The Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act (SAFRA) is by far the greatest step ever taken in Washington to combat the control of giant banking moguls over our country’s youth. Consistently, we have seen the cost of higher education climb pricing many young people out of the opportunity for a better future. At the same time assistance available to young people has actually gone down.
Twenty years ago, 60% of young people who were able to pay for college on Pell Grants today that number has dipped to half of that. The bill is the first meaningful step in a long-term solution to the predatory private lenders who take advantage of students.
Among other things, the bill will
- Invest $40 billion to increase the maximum annual Pell Grant scholarship to $5,550 in 2010 and to $6,900 by 2019. Starting in 2011, the scholarship will be linked to match rising costs-of-living by indexing it to the Consumer Price Index plus 1 percent.
- Strengthen the Perkins Loan program, a campus-based program that provides low-cost federal loans to students, by providing the program with more reliable forms of credit from the federal government and expanding the program to include significantly more college campuses.
- Keep interest rates low on need-based – or subsidized – federal student loans by making the interest rates on these loans variable beginning in 2012. These interest rates are currently set to jump from 3.4 percent to 6.8 percent in 2012. (This compares to loans that Courtney mentioned whose loans can have a 7.2 percent or even 10 percent interest rate).
- Provide loan forgiveness for members of the military who are called up to duty in the middle of the academic year.
- Convert all new federal student lending to the stable, effective and cost-efficient Direct Loan program. Beginning July 1, 2010, all new federal student loans will be originated through the Direct Loan program, instead of through lenders like Sallie Mae that are subsidized by taxpayers in the federally-guaranteed student loan program. Unlike the current lender-based program, the Direct Loan program is entirely insulated from market swings and can therefore guarantee students access to low-cost federal college loans, in any economy.
This was one of the biggest promises the President made to young voters this past election, and it came dangerously close to being thrown under the school bus by elected officials willing to sell out to any bidder. Luckily, youth across the country emailed, called, and tweeted elected officials begging for the change they were promised. The result was a commitment to the original bill that stops these wasteful subsidies and moves the program under the already existing Direct Loan program, and the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act will be folded in with the health insurance reform bill.
There must be reform, and Washington MUST choose students over the banking industry. Washington subsidized the banking industry with as much as $87 billion over the last 10 years, which has lead to a nationalization of the banking industry that continues to make CEOs richer while young people face a race to the bottom.
The best investment Washington can make in its future is with an investment in the nation’s youth. With young people who are trained and well educated our country can spur a new cycle of innovation capturing the entrepreneurial spirit of a generation. But with tens of thousands of dollars in debt, these students can’t take any risks even if they could begin a new cycle of growth and progress in these dire economic times.
This bill is the first major step in what could be the greatest overhaul in education. There is such possibility ahead, and nested in that is the glimmer of hope we’d nearly lost to the banking lobby.



19 Comments

I wouldn’t confuse student loan reform with education reform. They are quite different. Direct lending came about under the Eisenhower administration, it was when demand for the loans began to exceed the program that the Republicans started pushing for gauranteed student loans, then they tussled with the Bill Clinton as he began more direct lending, and until the economic melt down more schools went back to direct loans as the money for private issued gauranteed loans dried up. So, now with Obama’s proposal we will eliminate the subsidies, which is very welcome news, and something the Party has worked toward for a long time.
Higher education finance, however, is different that “education reform”, which typically deals with k-12. In this area, I think Obama’s approach has been quite flawed and does not rely on the latest findings. For instance, his administration is encouraging charter schools, when the latest data suggests charter school students do not perform better than students in traditional schools, yet they cost more, particularly to the often already cashed strapped communities in which we find them. His education reforms also encourage school closings and mass teacher firings, both ideas that failed over a decade ago.
I would aviod conflating “education reform” with higher education financial reforms.
Thanks for the analysis Sarah
You are absolutely right about the school debt deadweight we attach to too many of our kids. It destroys their options, and can easily destroy their futures.
