Once upon a time there was a concerted effort to prevent the officials charged with regulating the financial industry from doing their job. That effort was extremely fruitful and the result was a worldwide economic catastrophe. Of course, the wingers learned their lesson and never would do such an irresponsible thing again. That last sentence is the fairy tale.
Once again, the recipients of big money from the financial industry are trying to keep its operations above the law so that the consumers will be deprived of protection. In attempting to hamstring the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, once again the right wing will be okay with outright fraud, and the resulting economic chaos, as long as it will enable their contributors to make profits. Attacks against the CFPB are coming on a daily basis, as the right tries to make the world safe for theft from financial consumers.
Don’t let this concerted rightwing smear campaign—straight out of their stale playbook—distract from the facts. These daily hit-jobs on Warren and the CFPB are designed to do one thing only: lay the groundwork to limit the agency’s funding and autonomy and, consequently, its power.
Currently, the bureau is funded through the Fed—just as all bank supervisory agencies are independently funded—in order to avoid politicizing its mission by subjecting it to Congressional appropriations. Yet the GOP would like to create a different set of rules for the CFPB. That’s why Texas Republican Representative Randy Neugebauer has introduced legislation to house the CFPB in Treasury so that Congress can control the purse strings. He didn’t try to hid his objective, saying the move would allow Congress to “have some say-so on how big this organization gets and some of their activities.”
Warren addressed this issue squarely in a recent speech, “While the banking regulators charged with preserving the safety and soundness of financial institutions and ensuring consumer protection compliance by smaller banks would continue to receive independent funding, the agency in the financial regulatory system with lead responsibility for protecting consumers would face a different set of rules – rules that threaten its independence.”
Sweeping changes were promised after the recent meltdown of our system caused by toxic assets, an invention enabled by regulation that had been melted down first. The promises are another fairy tale, coming from a right wing that has lost any taste for responsibility.
While the world struggles back from the deregulatory swamp that hollowed out our investments until they were worth a fraction of their original value, the financial institutions that created this disaster are doing just fine. Since they are unscathed, their operators have concluded that all’s right with the world as long as they can escape the consequences.
Laws are the enemy to aspiring cheats. The very creators of the fraudulent investments too many investors bought up – thus losing savings they’d entrusted to the cheats – are charging forth to create fraudulent investments once again. Standing in their way is an agency created to protect the consumer of their toxic vessels. Naturally, the potential cheats will try diligently to bring down the agency set up to prevent their cheating investors again.
For anyone who watched the hearings that produced the FCPB, Chairperson Warren is well known for listening seriously to the right wing’s tag lines about reducing taxes as the ideal way to stave off financial ruin – despite that by that method they had produced that same financial ruin – then proceeding on to act inside the realm of real facts. By her guidance, a ‘bipartisan’ commission that included wackos like Jeb Hensarling, of Texas highwayman banker distinction, actually produced a workable plan to rebuild investors’ safe conduct through the miasma of deregulated and bundled financial consumer products.
It’s an old, tried and true, way of identifying thieves in the making, that they earnestly commit themselves to bring down the Rule of Law that would stand in their way. Sadly, our large banks have joined in that ethical downfall, by allying themselves with profits rather than depending on a reputation of soundness. The standard of sound practice kept smaller local banks for the main part within guidelines that sustained them during the recent financial meltdown.
Of course, as long as a business needs to pass itself off as serving its clients’ interests, while in reality it’s interested primarily in its own bottom line, the client is the main victim of its practices. Membership banks, a.k.a. credit unions, have the client as the main beneficiary instead of a bottom line that is their enemy, and are a far, far more trustworthy financial institution than any non-local, for-profit, bank.




6 Comments




Just fyi, the ‘B’ in CFPB stands for ‘Bureau’; I only know because it used to be ‘Agency’, and it took awhile to learn the ‘B’ bit.
Just for the record, yes, regulators were loking the other way on derivatives and MBSs, but Dems helped pass, andClinton signed, the 2 laws that did away with bright lines between commericial and ivestment banking, then passed the CFMA, which even made it illegal for the STATES to regulated swaps; crazy. And many Bluedogs and the White House blocked meaningful *RE*-regulation, but even the minimal Dodd-Frank could do some good if the agencies gave a fart. And Obama’s DoJ could be running actual investigations into what we all know was massive fraud, and prosecuting it.
I don’t know to what degree the CFPB would have authority over some of the basic fraud, but I do know that we should keep our eye out to see who Obama finally chooses to head the bureau.
Tom Miller (Iowa AG) is on the very short list. He is the head of the State AGs working on investigating the fraudulent mortgages and service agreements, and word has it that the investigations were bogus, and they are recommending deal-cutting fines that are so small as to be silly.
But yeah; it probably isn’t just the wingnut R’s who want to cut the Bureau’s funding in half.
Thanks, I corrected ‘board’ to bureau, swimming in alphabet soup means getting hung up on croutons sometimes.
Actually, the Phil Gramm proviso that removed what was then a tiny part of the financial community from regulation was slipped into a mammoth financial services bill, and did go almost unnoticed until suddenly it was being used to create the toxic assets that made such chaos in our market. While they should have been more aware of the potential for misbehavior, I blame the blue dogs more for being taken in, than for actual intent to enable the traders to bring down the world’s economy.
Gramm: ‘On Dec. 15, 2000, hours before Congress was to leave for Christmas recess, Gramm had a 262-page amendment slipped into the appropriations bill. It forbade federal agencies to regulate the financial derivatives that greased the skids for passing along risky mortgage-backed securities to investors. ‘
http://www.democrats.com/did-phil-gramm-cause-the-market-meltdown
Well, it’s sure not the story I know, but that’s okay.
Loved the ‘croutons’ in the alphabet soup. ;o)
Yves Smith linked to this; if it’s real, it’s a good thing:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/03/16/obama-administration-modify-mortgages_n_836350.html
Shooting for 3 million mods in 6 months.
Still doing the butterfly stroke thru them. Barney Frank does an excellent accounting of the maneuvers that led up to the deregulation leading to the financial meltdown.
The more the merrier, and more steps on the road to recovery.