In the alternate universe known as the Republican Party, there are two types of people: Those who say stupid, wrong, crazy, destructive things that hurt the country and its political discourse, but don’t really believe any of it . . . and those who say those things and believe all of it. John Boehner wants you to know he’s the first type.
Matt Corley at Think Progress picks up the Politico story that has Republicans leaders John Boehner and Eric Cantor worrying about how crazy Michele Bachmann makes them all look:
Sources say they have been especially wary of the possible damage inflicted on the party’s reputation by bomb-throwing Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.), who last fall called for an investigation into whether members of Congress are “pro-America or anti-America.”
Still, Boehner has largely avoided antagonizing the base on these hot-button issues — steering clear of using the words “death panel” — while criticizing Democrats for involving the government in end-of-life decisions. He’s been particularly careful to avoid the fate of former Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-Ga.), who found himself publicly espousing positions that didn’t have widespread support in his own conference.
Boehner’s dilemma is enough to make a grown man weep.
I’ve been wondering when those responsible moderates, Boehner and Cantor, would start to cringe that the crazies were becoming an embarrassment. The official Frank Luntz memo they sent out expressly said that obstructing, obfuscating, creating stupid distractions, lying and blatant demogoguery were expected of the Party faithful, but saying something that might embarrass the party was over the line.
Standards are important.



6 Comments







My guess is that she’s expendable in their eyes: She’s female, a Northerner, and in a state that’s likely to lose a congressional seat (probably hers, especially if a Democrat replaces Pawlenty as governor).
Especially if enough of her constituents heed her advice to not participate in the 2010 Census. It’d be a hoot if her own crazy talk caused her to lose that seat. ;-)
LOL. I think my favorite Congress story is how Richard Pombo, one of the ultimate scumbags, became the victim of his own personally corrupt pro-development ideology. He not only wanted to preside over the physical destruction of America by sprawl, but did exactly that to his own district.
But who moved in to all those new subdivisions? Liberals! Who voted him out, in large part precisely because of his anti-environmental extremism.
As for Bachman, I think it’s funny to watch the Republican mandarins squirm as the base becomes more politically self-confident and deranged.
The Serious Conservatives have even tried gingerly to dampen the Sarah Palin concept.
But after all these years of their drilling into the heads of the yahoos how the ultimate enemy is snooty “elitism”, and how “you don’t have to let those snooty liberals talk down to you”, I don’t think they’re going to be able to turn around now and do the talking-down themselves and make it stick.
As I said in another comment elsewhere, some of them might not like all of Beck’s escapades, but they’re going to have to go along with it and hope to try to guide it where they can, which they won’t always be able to do.
Standards? The GOP actually has standards? You’re kidding me?
They do, but those standards only apply to other people.
the wheels on the bus go round and round
round and round
round and round
the wheels on the bus go round and round
and michelle bachman goes under the bus
repuglitards like it simple …
(wink)