If you ignore virtually every major problem facing America, particularly those posing immediate crises for unemployed families, broken communities and struggling states, and focus only on what a country would normally do in ordinary times, then you’ll find some things to like in the President’s address to Congress. Yeah, we should invest in education, and energy, and infrastructure.
But after listening to and reading his speech, I’m struck by how disconnected that speech is from the harsh realities facing the country. To be sure, the President notes that in some areas, America is falling behind China or India and is ranked 9th, or umpteenth, or something other than “we’re number one!” So what? Is that really the problem we should worry about?
You would never know from the President’s speech that there are 15 million Americans out of work. He never mentioned it. Think about that. America’s unemployment rate — from 9.4 percent to over 17 percent when you count underemployed and those who’ve given up — is still at crisis levels we’ve rarely seen since the Great Depression. Sure, this President wants us to improve investments and education to provide better jobs for the future, but there wasn’t a single word from a supposedly Democratic President that would address today’s actual emergency. . . .
Virtually every state in the union is suffering their own budget crisis, but this President apparently thinks that’s not important. States and local governments face not the phony budget deficit hysteria that’s infected Washington but real, massive budget gaps they can’t solve through temporary deficit spending. So everything they’re forced to do is undercutting what Obama tried to do two years ago to revive the economy.
They’re laying off hundreds of thousands of public workers — teachers, firemen, police, public health and sanitation crews; closing parks; cutting services and denying needed health care to those in life-threatening conditions. You have to have your head buried deep in the sand to ignore this, but this President did.
In the meantime, there’s a major crime wave still going on in America’s financial sector. Wall Street banksters and the nation’s largest financial institutions are still systematically looting the Treasury while they nickel and dime the America people already undergoing a huge deleveraging from too much debt. We have an enormous mortgage crisis as a million families lost their homes last year and more millions will lose theirs this year. Yet the largest banks and their servicing agents are systematically committing fraud on both lenders and investors. But the President didn’t mention that, even though the nation’s economy isn’t likely to recover while the housing market is still in the tank. He didn’t explain why his own mortgage relief program had not only failed but had helped banks rip off homeowners and even steal their homes, but face no penalties.
As Americans watch this, they know the country is seeing a fundamental breakdown in the rule of law. It’s not just the failure to hold government officials in the last Administration responsible for crimes, or the continuing abuse of the Constitution in this one. The elite, the powerful, the rich commit outrageous crimes but go essentially unpunished. Corporations from drug makers to oil companies to chemical manufacturers get mere fines for massive theft, massive pollution and massive health or environmental damage, but no one goes to jail, and no corporation is banned from the market. They just come back and do it again.
This President apparently can’t see any of this. He can’t see the country. From his limited vision, there’s no record poverty, no growing, destructive income inequality, no predatory corporations. Apparently, we don’t kill 30,000 people every year from guns, and so on.
I don’t know where his head is. His obligation is to report to Congress on the “state of the union,” but he just failed.
John Chandley
Update: Mike Konczal had the same reaction, and has the data and charts to prove it.



179 Comments

Obama can’t talk about the state of the union because he’s too busy destroying it.
My top 3 Pissers in the speech:
“…this is a place where you can make it if you try.”
(that will ring in my head and piss me off for days.)
SS: “To put us on solid ground, we should also find a bipartisan solution to strengthen Social Security for future generations. And we must do it without putting at risk current retirees, the most vulnerable, or people with disabilities; without slashing benefits for future generations; and without subjecting Americans’ guaranteed retirement income to the whims of the stock market.”
(‘without slashing benefits for future generations’ could be very broadly interpreted…)
“But now that the worst of the recession is over” (we need to address the deficit). Over? Over for whom???
And his homage to the Constitution is hypocritical, to say the least.
He wants to improve education, but he doesn’t have the money, and neither do the states. How the heck does he think we are going to run an education system with no money?
Maybe Tennessee can fire a bunch of teachers, and the rest will work even harder.
Well, the key is fire all those bad teachers, the ones for whom the Congress did not give a standing ovation, and give the money to the winners of the race to the top. That’s essentially what he said.
Evidently, no mention of cuts to Social Security and raising the retirement age either.
Fine thoughts, Scarecrow, that put me in mind of a Robert Burns poem (this being Burns’ 250th birthday and all.
I think he doesn’t talk about it because he doesn’t have the moxie.
“…find a bipartisan solution…”
uh oh…
“the worst of the recession is over…”
This SOTU should be called the “Through the Looking Glass Speech.”
He did mention Social Security. See wendydavis comment above.
I noticed Wendy’s comments after I posted mine. Thanks!
I agree with your assessment. I also agreed with Lawrence O’Donnell who had some pretty harsh criticism – he said it was all but meaningless, filled with vagueness and contradictions.
I take all the Presidents words with a boulder of salt after seeing what he professed to believe in and what he actually did with healthcare.
Tonight he said:
“Let’s not balance the budget on the backs of the most vulnerable.”
Based on the healthcare experience-
One month later after 10 minutes with a lobbyist in a private White House meeting, “Um, okay, I get your message. Keep the tax break for the top 2%, lower corporate taxes and balance the budget on the backs of the most vulnerable. Deal. Gather the media and I’ll deliver a cryptic message about “hard decisions” and “frank discussions” and how we have put partisanship behind us to craft a historic legislation.”
