliminate the need for wage slavery? Tough call, but I bet yes.
The last time I saw it, it was streaming free classes from MIT on string theory…and there was a kid with no hands playing his guitar with his feet.
It was cool as shit.
Now that you have used the term ‘detonator’ I assume that this thread is flagged somewhere in the bowels of government. And not only gov’t but unknown number of corporations and government contractors have you and I noted.
Whether that is actually true or not we have that feeling lurking inside and when that feeling/fear gets to a point most will begin to pull into our shells and essentially give it up to the PTB.
Technology is eliminating wage slavery. It is breaking the contract that tied the worker to the capitalist. The problem being that under this system without money one can’t survive with any quality of life.
Must be really good “shit”. Enjoy!
I seem to recall that a whole bunch of surveillance videos disappeared from sites that viewed the Pentagon target on 9/11. If the state controls the apparatus, it also controls the evidence (except for a very few “rogue elements”).
JoelM@41
Oops.
Fuck me.
Quiet as it is kept, I did myself experience a momentary frisson, but not enough, I guess, to delete.
Too late now.
I figure as long as Glenn Greenwald and Arthur Silber live, I’m not a problem for them.
1. If the state controls the apparatus
Precisely why they go after cell phones with such vigor. From this standpoint, live streaming has an internal mandate that is hard to deny,
Serendipitously, the oakland vids have created evidentiary issues for the Ice Cream Three. That is a cost, but perhaps not a prohibitive one.
It’s serviceable, but the same purveyor, for those of deeper pocket, has some exotica that brings strong men to their knees, as it were…
I think that may be what the great Karl Marx (and who’s laughing now, gospodin?) referred to as “a contradiction”
I mean K*** M***
Oh, yes they have:
The NSA Is Building the Country’s Biggest Spy Center (Watch What You Say)
By James Bamford
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2012/03/ff_nsadatacenter/all/1
The privacy of ones self is very much at stake here. We are not allowed to view our images at any given time. They are the property of private enterprise / government agencies.
We / our, images are the private property of someone else.
I find that a bit spooky.
Exactly.
You sound like you’d like Rick Wolff and David Harvey.
Stop worrying. Just vote Obama. (Snark tag too big to fit in the comment box.)
Here’s lookin’ at you, kid. LOL
Any number of utopian visionaries have been derided and marginalized as “dreamers” and “kooks”.
Buckminster Fuller foresaw a world when it would not be necessary for everyone to labor. He did the research and worked out procedures and methods that would benefit everyone.
For one who was active more than 50 years ago, he was eerily prescient.
It seems the “law of competition” will continue to push the development of technology forward. If this is true,then we must find a way to make it work for us….the 99%.
The only error is that the first paragraph of this post is inaccurate. The “left” obviously has little to no power in the USA. There is no way that I can rationalize embracing the machine at the expense of my privacy for the benefit of the PTB.
holybull@58
I thought by juxtaposing toooth & nail with our obvious failure to get any results to be saying that we had no power…
I take pride in probing
All your secrets moves
My tearless retina
Takes pictures that can prove
I am made of metal
My circuits gleam
I am perpetual
I keep the country clean …
-Judas Priest “Electric Eye”
kokobell616@51
Well that of course is the thrust of the argument. Presently the one-way surveillance is only turned back on the state occasionally and by accident.
The goal is to make surveillance of the state apparatus as ubiquitous and constant as their surveillance of us.
Yes, this is utopian. but in enunciating the demand, we place at issue the boundaries of “state secrecy” (state embarassment control)
realitychecker@55
Just pucker up and,…
@60
picrtures that can proove=disambiguation.
One must be impeccable….(subject to a libertarian definition)
Yeah I heard Wolff talk as I guess maybe part of the occupy oakland coverage during a kpfa fundraiser.. Sharp analysis.
I’ll check out Harvey