You knew this was coming. It’s been obvious that Minerals Management Service’s ability to continue permitting offshore drilling depended on their rubber stamping the industry line that drilling could occur safely and without environmental impacts. The question was, where were all the government engineers and environmental scientists who knew better?
The New York Times has found the inevitable answer: they were muzzled by pro-industry managers up and down the Administration and afraid to speak out or lose their jobs.
The New York Times reports that for years, the MMS has not even bothered to require the necessary permits from BP and other major offshore drillers, even though government scientists were reporting major safety concerns, likely environmental impacts and threats to endangered species:
The federal Minerals Management Service gave permission to BP and dozens of other oil companies to drill in the Gulf of Mexico without first getting required permits from another agency that assesses threats to endangered species — and despite strong warnings from that agency about the impact the drilling was likely to have on the gulf.
Those approvals, federal records show, include one for the well drilled by the Deepwater Horizon rig, which exploded on April 20, killing 11 workers and resulting in thousands of barrels of oil spilling into the gulf each day.
The Minerals Management Service, or M.M.S., also routinely overruled its staff biologists and engineers who raised concerns about the safety and the environmental impact of certain drilling proposals in the gulf and in Alaska, according to a half-dozen current and former agency scientists.
Those scientists said they were also regularly pressured by agency officials to change the findings of their internal studies if they predicted that an accident was likely to occur or if wildlife might be harmed.
As expected much of the problem is traced to the industry capture and muzzling of scientists in the Bush Administration:
Federal records indicate that these consultations ended with NOAA instructing the minerals agency that continued drilling in the gulf was harming endangered marine mammals and that the agency needed to get permits to be in compliance with federal law.
Responding to the accusations that agency scientists were being silenced, Ms. Barkoff added, “Under the previous administration, there was a pattern of suppressing science in decisions, and we are working very hard to change the culture and empower scientists in the Department of the Interior.”
But these problems persist today:
In a letter from September 2009, obtained by The New York Times, NOAA accused the minerals agency of a pattern of understating the likelihood and potential consequences of a major spill in the gulf and understating the frequency of spills that have already occurred there.
The letter accuses the agency of highlighting the safety of offshore oil drilling operations while overlooking more recent evidence to the contrary. The data used by the agency to justify its approval of drilling operations in the gulf play down the fact that spills have been increasing and understate the “risks and impacts of accidental spills,” the letter states. NOAA declined several requests for comment.
The rest of the Times article is equally devastating, showing a pattern of ignoring warnings of known safety hazards and risks of catastrophic accidents, with scientists talking to the Times under anonymity. And yet, the Times Reports, MMS has continued to issue permits even after Secretary Salazar claimed there was a moratorium pending a review of the Deepwater Horizon blowout. This Alaska project is now pending.
This morning, we’re told President Obama will tell the media how angry he is about the the BP Oil Disaster. It will be interesting to see if he directs any of his "anger" at his own appointees, including the Secretary of the Interior. Because the whistle blowers are talking to reporters, too late and still afraid, but it’s just the beginning.
The Administration has a general policy of "looking forward," unwilling to expose misconduct and criminal behavior from the prior administration, while committing to do better going forward. It’s clear that’s not possible until the Administration cleans house and holds people accountable. Meanwhile, the Gulf and Gulf states are paying a terrible price for a lesson yet to be learned.
Update:
Times Picayune: Seven Hours of data missing from Horizon just before explosion; but UC Berkeley Prof. has been reviewing a collection of eyewitness accounts.
More:
The Nature Conservancy, Alabama: What this spill could do to coastal marshes
McClatchy, US Agency let industry write offshore drilling rules; Since spill, Feds have given 27 waivers to oil companies in Gulf
Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, Testimony from environmental officials and advocates (pdf files)
WaPo/Julie Eilperin, MMS ignores environmental permits
NO Times Picayune ongoing coverage, maps, pictures, diagrams




53 Comments







There is much for Obama to be angry about, a lot of it to do with his own decisions in the past sixteen months or so regarding this and many other things of grave importance.
If the laws over looked the facts because of political considerations and those are determined by lobbyists cash then doesn’t this prove the Bush era environmental laws are invalid?
The oil companies can’t hide behind laws they rigged.
There’s more here than just Salazar’s oil-friendly ways; the other problem is that, as Digby says, liberals are chumps. If the Democrats when in power were as assiduous at ridding Republican elements from the civil service as Republicans are at ridding Democrats from the government whenever Republicans are in power, government agencies in general wouldn’t be Republican-staffed turkey farms like FEMA quickly became under Bush.
Blue Dogs are Chumps Liberals were lied too we are fixing that now.
One my biggest disappointments with Obama is his refusal to purge the incompetents and cronies that Bush installed in all levels of government. Granted civil service workers are tough to remove but they can be re-assigned fairly easily and not all of them are civil servants. Corrupt contractors are still a ubiquitous fixture in just about any government office. Much could be done to make the situation better.