So it goes.
I hear ya Scarecrow.
We have a record ongoing forclosure crisis and related financial crime wave and it doesn’t get a single mention?
He talks about educating our kids to improve the economy yet the fact is that plenty of folks with an education cannot find work in our economy.
Then he talks about how great free trade agreements are and how he’s gonna hook us up with more of them. The only thing that will export is more of our factories.
He talks about investing in our future and spending cuts in the same breath…
And on it goes…
Oh, he mentioned housing — once. In the context of housing policy being regulated in five different places in the federal government! Not as bad as smoked salmon, though, hardee-har-har.
Great post, Scarecrow, thank you.
My sentiments exactly — he’s living in a different country than most Americans see every day.
Barack Obama is living on a different planet. It call United States of America, Inc. What good for GE, Wal-mart, Wall Street is …
Barack Obama is living on a different planet. It’s called United States of America, Inc. What’s good for GE, Wal-mart, Wall Street is …
Shorter Obama: ‘We’ll take a bipartisaon route to fixing SS, but we won’t cut benefits.’ Uh-oh.
Next month: ‘Now I never said….’
On another thread about what’s happening in Cairo, the poster was asking if the Overlords must be worried about similar events occurring in the States.
I really think they might be so out of touch with what’s going on for us that they are clueless as to the extraordinary need, fear, and outrage. Ergo: no worry. It’s all good, or about to get better if we keep our fingers crossed, and keep the media saying ‘Recovery is just around the next corner’.
Buy GE/Comcast! And DO IT TODAY!
“To be sure, the President notes that in some areas, America is falling behind China or India and is ranked 9th, or umpteenth, or something other than “we’re number one!” So what? Is that really the problem we should worry about?”
OMG, that’s exactly what I was thinking! What exactly are we in “competition” for and why? What good is being “Numero Uno” when the rest of the country goes to hell in a hand basket without a stable bridge to get there?
nice summation of reality vs. the Lie Complex Puppet’s absurdist blathering, scarecrow
From now on the SOTU should just be renamed the “America, fuck yeah! speech.”
The specifics of Obama’s speech will no doubt make many here on the left cringe. A worthless spending freeze, countless nods to compromise with Republicans that has never worked before and will not in the future.
But as a political speech, and a speech meant to speak to the middle of the country, it was pitch-perfect. The president rose above the fray and made the Republicans that have been belittling him over every inane topic look very small and very partisan.
http://www.sunstateactivist.org
SS is just a sliver …
Obama no doubt sees all the problems who mentioned but deliberately chooses to ignore. He’s a corporatist who has sent hundreds of billions to financial elites and who has stacked his administration with corporatists and often the same people who created the economic crisis in the first place.
For example, Obama and JP Morgan CEO Jamie Dimon have been pals for at least fifteen years when they were both moving up in Chicago.
With all due respects, you need to take the rose-colored glasses off when viewing Obama. He isn’t and will never be what you hope he is.
That is the TX plan…
I thought your were referring to: “To Mouse”
“Wee, sleeket, cowran, tim’rous beastie …”
Don’t remember who said it, but rather than “Win the Future,” we’re more worried about how to “Survive the Present.”
Yeah, he’s real good at “rising above the fray.”
O has shot his wad. He can no longer do the ‘inspiring rhetoric’ routine because he has not delivered. Republicans and Democrats are going in the same direction, using slightly different frames to signal their intentions. Both of them say ‘You are going down.’ (Unless, of course, you are a plutocrat.)
The Democratic Party of FDR was officially pronounced deceased in the PM on January 25, 2011.
Naomi Wolf in lectures has defined the face of the authoritarian/fascist state by ten traits/characteristics. They are as follows:
1. Invoke an internal & external threat.
2. Secret prisons where torture takes place-unaccountably.
3. Develop a paramilitary force.
4. Surveillance of ordinary citizens.
5. Infiltrate citizens groups.
6. Detain & release ordinary citizens.
7. Target key individuals.
8. Restrict the press.
9. Recast criticism as espionage and dissent as treason.
10. Subvert the rule of law.
Welcome to the United Authoritarian Fascist States of America. Sieg Heil!
Thanks for this post, especially its title. I was beggining to feel like i had swallowed crazy pills. American politics in the era of obama has never been more weird, in an Orwell kind of way. I wouldnt have belived that was possible after 8 years of bush, but there i go with my wretched american “it cant happen here” exceptionalism.
Obamas speech reveals a speechifyer who has been waiting too long for a chance to make the feel good speech of the year, too bad this really wasnt the time for it. He made it anyway. Well whats a gasbag like Obama gonna do? He has to get that speech in before the primaries start. I think hes trying to ride the Az. assasination bump all the way to 2012. How pitiful
We have no leader.
I saw in an old Dilbert that a project begin completed by two people can be done by one person for half the cost! What fucking logic…
I did not listen to the speech.
The most flabbergasting post-speech thing I picked up was that he actually mentioned Sputnik!!!!
Back to 1958. Yeppers, just the way to ‘look forward.’
This man is a fool.
I followed along on the live blog last night, and there were surely a lot of comments, so I might have missed it. But, what do people think of the Missing Judges?
Obama’s speech writer is about 12, what does he know…Obama edits in the grown-up phrases the kid misses, and you end up with a superficial term paper with rah rah in it. Ugh.
