Playing out in Honduras is yet another chapter of the rise of Latin America’s indigenous population. A rise in the popularity of the left, in our southern continent, reflects the growing unwillingness to bow to economic domination while receiving minimal support in return for labor and their lands’ riches. Meanwhile, the middle class in this country is discovering that they are served poorly by the ownership society that has been tearing down laws to protect the economy from depredations here in the U.S.
Friday, the U.S. announced that it will cut off aid to Honduras as the illegal government there continues to keep its democratically elected president out of the country. The class warfare there reflects on the same here, as the banana republicans of the economically dominant right wing tries to shut down democracy that gives working people our share of the country’s power and wealth.
The coming contest over health care in the Senate provides an amusing fugue in wordplay, as the ‘filibuster’ the right wing has been using to fend off the public interest here is a variation on the title given to U.S. vagabonds who descended on Central America in the 1850′s, the ‘freebooters’ or ‘filibusteros‘ who tried to annex five independent nations there to join with our Southern States.
In one of history’s fascinating quirks, a member of the aristocracy in Costa Rica, Nobel Prize winner President Oscar Arias, is leading the effort to reinstate Honduran president Zelaya, who was removed by a coup. Arias came into prominence as a hero of the southern continent when he resisted, and ejected, the Contra occupation of Costa Rica which brought war while solving internal Nicaraguan battles. Arias refused to allow the U.S. privateers/freebooters who had set up an illegal encampment to make war from Costa Rica on the neighboring Nicaraguan Sandinistas. Now Arias is again working to reestablish democratic sovereignty, this time in Honduras, against the rule by his own aristocratic class.
In a recurring churning of the parties to the south of us, the economic establishment is fighting against the rise of the left, which enables native working people to get a handhold on the wealth the aristocracy considers its own. Elected Zelaya was on the verge of putting to a democratic vote a proposal for establishing a constituent assembly. In the dominant economic class, that evoked the fear of letting the left give more power to the native working classes.
A discussion on Thursday’s PBS Newshour provided the amazing spectacle of Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen insisting that President Zelaya was removed because he had violated the Constitution by the attempt to bring to a vote one proposal for increased representation. I do not find any instance of that particular right wing congresswoman ever remarking that for his violations of the Constitution, President Bush should have been run out of this country in his p.j.’s while financiers set up one of their own in the White House.
Our right wing provides some pretty colorful episodes these days. To our south – in countries whose people make polite coughing noises when we call our own country America, as if it were the entire continent – the rising native population sees our ‘filibusteros’ using here the tactics that are failing there. The working class is taking back its countries to our south, by election. The right wing there took it by freebooting and filibustering.
We can learn a lot from seeing what a third world country looks like, and what it feels like to have labor stolen from working people, by studying Latin American history. This country doesn’t need to become another banana republic.



37 Comments




It’s a shame that Zelaya was expelled and wasn’t allowed a fair trial to defend what seems to have been his attempt to subvert the Honduran constitution.
“”The true significance of the coup, in one of the poorest and weakest countries in the hemisphere … lies in the test it poses to the inter-American system,” says Jorge Heine of the Balsillie School of International Affairs. “If the latter cannot succeed in restoring democracy in Honduras, it cannot do so anywhere. The message would thus be crystal clear: coup-makers can act with impunity.”——-as happened with the election of Hamas in Palestine.
He wasn’t trying to subvert anything, unless a non-binding referendum and raising the minimum wages counts as such.
Let’s see, putting to a vote a constituent assembly. Subverting the constitution by giving the people a voice, hmmmm, there’s a real problem.
The public is not served by the banana republicans.
Ya, the way he was trying to use machinery of government to push that through counts exactly as subversion.
Sympathy for the people of Honduras doesn’t change the nature of Zelaya’s actions or make them legal.
“In his article of June, 29, 2009, Thierry Meyssan submitted that the overthrow of President Zelaya in Honduras had been orchestrated by SouthCom. Moreover, the French edition of his article (through the caption of a photograph which was unfortunately not reproduced in a certain number of foreign sites) underscored the fact that the commander of the US military base at Soto Cano is none other than Colonel Richard A. Juergens, who had already supervised the “kidnapping” of Haitian President Jean-Bertrand Aristide according to a similar scenario. “
http://www.voltairenet.org/article161647.html
If you use the goggle translator, the link at the bottom of the above article takes you to the French article that can then be read easily. The URL is too long to post here; it wouldn’t work.
*******
http://translate.google.com/#
In an article in Martian News in Review, Lionel Dubinsky Jr. suggested that the English Royal Family is made of cheese. Is it a coinsidence that there’s been many recent, some say clandestine, Royal consultations with the Official Purveyor of Dairy Products that have gone unreported?
Sympathy for the people is democracy, sorry you don’t like it.
full disclosure; my relatives worked for United Fruit in Costa Rica, got very rich by annexing land and giving menial jobs to local/indigenous populations and they gave grrreat positions to themselves, you can visit my grandfather’s chair in The Pan American Union building in D.C., Juoquin Bernardo Calvo y Mora; head of the diplomatic corps and ambassador plenipotentiary and he’s on the dos colones bill. And I am very ashamed that they stole from the people what they should have owned
A bit of a low blow, Ruth. Sorry, that you think that disapproving Zelaya’s actions equals being unsympathetic.
