At FDL News, David Dayen covers an article on Elizabeth Warren in which she argues, correctly, that if the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau had been up and running years ago, much of the banking/mortgage fraud could/would have been prevented.
That’s fine as far as it goes. But there’s something missing from the polite Ms. Warren’s telling.
I’d very much like to believe that if a relatively new and still energetic Consumer Financial Protection agency had been around a few years back, and if it had been led by a relentless consumer champion like Liz Warren, it would have flagged and likely limited much of the massive fraud committed by banks, mortgage lenders, servicers and securities bundlers, provided . . .
. . . provided it wasn’t interfered with by more powerful regulators whose job it was to stop fraudulent banking and lending practices instead of interfere with legitimate investigations by those with authority, including state regulators.
It is a pernicious myth, perpetuated by those in charge at the time (many still here), that the federal government was powerless to stop the financial crisis and all the fraud and looting that attended it. There was plenty of authority, but the people in charge chose to look the other way.
Just as bad, these complicit federal regulators aggressively stopped efforts by states to investigate and halt the fraudulent practices. In early hearings of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, they interviewed numerous witnesses, including States’ Attorneys General and securities regulators from Texas, Illinois and other states who were empowered to investigate and stop fraud and began their own investigations. Several state officials and experts testified that their efforts were repeatedly stymied by federal bank regulators who, although willing to do nothing themselves to stop the rampant crime wave, insisted that states were preempted from even conducting their own investigations.
It is simply not true that there was no government defense against the massive fraud perpetrated by banks, mortgage originators and lenders, loan servicers, foreclosure mill law firms, and Wall Street securities/trusts marketers. All the authority the feds and states needed existed then to stop the reckless crime wave that eventually tanked the financial sector and has since victimized millions.
Federal regulators at the Federal Reserve, Treasury and OCC were complicit throughout. They chose not to do their jobs, and they’re just as guilty as the looters that still populate the nation’s financial sectors from top to bottom.
Yes, bring on the CFPB and put Liz in charge. We need its energy and new blood. But we also need to clear out the incumbent crooks who will do everything they can to tie her hands.
And don’t forget, that complicity permeates much of Congress and the entire Republican Party, whose representatives on the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission recently issued their own minority report that ignores all of this history. And they’re insisting the Commission’s final report ban any references to “Wall Street,” “shadow banking,” “interconnection,” “deregulation” and other terms that might reveal an entire political ideology’s complicity in the largest, most egregious looting ever perpetrated.



38 Comments

Thanks, good points. Actually, under questioning Greenspan has admitted that his failure to stop the ratings agencies from giving AAA ratings to toxic bundles was a contribution to the disaster.
How many years until the corporatists have infiltrated this new watchdog and replaced its investigators with its own cronies who will also look the other way?
Complicit, yes. Not only that, they were part of it and probably bribed to look the other way. As a matter of fact, I tried my best to get someone to tell me why starting in 2001 that all my stock holdings were going down but mutual funds were going gangbusters.
Keep in mind, at the time usually mutual funds held the same company stocks as most of us bought individually. Now, we all understand it was a derivities bundle they swindeled around the world. Yet, nobody stopped it or even tried to slow it down. That tells me everything I need to know.
Homeowners facing foreclosure should print banners and hang it on the front of their homes. “HELL NO! WE WON’T GO!”
They have helped and caused this economic distress and the situation with jobs and homes. People need to remain solid and firm and not be swindeled again. If the banks won’t renegotiate the mortgage contracts, then to hell with them!
Amen for your succinct analysis of the past and present insanity. I’ve prayed that Liz Warren be protected in setting up the agency and its operations. Thanks for reminding me that that prayer needs to be continued.
Blessings,
A month, maybe two at the most.
“There was plenty of authority, but the people in charge chose to look the other way”
You ain’t lying….That’s how corrupt our America is.
and now I am getting sick just thinking what we have become….(sigh)
“Federal regulators at the Federal Reserve, Treasury and OCC were complicit throughout. They chose not to do their jobs, and they’re just as guilty as the looters that still populate the nation’s financial sectors from top to bottom.”
