Greg Mitchell’s writings on the 65th anniversary of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as a screening of the documentary "Countdown to Zero", jogged my memory. In the midst of archiving 200 years of family history, I’d come upon a letter from Albert Einstein to my grandfather from December 1946, thanking him for his $10 contribution to the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists, which Einstein chaired. I located the binder that contained the letter Friday night, and re-read it and the original fundraising appeal my grandfather received.
From "A Statement of Purpose by the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists":
When the bomb fell on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, it broke a six year silence which had isolated the scientists who created the atomic bomb. Their private self-questioning could now be made public. At once they formed into groups to tell their fellow citizens the facts of atomic energy and its implications for society. The Emergency Committee of Scientists has been organized to convey this information on the large scale which has now become necessary…Others who can help are now asked to give their support. Two billion dollars were spent on the bomb. One million dollars are needed to tells its meaning to the nation at this time. The need is critical. We appeal for help.
My grandfather’s donation was acknowledged with a receipt and thank you note from Einstein:
Dear Friend,
On behalf of my colleagues of the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists, I send sincere thanks for your generous answer to my letter asking for your help in the great educational task we have undertaken. We value not only the practical support you have sent, but also the good will towards this work and the hope for a reasonable solution of this immense problem which your contribution expresses.
Faithfully yours,
A. Einstein
I was personally unaware the detonations sparked an immediate movement of American citizens across the Country united in their vow: Never again.
They (scientists) knew that the democratic determination of this nation’s policy on atomic energy must ultimately rest on understanding by its citizens. "America’s decision will not be made over a table in the United Nations. Our representatives in New York, in Paris, or in Moscow depend ultimately on decisions made in the village square. To the village square we must carry the facts of atomic energy. From there must come America’s voice."*+
*Albert Einstein, New York Time Magazine, June 23, 1946
+"A Statement of Purpose by the Emergency Committee of Atomic Scientists"
So far we’ve managed the "never again" part, but the odds are grim, and the need for citizens to revivify the village square into a true bully pulpit is more urgent than ever. The community we’ve built at Firedoglake and across the Internet is blazing the way, but sometimes we (Okay, me) blow off the basics as having no effect.
At a Netroots Nation panel, Rep. Jared Polis (CO-02) was asked how many phone calls a day his D.C. office receives. He said apart from hot button times, he averages 20 calls a day. I wasn’t alone in showing surprise at the low number. He went on to say that throughout the day he overhears his staffers’ conversations with constituents, and will sometimes jump on the line to join in.
I’d hit a wall this summer, overwhelmed by the sheer enormity of the problems facing this country, and the world at large. While still contributing financially where I could, I’d pretty much given up on writing letters or making calls to my reps. Rep. Polis’ words were a kick in the butt, a reminder that if I silence my own voice I’m allowing another to fill the void.
My voice counts. Our voice together counts more.
64 years after Einstein’s letter to my grandfather we haven’t yet blown up the world, and the education continues. The conversations continue. To continuing to raise the volume!
Einstein’s closing quote, amended:
"The democratic determination of this nation’s policies must ultimately rest on understanding by its citizens. Our representatives depend ultimately on decisions made in the village square. To the village square we must carry the facts. From there must come America’s voice."



35 Comments







Thanks for this post, fascinating look into the past and perhaps into the near future at the same time.
(Hope you don’t mind the modification of your headline/title into mixed case; we typically use AP-style heads here for ease of reading, and because all-caps is considered the equivalent of shouting on the internet.)
thx, rayne. (and it’s been so long since i’ve written a diary, i couldn’t remember how to format the title, appreciate the de-emphasization)
What a nice peice of history to have in your family.
It’s a lovely motivational diary. I need a kick too,
I’ve been exploring countries to immigrate to, feeling like all is lost here lately. Thank you.
Please contact us at aearequests at savion.huji.ac.il. I am most interested in your correpondence.
“…To the village square we must carry the facts. From there must come America’s voice.”
The village square is in trouble. We no longer have a consistent and reliable source for “the facts”. When 70% of the village is in favor of a policy that is absolutely contrary to the first amendment and elected officials are fanning the flames of bigotry, reason has left the building.
I have no doubt that were it seriously suggested that a nuclear attack was a “reasonable” course of action to deal with Iran’s weapon development ambitions, that a sizeable plurality ot the village would find it perfectly acceptable.
Thank you, rosalind, for this personal, yet universally important, history.
I was among that large group of children who were told six, and more, years later, that we would “…be safe, under our desks.”
