Written by Marianne Møllman for RH Reality Check. This diary is cross-posted; commenters wishing to engage directly with the author should do so at the original post.

Photo: Steven Depolo / Flickr
On October 15, the New York Times reported that adolescents who are vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) aren’t more promiscuous than those who don’t get vaccinated. HPV is a sexually transmitted disease that raises the risk of some cancers. It’s not surprising that a vaccine has no effect on adolescent sexual behavior. What is surprising is that fear of “sluttiness” is the number-one reason parents decide not to vaccinate their kids against HPV.
Put another way: A large proportion of parents in the United States are more afraid of their kids having sex than they are of their kids getting cancer.
In fact, “slut-shaming” and negative messaging about female and non-straight sexuality could themselves be compared to a viral infection. A study published in November 2011 found that nearly half of students in grades seven through 12 experienced sexual harassment, and that most of the harassment is directed at girls for being either “slutty” or “prudes” or against kids who are suspected of being gay.
Seeking to shame someone because of her or his real or perceived sexual activity and desire is prevalent among teens and constitutes a type of bullying that is extremely damaging. The 2011 study noted that students reported being particularly negatively affected by slut shaming. Research consistently shows that LGBTI youth have a much higher rate of suicide or suicide attempts than the general population, with a strong correlation between depression or self-harm and gay bashing.
Slut shaming and gay bashing originate with adults. I don’t mean just adults who tell children that all sex outside marriage is bad or consign LGBTI kids to celibacy, or banish them to hell. I mean adults who refuse to have a real conversation with teenagers about sex and all that comes with it — good or bad. The sex-negative culture we have created by not having real conversations about sex and relationships affects everyone.
Here’s how:
When we tell adolescents that sex is not something they should desire or like, we are telling them to set aside their own experiences in favor of a lie. Spoiler alert! A study looking at trends in premarital sex from the 1950s until now shows that the majority of Americans have sex before marriage. One of two things happens next, and sometimes both simultaneously:
On one hand, adolescents stop listening to the adults who tell them scare stories, because they see for themselves that the adults are wrong. Not everyone who has sex before marriage gets pregnant, contracts AIDS, or dies. And sex can feel amazing. When the adolescent-adult relationship is breached, children can lose their lifelines to trusted adults, who could have guided them through the mess that is puberty.
And some kids start doubting their own instincts. When we tell them that something that feels good to them is “bad,” they start thinking they, themselves, are bad. In this sense, slut shaming creates a culture of self-hatred in which girls in particular are only too willing to see themselves as deserving abuse.
It’s crucially important that we teach children to trust their own feelings about sex and relationships. Instead of telling teenagers not to have sex at all — a completely outlandish notion in a post-post-Madonna world — we need to acknowledge that sexual desire exists, and that consent, not shame, is key. Only a teenager who is taught to respect and acknowledge his or her own feelings will know when touching feels wrong, and therefore when they need to say no. This is one of the few things my parents got right. My mother told me more than once that the only rule about sex in our house was that I should never have sex I didn’t want to have.
Slut shaming and gay bashing come from the same place: adult discomfort with sex. This can translate into adolescent date rape, teenage pregnancies, and sexually-transmitted-infection rates that are through the roof for those under the age of 24. Shaming someone for having sex that he or she wants to have constitutes bullying and teaches teenagers to ignore their own feelings about sex, potentially pushing them to unprotected and unhappy encounters.
In short: The sex-negative culture that has parents denying their children access to cancer prevention is the same culture that may expose these children to a sexually- transmitted, cancer-inducing virus. It’s time to get real about sex.