How am I going to help to “outbuild the rest of the world” when we are now eating out of dumpsters?
Obama titled this speech “Winning The Future.” That’s pretty good, actually. I mean “WTF???”
But I think there’s another title more apt that I used in another comment on another bog post here on FDL: “President Strangelove, or: How I Learned to Quit Worrying and Love the Jobless Recovery.”
I think the missing judges are involved in a remake of Mean Girls, sans Linsay Lohan.
Hey, thanks for the information…not to worry;)
“We do big things.”
Obama, he doo-doos bullshit.
Too embarrassed to show up? I kinda wish Scalia and Thomas would quit their day job. haha
John, I thought the speech was very centrist-republican – but name a sotu where the president told the country that everything sucked? You want a liberal/progressive laundry list from a Reagan democrat? I’m sorry, John – who is living in fantasy land? Obama repeatedly said that we have to strengthen the public sector – he said we have to build modern industries to build a future work force. he said that main street is shuttered and the factories and mills are all closed – he said that the job scene in America has changed greatly over the last two decades – he said we have to have more teachers – he said the rich should give up their tax cuts before we take scholarships away from kids – did you not hear this? You want an honest conversation about what Obama said? Then try to be honest in discussing it…
Oh my. I remember being called in by the school Principal for a lecture on how important it was to the country for me to become a rocket scientist so we too could put a dog in space and let him die there. Alas, I write posts for a hippie blog!
Children. Acting like they got yelled at on the 2nd grade playground. That is the cleaned-up version of what I think of those “Justices”.
Good morning all and thanks for the post Scarecrow.
I hadn’t heard of that movie, but if Tina Fey wrote it (per the Google), it’s probably funny. Scalia and Allito not being there is not. On the other hand, it does make “who they are” even more transparent. Like, all the new tea party people in the congress who can’t even make it to their swearing in. Like, the more Sarah opens her trap, the more obvious it is what an incompetent she is.
:)
What is far more disconcerting to me than Obama, is the Democrat(ic) Party which is full on board – the kabuki we get is the only real thing we get.
Exactly.
Also, one of them was working on his taxes for the last ten years, while another was doing a cut and paste job on the Constitution to show to Michele Bachmann.
And surely they could have found a Democrat to give the SOTU response, couldn’t they? Why have Paul Ryan on just to double-down on what Obama said. Deficits? Bad, and a Top Priority, too! Free Trade? Good! Supply-side economics? Common Wisdom!
Aren’t they supposed to offer that spot to someone in opposition? Bernie Sanders, perhaps? Maybe Dennis Kucinich? A Democrat? Are there any Democrats left in Washington? Could they maybe have flown one in for the night?
Oh, I don’t think Obama is clueless anymore than Bush…..wait. Nonetheless, he obviously doesn’t feel the “fierce urgency of now” like he did when things were a lot better and could have been turned around more easily if he hadn’t decide to pretend to play pattycake with the minority.
Now, he’s pretty much got the congress he wants…which he didn’t use anyway. He just sets up “commissions” and comes back and rams it down congress’ throats.
He gave a feel good speech last night and helped the people whoa re doing alright feel good about themselves and the bots figure that if they’re experiencing something different, it must be them and only them who are having perception difficulties.
they still LOVE Obama.
We’re cooked
you mean the same FDR that locked up japanese Americans, firebombed tokyo and used the FBI to spy on war protestors? Really? I guess I don’t miss that great leader…
I liked Michelle Bachmann’s commercial better…isn’t this the Super Bowl??? Oh.
Good point…excellent point, in fact
Last night’s worst job in the country: being the fact checker for Bachmann’s drive over.
I was thinking the same thing myself (as scarecrow), as I looked over the coverage. Doesn’t he get the same Dept. of Labor stats we get every week? I guess he is too busy…
Fortunately, I did not waste any time watching the actual speech; there was a good hockey game on. I’ve learned – through repeated cuffs to the head – not to believe anything he says in a speech anyway.
Word… but then I knew that since 2004 and that is why I supported the majority’s choice, Hillary Clinton.
this is where someone or a lot of people tell me that Clinton would have done the same thing or would have been just as bad, to which I reply…Not even on her worst day.
It was entertaining to say the least. Heh.
You’re welcome. And, I’m really not worried, girlfriend. We’ll always have the comfort club.
Exactly.
“We have to make America the best place on Earth to do business.”
I literally cringed when he said that. Isn’t it already? Isn’t that the problem? What planet is he living on?
Ha ha. I’ll just bet.
My husband suggested they were on a date.
I took the high road and you took the low road . . . but we both ended up in Scotland.
Not only moxie, not a clue.
“…this is a place where you can make it if you try.”
(that will ring in my head and piss me off for days.)
The implication is that any undereducated American Citizen can compete head to head with any multibillion dollar, multinational corporation and a cadre of lawyers, accountants, patent thieves and murderers.
Add tort reform plus data mining domestic surveillance on behalf of corporate overlords which write their own legislation.
Yes we can. All on a level playing field, we Americans with our can do spirit.
Just like Erin Brockovich.
Anybody seen my bootstraps?
I was hoping a Dem would yell out “you lie”. Seriously.
Thanks for the synopsis, Scarecrow.