I rather doubt Einstein or your grandfather would have told us such patent nonsense.
(NONE of us “believed” it, by the way.)
DW
Oh, yes! I remember having drills in school and having to hide under the desks! I certainly hope my kids or future grandkids never have to do that!
They still have earthquake drills that put kids under desks is California. As if a desk could save them if the roof collapsed. It’s all nonsense.
Great work, Rosalind. Thanks.
Doorways! Stand in the doorways!
LMAO! At least they didn’t send us after plastic tarps and duct tape!
As if…instead of running out of the doorways!
Nice to see ya up and about.
What a great read and thanks for it, Rosalind.
The road IS steep, the obstacles ARE many.
Almost insurmountable, as you suggest.
Your call to action is compelling because of the challenges.
Dawg help us all, and thank you Albert Einstein.
Rcc’d.
It has always been astounding to me that exactly the right people were forced out of Germany by the fascists, (Einstein, Teller, etc), to help bring an end to the destructive war that the Germans and their allies brought upon us all. And then those very same people were exactly the right people to have in place to warn us all of the annihilation that we would face if their creation had been treated as just another weapon of war. Kudos to them and thanks for sharing rosalind.
Outstanding post. Thank you, rosalind.
I also remember the under the desk drills.
Recommended.
Yeah, it has been a long time since I’ve thought of those drills or memorizing all of the nearby buildings designated as fallout shelters. Even as a child I saw all of that as just platitudes to foist on a gullible public in order to make them feel like they’re prepared. I can’t imagine anyone with a brain thinking that taking shelter in one of those designated places would do any good.
What a wonderful report, thank you so much for sharing your family’s history with us, and for using it for such an inspirational launching pad. Indeed, the six years of silence drove scientists quite mad, as they could not debate the bomb they were building. It must have been quite liberating to know they could now contribute to the public debate about our new nuclear era.
Rosalind Hi
Grenoble, Three Mile Island…over heated reactors… meltdowns…nuclear waste…Soviet stockpiles around…maverick nukes yes out of control. One angry insecure group without hope could pull that trigger. All those test site have not reached their half life. We stopped building basement shelters long ago.
Good discussion would Isreal do it?
Yep, I, too, remember the duck and cover drills in elementary classrooms in California and then later in Houston, TX, during the Cuban missile crisis the ‘trial’ of being told to walk home to see if we could get home to be vaporized in our own homes rather than on school property. Those were the days, huh?
So silly…. I grew up near Houston and as it was a major port and as I lived within sight of Ellington AFB, I knew that in the event of war, I would be atomized fairly early on. Mrs Perminter sent a note home to my parents for pointing that out to my classmates during one of those stupid drills.
I recall being kept home from school during the Cuban missile crisis. Seemed very boring to be home with my baby brother and mom when all she was doing was listening to the radio and taking whispered phonecalls from my dad at his Top Secret workplace.
Teddy, I know there are millions of us who were affected by the various “crises” of our youth. I often wonder if my own children’s children will be altered by the various “wars” brought to us by Bush Inc. and by the failures to remedy natural disasters and by the constant threat of more nuclear misbehavior that is constantly threatened by the right and not countered verbally by the center (the lefties have no voice, far as I can tell.)
The possibility that modern weaponry will destroy humanity is one of the reasons why Albert Einstein was a socialist.
See his 1949 essay Why Socialism? http://www.monthlyreview.org/598einst.htm (less than five pages)
The really scary thing is that if there were an earthquake at the Oroville damn, the water going down the state would probably wipe out the San Onofre nuclear power plant.
Einstein’s 1st letter to FDR.
Teddy Partridge is upstairs!
Sunday Late Night: Stretch Talks Progress With TMCP
PS: Rosalind, thanks for this interesting recollection.
When I was in 3rd grade in Walnut Creek CA in 1962, we had walk-home drills. That is, if a nuclear catastrophe occurs, walk home. I remember thinking, well, as incomprehensible drills go, this is ok ..
Bohr and Einstein were/are my two big heroes, have read endlessly on & of them through my life (best lay/geek Einstein bio, Subtle is the Lord by Pais) .. real humanists .. the last innocents, almost .. I can’t imagine AE seeing what we’ve come to, what he would say
great diary, thanks for posting it
oh, and if you asked me in 3rd grade if i ever thought i’d make it to age 55 in this insane asylum of bomb-making, i’d have said, no way .. i’m still amazed really
America then and now would rather its public not know about the number and vocalness of those who disagreed immediately and for decades with our decision to drop those bombs, or about the short and long term problems they caused.
