That’s not the title of John Harwood’s NYT column today, but it might well have been. In a typical example of sloppy, one-sided Beltway thinking, Harwood opens with,
Soon enough, Democrats will have to identify new Medicare cuts they can support.
. . . and having swallowed whole that false Tea-GOP talking point, he explains why the Democrats must eventually not just cut federal spending on Medicare but do so by cutting benefits. His “logic” goes like this:
1. I understand that Medicare costs are rising because private health care costs are rising too fast for the whole country . . . but let’s forget that’s the real problem — implying a very different set of solutions aimed at the structure of health provision in America, not Medicare — and forget that ignoring it will still leave the economy, the nation and especially seniors in trouble. Instead let’s pretend the problem is too many old people and that the government can’t afford to provide them the same health care as they get today.
2. I understand that we pay providers — hospitals, doctors, drug makers, device makers — too much, but the Tea-GOP will oppose efforts to rein in those private costs — they only care about government spending — so we can’t fix that.
3. I understand that the Affordable Care Act contains an Advisory Board to identify and encourage ways to provide equal or better care at lower costs, but the Tea-GOP says that’s a “death panel,” so we can’t do that or expand its reach.
4. I understand that the ACA exempted hospitals from the Advisory Board for the first ten years [another WH deal], but since the Tea-GOP opposes the “death panel” Board anyway, we can’t fix that.
5. I understand that we’ve given special breaks to drug makers, exempting them from negotiations when the Bush-GOP passed the Medicare Part D drug benefit, but since the Tea-GOP opposes any government takeover, we can’t fix that.
6. I’m supposed to know, but neglected to mention, that Medicare provides care at lower costs than private systems, and the CBO just explained that moving to Paul Ryan’s voucher plan to pay private insurers will increase seniors’ health costs by about $34 trillion over 75 years, but that devastating and inconvenient fact just embarrasses the Tea-GOP, so let’s not mention it.
7. So that means we can only cut costs by reducing benefits. We can make seniors pay more for their doctors, “saving” [shifting] $240 billion, or we can make them wait until they’re 67 before getting benefits, saving [shifting] $124 billion, or we can just stop paying for some benefits they need and save [shift] even more. See? Saving [shifting] on Medicare is easy! We know non-Pod Democrats oppose this, and the American public strongly opposes and thinks this is morally wrong. But that’s what the Tea-GOP insists, so that’s what we Beltway grownups say we have to do.
8. The Tea-GOP won’t compromise on anything sensible, so it’s up to the Democrats and the White House to make all the concessions.
9. Everyone, including all of us adults, know this to be true.
10. Therefore, the Democrats are just stalling about cutting Medicare by hundreds of billions, but sooner or later, they’ll do what Mitch McConnell wants.
Now, John Harwood is a decent enough fellow, trying to be reasonable. An adult, as they say. But he’s just expressing the Beltway mindset in a nutshell. That leads me to two conclusions:
First, we need live cameras and reporters at Joe Biden’s place. Open up those discussions and let the American people watch the “adults” and listen as the Administration/Dems and Tea-GOP leaders, the Pods and the Zombies, explain their proposals and bargain away protections for senior citizens while they protect the wealthiest of the wealthy and the most destructive of the corporate looters and avoid facing the underlying cost problem.
Obama once said the health care reform debate should be televised. Good idea! We need more adult television. How about asking for that, John.
Second, America should have a party. Invite the austerity-suffering, enraged, courageous and unrepresented populations of Spain, Ireland, the UK, Egypt, Tunisia, Syria and have them occupy Capital Mall and Lafayette Square until this stunningly irresponsible, unresponsive, undemocratic government resigns. We could phone in pizzas and watch on BBC or Al Jazeera.
Or we could just do it ourselves.



46 Comments

The Fascist Democrats and Republicans won’t stop until they eliminate Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. It doesn’t matter that it makes no “sense”. It doesn’t matter that people will die. It’s what they want.
In the next election we will get a different mixture of elected Democrats and Republicans in Washington. It will not change anything.
Democrats should 1) put an end to this stupid discussion of cuts to Medicare or 2) get the f*ck out of the way of the American people so we can fight the morons who think discussing cuts to Medicare is a good idea.
If Democrats don’t do one of these two things, they are the problem.
“Harwood opens with,
Soon enough, Democrats will have to identify new Medicare cuts they can support.”
