Written by Kirsten Moore and Aimee Thorne-Thomsen for RHRealityCheck.org – News, commentary and community for reproductive health and justice.
RH Reality Check is partnering with key sexual and reproductive health and justice organizations to examine the facts on birth control methods. See also the article by Erica Sackin, "Just Facts: Will the Pill Make me Fat?"
In recent weeks, the blogosphere has been buzzing over the prospect of an over-the-counter (OTC) switch for a daily oral contraceptive regimen. Amanda Marcotte recently took on the topic in “The Pill: A Counter to "Over-the-Counter," raising many valid questions about the timing, purpose, and effects of an OTC switch. This is an issue that the Reproductive Health Technologies Project and other women’s health advocates have examined for more than a decade. The decision to move forward at this point in time in support of a switch comes after thoughtful discussion and careful examination of the scientific evidence and other relevant considerations.
The bottom line is this: we believe an OTC switch for a birth control pill would increase access to contraception by providing a highly effective, woman-controlled option that can be obtained without a trip to the doctor’s office, and the difficulties that often entails. We think this will be good for women. And it may even have the potential to transform the way we think about birth control by decreasing stigma and normalizing contraceptive use.
Medically speaking, the case is strong for OTC access. Birth control pills are a safe, effective medication used by over 10 million women in the United States alone, and the pill has 50 years of global data backing it up. Women can easily decide whether they are candidates for pill use (“Do I want to get pregnant or not?”). Birth control pills aren’t addictive, and you can’t overdose. While contraindications, especially hypertension, present a concern, labeling, advertising, and public education campaigns could be used to close the information gap and encourage women to seek regular preventive care. A recent study shows that with the proper information and support women can screen themselves for contraindications nearly as well as providers do.
Most concerns about contraindications apply specifically to combined oral contraceptives, making a progestin-only pill (POP) the most likely candidate for a switch. As Kelly Blanchard points out in “Let the Pill Go Free,” POPs have fewer and rarer contraindications and potential complications. This is confirmed by the newly released CDC guidelines on medical eligibility for contraceptive use. In fact, one formulation of a progestin-only pill is already available over-the-counter for women 17 and older—as emergency contraception (EC) products Plan B® and Next ChoiceTM.
But there is more to a switch than medical statistics. In fact, for many advocates the most important question is: How would an OTC switch make a difference in women’s lives?
Let’s look at young women for example. For young women, an OTC option could be a game-changer. It would begin to close the gap in contraceptive access created by the stigma and shame associated with being sexually active. This stigma can prevent young women, and young women of color in particular, from seeking or continuing medical care with a doctor or other provider. We know from research by the Pro-Choice Public Education Project that many young women do not feel comfortable talking with their doctors about their sexual and reproductive health, and “may be more inclined to forgo a checkup than risk the possible humiliation or stress of a doctor’s visit.” Prescription-only access means that forgoing a checkup may also mean interrupting use of birth control pills, or never starting them at all.
Societal stigma also acts as a barrier to access for young women or any woman who feels she may be judged for being sexually active. When you don’t want to be “found out,” it can be difficult or impossible to access birth control from an on-campus health center, Planned Parenthood clinic, or local family doctor for fear that “everyone will know” the reason. The ability to buy a pill pack from nearly any pharmacy or grocery store could be transformative for women for whom other sources are not acceptable or available.
An OTC option could also help to close the gaps in contraceptive use created by changing circumstances in a woman’s life. A survey by the Guttmacher Institute found that for more than half of women who had a gap in contraceptive use of at least one month, the gap in use “coincided with an important life event, such as the beginning or ending of a relationship, a move to a new home, a job change or a personal crisis.” Understandably, getting an appointment with a provider can be especially difficult in these situations, and an OTC birth control pill would provide a highly-effective method that is easier to start or continue during chaotic times.
We know that an OTC switch will not meet the needs of every woman, and that both prescription and over-the-counter options have benefits and limitations. Ultimately, it is difficult to predict all the outcomes of an OTC switch. This is partially because the causes of contraceptive nonuse and unplanned pregnancy are incredibly complex, and partially because we won’t know until we try.
Maybe it isn’t the perfect time to pursue an OTC switch. But in our experience, there is rarely a perfect moment to initiate change. We are in the business of transforming women’s lives for the better, and we cannot afford to wait for policymakers to roll out the red carpet or for the opposition to step out of the way. Improving women’s access to reproductive health care is not easy, and not always popular: that’s exactly why it’s so important.
We hope health care reform will mean more women have better health insurance coverage, including coverage for reproductive health care and contraception, though the reality remains to be seen. Yet, even under the most optimistic implementation scenario, there will still be problems with access. Our health care system is already overburdened, under resourced, and precariously reliant on a workforce aging toward retirement. As millions of newly-insured Americans become eligible for care, it is unclear whether this system will be able to meet the demand.