I’d say that liberal posers are chumps. The problem being that there are quite few self-described liberals who hear a few nice sounding words from a politician and accept them at face value. When I bitched to most of my friends about things like Obama’s early choices of Geithner and Summers all they reacted to was a few stupid statements that Summers had made a Harvard. The past actions and associations of the two were not accepted as predictors of Obama’s future policy in part because these people wanted the vague promises to be true. Even now many don’t understand how we got here or where it is likely to go.
Thanks for the update, Scarecrow. Obama’s probably angry because whistle blowers are talking to reporters. After all that’s happened, it’s very difficult to view his “angry” statements as anything more than Kabuki. I hope I’m wrong.
Obama’s statements just got made a lot less convincing thanks to the Times story
The Interior on all levels has deviated so little from the path staked out by Bush that it is almost painful to read about. From the failures of MMS to the ongoing attacks against wildlife protections nothing has been improved. The problem for this administration from day one as been an unwillingness to change the previous course of anti-environmentalism and deregulation. Much like the economy and the ongoing military buildups the current administration prefers to react to the next catastrophe rather than change policies preemptively.
Because they want to believe the Corporation’s lies. They don’t want to hear the Corporations are rigging the government tests.
Well, of course Obama has to pretend to be angry now. But it’s BS, No sentient being could have been unaware of how the Bushies systematically gutted the regulatory agencies.
The corproate rape of the American people continues unabated. We are supposed to relax and enjoy it.
Only an angry people’s third party can change any of this. Any other approach is just pissing into the wind.
i will not vote republican or for obama for president. i will vote for any other candidate that i find credible for the people. if there isn’t one, i will stay home for the first time in my life. or i could write in my next door neighbors’ dog.
Neither major party will ever get another vote from me, either. And I have voted straight Dem in every election since 1972.
All my efforts and interest going forward wil go toward a third party that emphasizes people over corporations.
I think we are getting somewhere by getting aggressive. There is a track record to be proud of with more and better DEMs like Al Franken et. al.
Better to fund the progressive campaigns and push for election reform and term limits, IMHO of course.
Sorry, my dear. I’m all out of lube. Plus, I’ve been paying attention to the big picture, not just one or two outlier data points that get undone as soon as the spotlight is turned off.
If you can’t see that the trend toward total corporate dominance is actually accelerating under Obama, then I feel sorry for you. Old habits die hard, even when they should die fast.
“… President Obama will tell the media how angry he is about the the BP Oil Disaster.”
Pure carbon dioxide emissions (hot air). He could and should be taking action. Instead, he will stage a media event for the little people, then privately reassure the oil fat-cats that they will be drilling-baby-drilling in the Gulf and in the Arctic without interruption…in exchange for a few “campaign contributions”. Obama has yet to lift a finger to curtail corporate abuses in any way. He is their servant.
That depends if his economic team has given him estimates of how high unemployment will get if the spill gets to Florida. Sooner or later Obama will hear that number then Obama then we get to see if Obama can stop drinking the cool aid if he sees Jim Jones pouring oil in it.
I’ll believe it when I see it. Obama’s “concern” for people’s jobs, homes, health, etc. have proven to be campaign talking points with no substance. The only actions to come out of this administration have been to protect corporate profits and to protect the Cheney-Bush Gang from prosecution for their domestic felonies and crimes against humanity. We have to stop listening to his empty rhetoric and look very closely at the policies which are newly implemented or retained from the previous regime. As was stated by someone else in reference to Obama’s War On Certain Drug Users, “he is all talk and no walk”.
“All hat, no cattle”
oops! Its already been used.*g*
He’s a fraud. Pass it along.
What would have been the alternatives? Certainly not McPalin…..working harder for Hillary? Now we do have to play for the future, I know.
I hate with my whole heart to say it but bush was a remarkable LEADER, leading us straight to hell but he got done whatever he wanted.
obama is a wet noodle leader but quite a go along to get along type of guy, a used Trojan Horse ass.
Any HOPE, NOPE.
But he’s so photogenic and by gosh people just like him.
And he does sit down and have a beer with people unlike da bush.
That would be a mule, a Trojan Horse ass.
What’s he going to do? Shake his little fist and stamp his little feet or do something more useful like firing Salazar and proposing a ban on all offshore drilling near the north American continent?
Have a private meeting, like he did with the TBTB banksters, explaining that he will give them all they need but they have to promise to pretend they each got a spoon of castor oil. The theater is the thing.
The Kossacks will lap it up. Maybe they’ll get a pat on the head.
wonderful plan.
He’ll scold them like he did the banks for being bad boys.
Free Markets have to fix safety and environmental rules! They however can’t pay to fix their mistakes! Free Markets can’t regulate themselves.
They were too busy having orgies to pay attention, it seems.
Take a lookie at THIS:
Lisa Murkowski BLOCKS Bill To Raise Oil Spill Liability Cap (VIDEO)
So, I guess we’ll have to raid the SS fund to pay for all of it after all.
Be sure to note Obama’s tepid “leadership” on this…oh, but it’s said he’s “angry” so expect a speech
Actually, the cap on liability is outside the clean up costs.
