The self-described Conservatives meeting in Washington, D.C. this week seldom mention the previous president, and when they do prefer to describe him as not being true to conservatism. The reality is that the worst president ever was the ultimate conservative. His failures, which are obvious to anyone in even the vaguest contact with reality, are the failures of conservatism. Those are failures that the movement and its adherents would like to distance themselves from. The truth, however, is that by getting the power to enact their programs, their now rejected former president has proved that their ideology is a failure, and a disastrous one.
Bush put into effect the tax cuts that he had promised, as well as the deregulation that is de rigueur for the corporate welfare conservatives espouse. As Thomas Frank pointed out on Washington Journal February 16, previous administrations of conservatives such as Reagan had made a practice of this and he continued it. As Frank noted, recently Reagan advisor David Stockman has published a book in which Stockman says he realized early on that the principle of cutting taxes while increasing spending on programs like defense was unworkable. Though he and other members of Reagan’s, and subsequent, administrations claimed that it was disaster in the making – and argued against the principle of incurring debt on the grounds that it would keep only Democrats from carrying out social programs – conservatives continued on with the policy that has destroyed our economy.
That the previous administration was irresponsible not only fiscally but morally is an observable fact that the present conservatives wish to deny, but the facts are there. To keep from equating conservatism with the ideology that brought on our present disasters, they deny their connection to the ultimate conservative, George W. Bush.
Dr. Paul Krugman spoke to that myth in November of 2007, and made several connections between the then president and the conservative ideology.
People claim to be shocked at the Bush administration’s efforts to disenfranchise minority groups, under the pretense of combating voting fraud. But Reagan opposed the Voting Rights Act, and as late as 1980 he described it as “humiliating to the South.”
People claim to be shocked at the Bush administration’s attempts — which, for a time, were all too successful — to intimidate the press. But this administration’s media tactics, and to a large extent the people implementing those tactics, come straight out of the Nixon administration. Dick Cheney wanted to search Seymour Hersh’s apartment, not last week, but in 1975. Roger Ailes, the president of Fox News, was Nixon’s media adviser.
People claim to be shocked at the Bush administration’s attempts to equate dissent with treason. But Goldwater — who, like Reagan, has been reinvented as an icon of conservative purity but was a much less attractive figure in real life — staunchly supported Joseph McCarthy, and was one of only 22 senators who voted against a motion censuring the demagogue.
Above all, people claim to be shocked by the Bush administration’s authoritarianism, its disdain for the rule of law. But a full half-century has passed since The National Review proclaimed that “the White community in the South is entitled to take such measures as are necessary to prevail,” and dismissed as irrelevant objections that might be raised after “consulting a catalogue of the rights of American citizens, born Equal” — presumably a reference to the document known as the Constitution of the United States.
Now, as they survey the wreckage of their cause, conservatives may ask themselves: “Well, how did we get here?” They may tell themselves: “This is not my beautiful Right.” They may ask themselves: “My God, what have we done?”
But their movement is the same as it ever was. And Mr. Bush is movement conservatism’s true, loyal heir.
Again in 2008, conservatives renewed their connection with Bush even though by then the evidence was clear that his administration had brought ab out any number of disasters. Still he was their apotheosis, his presidency the victory they had sought for so long. Polled by Gallup, the conservatives approved their ideal that the worst president ever had embodied:
Dec 11, 2008; George W. Bush remains popular among conservative Republicans (72% approve of him) despite his low overall approval rating.
The conservatives are trying very hard to scrape the remains of their perfected ideology off the windshield before voters recognize it. The extent to which they succeed is another catastrophe that will foul up the scene, and this country. We need to make the point as much as possible; the worst president ever, George W. Bush, was a real conservative, and succeeded in his ambition to achieve conservative principles. We are barely surviving the effects of conservatism now, if, that is, we do survive as a nation.



51 Comments







nightmare – to be sure
‘Fraid we’re living in one now, while trying to wake the voters up.
they were very successful to the degree that their ultimate goal was to destroy the social safety net. They have succeeded with the help of the democracts and their support of war and tax cuts for the top 2%
We are all conservatives now.
No truer words spoken by any Talking Heads.
Now, as they survey the wreckage of their cause, conservatives may ask themselves: “Well, how did we get here?” They may tell themselves: “This is not my beautiful Right.” They may ask themselves: “My God, what have we done?”
But their movement is the same as it ever was.
LOL.