Amen. When there are hundreds of billions of dollars involved, regulations — particularly the weak tea in FinReg just passed — will NOT work. This new “bureau” was killed at the very outset. It is NOT independent — and NEVER will be.
Good post. Bill black comments on this with regularity. Laws set in place after the S&L crisis could have been used to prevent this crisis, but still have not been used to this day.
But honestly, Lehman Bros. went under pretty much because Paulson told them to go under. The Fed and Treasury have MASSIVE authority, but have been afflicted with Obama disease – no balls.
It was polite of Warren to ignore the complicity of the Fed in the fleecing of millions of Americans.
I could use less politeness and more prosecution.
“… a relentless consumer champion like Liz Warren …”
I respect Ms. Warren as much as anyone. But she has been totally co-opted by a crooked administration that doesn’t give a rat’s ass about consumer protection. She is a fucking zombie now saying stupid shit about what could have been. This so-called “bureau” was NOT necessary to prevent ANYTHING that has happened — as the post suggests. This woulda-coulda-next time bullshit is just ludicrous. The proverbial horse has left the fucking barn on meaningful consumer protection.
Our government and the Fed enabled the entire rip-off and were 100% complicit. That’s why they covered it up. The economic collapse was obviously symptomatic of a corrupted system that went out of control.
More and more, as Obama made it plain that she wouldn’t get the CFPB permanently, and used her like he was waving a dog-yummy in front of progressives, Warren appeared to be perfectly content to serve that function.
My respect for her is not high.
A good call-out, Scarecrow. :o)
Amazingly horrible Article on HuffPO about what society was like when the robber barons were in full charge before the great depression and, maybe what will be coming down the pike with Oilbomber complicit in gutting Social Security
Not really OT:
The Poorhouse: Aunt Winnie, Glenn Beck, And The Politics Of The New Deal
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/29/the-poorhouse-aunt-winnie_n_802338.html
The history in this long article really brings home what we are about to lose.
Liz Warren, for all her insights brains and good intentions isn’t going to do anything. She was selected by this Adminisration. This Reagan parroting administration. She will do what they want her to do. Period. If there is one thing that this government has taught us all, it’s that talk is cheap. Actions speak louder and clearer and so far……….Obama has done little action that isn’t Republican pro-corporation. So it’s great to hear Ms. Warren is running the show. *wink wink*
Yep. Kabuki 101.
Captured!!
Cripes; Black says that the FBI is taking all their cues from the Mortgage Bankers Assn.! And that they aren’t even looking at accounting control fraud, which is the whole ball game. Oy.
Warren has to much integrity, spunk, and intelligence to be outright “captured.”
But still, for all practical purposes, rendered ineffective, and basically powerless against the powers that be; and a bit idealistic, a little more naive, and probably too ready to believe that the President and his Treasury Secretary are not in total sync.
Captured – no; operating under false illusions – yes.
Your links don’t add up. The Dayen piece on Warren discusses wrongs by servicers, while the link re: fed agencies stymieing states is about securities fraud, which is a very different animal.
The upshot is that your conclusion is unsupported:
Maybe, maybe not vis-a-vis servicing fraud, but we don’t have the information to prove or disprove that hypothesis.
“Accounting control fraud” is something that Black invented, so it’s no surprise that regulators didn’t read his mind / look into the future to when he came up w/ it and then looked for it accordingly.
Or: Black is full of it.
It is independent: it has a guaranteed revenue stream and authority to pass its own rules.
Where’s the lack of independence?
The hypothesis goes badly awry pretty early:
No, it’s most definitely *not* the job of federal regulators to prevent mortgage fraud. State AGs have primary jurisprudence over that; the federal agencies have an interest only to the extent that systemic stability is implicated (which, w/ hindsight, may have been the case).
That misunderstanding of what federal banking regulators are tasked w/ doing leads to the conclusion that the feds failure to do what they’ve never done and weren’t supposed to do can only be explained by malfeasance, which you then impute to other agencies like the nascent CFPB. In point of fact, though, mortgage fraud isn’t, wasn’t, and never was supposed to be a concern of federal banking regulators.
