In the U.S. we are assured that our health care is outstanding, and if we can just pay for it, we will enjoy excellent oversight. When we plan our family, we don’t factor in the prospect of death.
A pregnant woman in this country faces much higher threat of death in childbirth than in most of the rest of the industrial world.
A major factor in those deaths is heart and arterial disease, another result of obesity. Another factor is the increasing use of C-section, often employed to avoid the strain of childbirth for a variety of reasons.
Dr Bill McCool, at the University of Pennsylvania’s School of Nursing, points out that America is far above the World Health Organization’s goal of a 15% C-section rate.
"Surgery of any kind has risk," he says, and a C-section is, "still the riskiest way to have a baby.
"In the US, almost one third of women have that procedure for delivery of their baby."
Death in childbirth is not exclusive to the population segment that can afford C-section. The minority and poverty factors among our population also play a large role in these deaths.
Dr Bill Callaghan, of the CDC, finds that not knowing why African-American women are at greater risk when giving birth has given him and his colleagues’ sleepless nights.
"We can say that some of this may be due to socio-economic disparities.
"But it does not explain all of it.
"And to the extent that we don’t explain racial disparity in pregnancy-related mortality, we’re going to have difficulty making headway into it."
As our U.S. health care system receives increasing attention, the myth of superiority is dissolving very quickly. Under the paring away of protections the last, worst, administration accomplished, our health has deteriorated seriously.
We have a huge responsibility to bring back the strengths of public protections that government was intended to provide. Our lives depend on it.



8 Comments




C-sections: who benefits? Obviously, it doesn’t increase maternal survival if the US has such high rates of C-section and also very high rates of of death in childbirth. I suspect–although I don’t have evidence to support it–that C-section doesn’t significantly improve outcomes for the baby either.
Well, then…I’d say hospitals, pharma companies, health insurance companies, doctors, the usual suspects benefit from C-sections.
” and if we can just pay for it, we will enjoy excellent oversight.”
You said it! What is more disturbing to those of us that can’t pay for it is that the US is paying for Universal Care in a couple of “istans”. Tell me if you can, why can we afford to pay for another country’s care but not our own?
Congress is a joke. It’s like watching a Mr. Magoo cartoon each day.
Hate to see it, but the only benefit seems to be the old ‘bottom line.’
Sadly, once a woman has had one C-section, it’s also unlikely she’ll ever deliver naturally.
Congress is an old fashioned kind of joke; remember cruelty jokes?
Do you know what the statistics are for minorities and C-sections? I would assume that lower income women are more likely to get C-sections.
Actually, 22.9% for middle class, as opposed to 13.2 for poor,
http://books.google.com/books?id=O4JIakol5RwC&pg=PA581&lpg=PA581&dq=c-section+income+level&source=bl&ots=5s7f-StH8d&sig=5woqzEBSo8WjA6caafMxZ4ubrVY&hl=en&ei=vjgAS8ikG8GEnQf9n_AQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=5&ved=0CCIQ6AEwBA#v=onepage&q=&f=false
I suspect probably pain reduction reasons are involved, from my experience of those of my acquaintance who had c-sections.
If it’s 22 percent for middle classers and 13 percent for the poor, then C-section rates for upper income women would have to be significantly higher to get a 30 percent average for all women. So, yeah. Scheduled births, pain reduction.
No one questions that the people in other counties eat better and more natural foods. Woman work more and are less the couch potatoes we have here, and they aren’t exposed to the polutants and drugs our society is bombarded with.
Could it be way we live is the problem? Not the medical system or it’s availability?