The opposition needs to be able to frame this, Byrne said it best, was it during the Reagan years?
thanks, watching them running against themselves has been diverting, to paraphrase Arianna Huffington on Rachel Maddow last week – I think our punditry on the left is getting there.
and thanks also, ShotoJamf
And the John Birch Society is back funding in part CPAC.
The KKK, another right wing hate group that never goes away reared its ugly head to a welcome in Nahunta Georgia last week. Link
Very eloquent and succinct. Thank you, Ms. Calvo.
They are aided and abetted in this historical fraud by political nihilists that insist there is no substantive difference between Bush’s policies and Obama’s.
Mmmm, let’s see. War going badly and is unpopular, let’s do a surge!!!
Indefinite detention, check, in fact, let’s tell the SCOTUS that we can designate a person a “non-person” at the stroke of the President’s pen, inelligible for any rights under the Constitution.
Stimulate the economy, why, let’s load down the stimulus bill with… TAX CUTS!!!!
Health care… mmm, let’s see, Bush did Medicare Part D by letting the pharmaceutical companies write the legislation…. Let’s let the health insurancy companies (literally, Baucus’s “aide” that authored the bill was a health insurance companay rep) write the bill!!!!!
Those pesky deficits, what to do…… I know!!! Let’s take the Republican’s original idea and appoint a commission that Congress can only vote yea or nay on!!!!!
….. and on and on and on and on and on and on
Jeez, I just can’t imagine why people get that nutty idea OldGold. Must be something in the water maybe?????
I can’t imagine where they get that nutty idea, either. But, I suspect it is what dogs all nihilists, the inability to recognize and understand distinctions.
Yep, just as I said, insults.
And those like you that are insane are the answer??? After all, the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over again and expecting a different result. Continuing to support Democrats and expecting the next one or the next election to be different is insanity.
Ok, you’ve called me a nihilist and I’ve called you insane. Fun???
Oh, and you’re also in dire need of glasses if you “see” any distinctions in any of the examples I posted.
There, see, I’ve gotton quite good at it too.
Thing is, even though I think you’re dead wrong (and you think I’m dead wrong) about the substance of the difference between D’s & R’s, I’d bet good money we probably AGREE on what a good health care system is, on what the right amount of taxation is for the rich, and on what level of a social safety net the country needs.
Instead, we focus on the parts we disagree on.
Why???? I do it too, and am asking legitimately. Why??
Because the path you are pursuing will lead to nothing.
American voters self-identify roughly as follows: 40% Conservative, 40% Moderate and 20% Progressive. For progressive to accomplish anything we have to accomodate the damn moderates.
I dont mind folks who piss and moan about this, but I do object to the vilification of practical left of right politicians who bend to ths reality. These pols have brought us half-assed halting progress over time. I contend it is better than nothing.
And the path you are pursuing leads to nothing.
Gee, we’re gonna still play this game??
Half-assed progress??? Here’s the progress since 1980. The rich have gotten richer and now own more wealth, with a bigger disparity in wealth, then at any time since the New Deal.
The only half-assed progress that’s occurred is progress away from the progressive New Deal era. And to say the country is “conservative” based on a poll that asks them to self identify is as nutty as it is to say the country is rich based on an average of incomes. The word “liberal” has become toxic, and the word “conservative” has become acceptable, even when folks adhere to policies much more in line with progressives than with conservatives.
Single payer polls well EVERY TIME. Hard to get more progressive than that. The Public Option polled well EVEN AMONG Republicans. So when those pols were killing the public option and writing a corporate giveaway of a bill, they weren’t bending to any political reality, they were fulfilling the desires of the corporate masters that pay them.
Wake up man, and smell the coffee. Or keep you head buried in the sand. Doesn’t matter to me, but I’m done with trying to be nice since you have no intention of returning the favor. So keep living in your delusional make believe world where the Democrats are somehow our saviours, and I’ll keep living in the real one where the Democrats have become just as purchased as the Republicans and will fight to make sure they lose just as much as the Republicans deserve to lose.
Have a great day.
Fluoride?
Excellent post! It should be forwarded to every Democrat in Congress and the WH. It also needs to be sent to every Democrat in State and municipal government and all state Democratic Party chairs. The right will do all in it’s power to put the American people back to sleep so they can come in the dead of night to wreak more havoc.
thanks. I have no doubt that if the policy makers themselves don’t read FireDogLake, their staffers do.
I’m sure if there is one Congressperson that reads FDL it’s Bernie Sanders. What this country needs is more democratic socialists willing to call out Republican BS.
Anyone who actually does his job of serving the public is likely to read those of us who write about their issues, and no doubt Sanders stays up on FDL among other liberal blogs.