I agree. It’s time people realize she’s been co-opted and quit nominating her for a presidential primary run or other such nonsense. If you’re part of the Obama’s administration, you are part of the problem. Period. That’s why I admire Shirley Sherrod. As far as I know, she’s the only one who had the morals and the balls to turn down their job offer.
That’s fine to say, but what evidence do you have that she’s been co-opted and won’t be effective?
Wasn’t fmr Governor Spitzer in the middle of an investigation against the NY Fed when he was brought low by the scandal?
(nice timing)
“… what evidence …”
If the fifty States Attorney Generals could be prevented from bringing suit to stop the looting, what chance do you suppose Warren actually had of attempting the same thing?
I’m not saying I admire those who fold, but most normal people chose to be co-opted rather than face being ruined.
Not another who has bought into the Obama system of doing little to stop any future carnage as we currently watch gas prices pass the $4.00 mark on their way to $5.00 thanks to people who buy air. The increases have nothing to do with Supply and Demand. Another that tells half-truths!
Ms. Warren is in charge of a emasculated agency, if they ever get off the ground, and consumers will feel very little effect from the proclamations of the toothless Ms. Warren. You really think the Obama administration is doing anything to regulate the theft going on at Wall Street or the corrupt banks, like Bank of Amerca, who pays no taxes yet steals your tax money before they even put a hand in your pocket, or pocketbook.
Ms. Warren is an Obama stooge with no power. I think the master set it up that way! 2012 is coming.
I recommend watching/re-watching “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room” not to inform yourself about Enron, but to come up to speed on the forces that the Corporations and Bankers can bring to bear on those who try to stop their predations.
When it became clear that Enron was looting California, then Governor Grey Davis and the California Attorney General tryed to stop them, but were twarted by the coordinated efforts of Enron and BushCo.
It was Ken Lay who brought Arnold Swchartzenegger into California politics in order to back-stop efforts to stop Enron.
The real point to take away from “Enron: The Smartest Guys in the Room”, is that the Corporations have achieved nothing less than the total ownership/control of our government, and though it has been years since that fact has been effectively proven, that knowledge has yet to sink in.
We have to admit to ourselves that we’ve been locked out of the process before we can mount an effective campaign to retake our government.
Considering the success our corporate masters have had in enlisting the stupidest half of us to resist every effort to counter corporate control of our government, it should be obvious that it will be a long hard climb.
This is excellent reporting. Thank you, Scarecrow. Of course I knew the Feds had neglected to enforce anything along those lines for many years, but I was completely unaware that they had actually been preventing other authorities from doing so. This is the kind of information that needs to continue to get out to the public. Eventually it’s bound to have some impact on voters, and maybe even on policies.
jpe12, are you saying that the federal regulators were supposed to ignore fraudulent activities engaged in by the banks they were chartered to regulate? That just does not make sense. Where’s the provision in the enabling law that prohibits such agencies from at least highlighting publicly accessible information pertaining to fraud they uncovered?
….chirp….chirp….
…and equally adept was Warren at diverting attention away from the seed of the whole damned mess–namely, pressure from legislators who can be named as the ones who insisted on loans to buyers who would have a high default rate (“you WILL bend over and submit to the American Dream, suckers!!)….then when lending standards got the hell beat out of them, with Fannie and Freddie offering an automatic secondary market, anybody could generate a mortgage at no risk to them.
Then Wall Street ran with it. How unexpected.
…kindly enlighten us with your solution to Ponzi Security….
…you’ve convinced me…the oil co’s can charge any price they want, which means I’ll get rich owning their stock. I’m gonna put my entire portfolio into oil, while everybody sits around complaining…what an opportunity…you should do the same, shouldn’t you?
If your thesis is true, it is indeed strange that our National Forests are largely standing fallow the last 15 years (started with Clinton) , ravaged by a host of diseases and insect infestations which results in catastrophic fire. The lumber industry would love to go in and manage the resource, but has no apparent power with Washington DC. “Environmentalists” are obviously a bigger block of votes.
These facts cast doubt on your thesis, along with, for instance, a host of obstacles and outright prohibitions against oil exploration and drilling.
I wonder how the forests ever managed to get along without us.
….I dunno, but here’s a more pertinent question: Why do you place orders for wood products every day?