The New York Times’ Michael Cooper gives us a fawning tribute to billionaire David Koch, he of the infamous Koch Brothers and fifth most wealthy man in America, using the dedication of a cancer center at M.I.T. funded by Mr. Koch to extol his virtues as a great humanitarian and philanthropist. Oh, please.
The Times editors and Mr. Koch, it seems, are worried about what people might think of a man whose industries despoil the earth, poison our air and water and cause massive public health problems that cause untold thousands of deaths every year, while using his great wealth and power to corrupt our politics and fund the most radical, anti-human corporate protectionism in America. How could anyone think ill of him?
But Mr. Koch is a human being and he’s suffering from prostate cancer. Hence his dual need to find the cure and have others think well of him. So Michael Cooper and his editors oblige:
Mr. Koch, a billionaire who is perhaps best known for his family’s contributions to conservative causes, got a standing ovation from scientists, Nobel laureates and politicians of various political stripes as he opened the new David H. Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, which he gave $100 million to help build. And in a brief, and rare, interview, Mr. Koch, 70, spoke of his hopes for the new center, his prostate cancer and the prank call heard around the world.
So, this is about Mr. Koch’s need to feel good about himself:
But he said that he felt he had been vilified for his support of conservative causes, which have ranged from opposition to the health care bill and pushing for small government and low taxes, to questioning whether climate change is caused by humans. He and his brother Charles are known, on the left, as the billionaires who bankrolled the public policy and citizen action groups that helped cultivate the Tea Party.
“I read stuff about me and I say, ‘God, I’m a terrible guy,’ ” he said. “And then I come here and everybody treats me like I’m a wonderful fellow, and I say, ‘Well, maybe I’m not so bad after all.’ ”
Gosh, how could people have so misjudged the man? Perhaps it’s because his opposition to the health care bill extends not just to Romney/ObamaCare but to opposing having to pay taxes for any government efforts to achieve universal health care. Or perhaps it’s because lowering taxes for himself and his companies is made possible by extracting take-home pay from teachers, nurses, and sanitation workers. Or it’s because Mr. Koch is not merely “questioning whether climate change is caused by humans,” he’s secretly funding phony think tank studies and op-eds to mislead the public and lie about the science, and buying politicians and lobbyists to prevent any government restrictions on his unfettered ability to extract, transport, process or burn highly toxic substances that pose lethal threats to public health and without regard for the environmental damage it causes along the way.
The Times’ Cooper only hints at this evil when he notes one of Koch’s companies is trying to prevent regulators from limiting a toxic byproduct, formaldehyde, but that’s it. He doesn’t attempt to give us an accounting of the damage done by Koch’s companies, let alone an estimate of the numbers of people killed or sickened by these endeavors versus the number that might eventually be helped by Koch’s charities.
But the Times might at least have recalled that America has seen plenty of billionaire philanthropists use their ill-gotten wealth to convince us and themselves that their misdeeds didn’t matter.
This is the old John D. Rockefeller ploy. Ravage the land, poison the air and water, monopolize the resources, fix the pricing, overcharge the public and loot the public treasury. Then literally buy politicians to make sure you never have to curb your harmful behavior or give back in taxes more than a tiny fraction of what you stole.
Once you’ve amassed billions by doing that, you can afford to set up charities and attend ground breaking ceremonies where people applaud you as you tell yourself, “I’m not such a bad man, am I?”
Yes, Mr. Koch, you are.
More on Koch efforts in Wisconsin from Think Progress.




62 Comments

hope his prostate eats his dick,then the pebble balls…NYT i wont click …never
Those two men, just like their elite peers have absolutely no sense of good. They continue to enrich themselves via contracts, subsidies, and grants from our tax dollars.
“I read stuff about me and I say, ‘God, I’m a terrible guy,’ ” he said. “And then I come here and everybody treats me like I’m a wonderful fellow, and I say, ‘Well, maybe I’m not so bad after all.’ ”
Mr. Koch, my advice is to let your intuition guide you on that matter.
(Self moderating my views of David Koch to save the Mods the effort)
“But Mr. Koch is a human being and he’s suffering from prostate cancer.”
Best news I’ve heard all day. I know, I’m a bad person.
Philanthropy-as-karma-cleaning is nothing new. In the long run, some of those foundations (Ford, various of the Rockefeller foundations, etc.) do make a contribution to the public good. But in a very real way, they privatize what ought to be the role of the people – through our governing agencies – to take care of ourselves.
Boy, the rich really do stick together, don’t they? This is that twit Sulzburger’s doing.