Thirty years ago, parents could plan and prepare to fund the college education of their children, and everyone who could possibly arrange it did so. Now the cost is so high that most people cannot handle the load and their own retirement. This is intolerable.
Would be nice if current students could refi their shitty loans to a more comfortable situation.
Wow. I wonder if that is included.
Marianne Moore wrote something some time ago– not quite a poem, not quite prose– called “Profit is a Dead Weight.”
I know I have a copy of it somewhere; you’ve inspired me to look for it.
Thanks to Sara for making this understandable and it does seem to be a plus move.
But you are so correct to point out this is not to be confused with education reform. As I see school cutbacks to the extreme in my and neighboring states, the Kansas City closures, mass firings all apparently having the Obama approval I am most disturbed. It seems truly that we are in the final stages of dismantling universal public school education., a sure sign of decay.
Then there is the debacle of making universal the Texas version of history. I have to say my first thought on reading this was now with all that loan money what college will accept a kid who doesn’t know who Thomas Jefferson was and believes the planet was created 4000 yr ago
…Washington MUST choose students over the banking industry.
I’ll take “yeah, That’ll Happen” for $100, Alex…
Using government to invest in the future is something the last few presidential administrations have been unwilling to do. That bias has been shown in their priorities in education, space exploration, energy research, and infrastructure improvement. We’re now beginning to pay for that shortsightedness. I wonder how long it will be before we change our priorities?
I would avoid conflating “education reform” with higher education financial reforms.
Correct. All of the following are different:
–School reform (typically referring to P-12)
–Higher education reform
–Student aid reform
–Student loan reform.
Moving to 100% Direct Lending (DL) — by getting rid of the bank-based program — is only part of the last one: student loan reform. The savings from doing so are made available, in part, to the grant programs, but they are not “reformed,” per se.
While a welcome change, to be sure, if past is prologue, the small increases in the grant programs made possible by the savings from the move to DL will unfortunately be overtaken quickly by increases in public college tuition and fees, leaving low- and moderate-income students worse off.
Money Quote!!
If this nation doesn’t invest in the Education of our youth then we are investing in failure of the whole nation. Even the Rich will pay for this neglect!!
I think SAFRA does allow those who are current to convert their loans from private to direct lenders. Not sure if it will survive the Nelson axe, though.
Is it possible to restructure Social Security so that instead of SS purchasing U.S. Government bonds with the surplus, we reinvested it into student loans and first-time mortgages. The idea that the same program benefits all generations. Otherwise, I fear, it won’t be long before the younger cohorts will simply demand that Social Security be cut.
I couldn’t agree more. There needs to be a substantial effort for education reform. There are a few previsions in the student loan bill that do have some good help with pre-k but these were just add ons. We need meaningful education reform and student loan reform
Will you repose the poem or link to it here? I’d love to read it!
s it possible to restructure Social Security so that instead of SS purchasing U.S. Government bonds with the surplus, we reinvested it into student loans and first-time mortgages. The idea that the same program benefits all generations. Otherwise I fear, it won’t be long before the younger cohorts will simply demand that Social Security be cut. I’m not asking if it’s realistic, or if our government is not so corrupt that it would be unable to administer such a program responsibly. I’m asking a question best directed to a legislator. Can such a program be developed, or does such an idea have internal conflicts.
Is it possible to restructure Social Security so that instead of SS purchasing U.S. Government bonds with the surplus, we reinvested it into student loans and first-time mortgages. The idea that the same program benefits all generations. Otherwise, I fear, it won’t be long before the younger cohorts will simply demand that Social Security be cut. I’m not asking if it’s realistic, or if our government is not so corrupt that it would be unable to administer such a program responsibly.
Well said! I couldn’t agree more. I still have a lot it that hopey changey stuff. And I believe government can be a tool for good if you have good people willing to be connected to other people’s lives who care about making it better. With elected officals in office who make this fact a priority I believe we will begin a new era of promise and ideally progress
I’m pretty sure it’s not avaialable online. I’ll have to type it in by hand. But I know I have one of her books that includes it…
I will look for it, but I may not have time this weekend, at least not before Sunday evening.