An 11 minute video of Zelaya speaking at George Washington University.
*******
“For this reason and others, Manuel Zelaya came back to Washington to get additional commitments from Secretary of State Hilary Clinton. While Clinton did make some commitments on suspending more visas and not recognizing the upcoming elections in Honduras, the story of the US involvement in resolving the coup is still dominated by the support the US provides to the de facto regime. This was further deepened by the revelation that the International Monetary Fund, itself largely controlled by the US Treasury Department, has allocated $150 million to the coup government.”
http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/45779
We have a long history in Latin America of overthrowing governments which sympathize with populaces and are part of the ongoing economic raid of resources we have no right to. This is not a low blow, but history. Freedom takes a commitment that we need to show for ourselves as well as other people in the world.
Yes we do have a long history of just that. Suggesting that Zelaya should have the freedom to subvert the Honduran constitution doesn’t address that problem.
Equating Zelaya’s use of government to strengthen presidential power during the course of Zelaya’s presidency to a commitment to freedom is rather fanciful. Equating criticism of same to lack of sympathy for people is very much a low blow.
If you can back that up somehow, please do. If you can not, please take it off of me.
Ms. Calvo, thank you for further contextualizing the Honduras story.
It is unfortunate that such an important issue did not universally induce honest commentary from all its readers who chose to respond.
The big difference is that so many of our own poor would rise up to fight for them. Since when in history has a class worked against its own interests so willingly? White poor are convinced Big Black Obama is gonna kill them and their grandmothers. I mean, what the hell?
feel free to correct any dishonesty.
I wonder if Kennedy Option Guy’s could get it up for a filibuster? I mean hold somebodies ass up in the air.
It might be weird to filibuster your own party but well it’s pretty weird to have to.
I want to thank you for your posting, Ms Calvo, and to apologize for the dumbness of at least one of the commentors, who’s been reading right wing talking points off AP wire service or CNN, its hard to avoid and you have to really research this stuff…or take the word of the Latin American solidarity organizations who’ve been visiting the region for years…NACLA, Global Exchange, Soawatch, and others.
Thank you for helping to educate Americans that we are all in the same struggle, here and there.
I hope this Honduras mess is a blip in the larger burgeoning current of central/s. america seizing their destiny and telling our rapacious capitalist suicidal insanity to fuck the fuck off. Unfortunately Colombia is sort of our Israel down there, addicted to the MIC tit.
Even Fidel at his most thuggish – does it hold a candle to the dark age monster we’ve become? No healthcare anxieties there either.
Thats a really convicing tactic the right uses over and over and over again. Responding to factual arguments with hysterical non factual rants.
GJ
Are you also someone who thinks that opposing Zelaya’s illegal methods means that one is then necessarily pleased with the coup or happy with the Honduran oligarchy?
they are too stupid, generally speaking, to respond with anything but drivel. thats what their heads are filled with, usless disconnected drivel about cheese and asses.
Can you tell me what was “illegal” about zelayas ” methods”, be specific please, and reference Honduran law whenever possible (snicker)
If you can find fact in that link, please do. I found nothing but a name and an innuendo.
Ordering the armed forces of the nation to conduct the referendum when the constitution has no provision for an amendment process except as provided under article 373.
When the chief of the armed forces refused to accept the order, Zelaya fired him.
Send me a buck fifty for two Snickers.
which fact?
which link?
In your 21, you where referring to my comment @8. In it, I was responding to bb @7.
See her link.
Horse shit. the problem with arguing with right wing punks is that you belive shit that is made up, or you make it up yourselves.
you want the moderate spin
http://www.latimes.com/news/op…..3853.story
the consrvative spin
http://www.google.com/hostedne…..wD9AES6SO0
or the truth:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/i…..;aid=14993
Oh wait , you get all your information from a fat dope addicted community college dropout on the radio. i guess you win
i want a link for the martian article dewshbag..or make a real argument
Are you really too stupid to understand that saying that my Zelaya was engaged in illegality doesn’t mean that I support the coup?
If you think that I’m a devotee of right wing radio, it’s probably just another part of your paranoia.
Try not to address me the way you would your mother, please.
If you would like a link to the Martian article, I would hope that you would go there and look for one.
He was trying to use the “machinery of government” (i.e. Constitutionlly allowed procedures) to change the Constitution. Which, of course, means, bring in the military to have a coup.
By that standard everything from the articles of Confederation on was illegal. You would have deposed Lincoln.
If you can find me saying that I support the coup, I’ll go for treatment.
If you can show me how he was using Constitutionally allowed procedures, I’ll happily shut up. How could he possibly order the military to conduct this vote and how could he fire the head of the military for refusing when there was a court order enjoining the vote?
If there wasn’t a procedure for amending the constitution (mentioned in article 373) or if he wasn’t subject to the constitution and the injunction, and if he wasn’t misusing his authority, there might not be much reason to question his methods.
373
Not only wouldn’t I have deposed Lincoln (except maybe to ask about that habeus stuff), I probably also wouldn’t call the Honduran oligarchy the moral equivalent of our founding fathers
lol..he never does..