I opted to go out to dinner with friends and see the opening night of the new play about Molly Ivins, “Red-Hot Patriot”.
there is nothing wrong with much of American education. Where there is a problem with education is where there is a problem with communities. Crappy communities with dysfunctional families have crappy schools.
And before anyone accuses me of being raycist, rich white communities can also qualify under those perimeters.
Indeed. Still humping the American Dream.
The Bruce Randolph school he mentioned in Denver as an example of success became a charter-like school within the Denver Public Schools system during Michael Bennet’s time as superintendent (now Colorado Senator Bennet). They got a waiver from the teacher’s union contract. Arne Duncan has visited there and the principal was kicked upstairs to head DPS’ “New Schools Office” the mission of which is to increase charter schools within the district. http://randolph.dpsk12.org/about.asp
Denver now has at least 30 charter schools, making it one of the biggest adopters of charter schools. Unfortunately, while it may have been good for Bruce Randolph students, at my daughter’s neighborhood DPS school, the plumbing system is a disaster, as money and attention are diverted to charterizing education.
the same planet where he can think “you can succeed her if you try”.
“Obama edits in the grown-up phrases the kid misses…”
That would explain “puddles in heaven.” Obama missed that one.
How did you like it? And Ann is also coming soon.
Loved that movie, especially the shark tank scene….
The speech was OK. Although the rhetoric did not soar and no new substantive ground was broken, it was thematically sound and spot on in terms of tone. Most importantly, Obama appeared to be the President of the United States as opposed to a partisan pol.
It seems most folks initial reaction was similar to mine.
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2011/1/25/938919/-Obamas-State-of-the-Union-address-scores-highly
I know. Nuts, huh? (Sputnik)
I’m surprised no one has picked up how Reaganess Obama’s speech was. He blamed the poor and unemployed for their condition. Pretending the trillions of dollars spent on illegal wars and/or given to criminals on Wall Street is beneficial. And calling for more free trade NAFTA like deals that have destroyed American jobs.
A lot of jingoistic vapor.
I’m always really irritated by the “American exceptionalism” meme.
“The United States is the greatest, free-est, bravest, truest, tallest, handomest, most scrumptious nation ever to sit on the face of the Earth!”
We’re Number One! We’re Number One!
Block That Kick! Block That Kick!
Sieg Heil! Sieg Heil!
Four More Years! Four More Years!
Feh…
Omygod! Christine O’Donnell is on GMA!
Here we go again…. another Palin
I thought it was well done. It was pretty much chronological, with a big screen as a backdrop with photos and lots of her humor. I miss her a lot. I’ll probably be going to see “Ann” as well. Are you going to go to either of them?
Reality check,
Yeah, OBAMA could have addressed the emergency of 15 million out of work and have Dems in congress propose another spend policy to get a jobs bill passed to put people back to work. However, one small problem. The speaker of the house has “informed” this President to “not even bother” asking for a jobs bill, cuz it “aint never gonna happen on his watch”. So that is the reality for those of you wanting some of that. This Republican Congress will not even “entertain” a jobs bill, at least in the near future; And you can blame those folks that voted the Republican congress in cuz that is where it ends…so blame them. The good news is that in a couple of years we get another chance to vote eh?
And I risked on second to check on Laura Ingraham where there is a sub ranting about the pairing of D-Rs in the audience….a Capitol offense, so to speak. It is true that one really can criticize anything.
the game is completely rigged
THE UNITED STATES OF LUCYS FOOTBALL
so true
Hagen Dasz delicious vanilla ice cream…is sooooooooooo bland
Obama is a super terrific speechifier and politicker. Who else could swivel his head back and forth from left to right reading a teleprompter for 61 minutes without saying anything and not stumbling over any words.
I guess you could say he gives good bipartisan head.
I hope to….I have a friend who has already seen the Ann one on a run in Galveston….I hear she nails it. Thanks for the info. on Molly. I miss her too; she would be so hot about our Gov and the rest of our mess.
Don’t know if she originated it, but it’s on Digby’s this morning:
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/01/random-thought-on-sotu.html
“‘Winning the future’ would be a lot more inspiring if we were all sure we were going to survive the present.”
the party of FDR was murdered when the DNC back in spring of 2008 decided to, like SCOTUS did in 2000, tell the majority of voters to go stick it and put the person with less support in.
That’s the facts. A long time ago Bill Clinton said that the american people in their wisdom always got it right. But starting in 2000 we have had elites and elite wannabees decide for us that we were too stupid to make the best choice for president or nominee. Why do I still talk about this? Because I don’t freaking want it to happen again ever. This is what we get, two inexperienced Harvard legacies who lied through their teeth about who they were and what they would do and their supporters didn’t mind when it was the other team getting screwed. I never thought it would happen again after 2000, but it did and this time it was the Obama campaign, Howard Dean and Donna Brazile who did it.
This is what we get for letting it happen. Obama TOLD us that he was a Reagan republican. More people should have listened.
Reality check: Obama “informed” the Speaker of the House before he got his supersized play gavel that he didn’t have to worry about a jobs bill because he has no intention of doing anything about jobs except outsourcing more of them overseas.
Thank you scarecrow for the analysis. I did not watch the SOTU last night as Mr Obama is no longer welcome in my home.
Good day all!
Both poems worthy of a re-read. Thanks for reminding us.