No Medicare Cuts but end tax breaks for billioniares….
Shorter Village to NY-26: Lalalalalala, we can’t hear you.
Happy Memorial Day, everyone. Well, not so happy actually. I plan to spend the day mourning the death of the US and the potential it’s politicians wasted.
6. I’m supposed to know, but neglected to mention, that Medicare provides care at lower costs than private systems, and the CBO just explained that moving to Paul Ryan’s voucher plan to pay private insurers will increase seniors’ health costs by about $34 trillion over 75 years, but that devastating and inconvenient fact just embarrasses the Tea-GOP, so let’s not mention it.
Newspapers write for a 6th grade reading level audience and actually that maybe to tough for many people but the easiest way to get 6th grade reading level stuff is with 6th grade level writers.
Bottom line: Let’s declare open season on old people, preferably old Democratic hippies so there rest of us can get to the buffet table quicker.
Just got back from the local Memorial Day parade where I ran into a doctor friend of mine who is extremely pissed about the military action in Libya. Doesn’t have a fucking problem with Afghanistan or Iraq because those had congressional approval (couldn’t really cite where in the AUMF the approval made them other than illegal preemptive wars). I’m against the whole Libyan thing myself, but he’s against it just because Obama’s president. I think I have to start filtering the people I speak with.
I think this is a GOP plea to the Blue Dogs and Obama please save us by giving us political cover.
And they’ll be all too happy to oblige . . .
It’s the GOP/Media Complex’s fear that the Democrats — as shown by Jim Clyburn’s rhetorical raised finger to Miss McConnell — will stand fast for seniors and the 98% of us that aren’t in Harwood’s tax bracket, much less that of his owners.
The fact that Harwood thought it necessary to write this swill is a good sign.
Medicare, like Social Security, has nothing to do with the general budget or the deficit that’s running because of involvement in at least three wars and the ongoing
BushObama tax cuts. It’s astonishing how stupid the media think we are.I agree -
The GOP’s favorite black Democrat – Harold Ford Jr – was all over the dial agreeing that Medicare must be cut – Morning Joe would have been proud.
And then Meet The Press David Gregory was in your face with a smug Medicare must be cut and you don’t have a plan – and little push back from the Democratic voice (by the way – the media seems to be signing on to the Party having a new name – the Democrat Party).
It was bias by the media everywhere – CBS accepted GOP lies with no telling the viewers that there was even any disagreement.
It feels like the rich and corporate are desperate – and feel they can get over the line but need a major media push. And American independent press folks are doing what their paychecks require.
No wonder so many are moving to RT.com and other foreign news – Pravda has come to America.
It feels like the Rich and corporate are desperate
Cut military spending end both wars now. Also wouldn’t Ryan’s plan increase costs foe seniors? National Healthcare and drug price controls should be mentioned as ways to save money with out cutting benefits we tell the Tea Baggers either we do this or we cut benefits.
Cutting benefits is so popular right now.
I agree I think it is a sign that some GOPers can read the polling and they are worried.
I remember when the Times used to be considered a Liberal paper Brooks, Harwood, Judy Miller etc etc.
Just who are the Liberals left at the Times?
True – it was curious how folks avoided noting that with a dedicated revenue source, Medicare and Social Security are not adding to the deficit – and indeed can not go “BANKRUPT” as they simply reduce benefits to meet revenue if that becomes necessary.
Indeed someone pointing out these reductions proposed by the GOP exceed any projected revenue short fall caused reductions is always missing, as the media wants to hide the GOP plan to use those dedicated taxes for tax cuts for the rich and for tax cuts for “our” corporations(despite the fact that American corporations don’t think they are American beyond demanding military protection overseas as needed – and indeed do not even try to develop jobs in the US). .
Soon enough, Democrats will have to identify new Medicare cuts they can support.
Soon enough the GOP will have to identify what level of tax increases on the rich they can support.
The Helicopter Ben bank bailout plan is not creating jobs but the population is still growing and the few jobs being created pay less money than the jobs being lost.
10 years of Bush/Obama Tax Cuts for the rich have only created jobs in China.
If young college kids after graduation can’t find jobs, can’t move out of their parents home, can’t afford to get married, never mind pay their student loan without the IRS garnishing their McDonald’s paycheck.
Well then the GOP knows America faces a revolution that will probably be set off by higher food and gas prices.