It’s the amount that BP/TransOcean/Halliburton are on the hook to pay to the shrimpers/fishermen/other occupations for lost wages and economic disasters due to their feck-ups.
So, we’ll have to pay those too?
Obama can do this great speech in public followed by a private surrender scam only so many times. I think he’s running out of magic.
Good morning all.
Scarecrow, Robert Bea’s report, which you linked above, is exemplary, and all who seek a deeper understanding, as “this” all continues to come out (oil and truth; do they “mix” like oil and water, even a “tiny” amount of oil in a “very big ocean”?).
DW
Yes, I found Bea’s report excellent and very helpful, all part of continuing fine coverage by the Times Picayune.
The Times Picayune deserves serious props, Scarecrow.
One hopes their dedication to the coverage of this “blossoming” story both continues and is rewarded, appropriately.
DW
Gotta get busy. See y’all later. :-)
Oh so Obummer’s “angry,” is he? Well, hey then, libtardz: problems solved! Case closed! Yippeee skipeee, wheeeeee, everything’s just dandy now!
Seriously, how stupid does this Admin think we are? Yes, rhetorical question. The US population – whether they vote R or D – are, one and all, dumbed down sheep. Like some others who posted here, I have numerous D friends, who give me a very wide berth when I start to bitch about NObama, which I did very early on and have only gotten worse lately. But even with some friends, who are reasonably politically aware, the drinking of the kool aid is strong, plus I am also often blindsided by how very much the so-called “left” in this country has imbibed and accepted a TON of rightwing b.s. talking points – particularly about cadillac welfare queens and illegals, but also about crap like this.
I think we’re effed bc I really don’t see the US population rushing out to buy pitchforks over this. I think they’ll all roll over like the dumb cows we’ve become and take it up the you know what like the “good” little boyz and girlz we are.
The other day, some posters here were angrily asking if we FDL’ers thought that Rahmbama was supposed to “wave a magic wand” or something. Sheesh. Nope, magic wands be darn thin on the ground these days, but it seems like it would take a magic wand to get Obamarahma to actually do the job that D’s voted him in to do. You know: like enforce the few feeble regulations that are on the books. like clean house at the agencies and replace the crapulous Bush corporate cronies with staff who will do their jobs correctly and, gee whiz, what a concept, ENFORCE regulations.
But: no. Cue the Oil Gushing Kabuki Show, Act V, Scene I, where NObummer gets to strut his lil stuff… lots of little sound and not even much fury but still signifying abso-effen-lutely NOTHING.
That’s the problem. And well said. There are no vigorous activist liberals in view. The potential few who were aroused for the 2008 elections have long since faded away under the Obama style.
Yes. the people are prepared to passively accept more of the same but I have an intuition that this disaster will, in spite of feeble news coverage, become so expansive that truth may have its way eventually.
Hi, TS. From your mouth to God’s ears.
Is it any surprise one of the popular conservative suggestions for cutting govt costs is to eliminate NOAA?
New post up top…
Note: New post above reveals WH has concealed the video of the gushing oil for three weeks.
Words fail me.
A Molecular Biologist (employed as a professor/researcher at the same university he attended) is worried about losing his job on account of funding.
Where does the funding come from? If I had to guess, I’d say it came from Big Corporations.
Would this scientist fear and kowtow to the corporations that fund his work?
I was a little surprised to finally see the big rusty box (that they took time to spray paint) was accompanied with a containment vessel and a plan to capture the oil with tubing. The box failed.
Then there was a smaller top hat – also with the accompanying plan to funnel the oil up a tube. They pretty much must have know it would fail since they didn’t even try to place it over the well head.
On day 25 of volcanic spewing –TODAY– (and PLEASE STOP CALLING THIS A LEAK): The plan again appears to be first and foremost about keeping the well flow intact –to insert a smaller tube into the opening and capture the oil in vessels above. And only if that doesn’t work are they willing to block the well with junk.
Is it in fact true that BP has ALL ALONG BEEN more concerned about keeping the well going at all costs to the US ecology and economy than with blocking the freaking well?
I don’t see how we can draw any other conclusion.
I just don’t think they can plug that thing whatever they try. too much pressure
I suspect the physics of it would lean to capture and ship out than a plug, at this moment anyway. The best bet would be for the US to take possession of that oil as payment of damages, and then some.
Exactly right. To stop it immediately, you insert and detonate a high-temp explosive several hundred feet below the drill opening, and seal the damn thing. But that wouldn’t be in BP’s interests… They can insert a “siphon” to keep the thing producing, they could also insert an explosive seal.
Laws were violated, blah blah blah… who the hell is going to take reponsibility. These ass hats can do whatever they want unabated and consequences be damned when things go bad. /s
Attention all hands. Prepare to look forward.
And notice that all the first options to stop this primarily allow BP to keep the ability to harvest this drillsite? Temporary stopgaps until the backdrill allows them to re-open it for full operations? The FASTEST way to stop this is to blow it up, deep beneath the ground. But then, BP couldn’t keep getting the oil out… Thanks, White House!