11 Comments

Well, the fact is that the HPV vaccine is untested. Back in the days of real science, no one at the FDA would say something was A-okay and ready to use unless it had several years of testing. Although it its true the polio vaccine did not have to undergo such a rigorous standard, it is also true that polio affected tens of thousands of people in the USA every time it reached epidemic proportions.
But the disease of cervical cancer only results in some three thousand deaths each year and inside a nation of 307 million people, that is not a huge number of deaths.
DR Diane Harper came out and said this vaccine is dangerous, and she did that with first hand knowledge of this fact as a researcher. Among the side effects of any vaccine are these: narcolepsy, Guillaume Barre, MS symptoms, cancer and infection with any of a number of various other infectious diseases like meningitis.
If you really want your teenaged daughters to be safe, statistically speaking, make sure they are not texting and driving, GPS-ing and driving, and all the other hazards that are out there which are far more likely to injure or kill them. And being responsible and avoiding texting and driving is not something that will carry any risky side effects, other than the kids not looking so cool with the other kids.
Here is at least a partial “skinny” on the vaccine: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marcia-g-yerman/an-interview-with-dr-dian_b_405472.html
Note how Dr Harper points out that if the HPV vaccine only has protective factors lasting for 15 years, than vaccinating an eleven year old is not going to hold out maximize benefits.
As if that’s not enough, it’s thought that HPV vaccine destroyed a girls’ ovaries.
New research has shown that evidence for the safety and efficacy of the HPV vaccine is lacking.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23016780
” We find that HPV vaccine clinical trials design, and data interpretation of both efficacy and safety outcomes, were largely inadequate. Additionally, we note evidence of selective reporting of results from clinical trials (i.e., exclusion of vaccine efficacy figures related to study subgroups in which efficacy might be lower or even negative from peer-reviewed publications). Given this, the widespread optimism regarding HPV vaccines long-term benefits appears to rest on a number of unproven assumptions (or such which are at odd with factual evidence) and significant misinterpretation of available data. ”
“The notion that HPV vaccines have an impressive safety profile is only supported by highly flawed design of safety trials and is contrary to accumulating evidence from vaccine safety surveillance databases and case reports which continue to link HPV vaccination to serious adverse outcomes (including death and permanent disabilities). ”
Here are the facts in context:
More facts in context:
(Part 2 of 3)
Yet more facts in context:
Everybody can watch The War on Health FDA’s Cult of Tyranny for free. “Regulatory Capture” takes on a whole, new dimension with those jokers.
Not sure about the CDC, but of course, anybody who would look to corrupt the FDA, and ignore their “opportunities” for corrupting the CDC, would be practicing bad business. Doesn’t mean the CDC is corrupt, also (I honestly don’t know), but it’s something to think about.
I don’t have a link handy, but Gary Null has exposed FDA attended phone conferences showing that the FDA certainly knew that vaccines were giving kids autism, even as they publicly pretended, otherwise. (That’s when it doesn’t kill them, as happened to Jennie McCarthy’s child.) The deadly or life-destroying reactions aren’t typical – I vaguely remember .5%. However, for those children who do become autistic as a result of the vaccine, their lives are typically ruined, and their parents’ lives will never be the same, either.
I attended a Gary Null event in NYC, where we met a family of a vaccine damaged child. He became totally dysfunctional. Both parents were NYC cops – certainly not given to making up stories. Gary Null’s protocol not only helped normalize the child, but he went on to become an honors student.
Your digestive tract is part of your immune system, and, while unintuitive (I suppose), therapy for vaccine damaged children should certainly include normalizing their intestinal flora. A good book on the subject of intestinal flora is “Bacteria for Breakfast”.
Progressive Radio Network has recently interviewed Dr. Braverman, who is a real hero against over-vaccination. The British system is even more ruthless in destroying vaccine truth-tellers, than the US is.
Someone posts a single comment and you accuse them of “hijacking” a diary. Next, you go and post a complete web page spread over three maximum length comments.
Do you purposefully do stuff this, or are you really oblivious to your double-standard?
Just provide the link next time instead copying the whole page.
I see no indication on the website of the Government of British Columbia of the source(s) of the information they present as established fact. I think that’s a troubling omission.
You can paste anonymously authored “fact sheets” ghostwritten by the pharma lobby all day, but just because something is published on a government website doesn’t make it science. The unfortunate fact is that public health authorities are increasingly just extensions of the profit interest of the pharmaceutical industry.