God save us where is Senator Bernie Sanders? I DON’T CARE that he’s a socialist! He seems to be the only Senator willing to stand up to the GOP (forget the spineless pseudo-democrats!) I’m on both ss and Medicare and am under 55….does that mean I get to die on the streets? This is insane to have this happening in the USA. Seriously?
Not necessarily tax cuts for the rich. Their plans all seem aimed at getting those programs into private hands. It will be like Obama’s great Health Insurance Company and Pharmaceutical Welfare and Giveaway Act: We’ll still be required to turn over our money for a vastly inferior product at grossly hyperinflated prices.
They call Harold Ford JR the new kind of Democrat….if this is true we all need to take cover. He is such a kiss ass…Joe Scarborough can’t get enough of him. Same goes for that cut throat Mike Barnacle who has his head up Scarboroughs ass. Isn’t it amazing that all of the people trying to stick it to us are making their money off of the taxpayers or sitting it out in some talk show predicting what we should be doing in our lives. None of those pricks could make it working for private industry punching a timeclock everyday. Those Washington Reps retire at about $160,000 a year with golden healthcare benefits all paid by us and then they tell us to take care of ourselves. They want to cut Government but they fight like hell to keep collecting a check form the taxpayers. Everyone I talk to wants these bastards out. Doesn’t matter what party ….they want to throw all of them out.
Well, there’s Krugman, Blow, and Collins. But you’re right, the bench isn’t very deep.
In strictly zero-sum terms, when was the last time the middle class and working poor benefitted at the direct expense of the rich and powerful? And when was the last time the inverse happened? Answers to this is the reading of the last rites to a Government “of, by and for the people” as it spends its dying quivers on the slaughterhouse floor.
How’s that for a topic, Mr. Softwood.
Well let’s look at the scorecard …
They bought the lawmakers. They bought the WH. They bought the SC. The regulators and inspectors. They own the federal depts, if not totally, they own key positions, appointed by past and present presidents. SEC, FDA, EPA, etc …
They own the media.
Everything that once stood as the cornerstone of this democracy is now owned by them.
Honestly, does anyone think they won’t get Medicare? Eventually.
They already got their big chunk out of SS. Now all they do is wait, and in a few years when it starts going under (thanks to them), it’s all theirs. Does Medicare really have a chance?
I think we all know where this is going. Hope and change? Hope for them. And plenty of change for us, now and in the future. Just not the good kind.
This is true for social security. But, it is only partially true for medicare. Medicare is not completely funded on its own. It is subsidized by the government for any costs above its tax collections.
We need to start to form a separate Gov’t in exile. DC is a totally Corp. occupied zone.
There could be a lot of savings by fixing the waste in Medicare without touching benefits for anyone. This article hightlights some of them:
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/26/opinion/26redberg.html
margaret- not true on its face… 75% of medicare part B is general fund money… not “earmarked” through special taxes or premiums…
John Harwood,under cover agent posing as a journalist carrying dirty water for teapublican’ts the ranks of the media are full of them.
but the Dem’s read the same polls & cede the argument,capitulating allowing the teapubs to reframe the narrative,PATHETIC!!!
True but hey maybe O wants to get reelected?
Agreed. “He’s a decent enough fellow” I dont agree with. When the most important thing in your life is that you keep getting invited to all the ‘right’ cocktail soirees, and not coincidentally hang on to your 6 or 7 figure salary, that doesnt exactly define you as a paragon of virtue.
I agree -
Much like the rape of Greece where the EU – as price for using the Euro – demands Greece selling Gov operations to their favorite billionaires – our billionaires want to be able to mark up the cost of public services for their private use whenever they need a new billion dollar boat.
The Medicare solution does sound a lot like Obamacare – which is not an accident – by either Obama or by the GOP.
But I suspect the final bill that gives the rich and richer what they want in terms of selling our health financing – the bank function – to the private sector, will also have a tax cut for the rich because their greed never ends – and our media will tell us that it is good for the economy.
Poor Greece – the party on the left finally defeats the party that ran up all the debt, and now tries to get along with the EU by cutting government wages and selling off government assets, while the people look at an “opposition party” of conservatives that say they will not sell off government functions without getting agreement to also lower taxes on the rich because the tax cut is a jobs program.
Every time I think the rich can’t do much more to us, somewhere in the world I see the next step that is planned.