David Koch was calling lots of media to deal with the prank call and reminding people how to pronounce his name. He called me by accident. Listen in:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5X6aC1jWi0w&feature=youtube_gdata_player
I hear my trad-Dem pals *extolling* the wonderous “virtues” of elites like Bill Gates bc of Gates’ foundation and all of the “good works” Gates does. And then I get started on what a load of rubbish that all is.
Yeah: I *suppose* it’s “nice” that obscenely wealthy elites like Gates & even the Kochs spend their filthy lucre on “public works.” But what most citizens don’t get is that these elites amassed their foturnes through tax cuts, tax breaks, tax incentives, bribes, thieving and other forms of chicanery. Now the Kochs want to break the backs of the unions and grind public servants under their boot heels forcing public servants to work for low pay and paltry (if any) benefits.
But I should bow to Koch’s “beneficence” for contributing to a cancer hospital, which I duly note, Koch *needs for his own health care treatments.” Wow, what a guy!
And frankly, most of these contributions that these obscenely wealthy crooks make are – ta daaaa!!! – *tax deductible.* So in other words, these crooks rip YOU & ME off via the tax laws, in order to *direct their money* where *they* want it to go (and in a lot of cases, that’s into their off-shore accounts, where there’s even less chance of any fair taxation).
Cry me a river, Kochroach, and Schulzberger & the NYT can, along with Murdoch & his media empire (which the NYT is racing to emulate), can stick it where the sun don’t shine.
Buncha of elitist propoganda on steroids. PTOUI!!!!!!
He should just buy up all the people with the same spelling of his last name as I have known personally folks with three different pronunciations plus the former mayor of NYC had a fourth pronunciation.
Cook
Cock
Coke
Cotch
are all valid pronunciations used by people with the same spelling
Bigass tax break that’s all it is. He’s a major jerk.
Yep. They all got their billions from legalized fraud, brought to you by lobbied politicians. Self made my ass.
Prostate cancer. Couldn’t happen to a better guy.
Of course, the rich get it by scuzzball means, use a small % of it to do something slightly good. Suffer none of the condemnation where it is due, then get super praise for their one little donation.
Sucks, bigtime.
“Philanthropy-as-karma-cleaning is nothing new. In the long run, some of those foundations (Ford, various of the Rockefeller foundations, etc.) do make a contribution to the public good. But in a very real way, they privatize what ought to be the role of the people – through our governing agencies – to take care of ourselves.”
Bingo. Philanthropy and private charity generally are more clearly seen as symptoms of the failures of the funding of public institutions than as positive efforts and in the case of Koch are clear evidence of hypocrisy as he largely opposes the funding of those public institutions, preferring their goals be dependent on the tax deductible largess and associated control of the wealthy rather than having reliable public financing.
Private philanthropy is more often than not more about ego, hubris and control (and tax avoidance) than about its stated goals.
Michael Cooper = KockSucker!
So the science types and Mass pols gave hizzoner a standing ovation. What would you expect them to do to someone who just gave them $100 mil to fix his prostate cancer? Moon him? Then again, he also gave a wad to ABT. But when he stood on stage before a performance to receive his expected accolades, he was roundly booed by the audience.
Funny I dont easily find a NYT link about that, but -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/kert-davies/david-koch-booed-at-ny-ch_b_804648.html
Exactly! Back in the late 70′s and early 80′s the very wealthy doctors I worked for would all be out of the office on December 30th, if it were a weekday. They would all be at their local favorite chairity location for a nice fat donation. The YMCA in our area was one of the favorites, but then they used the facilities every morning along with their families.
The very last accounting day of the year went to contributions for their tax write-offs.
Next donation will be to a church to insure passage to heaven if he kicks the bucket.
Heh. I once booed John Whitehead at a big dinner (about a thousand people). Can’t remember the exact circumstances, but my beef with him at the time (early 80s) had to do with the disparate treatment of women on Wall St. of which Goldman Sachs was a major practitioner. Given that I was in the audience, it prolly had something to do with the same subject. So he richly deserved my derision.
Not much has changed since then either.
Prostate cancer.It couldn’t of happened to a bigger prick.
David Koch is an ASSHOLE.
That is all.
Carnegie already tried that.
Andrew Carnegie Donations for Estey Pipe Organs
(incomplete)
Opus No.
