The Fish & Wildlife Service has just announced that the sage grouse is a candidate for listing as an endangered species, but its listing will be precluded because its habitat overlaps with oil, gas, and wind development across the West.
As Representative Jason Chaffetz (R-UT-03) states, classily:
The only good place for a sage grouse to be listed is on the menu of a French bistro.
The sage grouse, also known as sagehen, is well known for its courtship rituals. Male birds strut, flex, preen, puff up their pecs, and grunt like Muscle Beach bodybuilders.
The sage grouse lives in cowboy country — the sagebrush, plains, and high deserts across the West, from California’s Owens Valley to the Dakotas. One bird needs a lot of territory — it’s sensitive to any activity within four miles of its nesting grounds. And its territory has been covered by an intricate spiderweb of humans and their accoutrements: roads, pipelines, cattle, sheep, prairie fires, invasive plants such as cheatgrass, oil derricks, and (mostly proposed) wind turbines. The grouse is considered a keystone species, meaning that its health indicates the health of an entire landscape. It’s almost no surprise that its numbers have dropped from 16 million to a few hundred thousand.
The bird is no stranger to litigation. The Bush administration refused to list the bird following a petition. The Western Watersheds Project won a lawsuit in which the judge held (this is a shocker!) that a senior political appointee illegally tampered with the scientific determination whether to list the species. The Bush administration then decided to -run out the clock- engage in further studies until Obama took office. The listing has been described as a litmus test for conservation in the Obama administration.
Today, the Obama administration announced a compromise in which the bird is listed as "warranted, but precluded" by higher priorities:
The Interior Department says it won’t list sage grouse as endangered or threatened but will classify the bird among species that are candidates for federal protection.
The finding is good news for the wind energy and oil and gas industries, which will still face scrutiny in grouse habitat but will have more leeway than if the bird were listed.
As the New York Times editorialized earlier this week, the "warranted-but-precluded" status holds out the promise, or threat, of more stringent regulations, and requires good faith efforts from affected state governments and the Bureau of Land Management.
The Fish & Wildlife Service press release spins it as "expanding common sense efforts" to preserve its habitat, hoping for voluntary conservation by private landowners "while ensuring that energy production, recreational access and other uses of federal lands continue as appropriate."
In other words, the sage grouse is likely to join the pika. Poor silly bird never had a chance, going up against our energy needs.



16 Comments







thanks for covering this. Time to rerun Walt Disney’s “Vanishing Praire,” one of the first of the nature films they did 40 years ago. Sage grouse was featured prominently, and a whole generation of kids grew up believing they should care about its survival. But that was then.
That is one gorgeous bird….whoever did it harm?
Obama’s donors
Just one more endangered species – along with the rest of us. What a shame. They are beautiful and their courtship ritual is something to watch. When will we realize that when everything else is gone, we won’t stand a chance.
It could very well turn out that much as the bird’s status, my vote for Obama in the future might be warranted-but-precluded too.
Updating my original story a bit, the warranted-but-precluded garbage will be a regulatory mess, pleasing neither the environmentalists who want cattle and oil wells off public lands altogether nor the oil and cattle barons who want to do what they please with our lands.
A lawsuit is already being discussed — that was fast!
This will play into a larger theme being developed by Republicans seeking to manufacture another Sagebrush Rebellion.
Warranted but precluded?? That’s the biggest load of BS I’ve ever heard. That’s saying something considering it’s DC we’re discussing.
Warranted but precluded
So now we got a new word to replace the word centrist which is used as alias for Corporate Welfare in MSM.
I just read about this in Audubon magazine. In Wyoming at least, the situation is not as dire as it seems from this article. A coalition of ranchers, farmers, conservation groups including Audubon and others, and the energy producers all got together and worked out an agreement.
This agreement uses sound science to designate 13 million acres of prime habitate for the grouse as protected. It allows some controlled activities in the marginal areas. The listing of the species would have required that all the areas be protected – and would have meant that more than 75% of the state would be covered.
This coalition realized that they didn’t want another spotted owl controversy, and the sage grouse is receiving protections by the state and in cooperation with all the players, including the energy companies.
In turn, the energy companies will be contributing to a fund to help manage the habitats.
This agreement is a milestone in cooperation between entities that usually are at each others’ throats, and I would hate to see this precedent destroyed by lawsuits and incomplete reporting on the issue.
Lokywoky, four entities that don’t have a good track record in managing threatened species’ habitat are the BLM, state of Wyoming (check out what happened to the WY wolf management plan), private “shoot, shovel, shut up” ranchers, and energy companies. I certainly hope your optimism is well founded.
A few other folknames for the Sage Grouse listed in my book: Cock of the Plains, Fool Hen, Sage Chicken, Sage Cock, Sage Hen and Spiny-tailed Pheasant.
pg. 122,
North American Bird Folknames and Names
Bottlebrush Press, 1996.
loky: The Audubon rep in Wyoming is sucking up to Ken Salazar and Industry to get big bucks from Interior for essentially privatizing mapping of sage-grouse habitat.
This will make it harder for the public to access info on leks and bird number declines.
Audubon members need to know that their Wyoming people are aiding and abetting the bird’s slide to extinction.
This is a bird that does not tolerate human disturbance. An oil well or wind mill in each Section (640 acres) just won’t cut it.
Plus the “core habitat” mapping that Audubon (WY) touts is all about having non-core SACRIFICE areas where the energy companies can frolic. Some of us are calling them “corpse” areas, because this jut won’t work. They are already being perforated with development.
Here is what is going on:
https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&tab=core&id=47d8ef1c072c27688ee866d748864c0f
Synopsis:
Added: Feb 03, 2010 11:06 am
The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), in accordance with FAR 6.302-1 intends on negotiating and awarding a sole source contract with The National Audubon Society for the mapping and modeling of core Greater sage grouse habitat. The BLM will utilize the geospatial core habitat data for Greater sage-grouse to better manage for the conservation of this at-risk species. The standard NAICS classification is 541370. The size standard is $4.5 million.
The Audubon Society has established a working relationship with the eleven western state wildlife management agencies to acquire the use of geospatial data depicting Greater sage-grouse lek locations and lek breeding …
THIS is unneeded and expensive outsourcing to the Wyoming Audubon fellow – so Salazar’s BLM can better limit public access to info, and provide massaged mapping tha depicts what BLM and industry wants.
RL, thanks for the post.
Are you familiar with Joel Salatin and his ideas about disturbance and rest?
Boo Radley, interesting, thanks! I have backyard chickens but he’s quite a bit beyond that.
good morning