Thank you for sharing. You should encourage more parents to share like stories.
He can’t see any of the real troubles or problems, because he is now living in that DC beltway bubble… where there are no really serious problems.
I hear you. It’s hard to raise ourselves up by the bootstraps when our “boots” are just wads of burlap and string.
Yeppers. Translation Corollary: You ain’t maikin’ it, you ain’t tryin’!
Our President believes in Christianist Prosperity Doctrine and Santa Claus Dogma!!! Fucking A!
Don’t need no bootstraps, hack; just hard work and no sin.
Couldn’t disagree more. I graded his speech as an F that isn’t even within shouting distance of a D-
Given the actual state of the union, it was a 61 minute yawner utterly devoid of substance, new ideas, intelligence, empathy, and passion.
The grand project of moving the economic system back into the 19th century has been going on for 40 years. The Democrats and Republicans have both been increasingly tools for their corporate masters. The East Germans used to make a joke that the difference between the Republicans and Democrats was that one drank Coke and the other drank Pepsi. It seems that they were prescient.
here is where your logic is mixed up. You think Mean Girls must be funny because Tina Fey wrote it. But none of us realized it was about her because she is still about as shallow as the girls in that movie with her biggest claim to fame being insulting Palin. She can’t seem to get past it even though she has a big hit in 30 rock.
Palin campaigned for more candidates than Obama did in 2010. I would say that even if you disagree with her on almost everything as I do, saying she is incompetent is kind of silly, no matter how much you might wish it to be true.
ROTFLMAO!
more winning candidates…..
That’s right. The Obama household is doing just fine. They get wealthier by the day. And everyone he knows is doing pretty well, except for Robert Gibbs with his pathetically modest salary.
I did. Nobody heard but my spouse who told me to knock it off…
Come to think of it, in sixth grade we each had to bring a dollar to buy big old flower seeds of some sort that had been treated with gamma rays!
Wonder how handling those affected our health? But man; did those puppies put on accelerated growth! Then we’d do the atomic-bomb drills, and hide in the school basement. Incoherent? Yeppers!
You’re killin’ me, Scarecrow!
Great Post!
Obama speech was not for 99% of americans, it was for the top 1% of americans who he works for and cares about.
remember these simple facts
all the millionaire senators loved OBAMA speech
wall street millionaires and billionaires loved OBAMA speech
(remember OBAMA bailed them out in 2008, and now has hired one
to be his Chief of Staff)
Like Bush, Obama represents the rich and the super rich. :)
I heard their were parties all over Martha Vineyard after Obama great
speech.
I don’t think you meant to say “pretend” to play patty cake….
Hoover speechified real good.
what should the president say? America – the okay place! America: whatevs.. America – land of hatred and racism! And people wonder why the left seems to hate their country…
Sieg Heil…whatevs…
Not to quibble with Jeezus er nothin’, but Bernie’s a Socialist.
Let’s all give a round of applause for Democratic Socialism!
thank God for Firedoglake, Counterpunch and Truthout !
I also couldn’t bring myself to listen, much like with W. I used to make it a practice, as a Dutiful Citizen, but have lost the stomach for the dog and pony show, and respect for the process.
The one takeaway I have from the test and commentary are the call for freezing non-discretionary spending, but certainly NOT DEFENSE-OMG NO!, and that for the lowering of corporate tax rates.
Living in San Francisco, that Liberal Bastion, I still have many friends who, not paying very close attention to the reality, and believing what they read in the MSM, wonder why I am upset. Even these educated, liberal, progressive, and ‘informed’ folks, the left cognoscenti if you will, are buying the White House schtick.
At the risk of repeating comments from above, we are sooo fucked.
Exactly what I was thinking – Prosperity Christianist bullshit. Obummer ain’t Rick Warren’s bff for nothing. Anyone who thinks Barry Zero is some kind of liberal is not paying attention or has been brainwashed by the rightwing noise machine. What a load of crap. How insulting.
And making a point of saying that Labor supports them. They do publicly, the oafs; why do they think they owe him? Do they forget how many millions they put into his election coffers? For what?
Obama wants to compete with China so we can win in the future. He apparently plans to make this happen through cheerleading and better speeches than they give in China.
Really, people, it doesn’t matter what Obama said. The rubber hits the road where the Republicans refuse to do what he wants regardless of how useful or well intentioned.
The truth is that we don’t know how to compete and certainly won’t be competing with the continued export of American jobs. Nothing in this speech and nothing proposed in the congress is going to change this. Frankly, I don’t expect Obama to admit this.
As long as we participate in the global economy, living standards for the vast majority will decrease year by year. The good news is that housing prices are getting cheaper year by year. No one knows how to fix this without withdrawing from the global economy. The Chinese are better educated, smarter, more numerous, and cheaper. What is so hard to understand here?
Unfortunately my trad-Dem voter roommate watched the SOTU and was all *starry-eyed* with wonder at how “great” it was. I was working, so I missed it (and had no intention of watching a re-run; I know that tired HACK doesn’t mean anything he says. I’ll watch what he does, thanks very much).
Shocked to hear that LoDo actually critized Barry Zero, but that’s good. Just saying that a lot of trad-Dem voters are probably like my roommate: easily satisfied with a load of crappy pablum signifying absolutely nothing good for Main Street.
Agree. A poor sense of community often results in poor community institutions.