Year
Church
City
State
10
1903
Laurel Avenue Presbyterian Church Johnston PA
31 1902 Fifth Street Methodist Church Harrisburg PA
52 1903 Bridge Street Presbyterian Church Catasqua PA
53 1903 Lower Providence Presbyterian Church Eaglesville PA
66 1903 St. John’s Evangelical Lutheran Church Columbia PA
83 1903 St. John’s Reformed Church Mifflinburg PA
97 1904 First Methodist Church Media PA
133 1904 Methodist Church Bedford PA
140 1904 St. Luke’s Reformed Church Trappe PA
166 1904 Evangelical Lutheran Church of the Holy Trinity Jersey City NJ
186 1904 Presbyterian Church Hamilton Square NJ
207 1905 Ebenezer Methodist Church West Philadelphia PA
246 1905 First Presbyterian Church Cape May City NJ
247 1905 Baptist Church New Britain PA
287 1905 Methodist Church Sayre PA
476 1907 Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church Plymouth MA
606 1908 Presbyterian Church Center Moriches PA
611 1908 Metropoplitan Temple New York NY
624 1908 Congregational Church Fulton NY
679 1909 Fulton Avenue United Bretheren Church Baltimore MD
683 1909 Trinity Methodist Episcopal Church Lakeport NH
703 1909 Meade Memorial Methodist Episcopal Church Nesquehonig PA
742 1910 Capitol Hill Methodist Episcopal Church Denver CO
882 1911 Methodist Episcopal Church Stoughton MA
959 1912 First Baptist Church Terrell TX
1003 1912 Central Baptist Church Chelmsford MA
1008 1912 First Baptist Church Randolph VT
1160 1913 First Presbyterian Church Antrim NH
1242 1914 Trinity Church of United Bretheren New Cumberland PA
1263 1914 First Congregational Church Whately MA
1279 1914 Northside Unitarian Church Pittsburgh PA
??
1904 Methodist Church Dauphin PA
What were known in the Middle Ages as “Indulgences” by the Catholic Church. So even wealthy mass murderers could rest easy on their deathbeds. But hey, the USA is already well on its way to turning back the clock 500 years.
So he’s working to find cures for wealth people who have cancer right? But if a poor kid has a common infection he’d let him die without medical treatment.
Let’s not forget the Rockefeller contribution to German science in funding and setting up and directing. the`Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry” and the “Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Anthropology, Eugenics and Human Heredity. We all know how humanitarian that turned out to be.
When you have the money you set the priorities.
cant by me love–said the beatles.
Yes, I can says David Koch:
“I read stuff about me and I say, ‘God, I’m a terrible guy,’ ” he said. “And then I come here and everybody treats me like I’m a wonderful fellow, and I say, ‘Well, maybe I’m not so bad after all.’ ”
No wonder he opposed health care for all. He has his. And does anyone think that but for his BILLIONS he would not have acc ess to the “miracle” experimental cancer drug for his diseased prostate?
This man IS THE DEATH PANEL.
Koch did not contribute to a “cancer hospital” – indeed I doubt he fulling funded the structure that was built – and certainly did not fund the staff that must be hired. The staff are from buildings E17 and E18 which was the MIT Cancer research area – this 7 story glass structure (360,000 square feet) on the east end of the campus merely replaces those labs and offices.
In contrast. When Mrs Green funded the Green building at Tech, she did, as I recall, fund the full cost for that massive improvement in the facilities for geology – her discipline when in the late 19th century she graduated from Tech and began her career finding oil.
As far as I can tell the Koch brothers are similar to the sons of Howard Winklevoss (see “social network – Facebook – movie”)- in the small world basket one can put the fact that I met him – and was not impressed – he wanted to sell a license to use his proprietary set of random numbers for use in doing risk analysis and balancing risks (as in derivatives – - he is fellow actuary who learned the value of latching onto Wall Street ( and as he had connections that mere mortals from Tech do not have he succeeded) – indeed he had his own hedge fund – his idea was a case of getting a better 6th decimal of accuracy in a process (random walk) that was questionable as a model – wanted a 100,000 for the license when actuarial wages were $40,000 a year – it was the kind of thing “needed” for the stuff done by the PHD’s at Long-Term Capital Management L.P. doing that hedge fund’s absolute-return trading strategy before it went belly up and required Greenspan to save the world economy – again.
Call me when any Koch contributes his first billion – to anything. Meanwhile I have already gotten my first call for a donation to support the cost of running the place – seems Tech can not believe we did not all become rich.
does the NYTimes newspaper guild contract allow the writer to withhold a byline?
ours used to.
“Not much has changed since then either”
I agree
It speaks volumes that his “charity” event HAD to be used as a forum to “play victim.” Which is a tasteless action for a charity event. Koch used charity and politicized it. Tasteless when cancer has no political preference. This displays a total lack of good manners on Koch’s part.