Thank you so much for memorializing the vaporization of some 200,000 Japanese, mostly civilians and the reminder of the cost of achieving the ending of armed hostilities on this day 65 yr ago.
But the danger of nuclear holocaust is not past history. It continues today, It As long as there are nuclear weapons there will be those who intend to use them. And as long as there are nuclear power plants there is the assurance that more will die from accidents, some that will last thousands of years. The Russians this summer feared inhaled radioactive smoke from the forest fires around Chernobyl.
http://www.monthlyreview.org/598einstein.php
Why Socialism?
by Albert Einstein
This essay was originally published in the first issue of Monthly Review (May 1949).
Is it advisable for one who is not an expert on economic and social issues to express views on the subject of socialism? I believe for a number of reasons that it is.
Let us first consider the question from the point of view of scientific knowledge. It might appear that there are no essential methodological differences between astronomy and economics: scientists in both fields attempt to discover laws of general acceptability for a circumscribed group of phenomena in order to make the interconnection of these phenomena as clearly understandable as possible. But in reality such methodological differences do exist. The discovery of general laws in the field of economics is made difficult by the circumstance that observed economic phenomena are often affected by many factors which are very hard to evaluate separately. In addition, the experience which has accumulated since the beginning of the so-called civilized period of human history has—as is well known—been largely influenced and limited by causes which are by no means exclusively economic in nature. For example, most of the major states of history owed their existence to conquest. The conquering peoples established themselves, legally and economically, as the privileged class of the conquered country. They seized for themselves a monopoly of the land ownership and appointed a priesthood from among their own ranks. The priests, in control of education, made the class division of society into a permanent institution and created a system of values by which the people were thenceforth, to a large extent unconsciously, guided in their social behavior.
But historic tradition is, so to speak, of yesterday; nowhere have we really overcome what Thorstein Veblen called “the predatory phase” of human development. The observable economic facts belong to that phase and even such laws as we can derive from them are not applicable to other phases. Since the real purpose of socialism is precisely to overcome and advance beyond the predatory phase of human development, economic science in its present state can throw little light on the socialist society of the future.
Second, socialism is directed towards a social-ethical end. Science, however, cannot create ends and, even less, instill them in human beings; science, at most, can supply the means by which to attain certain ends. But the ends themselves are conceived by personalities with lofty ethical ideals and—if these ends are not stillborn, but vital and vigorous—are adopted and carried forward by those many human beings who, half unconsciously, determine the slow evolution of society.
For these reasons, we should be on our guard not to overestimate science and scientific methods when it is a question of human problems; and we should not assume that experts are the only ones who have a right to express themselves on questions affecting the organization of society.
Innumerable voices have been asserting for some time now that human society is passing through a crisis, that its stability has been gravely shattered. It is characteristic of such a situation that individuals feel indifferent or even hostile toward the group, small or large, to which they belong. In order to illustrate my meaning, let me record here a personal experience. I recently discussed with an intelligent and well-disposed man the threat of another war, which in my opinion would seriously endanger the existence of mankind, and I remarked that only a supra-national organization would offer protection from that danger. Thereupon my visitor, very calmly and coolly, said to me: “Why are you so deeply opposed to the disappearance of the human race?”
I am sure that as little as a century ago no one would have so lightly made a statement of this kind. It is the statement of a man who has striven in vain to attain an equilibrium within himself and has more or less lost hope of succeeding. It is the expression of a painful solitude and isolation from which so many people are suffering in these days. What is the cause? Is there a way out?
It is easy to raise such questions, but difficult to answer them with any degree of assurance. I must try, however, as best I can, although I am very conscious of the fact that our feelings and strivings are often contradictory and obscure and that they cannot be expressed in easy and simple formulas.
[more at link]
i was out last night and had no idea my diary’d been front-paged. thank you fdl mods for the honor, and thanks to all who’ve commented. i’ve also been feeling overwhelmed by the sheer number of dusty boxes full of family history still to be inventoried, but have new energy to take them on.
And an awesome one it is too!
Awesome diary Rosalind…!!! Some times I dig out Einsteins writings about social aspects of life. He considered himself a “humanist” and his writings about that are fascinating to me. He was criticized for these writings because he said things that went against the military industrial complex and fascism/greed. (and also because there were no “laws of physics” or “math formulas” for him to prove his philosophy. (easier to discredit because these ideas could not be proved.) Thanks for sharing!
DW…good to see you posting…I meant to post on your diary about the unfortunate car accident but got called away and didn’t make it back to post before it was gone. Sending good wishes for a speedy recovery your way.