The OC OTC Working Group recognizes that a successful path for a switch involves tackling the policy question of how OTC products are covered (or not covered) by public and private insurance. The Working Group also takes seriously the importance of women’s access to a full range of preventive health services and information. Confronting these challenges will require successful partnerships between insurers and advocates, significant legislative or administrative policy change, and the allocation of public and private resources in a manner that prioritizes women’s health. We also recognize that these questions are much bigger than an OTC switch for a single pill formulation.
We know it won’t be easy. We bring to this campaign the lessons learned from the fight for an OTC switch for Plan B. Women’s health advocates, led by the inspiration of Sharon Camp, made that happen. Most people didn’t believe it would actually go over-the-counter and of course, for some, it still hasn’t. But for many women, we were able to expand access. Just as important, we were able to advance a positive message about being sexually active and taking charge of your life. We anticipate that pushing for an OTC birth control pill with further test the boundaries of our society’s comfort and sense of normalcy around sex—and we welcome the challenge.



22 Comments




Excellent. If young women could get an over the counter pill, we would probably stop two-thirds of the abortions in this country. Of course, the right wing would have a fit and would fight it every step of the way. I applaud your endeavor and hope for the best.
I have concerns about potential health hazards when taking birth control pills. I haven’t kept up with the latest on this drug, but my concerns would be: a) young women would take it without a dr’s supervision/care and could experience some potentially serious medical problems, b) young women would take it incorrectly and then get pregnant anyway (plus perhaps not know it for a while and keep taking the pill, which is dangerous), and c) some young women may not be counselled properly re the risks of veneral and other more life-threatening diseases.
Not a curmudgeon. I can see the “pluses” for the pill to go OTC, but it seems that much more risk is involved than having condoms, for ex, become much easier to buy (out on the shelves where you don’t have to ask for them in a whispered voice).
Interesting post, and I’ll be curious to see how this goes.
as long as birth-control pills are composed of hormones and their effect based on changing hormonal levels in the human body, they’re less likely to be without side effects than a latex dam.
Wow, the concern trolls sure are out in force!
I esp. like this:
…young women would take it incorrectly and then get pregnant anyway.
What’s stopping that from happening now? Are doctors chained to “young women” 24/7 to make sure they take the pill “correctly”? Jesus fucking Christ…
Add the “morning after” and you double the number of abortions avoided.
Actually more recent long term studies are coming out and showing that women who take BCP are healthier than those who do not. I will see if I can find some links.
Why should women have to put drugs in their bodies instead of guys putting the hood on?
I know, I know. Nah gonna happen. I like the theory behind this, I just wish men would man up. Women take all the risks.
not really…
talk to me.
Many men I know man up…I raised 6 not all mine but I raised them so I know. And I made sure I was done making more… all fun and games now.. no worries..
I know you’re a man. I’ve got one too. But on any given night when a set of men and a set of women are going out looking to get laid, I bet there’s more women worried about getting pregnant then there are guys worrying about financial responsibilites. Maybe me ancient memories of dating is distorting my view. My man is helping me raise my 16 year old and a day doesn’t go by that I don’t thank him. In some way or another. :)
I hear what you are saying, though.
I think if women are to make the choice, (and I think we/they should have that right) then it seems to make sense that they take at least equal responsibility for contraception. The BCP is so perfect for most women that I would hate to get into gender role conflicts.
In my view this is a man woman/thing mostly as relates to those monstrous men who drive the RTL movement.
Being able to get BCP over the counter will not end efforts to control women’s contraception. In my state this election there is a proposed amendment that will define life as occurring .at fertilization. Other states of course have or will be pushing that further as oral contraception and morning after become more available.
I think we have to face up to the fact that life could begin at fertilization and this is meaningless as it relates to the permissibility of contraception and/or abortion. Even so, some life can’t be allowed to go forward because of a number of ways. We take life in war, we smoke or do not take care of our blood pressure, we allow people to withhold hydration and nutrition knowing they will die, we do not provide adequate health care which we know will lead to death, we have the death penalty, we drive too fast or engage in extreme sports which increase the chance of death, etc… We make these calls every day or someone else makes them for us. I say we admit that no one, not them, not us knows when life begins but a woman has the say on when and whether it continues.
Anyone recall Malcolm Gladwell’s New Yorker article from March 13, 2000, ” Annals of Medicine: John Rock’s Error”?
Rock was one of the inventors of the Pill, and a “devout Catholic”.
From the New Yorker’s online Abstract (full article available to subscribers or purchasers):
“Describes how it was decided to cut out the use of the Pill every three weeks in order to allow for a regular menstrual cycle–emulating the rhythm method of birth control… More to the point, if Rock wanted to demonstrate that the Pill was no more than a natural variant of the rhythm method, he couldn’t very well do away with the monthly menses. Rhythm required “regularity,” and so the Pill had to produce regularity as well…”.