However, NCLB is one of the worst educational ideas to ever come down the pike. As a colleague of mine rightly sums up its effects on students: “It’s killing their brains.” We see the results every damn day. If the dominant method of education is to get students to memorize and regurgitate Right Answers for standardized tests within a framework of social efficiency, we will produce students with a limited capacity for thought and will see the inequitable distribution of resources upward.
That Obama is committed to continuing this abomination and its intellectually-crushing, privatizing, segregating results (to the detriment of community) is an indication of the lack of any meaningful difference between him, George W., or any of the other corporate, political operatives in our broken representative democracy.
But hey, if they are going to hack away Social Security and other social programs, why not public education as well. Screw community—unless it is gated, apparently.
Enjoy your fetish. She was my senator. There isn’t the barest crevice of white space between HC and BO. That was clear enough in 2008. I supported BO because he had superior charisma and, at the time, less baggage of vilification, of both the insane and justified varieties.
Umberto’s Eco’s thoughts: http://www.themodernword.com/eco/eco_blackshirt.html
They WANT to believe….until things get even worse. then they’ll ask you why you didn’t warn them? Same thing happens with me all the time.
the problem, to a large extent is our media which doesn’t report on what’s really happening so pols like Obama can say whateverthefuck they want and people feel all warm and fuzzy…until they get kicked out of their house or get sick.
I want to see a Mubarak moment here in the US:
Thousands defy Egypt’s leader in fresh protests
‘The people want the fall of the regime,’ they chanted
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/41267995/ns/world_news-mideastn_africa/
and not by the TPers
When a “leader” is making this many references to an heroic, stronger past, they’ve got nothing. There will be no collective winning the future because there are no plans to accomplish that.
Indeed. Quite the shame that reality can’t gain any sort of traction.
To the contrary, we have the giant stroke job in this NYTimes online editorial this am.
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/26/opinion/26wed1.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&ref=opinion&adxnnlx=1296058079-VDwE85rjoQKTo7LOhplirA
I almost gagged.
But their products are crap. What is so hard to understand about THAT?
The inflation is in steadily declining quality and now, not even the $ to buy the junk.
We’ve ALWAYS competed in the global economy. This is not new, TPTB make it seem so but all it is has been the end of tariffs to protect domestic industry and the end of regulations to protect the citizens and outsourcing. That’s the “global economy”
Posted above, not below:
But their products are crap. What is so hard to understand about THAT?
The inflation is in steadily declining quality and now, not even the $ to buy the junk.
We’ve ALWAYS competed in the global economy. This is not new, TPTB make it seem so but all it is has been the end of tariffs to protect domestic industry and the end of regulations to protect the citizens and outsourcing. That’s the “global economy”
Good article, Scarecrow.
Obama’s SOTU in short: “We’re okay, we pursue democracy. We could do better and I have all these plans. We have no money and we’ll have to cutback even more. And… oh, yeah… we won the Iraq War.”
A big fat “polite” pack of lies.
Sure he ignored the plight of the vast class of jobless, but gollygosh, wasn’t it a nice speech?
Here’s the Big Thing we’re overlooking:
This speech was not designed as a roadmap to help Americans.
This speech is the first speech of Obama’s re-election campaign.
It was designed to attract Independents, Centrist and Conservative Dems, and a few Moderate Republicans who will love him for his business-centric proposals, like lowering corporate taxes, and a five-year domestic budget freeze.
He said he doesn’t buy all of the Catfood Commision’s recommendations. But he seriously announced that he’s buying into the idea that The Budget Must Be Cut, and the Deficit Must Be Reined In. Now.
The punditocracy only measures the speech in terms of election viability! Even though we might like yelling at our teevees at them for dismissing what’s good policy for Americans, we should understand the purpose of the speech.
From now on, it’s all about re-election.
I just posted waaaay downthread that this speech is all about re-election, and everything from here on out will be.
He gave everyone but the extreme Left and the Wingnut Right something to love. The smack at the oil companies? What was that? Did it come with a wink or was it in any way real?
clearly
Well we do, but it’s not anyone that ever ran for office. Voters no longer have any real choice about who’s running the country. The Plutocracy has all the say; Congress, the SCOTUS, the POTUS dance to Oligarch’s tunes, not to the tunes of the serf voters.
You are spot on.
Here is the Naomi Wolf article describing the 10 steps to fascism. http://bit.ly/hTcUIT
That’s what some people appear to think (not here). I don’t get it myself. Walk down your d*mn street and look at all the foreclosed homes and find out which of your friends and neighbors are out of work, and then come back and tell me how great Barry Zero’s TelePrmptr talk was.
Feh…
I agree. There was a conservative posting here yesterday who was falling all him/herself to wildly *praise* Obomba for his proposed austerity measures and was simply and blissfully *eager* to see more US jobs off-shored to third world countries. I sh*t you not; that’s what this person was blogging about… whilst praising Barry Zero to the hilt for being so “responsible.”
So yeah: perhaps the Great Pretender will, in actuality, just get out there and campaign to the so-called “moderate” Republicans – you know: the ones who aren’t that racist or crazed – and perhaps they’ll all fall in line to vote for Pres. Zero. Could be the plan. Wouldn’t surpise me.
“The elite, the powerful, the rich commit outrageous crimes but go essentially unpunished.”
