Written by Debbie McMillan for RH Reality Check. This diary is cross-posted; commenters wishing to engage directly with the author should do so at the original post.

Image: Aimee Ardell / Flickr
Like most people, the sum of who I am is much more than my individual traits. However, there is one fact about me that puts me way outside the mainstream. It’s that I’m a tran-sgender woman.
Last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that Massachusetts judge ordered prison officials to provide sex-reassignment surgery for a murder convict.
The piece started by talking about a transgender woman who used to meet in dark parking lots with other transgender people for support. “How things have changed since then for transgender men and women in America, who have made great strides in recent years toward reaching their ultimate goal: to be treated like ordinary people,” the piece noted.
I agree, strides have been made. But “great” grossly overstates the reality. Discrimination and misunderstanding is still rampant. I frequently feel that I’m assigned to a class of sub-humans. Even the judge who ordered the surgery said it was to treat “gender-identity disorder.” As a society, we still view transgender people as being against the natural order and place the blame on our minds, rather than where the real problem is: our incorrect bodies.
A recent article in the New York Times Magazine would indeed lead sympathetic readers to believe things are not so bad for transgender people and that there’s really just left over misunderstandings to clear up. The piece told honest, compelling, sometimes gut wrenching stories of good people trying to navigate the world for and with their gender non-specific children.
Consider that it was only in April of this year that the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunities Commission ruled that that discriminating against an employee or potential employee based on their gender identity is in violation of the Civil Rights Act. Forty-eight years after that Act passed Congress!
Twenty states now have laws prohibiting gender discrimination against LGBT people. However, that still means that 30 states do not.
I work with transgender people every day. Many of them have trouble finding housing or jobs, no matter what the laws say. Many of them are drug users driven to it, in part, because by living with the constant, unrelenting stigma we feel. It’s almost palpable.
I went to the street alone at 14 because I thought it was the only place for someone like me. I became a commercial sex worker because I believed it was the only occupation available to me. I looked around and saw that no one was going to give me a job.
Though I lived as a woman and looked like one, when I was arrested for solicitation, I was sent to the men’s prison. After one arrest for prostitution, I was thrown in the wing with the felons. When I inevitably contracted HIV, the doctors I sought continually called me by my birth name. When you have HIV, you want medical personnel who understand that your entire life changes the instant you get that diagnosis. Not someone who doesn’t bother to look in your eyes and see the very basics of who you are.
To be fair, these events happened to me 20 years ago. Back then, we didn’t have the word “transgender” and I was considered an effeminate gay boy. Things are different now but believing that there is significantly less discrimination because some people allow their sons to wear dresses is like thinking that because we have a black President, racism in America is gone.



7 Comments

Sadly, Debbie, you seem to have answered your own question several times over. The judge’s calling transgender *any* kind of disorder is sad, but (cold comfort) at least he didn’t call it a name that the DSMIII used to use (psychological disorder, I believe).
I do hope you interact with commenters here, because we are fortunate to have in our community a transgender denizen. A couple years ago she penned a moving, brave, and very educational piece about her experiences. From the comments on her thread, it was clear that I wasn’t alone in my ignorance about the term, both psycho-spiritually and medically, as she explained the different chromosomal sub-types, I guess you’d call them.
Her piece was so wonderful I kept it at my Posterous site for a long time so that visitors could read it, and understand better.
A transgender Navajo boy in our community was murdered a decade ago; his name was Fred Martinez, and it was a tragedy that I have trouble speaking about today without tears bubbling out.
You have my great respect and virtual love for writing this, and I wish you all the best. When I have a bit more time, I’ll come find the links for Margaret’s diary, and one or two I wrote about Fred.
We have to get away from the myth that sexuality is black and white. Girl or boy. Gay or straight. It just isn’t reality. The fact is that sexuality is more accurately defined by a continuum than by black and white divisions. This is the way nature made it…and we are trying to view reality through a cognitive distortion.
I like to ask instead what might be the purpose of the design. Why is it a fact we were created this way. I guarantee there is value in this that we are missing. In other words what is the advantage that nature intended by creating our sexuality to be this diverse? (and the facts are they it is, and always has been this diverse, transgender has existed since the beginning of time, people are born with both male and female organs, and various other differences, same sex love has existed since the beginning of time, these are facts…that cannot be denied).
I do think that in same sex couples it decreases procreation…decreases the number of children born to gay couples. (not that they can’t have kids or shouldn’t but the number is naturally lower in a time of over population). Also I think an advantage is insight into this sex or that sex. The chippewa indian tribe used to see gay members of the tribe as having special insight into the sexes, and marital conflict and negotiating issues between the sexes. This seems a valid advantage. I bet there are more.
We have got to stop crossing off these realities and start using acceptance, finding instead the purpose and the meaning behind these facts of nature. I believe that the dialectic exists in everything. That means to everything on earth are polarities, the good, the bad, the positive, the negative, the intended and unintended. In these polarities there is synthesis to be had.
You are courageous for speaking out, sharing your story, living your truth.
The invalidation of the truth…the existence of these valid ways of being, is a travesty not just for those who are invalidated but for all of us who fail to see, experience the truth in our lives in regard to these issues!
By the way…when I was reading the headlines without my glasses I thought you had asked the question: Have we become a world of transgendered people? It was only after putting on my glasses that I could see the real headline…but I rather liked my own version!
I found one I wrote about Fred just before Independent Lens was to air part of his story a friend of mine helped with. You may already know that in Navajo culture, transgendered are rather revered, and are known as Two Spirits, isn’t that a fine term?
This is Margaret’s fine post; I can’t imagine she wouldn’t enjoy you and everyone reading it again, in many cases.
I think attitudes toward transgendered people have changed a whole hell of a lot. I don’t think it would be pollyanna-ish to say that, as knowledge and understanding grow, attitudes can and do change.
Well I was going to comment but as wendydavis courteously linked to my post, I really don’t have a lot to add, except to say that it’s still a daily struggle to live as who I am. Oddly, some of the places were I would expect hatred, I get acceptance and some of the places I would look for compassion, I find only rejection.
And of course to say, thank you for your post and thank you Wendy for linking to mine. I know we don;t always see eye to eye but not very deep down, we want largely the same things.
Hey Wendy,
Debbie is unfortunately not at liberty to answer questions here, because it is strictly the RHRC account and she does not have access. She can answer on the RHRC site, under her own name.
Thank you for your comments,
RHRC Staff