The greed of the rich – and of our media talking heads for their paycheck – never ends or even decreases.
No – not true
I was wondering if there was another John Harwood out there who is a journalist and decent fellow, and not the shallow shill I’ve seen ad nauseam,posing as reasonable by planting seeds of discouragement to cadge a cocktail now and then.
it’s not the “tea-gop” talking points that i worry about. did anyone listen to clinton at the peterson summit?
here’s a bit of my v rough transcription (please let me know if there is an official transcription available, i hate wasting my time on this — listening was bad enough):
………
clinton: the terrible double-bind america is in right now. in classical economic terms, this is the worse time to cut deficits. that’s the relentless stream of columns paul krugman writes in the new york times every day. he’s right about that. there’s a chance that if there is zero demand, for private capital, it’s not quite that low but interest rates are virtually zero and there’s so little activity in the private sector, if you cut public investment at the same time that actually you’ll lose more revenues in declining economic activity in declining tax revenues than you get from the spending cuts. it’s going to be very interesting to see what happens in the united kingdom on that ‘cuz the early results are not particularly encouraging.
the theory of the cameron budget is the same theory that the european central bank seems to be driving. is that even though interest rates are functionally zero, so the benefit you normally get from reducing the debt is to ease interest rates and you get a big increase in investment. they think there’s some sort of confidence premium in doing it right now when things are fairly flat.
what i thought the genius of the bowles-simpson report was that they recommended big structural long term changes and asked that we not start until next year when the recovery was clearly, plainly under way. and the work that pete peterson and michael and the whole group at the peterson foundation have done is based on dealing with this over the long run.
so, my view is if you deal with it over the long run and tell the american people the truth, i think we can work through this.
now, i know, some people will say that the election in new york yesterday, for congress, proves that’s not true, but i just completely disagree with that. i mean the republicans ran to the left of the democrats on medicare in the last election. they excoriated us for all these savings that are now embedded in congressman ryan’s budget. and they claim we cut medicare when what the democrats essentially did was to cut the reimbursement rate for medicare advantage and put the money into lengthening the life of the medicare trust fund and closing the donut hole in the drug program. which according to kathleen sebelius’ report in the morning paper is saving money because we’re also requiring a discount on drugs bought in volume. which we should do, i think.
Q: but do you think the race in new york was a referendum on this issue or was it about something else? it’s sometimes easy to over interpret…
clinton: no, no, it was about medicare. but the only point i’m trying to make is it was an inevitable consequence of the republicans ran to the left of the democrats. they attacked the democrats for cutting medicare. it was not a true charge. and the democrats, for reasons i will never understand, decided to keep what they had actually done a secret so the attack would certainly work. go figure. and so, it happened. but, all i’m saying is you shouldn’t draw the conclusion that they new york race means that nobody can do anything to slow the rate of medicare costs. i just don’t agree with that.
i think that you should draw the conclusion that the people made a judgement that the proposal in the republican budget is not the right one. i agree with that. but i’m afraid that the democrats will draw the conclusion that because congressman ryan’s proposal is not the best one that we shouldn’t do anything and i completely disagree with that. i think there are lots of things you can do to bring down medicare costs. when i was president we passed a medicare reform bill, bipartisan, and it saved 50% more than it was estimated to save in the first two years. so much so that the congress went back and actually increased some of the reimbursement rates. and still, over a ten year period, keep in mind this is more than decade ago, it saved 23% more than the congressional budget office said it would. more than $700 billion dollars over a decade. so, you can do this.
………
Again – no – not quite true
The 1.45 percent that the government deducts from your paycheck — and also from your employer — is placed in the HI Fund to cover Part A services. This payroll tax provides the bulk of the money that flows into the HI Fund; that money is in turn used to cover Part A expenses. There is NO general funds monies.
Part B, which covers doctor appointments, is run by a separate trust fund, called the Supplemental Medical Insurance Trust Fund (SMI Fund). Enrollee premiums and funds from the general budget supply the SMI Fund, which then pays for Part B services.
The SMI Fund’s premiums and federal tax revenues are to be adjusted annually to cover the cost of Part B benefits; therefore, the fund cannot be overdrawn. Payments into the HI Fund, by contrast, are based on the number of workers paying into the system and are not adjusted each year, so the fund can become insolvent. HI Fund trustees meet annually to predict the fund’s solvency.
