House and Senate Democrats who have been pleading with the White House to exercise some leadership on how to get closure on a health reform bill were effectively told it was up to them to pass legislation. President Obama seems to be redefining his function as providing a forum for national discussion, and Congress can take whatever they decide to the electorate.
Obama’s statement to supporters at a DNC fundraiser is here. The Q&A begins about 25 minutes in, and the first question asks about the strategy for moving on health reform.
The New York Times Prescriptions blog reports:
At the fund-raiser for the Democratic National Committee later on Thursday, however, Mr. Obama said that once Congressional Democrats had worked out their differences and settled on a final bill, he would push for a vibrant, public debate over the health care legislation. He said he planned “to call on our Republican friends to present their ideas.”
“What I’d like to do is have a meeting whereby I am sitting with the Republicans, sitting with the Democrats, sitting with health care experts and let’s just go through these bills,” Mr. Obama said. “Their ideas, our ideas. Let’s walk through them in a methodical way, so that the American people can see and compare what makes the most sense. And then I think that we have got to move forward on a vote. We have got to move forward on a vote.”
Mr. Obama said that Americans were apprehensive about the health care legislation because there was too much misinformation that he would now work to clear up.
“They are certain that they would have to go onto a government plan, which isn’t true,” the president said. “But that’s still a perception a lot of people have. They are still pretty sure that they would have to give up their doctor. They are still pretty sure that if they are happy with their health care plan, that it’s bad for them. They are still positive that this is going to add to the deficit. So there is a lot of information out there that people understandably are concerned about.”
He continued, “That’s why I think it’s very important for us to have a methodical, open process over the next several weeks and then let’s go ahead and make a decision. And it may be that if Congress decides, if Congress decides we’re not going to do it, even after all the facts are laid out, all the options are clear, then the American people can make a judgment as to whether this Congress has done the right thing for them or not. And that’s how democracy works, and there will be elections coming up and they will be able to make a determination and register their concerns one way or another during election time.”
At one point, as the president insisted that he would continue to fight for the health care bill, the crowd chanted, “Yes, we can! Yes, we can!”
It’s an interesting notion of leadership and democracy. We’ll lay out the case, call in the experts on [I suspect] national television, let the opposition take their shots, and then decide whether we want a bill or not to take to voters in November.
But what’s missing is any acknowledgment that Obama and the White House bear any responsibility for the contents of the bills and how the public perceives them. Many of the legitimate concerns and anger over these bills arise from the White House’s secret PHaRMA, hospital and AHIP deals, and the WH failure to fight for (or outright opposition to) sensible, popular measures like a public option, drug reimportation and Medicare bargaining, anti-trust immunity and so on. Who’s responsible for leaving the Senate bill with a serious affordability problem and an unsellable excise tax? And how does the White House propose to resolve House-Senate differences in ways that promote the public interest?
A well structured public forum to debate the merits of the health reforms may be just what the doctor ordered in a rational democracy. But the Republican have no incentive to play a responsible role in that Obama-staged drama. They’ll keep reading from Frank Luntz’ book of lies as long as it’s working for them. But maybe that’s what Obama is counting on.
Related:
LA Times, Anthem Blue Cross Proposed Huge Premium Increases
The Hill, Sen Landrieu says Gov. Jindal wanted the Louisiana Medicare bailout (and Nelson says his Republican Gov. wanted the Nebraska deal)
Politico, Al Franken lays into David Axelrod over health care bill



13 Comments







I don’t think Obama was ever fully engaged in health care, and still doesn’t seem to be. It looks like his strategy is to lay low and hope for a winner, call it a success. If nothing happens on health care, then it’s “Congress’ fault”, not on him.
That’s certainly not leadership in my book.
Well, he was always in a position to claim success or pass off failure on Congress it they didn’t pass a bill.
It’s up to them to pass legislation and not whine about the absence of leadership, because they’re the ones who are up for reelection this November; he isn’t. It’s their job to pass legislation, not his.
I don’t admire some of what he’s done on the bills so far, but Congress should be held accountable for what it does or doesn’t do. And he’s not going to be able to help them much in November, even if he becomes more popular again, because he’s not on the ballot.
They can/should just function as though he’s a moderate Republican President from the 1960s, and work to get something — the best thing they can — passed that he’ll sign. I think there’s a huge range of bills and features he’d sign if presented to him. And they’re better off not feeling bound by his PHaRMA deals, etc.
Hey Scarecrow–Heres an interesting article from politico and Al Franken. Seems that Al may be getting a bit of a reputation. But still, he’s fighting for us, and hes hitting it hard. Heres the link:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0210/32561.html
Thank you Al.
Yep, thanks for posting the link. Franken is a breath of fresh air.
Obama’s disengenuousness (and that is the most optimistic term I can give his behavior) on this is clear, but completely baffling. It is not working to keep him above the fray (he’s suffering politically anyway), it’s horrible leadership (as Franken clearly says) and—
IT’S NOT WORKING.
Here this guy is telling Democrats not to “run for the hills” in the SOTU, when he himself is a permanent resident of ‘the hills’.
I just don’t get it. Massive fail.
It’s just baffling that Obama apparently thinks he can blame a failed agenda on Republicans come November. As if Americans cared about the process.
“Baffling” is a fine choice of word indeed. I don’t know how it is people like you, who are trying very hard to do ground-level activism on real change, can continue to abide by the “leadership” your party’s highest figures are offering you.
He wants to have it both ways: Direct (and in fact micromanage, via Rahm’s behind-the-scenes whippings) the HCR process — but set it up so that the Senate takes the fall if it all goes pear-shaped.
Franken, for one, is having none of this. And Franken wouldn’t have stepped forward unless he knew that he Harry Reid’s tacit approval to do so.
This is all a ploy to avoid a Republican filibuster. It’s BS and the Republicans know it. Nothing could serve their purposes better than for Obama and the Democrats to continue to drag out this healthcare disaster as long as possible. Idiocy.
i think it’s the senate. they are supposed to be an independent body – part of the congress that writes the laws. if they refuse to do their job and instead expect obama to do if for them (and as you know i’m not one to reflexively defend obama *g*), that is their own damn fault.
“Test for democracy” has already failed. Furthermore, I don’t think the Presidential moniker “The Great Facilitator” just has “a ring” to it. Mr. Obama might instead try using the Presidential bully pulpit to force some or all of the change he campaigned on, wrt real health care reform and other issues.
As it stands, some asshole Senator from little Alabama is blocking all nominations to the administration over some military pork spending. This is the opposite of where Obama needs to be. Senator Butthead (Jerk – Subsidy-Dependent State) should have been smacked down this morning. If Obama can’t or won’t mop up the floor with this one overbearing Senator, he sure isn’t going to be able to lead the Congress to real reform.
We must force Obama to resign ASAP, or at the very least choose not to seek a second term.
He’s a moral coward without values or principles who cares only about power and money.
I’m sure Franken had every intention of entering the Senate with his hat in hand and be a respectful junior Senator and learn the ropes.
But remember, Franken was a math wizz in college and actually earned his fortune through talent and not corruption. He is smarter than the most of his fellow Senators and it didn’t take him long to understand that rather than joining an august body worthy of respect, he had instead walked into a den of slimebags and idiots.
I’m glad he has apparently decided not to play along.