Not only unpunished, they are being rewarded with more tax breaks.
A blogger wrote back then: A choice between chocolate ice cream or vanilla ice cream.
And God; how we love Clinton as SoS! Feh!
He’s never going to face reality: his bipartisanship is nothing more than toadying to the rich and an insult to the poor.
In his third year as President Obama bragged in his SOTU speech, “…the stock market has come roaring back. Corporate profits are up.”
This article and these comments are right in that he either does not get it or this was his intention all along. Either way we need to primary or oppose him with a third party for the long term future of our country. Anthony Noel at admin@themalcontent.com is forming a New Progressive Alliance to try to answer the question of where we go from here.
Empty words from The Empty Suit. No mention of the middle class’s plight. Or the poor. No vow to oppose any cuts to S.S. A 5-year freeze on domestic spending. Gee, I wonder whose hide that’ll come from. It was all Obie begging the Fatcats, “If you buy me another term, I’ll take good care of you. To hell with my base.” Can’t even believe there’s a Democrat left still defending Obama. What a horrible mistake he was, although HRC was no better. The Dem Party has made itself completely useless.
The headline says it all.
The closing reminded me of this:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0325537/quotes?qt0186939
Cutting SS is the big bad wolf’s job ( the GOP) Barry will get us the “best” deal he can though. Other wise the wolf will huff and he’ll puff and he’ll blow the house ( the USA) down ( not raise the debt ceiling is the ploy this time around, @ XMas it was the budget thing). Get ready for the coming “kabuki show” Barry saves the fair maiden ( SSI etc.) starring Barry Obama ( we wanted Will Smith but he was occupied elsewhere) as good guy and the nefarious nasty GOP house ( as bad guys and gals). Barry is on “OUR” side ( not really) but he plays that part in this new production coming soon to DC for your viewing benefit. ( benefits though will be cut after the performance folks.) Hey someone has to pay for the show, right?
You do not know Hillary’s history, obviously.
The Health care fight in 1993 revealed a strong supporter of single payer who only let go after Bill told her he had insurance co. buy in if no single payer (and yes that is what my – I was head of the Sun Life of Canada US tax Department – told him) – and she still came up with a health plan well to the left of the Bob Dole 1993 plan that Obama got passed.
I watched “Topper” instead of the SOTU thang. Barry’s just as invisible as Cary Grant in the movie and America is the car wreck he’s been tossed from.
Spot on, Scarecrow, thank you. And as usual, the same goes for most of the comments. I was jarred by ‘win the future’ until WTF was pointed out – I am absolutely sure that he and his speechwriters knew very well that was the acronym. They are probably having a great time with that in their champagne fests, getting the minions to buy what for them was a figurative finger in the eye.
The huge lie in the speech for me was the line about reversing the Bush tax cuts at the moment of reality closest to his signing it to continue for another two years. Huh? He really thinks we will buy that. To my mind that is in your face disrespect to anyone with a brain. He’s all ready to sell us the Brooklyn Bridge. Why not? WTF. Let’s just have fun crafting inanities for the pundits to play with.
I also agreed with Lawrence O’Donnell who had some pretty harsh criticism –
“Harsh criticism” and “Lawrence O’Donnell” don’t seem to belong in the same sentence, unless there’s an “of DFHs” there as well.
Interesting that you identify “most folks” by a reference to The Great Orange Satan.
I don’t quite think that’s “most folks” – or at least not most SANE folks.
It’s obvious where his head is….
Don’t forget the folks at the Great Orange Satan, who are apparently clapping as well.
Single payer advocates were locked out of discussions in Hillary’s commission (conducted with Cheney-like nontransparency) just as they were in the public discussions of 2008-2009. I’ll take your anecdote about her inner yearning for single payer at face value. So what? Here’s Barack Obama explicitly advocating SP in 2002, claiming the only obstacle (uh-oh) was having Dems capture the White House and both houses of Congress: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fpAyan1fXCE
Whether HC’s “Managed Competition” monstrosity was more progressive than the current law is immaterial. She’d walked away from that, no less than from single payer, by 2008, just as Obama disavowed single payer. At that point, they were both cribbing from the Edwards plan.
I posted a diary yesterday outlining why I wasn’t going to listen and was surprised by the outpouring of “me too!” comments.
http://my.firedoglake.com/mauimom/2011/01/25/is-it-irresponsible-not-to-listen-to-the-sotu-address/
I wonder what the “win-lose” ratio is: the number of “independents” and “moderates” he picks up, compared to those of us in the “base” that he’s lost or loses?
I know that for myself, and from the comments I’ve read, those of us who’ve deserted him were hard workers in his campaign, donors, spreaders of the “word.” Are the Repubs, “Independents” and “moderates” going to pick up that slack?
Yep! way up his ass.
How did Obama sycophants on MSNBC try to spin the speech ? anyone watched MSNBC,I stay away from the cable news show as they are almost useless,just pure propaganda for either Dems or GOP.
It was an OK speech. I did notice the really simplistic language, though.
And then he let loose the whopper about cutting subsidies for oil companies. I just about drove off the road! Yeah, good luck with that!
Oh, and the other one: become a teacher.
And that totally makes up for her atrocious voting record. Awesome…
That’s a good point TeresaInPA. And even in some better off area’s, communities suffer because workers are organized around the idea of job mobility thus have very little community attachment.