Wait. People in Congress can read? Who knew?
A conservative wouldn’t change the tax rate, fearing the consequences, the consequences we soon had, btw.
Again, these people aren’t conservatives.
You might call them neo-conservatives, or neo-fascists, but definitely not conservatives.
You have a good point but I used the name they like to call themselves.
Clinton’s Rubinomics did far more damage to the economy than Bush with his tax cuts, it opened the door on this current economic meltdown in spite of Brooksley Born’s efforts to regulate the Market. Partisanship is the weapon of choice for the PTB.
She’s a heroine of mine, just was emailing this to a friend this a.m.;
‘In 1997, Brooksley Born warned in congressional testimony that unregulated trading in derivatives could “threaten our regulated markets or, indeed, our economy without any federal agency knowing about it.” Born called for greater transparency–disclosure of trades and reserves as a buffer against losses. ‘
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/edcut/370925
What she has brought out in hearings recently is that Goldman Sachs has been making a great proportion of its profits from ‘proprietary trades’, overriding client interests to maximize profits, something that the president is trying to regulate but having the usual amount of trouble getting the right wing, particularly in the Senate, to represent its constituents rather than its political aims.
I don’t know how you can assert that Obama is trying to regulate the markets, given that it’s merely the realm of “savvy businessmen”. The same faction that was fighting Brooksley Born, is after all still running the looting.
http://documents.nytimes.com/draft-of-president-obama-s-financial-regulation-proposal#p=1
Since Gitmo’s emptying out, maybe we can send them there for their next CPAC.
All reports are that the food is just great. /s
Why do progressives even waste their time thinking about CPAC at all? Why isn’t that time spent instead organizing with other progressives to organize Main Street to take back Washington?
These reactionaries are either Republican ideologuges or Republican Bilderbergers intent on coopting the ideologues into the ruling class.
So much mental masterbation about fools when the fooled themselves should be the only focus of progressive attention.
Because, it seems to me, that progressives can’t agree on anything, and spend as much time sniping at each other as they do the real enemy. Also, it doesn’t help when many can’t even see that the sky is blue. I mean, that the Democrats are just as purchased as the Republicans and are NOT the answer any longer is as clear as the sky is blue, but we can’t even agree on that.
And even when we do, we can’t agree on what to do about it.
And when we disagree we immediately turn to invective and nastiness…WITH EACH OTHER!!!
I’ve seen it so many times now I catch myself doing it too out of frustration.
I would say the progressives need a good leader, but our very anti-authoritarinistic ways make that ineffective too. Don’t knnow what the answer is, but I do know if we don’t get our shit together, and soon, it’s going to be too damned late to save this great country.
We need it back NOW.
Now goddammit, now! (quote from Die Hard, lol)
“Don’t knnow what the answer is,”
I do think Jane is on the right track.
Since the object of winning elections has to be the goal of anyone who actually wants to serve the public, it would hardly be useful to ignore the opponents’ tactics, and their policies.
lack of the left’s vision has been the cause of the demise of the left itself for so long. well, as long as “socialism” and “communism” remain the dirtiest words in this country, nothing will come out of this suffering.
Thanks for your comments, I have to be offline for a bit, will check in later this p.m.
We already had/have the regulating agencies in place that could have prevented the current meltdown. So it’s hard to see how more regulation will accomplish anything when the same ideology that created the mess is still being promulgated by the same actors—this time in the Obama administration.
‘Let’s create Regulatory agencies but make sure that they are toothless’, is not reform. Much as HCR is not reform as long as it relies on private Insurance to accomplish it’s goals. Obama is a supply sider and as long as Rubinomics remains the overarching religion, nothing will change, imo.
the laws were in place and Greenspan didn’t use then because he tho’t that the effects of the disaster would be dispersed as they had been in the S&L meltdown. and said so.
This is one of his apologias; http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/business/july-dec08/crisishearing_10-23.html
The right wing led the nation into disaster and wants to keep doing it. When the working class has its share of the market, the ultra rich (mogul horde) keep more while the folks who earn it for them lose.
Only partially true. Perhaps in some selected short term things.
But the liberal/progressives need to get off their collective ass and take a page from the hard right wing’s book and plan and implement a long term strategy to turn the electorate back leftward
http://www.gallup.com/poll/123854/conservatives-maintain-edge-top-ideological-group.aspx
Is this supposed to prove there is no use in working to change minds and transform the culture?
Knock Knock.
Who’s there?
Whistling.
Whistling who?