The full article (and some of the Abstract) includes the well-known but seldom emphasized effects of endless menstruation that single women and childless women experience, some of the effects being very harmful, including cancers and anemia.
http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2000/03/13/2000_03_13_052_TNY_LIBRY_000020393#ixzz0vgxPkDwX
(For further discussion beyond firedoglake: carefully-advised women can take the active Pill without interruption, i.e., without the ‘natural’ menses in her cycle.)
I tend to agree with you on the definition of life. But I doubt many will soon recognize that there is naturally great wastage of fetuses in all species: much less the hypocrisy of having fits over abortion but no problem with wastage of human life by other means from deprivation of adequate food and perinatal care to the slaughter of our children and their victims in war.
It’s really not about life. It’s about controlling women and the seed.
Some drugs are appropriately “open-access,” some are simply not. Call me a concern troll if you want, but it’s an undeniable risk to take any potent hormone treatment. Oral contaceptives are potent hormones.
OC increase clotting and caardiovasclar risks, especially among women who smoke or have hypertension. Far more commonly, weight gain, nervousness, and absence of, or abnormal, menstruation are experienced by women on OC. Those side effects seem likely to me to increase non-compliance and hence, unintended pregnancy. Most Americans (women and men) are simply ignorant of science and medicine, and are not qualified to take potent hormones safely. What would be the individual or societal value of increased illness and, potentially, increased unwanted pregnancy?
FWIW, I’m speaking as a sterilized man, who just got his 11 y.o. daughter the HPV vaccine, will get her on the pill whenever she requests it. I also plan to vaccinate my teenage son against HPV when that gets approved (it will). I also support free and open access to this birth control option, but only if done under proper medical oversight.
and TalkingStick @ 16
I would argue that this “life begins” talk is, at best, a planted diversion and a conflating of religion and science, and that it is at the (rotten) core of the anti-abortion argument.
“Life began” some four or four-and-a-half billion years ago…probably once, maybe multiple times…but under conditions that no longer exist. “Life” has continued and reproduced and altered and proliferated since then…since “life began”…but it hasn’t “begun” for all those billions of years since then.
“Life” doesn’t begin now, it reproduces, and it does so in a variety of ways. The way it does so in us involves the coming together of an ovum and a sperm.
Do you have any question of whether an ovum is “alive”? Or any question of whether a sperm is “alive”? The event is the coming together of two already “live” things, and the result, whatever it is not the creation of “life”…not the “beginning of life”.
This “life begins” gobble-de-gook is the fabrication of the church…the “pro-lifers” (an obnoxious term that should never have been allowed to achieve the status it has…witness what’s going on here). By using such a term, you are perpetuating the ideologies of those who deployed it and poisoning the discussion with their presumptions.
Having gotten that off my chest, I am willing to sit back and listen to any of your anti-appendectomy arguments. (But let’s start off with…is the appendix “alive”?)
While I agree about the social benefits of greater access vio OTC. There are so mnay ways the Big Pharma games the system that the idea of unregulated hormones being on the shelf scares me a bit.
When I first began takingthe pill, it took months and 3 different formulations before my doctor and I figured out the best formulation for me. My doctor also schooled me on the dangers of things like smoking (and asked whether I had taken up smoking at every yearly visit) and on the symtoms to look for for complications and dagerous side effects. And asked about them at each yearly visit.
I thik about the problems that came up with the over hyped intorduction Yaz and some years ago that other one with commercial with the flower fairies on it.
Hormones are powerful in their effect on the body. The FDA does NOT do a good enough job of keeping thigs off the market until big eough studies are done. Big Pharma games the system.
It seems to me, that removing the social stigma is the safer way to go. We could start that with better sex ed in schools.
I went to a Roman Catholic HS in the 1970′s we had MUCH better sex ed, including every kind of birth control around in those days, than my kid has now going to public HS. Kids to day have no idea how to protect themselves other than condoms (which ain’t a bad way, but still)
Ignorance is not bliss and our society prefers to exploit our children for a buck. We can turn that around.
sure… some hormones can be dangerous and birth control can have some side effects… BUT, Tylenol and Aspirin can be DEADLY. And they’re over the counter for decades.
It’s the puritanical fear of sex that focuses worry on the birth control and not on other over the counter medications that can actually shut down organ function, sometimes irreversibly.
So, Tylenol, Aspirin, possibly deadly over the counter medications, Alcohol, Tobacco, and Coffee, addictive substances which are pretty much the equivalent of over the counter (simple age restrictions is all), and that causes little comment.
But try to free women from being at the mercy of doctors or a health system that keeps records of their information prying parents may be focusing on (if they get insurance through parents), or uninsured, or whatever? And OH NOES SIDE EFFECTS!
Color me unsurprised and unimpressed with your “concern” for women.