I was just pointing out that we already fail to make full use of the people whom we have educated to a high degree. Why would more of something which we are not fully utilizing somehow magically fix our economic problems?
I characterize Obama’s SOTU as a “cotton candy” speech – from a distance cotton candy appears substantive until you bite into it and discover it’s nothing more than spun sugar and air!
He will “win the future” and the prize for winning it is the money necessary to “win the future.” ;-)
“Win the future?” WIN the FUTURE? What the hell does that mean?
You don’t know where Obama’s head is? I know where it is…it is up Wall St/Big Business/mega rich’s asses! And the view from there everything is fine and dandy.
LOL.
But you write those posts extremely well, Mr. C. Best short analysis of the Lie About the State of the Union speech I’ve read.
“Obama, he doo-doos bullshit.”
Very good. Suitably childlike, just like his approach to reality.
No, the reference is to the polls done by CNN and CBS. It has nothing to do with Kos, per se.
Interesting you would criticize a link without looking at it.
He believes we don’t have the guts to vote for Nader or another decent 3rd party (which of course excludes the Libertarians those similar to it). In my case he’s wrong. The rest of my family was smarter than I was in 2008.
WIN the FUTURE? It means about as much as Change You Can Believe In.
So what he means is the US workforce should get along on Sri Lankan level wages and Nigerian level work place protections. (Watch out for this guy, he will steal your last flea bit blanket.)
Yeah, solerso. This post struck me the same way. I have this feeling that O is the most Onion-y president we have ever had. Hence the Onion-like title of this post. This president is a fake imitation of a mirage of something or other that isn’t even there. And he has begun to seriously creep me out.
Well put.
You might be surprised, Mauimom, at the numbers of folks who call themselves ‘Liberal’ in the blogosphere who are sticking with him. And a whale a lot of them worked for him, too, and gave money.
The Unions have kept silent about his KORUS deal so far, except for the Steelworkers, who must have felt (bullied)…I mean grateful to him ove GM.
But will they raise money for him? Unless they have some Come-to-Jesus moment, I’d think they would, AND work for him.
Thank you Scarecrow. Nicely done. One question–if you saw Howard Dean’s pre-SOTU hype-gasm on MSNBC–did you happen to see what flavor of koolaid he was drinking?
Mason-Always value your opinions and blogs that are right to the point—-Jim (formerly from Symsonia KY)
Nobody said FDR was perfect; not even him. Yes, locking up Japanese-Americans was wrong. That doesn’t make what Obama is doing right.
And you cannot compare World War II, where our national survival really was at stake, to any of the shenanigans that have gone on since. If you do, please seek professional help.
I hate what my country is becoming. The left doesn’t hate their country, they hate what people like you and Obama are turning it into.
BTW, in what branch of the military did YOU serve? I was Navy, myself.
Just in case this response gets lost in the nest, it is in response to warpublican at 6:58 am.
The intent of my comment was surely not to applaud or condone the persecution of Japanese Americans in WWII, the firebombing of innocent civilians in Japan, or the Gestapo tactics of Hoover. I would add to the long list of FDR’s weaknesses and personal failures the St. Louis affair and the failure of the allies to bomb Auschwitz, etc.
The thrust of my comment is that the Democratic Party of Roosevelt, Truman, Kennedy, and Johnson-yes they were all butchers-stood for something very important: The well-being and betterment of the average American. We had reason to believe that above all of the obvious excesses and corruptions of executive power and elected office the core constituents of this country, We the People, could hope for a better tomorrow for ourselves and our children. Our long years of labor insured that we received pensions, medical benefits, and social security.
I listed Naomi Wolf’s thoughts to indicate how far we have fallen from the pure light of democracy and hope. I am surely not a seer, and life always holds surprises for the over confident and self-righteous, but in my humble opinion, the Democratic Party is dead, and the country is being sucked down the rabbit hole of hopeless poverty and fascist dictatorship. Otherwise, how was the play Mrs. Lincoln (yes for the purists there are other versions of this remark, but I think the point is made).
A little bipartisan head is much better than no head at all.
Wendy Davis from TPM? If so, nice to see you here :)
“this is where someone or a lot of people tell me that Clinton would have done the same thing or would have been just as bad, to which I reply…Not even on her worst day.”
Evidence, please. Faith-based conclusions need not apply. What evidence can you present that she’d have been one shred better or less corporatist than Obama?
Do I really need to explain the false choice and strawman fallacies to you? You gotta have something better than this.
Of COURSE there are Serious Problems. Terrorists! Deficits! Illegals! Greedy recipients of evil entitlement programs! These are all Serious Problems to the inside-the-Beltway crowd. What could you possibly have been thinking? ;P
Ol’ Bobby will be rakin’ in the “consulting” and “speaking” fees any day now. Wall St. will take care of its own. But then you knew that ;)
And I might too (although I’d probably puke every night after doing it). With Thomas, Scalia, Ginsburg and Kennedy all up for potential replacement in 2013-2017 (unless they go sooner), I might not see much of a choice. And I hate that.
Obama’s head is in getting re-elected. He will say anything he thinks he needs to say to get elected just as he did in 08. He is a typical lying politician who cares nothing about the people who voted for him but kisses every ass the CorpoRats expose to him. He is lame and pathetic excuse for a leader for sure.