But while SMI can not be overdrawn, the Congress can – if it wishes – not force an increase in Part B (or Part D) costs paid by the Medicare beneficiary by paying for some of those costs
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/ReportsTrustFunds/downloads/tr2011.pdf
From the above we see that in 2010 the Congress voted to fund Part B with $163.5 Billion and to fund Part D with $51.1 billion out of costs of $212.9 billion for Part B and $62.0 billion for part D.
If the point is that Congress votes funds into the Medicare Part B & D – but not Hospital (A) system from General Funds that is true.
And indeed transfers from the general fund are an important source of financing for the SMI trust fund and are currently 1.5 percent of GDP and would increase to an estimated 3.0 percent in 2085 if we refuse to go to single payer with the Maryland Medicare waiver that forces all to accept the same price for a given service.
If having people like John Harwood, H Ford and D Gregory are bad on cuts to Medicare/Medicaid and SS you should watch Fox, God Lord the BS coming out these clowns is amazing! They have kids on the air making appeals to seniors that cutting would be great for young people…Fox is presenting Boommers has the “richest Generation in history!” John (I look frightening) Stossel has a bunch kids on his show scaring them (by looking at them) about the greedy old people…Judge Natploitano (who looks a hedge hog) was babblering on about govt should not be paying for people’s pension/health care!!! Really Judge? Judges in NJ (he served in NJ) get FULL 100% pension health benefits after only serving for 5 years..so Judge Hedge Hog is getting a 6 figure pension w/health benefits for life from the state of NJ…
The only really amazing fact is the American people are not buying the crap…80% are STILL opposed to the cuts…and John Haward…the Congress and Obama are there to serve us not to serve big money interest…John. Oh John…would you and others in the MEdia interview people like Dean Baker or Joe Stiglitz…? Maybe you will learn something
Recently E.J. Dioanne referred to Obama’s “Preemptive Concession Machine”. Whoops, I fear it’s revving up as I write this.
This is what happens when you give all of those Rich people big tax cuts. They use that money to play havoc on the rest of us. They bought the Government and the SC plus the Media with all of those tax dollars that they really did not need. Lock and Load!
Scarecrow, congratulations, this piece was picked up to run on today’s Alternet. Is this a first for you? Do you think you might become syndicated someday? Anyway, hooray for you, and thanks for all your great posts.
Blessings,
Thanks for the transcript. Provides a little more context for the his off the cuff coments to Ryan that got so much play.
Ok so we throw them out. Then what? Chances are the next bunch is just as bad or worse. The problem is the system. By the time you go through the grinder getting to Congress you feel entitled to the pay benefits etc. Your now part of the “elite” and it doesn’t take long to get comfortable inside the DC bubble. Your living large, the restaurants, parties, limos trips to Asia ( fact finding ) and it goes on and on. Your important your powerful and now the fear enters the pic. that it will all go away if u don’t get re-elected and so the begging for $$ starts and the slide begins. Your values are put up against your ego and your family’s new life. By your 3rd term your part of the club.
Excellent piece Scarecrow.You so Right with every word you wrote. Along with caving in to them on everything which for the life of me i do not under stand why they are so scared of the teabaggers and the repugs.There is also the unwritten rule that no one who is a Democrat,Progressive,Liberal or a decent compassionate human being can ever,ever call these knuckle dragging,greedy,hateful,vile creatures out on what they are or you have to grovel to them for their forgiveness and stand the risk of losing your job (Olberman,Shultz anyone?)God portend anyone tell the truth about them and what they are and what they stand for or a house will fall on their heads.So, not only are they to be agreed with on everything they say, do, and want we must also remember that their delicate,tender feelings must not ever, ever, ever be hurt tho they can say anything about any one who displeases them no matter how vile,low or nasty it is.Remember the new Golden Rule always agree,always give in and never be unkind to them or call them out or life will become even more of a living hell than they have planned for any one not evil like them.
The elite feel entitled to the $$ and the power. As my elitist pal says, “were smarter then the rest of you and deserve to rule.” His condescending arrogance with its smug attitude is that of a person who has won a huge war ( 35 yr. class war) and knows it and he also senses that we ( the rest of us) have no plan B beyond some complaining on these blogs.
Good Point! So lets reward them with another term so they can keep up the bad behavior. No !!! Throw them out and replace them with a group that will change the system. Like with TERM LIMITS……….