Whistling through the empty heads of liberal/progressives.
I repeat
No. It explains why pure progressive ideas are seldom enacted into law.
Progressive ideas have in the past been elected into law and can be again.
The poll is a time stamped sound bite. Why do you insist on pressing a point to the contrary?
One must assume your politics are conservative and you certainly have the right to them.
Peace
This is so true. Conservatism is a completely failed ideology, unless you are a conservative, and are trying desperately to unattach it from their conservative hero, George W. Bush. Unfortunately, we have a so-called progressive president determined to reanimate this dead corpse. Obama seems intent on reviving this failed ideology by constantly referring to it and giving it legitimacy. We finally had a real chance to drive a stake through Dracula’s heart, and complete the death forever by cutting of his head, but the Democrats, as usual, failed to do so. This insane need for bipartisanship reveals to me one thing about the Democratic leadership, they are scared to actually lead. George W. Bush, as we all remember, was the conservative hero the movement was looking for. Well they got what they wanted, and as any person with a brain could’ve told them, it failed as spectacularly as we expected it to. Now the country is trying desperately, without much help from the elected Democratic leaders, to pull us back from the failures of conservatism.
Late, but just a shout out to say another great post, Ruth . . .
They had a run at it, and they destroyed the country.
No other message need be sent, shouted or sold.
We hammer this, day in and day out, at the top of our lungs.
We beat them with it, mercilessly, like calamari under the tenderizer mallet in our hands.
Thanks.
Bless your heart, keep it up.
Thanks Ruth. I don’t always agree with Krugman but he couldn’t be more right about Dubya being a Conservative. Bush and the Congressional Republicans during his first six years were the fulfillment, the consummation, of the Regan Revolution. If Goldwater is Abraham and Regan is Moses then George (clown shoes) Bush is Jesus H. Christ. Just like the thumpers said he was.
thanks, and yes, they are the ultimate goal. Mission accomplished.
The conservatives have been trying to ruin this Country for a hundred years.
It started long before the last Bush administration, and even before Reagan but the people are to blind to see what is in front of their eyes.
The great depression was because of their conservative principals, and it’s recovery could not have happened if they were in charge.
The middle class would never have been created by them, there would be no SS or Medicare. There would be no Unions or employee safety or benefits with them. There would be no civil rights or equality with them. Even now they are against the rights of many people from woman to gays, and their racial undertones come out much to often.
What they preach like small Government and low taxes they don’t live up to. Much of the Countries debt is because of them. Their ideas of less regulation are to let the big money interests and the crooked do as they may, and to let the normal citizen fend for Theirselves.
In recent months they have shown that they don’t care about people dying from no healthcare, or suffering without it. They don’t care if people with it lose everything because it doesn’t pay, or go through hell because of it’s actions.
They have said nothing about the foreclosiers, because if the people can’t pay they deserve to lose in their eyes. Just like with Tort Reform they don’t care about the injured, but are really heart felt for those who have to pay, or pay the insurance costs because others did wrong.
They preach the Constitution, but who has tried to undermine it, change it, and go around it more. They preach human rights but then try to take away everyones rights. They preach conservativeness in fiscal matters yet spend like drunken sailors, and don’t pay for everything they want to do. Earmarks tripled while they were in power, while some of them bitched about it. They would have us forget the scandles, and the lying, fear mongeringing, calling the oposition unpatriotic.
Anyone who believes anything the Conservatives say, and that includes Ron Paul are loonies. Yet You’ll notice much of the Country is turning to them as our saviors from the mean progressives.
America the land of Loonies, and Home of the ignorant.
thanks and this is a very sound statement.
Ruth, So well written. Thanks. As a fellow TXan it is so great, even an honor to the smarts of Molly Ivins to point out so assuredly and truly what a complete failure Shrub truly was, especially poignant since he rode in on the slime of a stolen election and a shameful SupCt decision. Even his dad knew his dumb kid needed tutoring.
Thanks for the powerful reminder that we should not forget…a really malevolent and immature addict.
Thanks, and it’s true that being a TXan myself, I take it somewhat personally that one of our worst insinuated himself into control of the country and made such of a mess. We do have worthwhile and honest public servants, but he’s not one.
And glad to see the info about insurance rate controls.
OT: This is sort of nice: NYT
“Obama to Urge Oversight of Insurers’ Rate Increases
President Obama will propose on Monday giving the federal
government new power to block excessive rate increases by
health insurance companies, as he rolls out comprehensive
legislation to revamp the nation’s health care system, White
House officials said.”