If he thought of himself as “not so bad,” he would have displayed restraint and not even mentioned the the phone call that he felt vilified him.
Playing victim is the tall tale sign of the fact that he knows he is a deceptive power broker.
Stating “on the left” was irresponsible of the journalist. Factual documentation verifies the Koch funding behind the TPer’s. Simply, “they are known as the billionaires who bankrolled the public policy and citizen action groups that helped cultivate the Tea Party.” This fact has nothing to do “with the left.” It is fact.
You can exactly the same for Cardinal Mahony. Mahony might actually be a better person than Koch, but it’s a close call.
Tell them to go read up a=on Andrew Carnegie’s foundation. He funded a lot of good stuff (the libraries come immediately to mind), but it was because he’d been remarkably nasty as a corp-rat.
these things, and things is what they are, have done untold amount of damage tot his world.
monsters like him deserve all the karma they get.
here’s hoping to a long and painful death.
As long as he doesn’t have to pay taxes on it. Standard practice for multi billionaires.
And don’t forget: He *inherited* his money. It’s a lot easier to stay wealthy than to get wealthy. Especially these days, with folks like the Kochs gaming the system.
It’s funny that Bill Gates Sr., Jr’s Dad, came out and said he’d like to pay higher taxes, but his Son has yet to say that same thing.
The was a great line in the film “Broadcast News” (1987). A smug corporate type trying to fake sympathy insincerely told a laid off employee, “If there’s anything I can do for you…” and his victim said evenly, “You could die soon.”
That’s what the Koch brothers can do for their fellow Americans. They could die soon. I say this without malice, it’s just an observation.
Book Salon up with Micah Sifry’s Wikileaks And The Age Of Transparency hosted by Siun
It’s amazing how much applause $100 million dollars can get you. Just look at people like Qaddafi, Saddam, and all the people who cheered for their benevolence.
Considering the Magna Carta dates back to the 13th century I’ll call your 500 and raise it to 800+ years.
Oh, the irony of David Koch suffering from prostate cancer, a cancer that’s linked to the hormone-like effects of environmental chemicals that mimic estrogens, androgens and pollutants. Wonder to what extent Koch Industries contributes to this particular cancer. Also wonder to what extent the lobbying efforts by Koch Industries to undercut the EPA’s regulatory function contributes. Looks like David Koch, along with the other 9 out of 10 American men in their 70′s, now gets to deal with a cancer that’s linked to their own corporate interests.
The unstated irony is that Koch Industries’ operations cause more cancer than we’ll ever be able to cure. Cleaning up or closing their dirty factories and plants would prevent more cases than billions of research can. Except the people living near or downstream don’t count to the David Koch’s of the world.
heh – thanks for that link. Pretty good. I note that David Koch has been a bit more free lately in tossing his filthy lucre & ill-gotten gains around on some arts endeavors. I guess that’s “nice,” but then again: these institutions are forced to “rely” on the largesse of such individuals. If the largesse dries up, too bad.
Bill & Melinda Gates gave some amount of money over a decade ago now to US Public libraries to purchase PCs for public patron use. Since then: nothing. These same public libraries have faced ever decreasing funds since that time, and some have had their doors closed due to lack of funds.
That’s the biggest issue I have with Oligarch largesse: it’s sporadic, it’s unreliable & it often comes with lots of strings attached (i.e., it can only be spent in certain ways for certain types of programs, whether those programs are what’s needed most or not).
A lot of citizens hear about such donations and think: oh how wonderful is that Oligarch. My reaction is: not so much. I’d rather have these same Oligarchs paying *fair taxes,* so that the funding for these & similar institutions is more secure, more reliable and comes with less strings attached.
Koch got a *tax break* for his donation… never forget that, whilst the Kochroach is standing up on his two hind hooves & braying about what a great fellow he is. He got out of paying ever MORE taxes by his “generous” donation. ptoui!!
So, he’s wealthy enough to buy an audience to be applauded. BFD
Yes, the Kochs learned at their Daddy’s knee how to game the system. Daddy was one of the prime movers behind the John Birch society.
heh… but apparently not even all his wealth always ensure that the audience will clap… one bright spot, at least.
If it WASN’T ABOUT HIM, why not make an anonymous donation? But then it would be insane to automatically eliminate vanity from the psyche of an ill begotten billionaire…”a man that were bewailing the death of his father to laugh, for that he now began to live by having got an estate, without which life is but a kind of death; or call another that were boasting of his family ill begotten or base, because he is so far removed from virtue that is the only fountain of nobility; and so of the rest: what else would he get by it but be thought himself mad and frantic?”
