Another progressive development has happened in our neighbor to the south. A female president has been elected in remarkably civilized proceedings in Costa Rica. Laura Chinchilla has succeeded former Presidente Oscar Arias, who won the Nobel Prize for ejecting Ollie North and his band of freebooters from the country.
The history of Costa Rica is, like most of the nations’ histories on the American continent, a mixed one of advances and invasions. Originally held by native tribes, it was ‘discovered’ and ‘developed’ by descendants of the European community. It was invaded again by U.S. ‘freebooters’, in hopes of setting up a kingdom after the Civil War, as I outlined in an earlier post. The ragtag invasion was battled and defeated by troops composed of descendants of the several nationalities there, but the government always was dominated by European descendants as was the case in many of the Latin American nations. In recent years, this has increasingly ended as majorities of natives bring their own into power.
New Presidente Chinchilla combines two elements which are fighting it out here in the U.S., as she is a member of pro-life movements and the socialists, internationally.
Chinchilla’s Partido Liberación Nacional is a member of the Socialist International,[3] whose motto is the promotion of "progressive politics for a better world." On November 28, 2009, Chinchilla became Costa Rica’s only mainstream party candidate to participate and voice support for a controversial march dubbed "March for Life and Family".
The success of a woman in politics seems to many of us, as progressives, the opposite of the anti-women’s rights stances of the right wing that is the pro-life element here. In predominantly Catholic Latin America, however, this is playing out differently.
As a descendant of one of families that comprised Costa Rica’s former representatives, I extend a hand of welcome to the new president of that country. I fervently hope that she will continue that country’s civilization and the resolution of conflicts that keep any country from promoting the interests of its people. Her first address to the country, as their president, gives me hope.
"I want to thank the pioneering women who years ago opened the doors of politics in Costa Rica," Laura Chinchilla said Sunday to flag-waving supporters in the capital, San Jose. "My government will be open to all Costa Ricans of good faith."
Some good faith will be the greatest help for all elements to reconcile and work together. We fervently hope that we will find some here, as antidote to the political opportunism that works against the country’s best interests.
Of course, Tom Tancredo probably thinks voters were supposing they were electing a small furry animal since they don’t speak English.



10 Comments







I don’t know much about Costa Rica, but from what I have read she is not a very progressive candadite. The prior administration of which she was the VP, had a very bad environmental record and was completely in the pocket of national corporations.
She is also anti gay marriage and anti abortion rights.
I would say this is a step back for progressives and Women in Costa Rica.
Would it be a progressive development if Sarah Palin became president here? This is a horribly misguided post. She’s a woman, but she’s a social conservative that opposes gay marriage and abortion, and adamantly opposed an amendment to separate church and state in Costa Rica. hopeful is right: this is a huge step backwards for Costa Rican progressives.
tOdd its a 100% Catholic Country imagine if Pat Robertson became President for over 100 years the rich live in big houses the poor suffer there is no middle class. Now imagine what change would look like the mere fact a woman got elected and not just because her husband was the President like in so many other countries is a big step.
Hispanics do have some issues with women in charge the mere fact this happened makes me hopeful.
Ruth maybe you should mention more about what kinds of things the first woman President wants to do that would make Lefties proud?
Also just how many governments have switched to Progressive in South and Central America how many switched during the Bush years as the CIA shifted resources away from them and to Iraq?
I’m not sure Bush would like this legacy:)
Hopefully Mexico is next to get a Lefty Leader!
Thanks, TCU, I forget the total lack of knowledge that the media gives the audience here, and that I stay in touch. Actually Arias’ refusal to accept domination by the U.S. is a very good indicator. What Chinchilla continues is a firmly resisting, nonviolent, left wing. The now multilateral corps that have taken over our gov’t are an outgrowth of the U.S. industrial domination that characterized latin Am’n gov’ts in the past decades. The socialism of their growing political scene is a refusal to allow that domination, and its exclusion of the worker – not to give the full college course in FDL space. But redistribution of wealth has been gradually occuring in L’n Am’ca and it is much in evidence as the educated, healthy, well housed and fed population as a whole takes the reins.
Might I suggest an other diary and since you have so much more read on the info than I do and maybe a look at Mexico I do so want my Grand Parents land to be free.
Thanks, I will put something together eventually, it seems to bore folks for the most part. We Latins must seems pretty incomprehensible, we just keep devoting our country’s resources to our own people.
As for campaign, Ms. Presidente maintained she would make the country secure, and had the experience to do it – and of course the major threat is from the vampire corporate takeover which Arias has demonstrably combated.
overview here; http://english.cri.cn/6966/2010/02/07/2001s548552.htm
and ” “We don’t receive a bounced cheque from the people. To the contrary, we have shouldered solemn obligations to hold dialogues with all parties and social sectors,” she said.
Chinchilla’s campaign platform included improvement of the country’s infrastructure, creation of a progressive income tax and new jobs with “green jobs” initiative.
She also has promised to create more job opportunities, better living conditions for children and senior citizens, as well as to combat crimes and drug trafficking. ”
http://drugpolicycentral.com/bot/article/news.xinhuanet5581.htm
President Arias threw out the Contras, which was quite a progressive step. Some of his policies, such as support for CAFTA, were ones that are not particularly encouraging, but his role in supporting the elected president of Honduras over a military coup that corporate groups wanted, to keep the populace from gaining greater power as voters, was quite sound.
Being a socialist is progressive, though as I point out, she has been associated with pro-life groups – as have most practicing Catholics in this country, whether they are progressive or not.
Cool!
Yes, it is. Unlike U.S. pro-life groups, most Latin associations of this inclination espouse opposition to war.
Also more on what did this lady run on? Would we be pleased? I think you guessed I’m Mexican:)