— The Praise of Folly
“Gosh, how could people have so misjudged the man? Perhaps it’s because his opposition to the health care bill extends not just to Romney/ObamaCare but to opposing having to pay taxes for any government efforts to achieve universal health care.”
I prefer the Romney/Obamacare model- where cancer drugs like Avastin won’t be available for anyone…
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/08/15/AR2010081503466.html?hpid=topnews
The Koch brothers certainly set the agenda as money talks. Tea party groupies , birthers, more generally known as dimwits united are the new glory brigade in US politics today. They are ably supported and financed by the likes of the Koch brothers those Lunatic billioniares. Sadly the ad hoc leadership of this hotch potch of cretins whose public spokesperson is that well noted paragon of true intellectual superiority Ms Sarah Palin a harridan whose leadership qualities are on a par with a previous US vice president who had problems with spelling. Fox the wholly owned media outlet owned by Rupert Murdoch AKA ( The Dirty Digger) which specializes in lies under the guise of news spread by one of its main presenters a well known psychotic Glen Beck continues to offer us mad, bad, dangerous errant nonsense on a daily basis. appealing to a false patriotism referred to by Benjamin Franklin as the last refuge of the scoundrel.Joseph Goeballs once said make the lie big enough and it will be believed. Dim wits united buy that lie daily and promote it. Fox are experts at making dimwits support them in continuing such lies.The people need to wake up and take thier country back from all these lunatics before thier masters the likes of the Koch brothers make slaves of the people of this nation. Wisconsin is where it must end. God bless America and end its suffering. anyway its a true embarrassment to watch this unfold. The nation needs some quality leadership. Obama has failed in his duty of care to the people. He is simply hamstrung and bewildered by the likes of those that set the agenda.
Drug research for significant public health problems such as cancer should be financed by public research institutions and the resulting drugs granted immediate generic status for economical use by mankind writ large. As it is now much of the supporting research for corporate pharmaceutical development is conducted at public research institutions at taxpayer expense and the resulting- often obscene- profits privatized.
Private for profit big pharma should be reduced solely to developing luxury potions like cosmetics and boner pills etc. where no lives are at stake. There are plenty of profit opportunities there.
Who will the members of ATLA/AAJ sue then if there are ultimately problems with the significant public health drugs?
Billionaires’ philanthropy is only a tax dodge.
May David Koch’s name be erased from the book of life.
If Koch really is worth $22 billion, and generates a mere 5% annual return (which is very low for high net worth people) he’s getting $1 billion a year. His “donation” is barely 10% of that.
Let’s put that in public school teacher model making $50K. 5% is $1,000 (about what an elementary teacher pays out of pocket for school supplies). 10% of that is $100.
Got it. Koch just pulled out $100 and NY Times is fawning.
Oh, so that’s what they’re calling them now…..
{g}
(MODNOTE: Thank you)
Clarifying. Actually we “on the left” aren’t calling them “public policy and citizen action groups.” Because, y’know, they’re not.
But I guess that’s what the “librul” NYT is calling them now….
Rest assured…he will die a long and painful death. He is not cured or in remission, it is just a matter of time. This is one of the most incidious cancers to die from. It will slowly eat his bones, he will be bloated and weak. All he has right now is a band aid supplied by his ‘miracle’ drug. And this is Karma.
There goes that liberal New York Times again. Slamming a defenseless and kind-hearted philanthropist just because he happens to be a concerned, conservative patriotic American.
It being Sunday, let’s all join in with the following hymn:
There was a rich man and he lived in Jeroosleeum,
Glory Hallelujah, Hi ro jerum,
He wore a bowler hat and his coat was very spruceeum,
Glory….
Chorus: Hi ro jerum, hi ro jerum,
Skinamalinkeedooleum, skinamalinkedooleum,
Glory Hallelujah, hi ro jerum.
Now at his gate there sat a human wrekeeum,
Glory…
He wore a bowler hat, but the rim was round his neckeeum,
Glory…
Chorus (with gusto)
Now the poor man died and his soul went to heveeum,
Glory…
And he danced with the angels till a quarter past eleveeum,
Glory…
Chorus (more gusto)
Now the rich man died but he didn’t fare so welleeum,
Glory…
He couldn’t go to heaven so he had to go to (you know where)
Glory…
Chorus (can you manage more gusto?)
Now the moral of this story is that riches are no jokeeum
Glory….
And we’ll all get to heaven ‘cos we’re all stoney brokeeum,
Glory…
Chorus (sing yusselves hoarse)
NYT is good for its editorials and Krugman…other than that, it’s just another corporate piece of shit.